The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 334 (new: 4)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 90 (new: 1)
Total number of packages requeste
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:45:32PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So, why :
> > * does aurelien initiative causes troubles ?
>
> If the packages he uploads have already been built (but not uploaded) by the
> autobuilders, the packages in the archive will not correspond to the public
> build
hi Gunnar,
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 05:11:54PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just filed bug #404896 - I'm copying it here as I hope you have some
> comments regarding it:
>
> The following Perl modules have been orphaned (or have not been
> updated) for a long time, have no reverse depend
On Friday 29 December 2006 03:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It was? I don't remember this... I certainly wanted to make sure etch
> didn't release with ancient, lingering versions of python like 2.1 and
> 2.2, but from a release POV I never had strong feelings about getting
> rid of python 2.3, whi
Note that the XFCE CD originally announced in the head of this thread is
actually working now.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso
It won't install xdm though.. that will probably be fixed in time for
next week's build, along with hopefull
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:38:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> An explicitely stated goal of the release team was to reduce the
> number of supported python versions for the next stable release.
It was? I don't remember this... I certainly wanted to make sure etch
didn't release with ancient,
Hi,
I just filed bug #404896 - I'm copying it here as I hope you have some
comments regarding it:
The following Perl modules have been orphaned (or have not been
updated) for a long time, have no reverse dependencies, and have quite
low installation count according to popcon:
libbusiness-ups-pe
Some of the comments and questions in this thread suggest gaps in
understanding of the autobuilders, which I think warrant an answer.
Hopefully this doesn't lead to more flames and recriminations...
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Aurelien mailed debian-arm, we
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:32:28PM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[snip]
>> mips
>>
>> jealously scribbles all over the first 512 bytes
>
>I figure that's a DVH "Disk Volume Header" as used on SGI machines.
Yup, exactly. I borrowed the layout from your own genisovh
progra
Hi Arnaud,
go ahead, you got it :-)
Thanks!
Thomas
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:00:01 +0100
Von: Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Thomas Schoepf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: suspend2-userui looking for a new maintainer
> > "Thomas" == Thomas
Steve McIntyre wrote:
[snip]
> mips
>
> jealously scribbles all over the first 512 bytes
I figure that's a DVH "Disk Volume Header" as used on SGI machines.
> mipsel
> ==
> bytes 000-008 : 0-padding
> 008-011 : magic header
> 012-015 : boot mode
> 016-019 : load address
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:20:13PM -0600]:
> (...)
> So, please comment if this package is worth keeping... Or remove it
> otherwise :)
Ok, so adn pointed out on IRC to me that this package is depended on
by mplayer - I didn't find it, as I forgot I'm tracking Marillat's
multimedia
Subject: ftp.debian.org: Request for removal of libconfhelper-perl
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm looking at orphaned Perl packages, adopting some or trying to find
which should be dropped instead. I found libconfhelper-perl to be
surprisingly popular (1548 on popcon), but it's
> "Thomas" == Thomas Schoepf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> Hi, the subject says it all. If noone wants it, I'll orphan
Thomas> it on 1st of January 2007.
Hello,
I'm using a lot suspend2-userui, therefore I am interested by taking
care of this package.
Regards,
Arnaud Font
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a message of 0 lines which said:
^
It wasn't quite that short. ;-)
> It seems so, thanks, but it is hard to say because the file in
> http://www.bitpim.org/pyxr/c/projects/bitpim/src/protogen.py.html
> seems quite underdocumented.
I suppose I got related problem.
Here are my /etc/apt/preferences
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=etch
Pin-Priority: 900
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=sid
Pin-Priority: 400
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=experimental
Pin-Priority: 300
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian
Pin-Priority:
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #403460
Owner: Suresh Rajashekara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: gdc
Version : 0.20
Upstream Author : David Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL or Web Page : http://dgcc.sourceforge.net/
Licence : GNU Gener
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwebapp-ruby
Version : 0.0.20061228
Upstream Author : Tanaka Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cvs.m17n.org/~akr/webapp/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Ruby
18 matches
Mail list logo
