Bug#195481: finale. DTM season. driver

2006-10-28 Thread fully
flags. attached farm outskirts photos heres start Apologies night.Our kicked verbal Rossi on shootout MOTOGP Valentino secured fifth position onhis retaining inquire gnugnu.org Voice: Fax: Webmasters you. Franklin St Boston MA Verbatim copying entire article permitted worldwide without royalty m

Bug#98549: only:

2006-10-28 Thread Scaled
sets.XXX nonblack widescreen DVDs files.XXX API TCP/IP LCD Girder Export maximum device Cut chronology altering actual entering specific number.XXX override Output sound Output.XXX Shortcut Parsing redirect registry Phoenix HalfBlood Prince Explore items: most vacation look to. But hero his sum

Bug#162262: checked expects string.So

2006-10-28 Thread afternoon
plot map:click larger viewI around testing although guess cracking trying secured beside monkeying WEP encryption Linksys WRTG Apple Airport Express beaming iTunes such they HTML. According will:Look browsersbe weekWhen hover cute popup Mozilla Camino OmniWeb. sounds reasonable there inhouse pe

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 28 October 2006 23:56, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > Is that really a good idea for something that is so young and > > untested, so shortly before the release? > > Is it wanted for all architectures, for all systems, irrespective of > > their speed? > > Calm down Frans, what about aiglx the

Bug#395950: ITP: dragongoserver -- web-based server for playing game of Go

2006-10-28 Thread Al Nikolov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: dragongoserver Version : 200608-stable Upstream Author : Erik Ouchterlony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dragongoserver/ * License : GPL Descrip

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 10/28/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 28 October 2006 23:11, Gustavo Franco wrote: > If there will be no regressions, please add the composite bit in the > xorg.conf by default. Is that really a good idea for something that is so young and untested, so shortly before the

Re: Bug#395333: ITP: counter -- Simple and light web hits counter

2006-10-28 Thread Eriberto
Hello Roberto!This is the original name. I can change this. But I have a problem to package it: the author name isn´t expressly declared. I am waiting a contact of the probable author. Because this problem I and a friend are making a new php code that makes the same thing. We are creating a SourceF

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 28 October 2006 23:11, Gustavo Franco wrote: > If there will be no regressions, please add the composite bit in the > xorg.conf by default. Is that really a good idea for something that is so young and untested, so shortly before the release? Is it wanted for all architectures, for al

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 10/28/06, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > If we're going to ship xorg with aiglx and composite enabled by > default (actually i dunno really), beryl in etch and in default > desktop environment (just listed not enabled

Re: Alioth upgrade -- done

2006-10-28 Thread Roland Mas
Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006-10-28 16:16:31 -0400 : > Excellent. Thanks for the hard work. This is not a problem, per > se, but rather a question. I saw that the new Alioth server has 8GB > of RAM, but now swap space. I understand that 8GB is quite a bit, > but I was wondering what the rationale w

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:37:09 -0400, Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think that is an artifact of any mail sent to d-d-a, as a >> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org header is >> automatically added for every mail sent there

Re: Bug#395333: ITP: counter -- Simple and light web hits counter

2006-10-28 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:44:49PM -0200, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: counter I would think that this name is far too generic. Is there not a more specific name which could b

Re: Alioth upgrade -- done

2006-10-28 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:02:07AM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Hi all, > > The Alioth migration and upgrade seems to have worked out mostly okay. > You are therefore encouraged to test and use the new and improved > alioth.debian.org, and report problems if you find any. > Excellent. Thanks for

Re: Linux 2.6.18

2006-10-28 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Is there any chance 2.6.18 will make it into etch to solve bugs like #391448 and #389803? Yes, but this requires addressing #395110, investigating or fixing #395247 and #392818 and getting a s390 build first, as per linux-2.6's excuses. This would be best asked to debian-kernel. -- To UNS

Re: First draft of review of policy must usage

2006-10-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:01:32 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Why do change the second and third must to a should? >> If the script uses features from bash, and /bin/sh points to for >> instance dash, it's going to break. So you eith

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Matthias Julius
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that is an artifact of any mail sent to d-d-a, as a > Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > header is automatically added for every mail sent there. Even for mail that already has a M-F-T header? Matthias -- To UNSUB

