On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:05:35AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If you disagree with a setting that a maintainer has specifically set,
> you should explain in an e-mail to the relevant bug that makes it
> clear why the state should be changed. If the maintainer is not
> convinced, then ask -devel
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 339 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 86 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requeste
Santiago Vila schrieb am Mittwoch, den 13. Dezember 2006:
> While we are at it, allowing each user to choose among several popular
> DNSBLs would be great too. In fact, there is a dnslists file in /etc/exim4
> which already contains several role accounts (and at least one which is not).
> We wou
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 14:12 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Please have a look at
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=248393
>
> which is an RFP bug which was closed due to inactivity and which
> had to be reopened and retitled into ITP instead of filing 1 more
> bug, or am I
Hi,
2006 m. gruodis 14 d., ketvirtadienis 21:01, Marco d'Itri rašė:
> I don't, I believe that pmount is buggy and this is a security hole.
> While you can be pretty much sure that every USB and firewire device is
> removable, the same is not true for MMC devices.
>
> This is also related to #40264
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.1-22
Severity: wishlist
Hi
Yesterday I saw a package which uses the shell functions provided by
lsb-base but did not have a dependency against it and I came across this
topic. Currently lsb-base is required and prodivdes the init script
functions which should be used
Am Donnerstag 14 Dezember 2006 20:01 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Dec 14, Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2006 m. gruodis 11 d., pirmadienis 20:33, Marco d'Itri raš?:
> > > I do not think that every mmc* block device is removable,
> >
> > What do you think about following pmount polic
Please have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=248393
which is an RFP bug which was closed due to inactivity and which
had to be reopened and retitled into ITP instead of filing 1 more
bug, or am I wrong?
Now, I guess, it needs to be reopened and merged with the current I
On Dec 14, Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006 m. gruodis 11 d., pirmadienis 20:33, Marco d'Itri raš?:
> > I do not think that every mmc* block device is removable,
> What do you think about following pmount policy on determining removable
> block
> devices? I think it would be a
Le jeudi 14 décembre 2006 à 11:56 +, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
> partimage depends on libnewt, which I maintain. libnewt-dev ships libnewt.a.
> libnewt opportunistically links to libfribidi if it is present; it uses
> dlopen() to do so.
>
> However the partimage build fails when done with '
On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So where do people think the bug lies?
> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
Yes.
> - Should the static version of libnewt be built differently so as to
> not call dlopen()?
Maybe.
> - if so, any recommendations on how?
Rem
On Thu 14 Dec 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > What about elementary HELO checking? Do they need "patches" as well?
> > [ I would gladly explain how to do it with postfix, but we are using exim ].
>
> I can't answer for them. But as an alioth admin, I al
> "Tatsuya" == Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Tatsuya> I think you may file bug reports to the `May be bug'
Tatsuya> packages.
Hello,
Thanks a lot. So there are 17 packages which may bug. I will bug report
these packages tonight if nobody has objections..
On December 14, 2006 at 12:23AM +0100,
arnaud (at andesi.org) wrote:
> At the moment, if you are using only emacs-snapshot some modes aren't
> installable because they depend only on emacs21 and not emacsen (or at
> least emacs-snapshot if the mode doesn't work with xemacs).
>
> I wonder wha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Raphaël Pinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: array-info
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Benoit Gaussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/array-info
* License : GPL
Description : co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qct
Version : Not yet released
Upstream Author : Steve Borho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hg.borho.org/qct/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python (with PyQt4)
Hi,
I've an interesting bug scenario sent to me by someone trying to build
partimage statically.
The partimage build is being done to make a small minimal-environment
binary (sort of boot-cd, etc.).
partimage depends on libnewt, which I maintain. libnewt-dev ships libnewt.a.
libnewt opportunistic
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Santiago Vila wrote:
> What about elementary HELO checking? Do they need "patches" as well?
> [ I would gladly explain how to do it with postfix, but we are using exim ].
I can't answer for them. But as an alioth admin, I always like patches
even for changes which look like tr
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > While we are at it, allowing each user to choose among several popular
> > DNSBLs would be great too. In fact, there is a dnslists file in /etc/exim4
> > which already contains several role acco
> "Luca" == Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
Luca> This is bug #321995 [1], quite old, I'm cc:ing the maintainer
Luca> in case he doesn't read d-d.
Actually, concerning nethack-el it is bug #378010 but the maintainer
hasn't answer whereas the bug was submitted 6 m
> "Luca" == Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
Luca> This is bug #321995 [1], quite old, I'm cc:ing the maintainer
Luca> in case he doesn't read d-d.
Actually, concerning nethack-el it is bug #378010 but the maintainer
hasn't answer whereas the bug was submitted 6 m
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Santiago Vila wrote:
> While we are at it, allowing each user to choose among several popular
> DNSBLs would be great too. In fact, there is a dnslists file in /etc/exim4
> which already contains several role accounts (and at least one which is not).
> We would just nee
Hello!
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:23:56 +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Here is the list of the affected packages (this kind of problem may
> already have been reported for some packages in this list):
[...]
> Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>w3m-el
This is bug #321995 [1], quite old, I'm cc:i
23 matches
Mail list logo
