Hi
I'm trying make a patch package with dh_installkpatches. Patch works
for 2.6.18-2 but not for 2.6.18-3. So, how grants this condition?
Thanks in advance,
--
Marcio Roberto Teixeira
___
I use newsreader (nntp). Don't send m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: policykit
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/PolicyKit
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Desc
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > > a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a
> > >spammer/malicious person from closing
Hi,
the weekly send reports about release critical bugs to
debian-devel-announce have the Content-Type “unknown-8bit” set. Why this?
What is unknown for the encoding of the reports?
And why is the sender of the reports not a valid address?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(generated from [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:43:06PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > a) for mails to -close or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to prevent a
> >spammer/malicious person from closing all the bugs or mangling
> >with the BTS in such a way that wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: apt-cross
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://buildd.emdebian.org/repos/tools/apt-cross/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libbuilder-ruby
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Jim Weirich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://builder.rubyforge.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pygraphviz
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : Aric Hagber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://networkx.lanl.gov/wiki/pygraphviz
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > Maybe one improvement would be to reduce the number of links in this
> > > > directory to one per certificate. Currently for each certificate
> > > > provided by ca-certificates the certificate has a link to /usr/share/..
> > > > and the hash has a link to the other link
also sprach Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.04.1448 +0100]:
> It seems there is an update-ca-certificates, which has a config file
> (/etc/ca-certificates.conf) that says which certificates should be
> enabled.
... at which point it's really pointless to argue that the symlinks
to /usr/sh
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:30:54PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe one improvement would be to reduce the number of links in this
> > > directory to one per certificate. Currently for each certific
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
> >
> > Maybe one improvement would be to reduce the number of links in this
> > directory to one per certificate. Currently for each certificate
> > provided by ca-certificates the certificate has a link to /usr/s
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:52:03PM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
>
> Maybe one improvement would be to reduce the number of links in this
> directory to one per certificate. Currently for each certificate
> provided by ca-certificates the certificate has a link to /usr/share/..
> and the hash has a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-pam-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CH/CHANSEN/Authen-Simple-PAM-0.2.
also sprach Joey Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.04.1315 +0100]:
> Hmm, why don't you use a CAfile which is not provided by the
> package but one that is created by you on your own and which only
> incorporates the certificates you want to accept? That way you
> won't interfer with packaging.
On 10:34 Sat 04 Nov , Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 11:12, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> > Description : Simple and consistent framework for authentication
> >
> > This is the basis package for various authentication methods.
>
> This description should be a bit extende
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joey Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.04.1252 +0100]:
> > Hmm. Why are the certificates in /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.pem used but
> > not those from /etc/ssl/certs/cacert-class3.pem?
>
> Because I had to disable the use of CAdir and use CAfile instead,
> due t
also sprach Joey Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.11.04.1252 +0100]:
> Hmm. Why are the certificates in /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.pem used but
> not those from /etc/ssl/certs/cacert-class3.pem?
Because I had to disable the use of CAdir and use CAfile instead,
due to performance issues:
http://peo
martin f krafft wrote:
> ca-certificates installs about 100 certificates into
> /etc/ssl/certs. However, these are not actually dropped into the
> directory; instead, symlinks into /usr/share are put in place:
>
> piper:/etc/ssl/certs# ls -la /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.org.pem
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
On Friday 03 November 2006 11:12, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> Description : Simple and consistent framework for authentication
>
> This is the basis package for various authentication methods.
This description should be a bit extended.
Authentication in what context? Do I need this when I want
20 matches
Mail list logo