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:27:30PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > It would help if related votes would be kept out of debian-devel. > honnest mistake, due like Roland said, to the fact that there is both a

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Samstag 28 Oktober 2006 20:30 schrieb David Nusinow: > For etch+1, I'm planning on making it enabled by default and doing away > with most of the debconf stuff anyway though. AFAIK this can be very bad when looking at performance and CPU usage, doesn't it? In this case, it should be only be en

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:27:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:50:13PM -0400, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > If we're going to ship xorg with aiglx and composite enabled by > > > defaul

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:50:13PM -0400, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > If we're going to ship xorg with aiglx and composite enabled by > > default (actually i dunno really), beryl in etch and in default > > desktop e

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:31:54AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Can I ask why you people (not only you Pierre, generic question) are > Cc-ing vo

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:01:36 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:31:54AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines >> > =-=-=-=-=

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > If we're going to ship xorg with aiglx and composite enabled by > default (actually i dunno really), beryl in etch and in default > desktop environment (just listed not enabled by default) would be a > huge win, maybe it's too late n

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 10/28/06, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:23:27PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: > Given you're talking about cgwd, you prolly mean beryl (nee > compiz-quinnstorm) rather than the original compiz which is > in Debian. > > The beryl packaging is being unde

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Kazuo Ishii
--- Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> からのメッセー ジ: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:31:54AM +0200, Pierre > Habouzit wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between > These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Can I ask why you people (not only you Pierre, > generic question) are > Cc-ing votes to

Bug#105337: ISOMaker Codecs meritline

2006-10-28 Thread RegionFree DVDIdle
Roads Richmond Roanoke Vienna Alaska: Anchorage Fairbanks North/Nome Juneau Idaho: Boise Montana: Oregon: Portland Seattle There... carrier switches routers. Howard appeal carriers because lower costs. providers deploy mainly comment blogentry Let optional Subscribe helpYesNo BlogCity v.aTerms a

Re: Is something wrong to XGL, Compiz, Cgwd be packaged?

2006-10-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:23:27PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:50:50PM -0300, eduardo.oliva barruzi wrote: > > Hi, I just wanna know if there are any problems regarding the License or > > something else that make these packages actually unavailable? Neither has li

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:31:54AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Can I ask why you people (not only you Pierre, generic question) are > Cc-ing vo

Bug#195481: personal. doubt nonfriends fellow

2006-10-28 Thread faced push
nd short story rural junior passing games. minUPDATE: inventing Point. stash TSA Keyspans cordless USB Skype bye grandma. Evil two daughters. Distro handson OReilly Canadian: Links Weblog at Seneca Linux brother Scotts Mercy Ships hangon spots moves correctly far dont. pleased ks. feat pulled na

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 02:31:54AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Can I ask why you people (not only you Pierre, generic question) are Cc-ing votes to debian-devel? Is it an error? If it is not I can only imagine that it

Re: arches and etch

2006-10-28 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:54:02PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings, and thank you all so much for your usual fantastic work on > Debian! > > I just wanted to make a few observations about the recent decision to > scrap m68k from etch: > [snip reasons which are complaining about other arc

Re: First draft of review of policy must usage

2006-10-28 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:31:01AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 25 octobre 2006 à 01:03 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > > Here is a first draft of changes to the policy that I think > > are required to bring ot closer in line with extant practice. I > > removed portion

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

2006-10-28 Thread Roger Leigh
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > 2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686 > [ 2 ] Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold > pending a vote > [ 1 ] Choice 2: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation stands until a vote > - - -=-=-=-=-

Re: Debian Etch

2006-10-28 Thread Ben Finney
Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this mail should only be something to encourage you to develop etch > in the beginner-friendly way as it is today. thank you therefore! Thanks for giving comments on your experience with Debian. > I don't like: - no easy overview in the console for ex

Debian Etch

2006-10-28 Thread Thomas Fischer
Hallo out there, this mail should only be something to encourage you to develop etch in the beginner-friendly way as it is today. thank you therefore! I like: - fitting installer to kernel - easy way to upgrade kde ;-) - hibernation - gnome as main-desktop I d