Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joost Yervante Damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: waves
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Vik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Vincent Van Dam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : not available yet
* License : GPL
Programming
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #173879
Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-skas3-v8.2
Locale: LANG
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:37:24AM +0200, Andreas Tille a ?crit :
>
> >3. File bugs against all packages that provide
> > x-terminal-emulator but do not show the -hold feature
> > (would this be reasonable)
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/06 13:37, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include * Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) [Tue, Oct 03 2006,
> 05:11:46PM]:
>> Jan Kechel:
>>
>>> Michal Čihař wrote:
[snip]
>
> Aha... Ok... And how many cobolds do you need to kill to win that
> game? (SCNR)
s/co
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:58:44PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I've just orphaned the piuparts package. I can't promise to spend any
> time on it myself in the next few months, so it's better to be explicit
> about this.
>
> See also http://lists.debian.org
Hello,
I have received a bug report saying that lprng will not start when the
initscripts are run with the RAMRUN option. This is because RAMRUN does
not make and subdirectories.
What is RAMRUN supposed to do? Does it just make an empty tmpfs
partition? Is there now a new expectation that all a
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:23:21PM +0700, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
> Seems like debfoster does what you need. However, it's considered obsolete
> now that aptitude takes care of unused packages.
debfoster (2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version, new maintainer team.
* Revert
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:24:14PM +0200, Jan Kechel wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> have fun trying it.
> >
> > Thanks. Is a single perl script worth packaging, though?
>
> since v0.4 its even seems to be working correctly :)
> http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
>
> I guess that's
#include
* Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) [Tue, Oct 03 2006, 05:11:46PM]:
> Jan Kechel:
>
> > Michal Čihař wrote:
>
> >> Anyway if you use aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks
> >> all that automatically and you don't have to guess.
>
> > Cool, didn't know that. But it doesn't work for
> > packages t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> have fun trying it.
>
> Thanks. Is a single perl script worth packaging, though?
since v0.4 its even seems to be working correctly :)
http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
I guess that's also the final version (a
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:54:02AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> If you think they are useful, by all means go ahead and put them
> somewhere else. It's free documentation, you can do with it whatever
> you like.
>
> I do not feel that it is my duty to put these diagrams in the main
> Debia
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 19:10, Krystian Wlosek wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Joost Yervante Damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: bluemsxlite
> > Version : 2.6.1
> > Upstream Author : Daniel Vik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:34:37 +0200
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag 03 Oktober 2006 16:26 schrieb Michal Čihař:
> > if you use
> > aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
> > don't have to guess.
>
> Only if you also installed the package-to-rem
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I checked the code of pbuilder-satisfydepends, and I see it tries all
> > versions of "apt-cache show" output to see whether one of them would be
> > enough, but I see no place where it would request a particular version.
> Yup, that's not supporte
Am Dienstag 03 Oktober 2006 16:26 schrieb Michal Čihař:
> if you use
> aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
> don't have to guess.
Only if you also installed the package-to-remove with aptitude.
HS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eikazo
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Abel Deuring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://eikazo.berlios.de
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Joost Yervante Damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Package name: bluemsxlite
> Version : 2.6.1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Vik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.bluemsx.com/
> * License : GPL, Zlib, BSD
> Programm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/06 11:01, Jan Kechel wrote:
>
>>> Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
>>> apt-findremovable.
>
> cool :)
>
> I just released v0.2:
> http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
>
> .. it's getting slower (takes about 1
Jan Kechel:
> Michal Čihař wrote:
>> Anyway if you use aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks
>> all that automatically and you don't have to guess.
> Cool, didn't know that. But it doesn't work for
> packages that are already installed via apt-get.
You can mark all packages as installed automat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
> apt-findremovable.
cool :)
I just released v0.2:
http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
.. it's getting slower (takes about 1min to complete),
but now it re-checks, if apt-cache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/03/06 09:54, Jan Kechel wrote:
> Michal ihaY wrote:
>>> deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
>
> yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
> checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified on
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:54:09 +0700, Jan Kechel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified one
Seems like debfoster does what yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michal Čihař wrote:
> deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified one
> Anyway if you use
> aptitude instead
Bill Allombert wrote:
> I am certainly interested helping with piuparts but I am not confident
> I understand where you would like the project to go.
Count me in! (See a longer email I wrote on this some minutes ago).
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :
Hi,
I have been wanting to answer to your emails about piuparts sooner, but
I was unable to.
As you are already aware of, I am very interested in getting to know
piuparts much better, to make it part of my QA efforts. I have not been
able to yet.
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> [...] I am overcommited w
Hi
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:13:49 +0200
Jan Kechel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does a tool like this already exist?
deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe. Anyway if you use
aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you
don't have to guess.
--
Michal Čihař
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:13:49PM +0200, Jan Kechel wrote:
> I always had the problem, that if I removed a package via apt-get
> remove, that there were still other packages that only were installed
> because of that package.
Use aptitude -- it has had this functionality for quite a while now.
/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi,
I hope this is the right mailinglist for this.
I always had the problem, that if I removed a package via apt-get
remove, that there were still other packages that only were installed
because of that package.
I wrote a little perl-script:
N
Javier,
On 10/2/06, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PD: Notice that I'm not implying that a wiki is not a good resource for a OSS
documentation system (my opinion is quite the opposite), I'm just saying that
writting up documentation in two different wikis, at people.de
Le Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:37:24AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>3. File bugs against all packages that provide
> x-terminal-emulator but do not show the -hold feature
> (would this be reasonable)
>
> Would be option 3 also interesting for other packages? IMHO if
> we have the
==
Bapco detected hostile or unwanted content in this message.
If you believe this is in error, please resend the whole message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please make sure that you specify the recipient email address(es) in
your message.
Your email
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061003 12:32]:
>> * Prioritization: Important issues will get addressed first. Unimportant
>> issues will still get addressed, only later.
>
> If someone implement some kind of help-desk, please implement a ho
* Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061003 12:32]:
> * Prioritization: Important issues will get addressed first. Unimportant
> issues will still get addressed, only later.
If someone implement some kind of help-desk, please implement a hook for
maintainers to subscribe for problems with thei
Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> First off: Thanks for thinking this through and answering.
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
>> Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Since this is an ongoing problem, how about the following:
Hi Rodrigo,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:35:42PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:54:09AM +0200, Maarten Verwijs wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Try filing better bug reports instead.
> >
> > Since this is an ongoing
Nico Golde wrote:
I'm sorry but your bug reports aren't very helpful
sometimes. For example in #390564 there is no explanation
why hal should be added to the Suggests. And thats what is
required at least to make you mail helpful.
You are quite right: and a reply like yours here is much more
Hi Frank,
First off: Thanks for thinking this through and answering.
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Since this is an ongoing problem, how about the following:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We already have the users l
[Josselin Mouette]
> Maybe it should be mentioned that some ftpmaster has fast-tracked
> this package out of NEW - maybe to fullfill his campaign promises? -
> despite the copyright file being incorrect (GPL instead of MIT), the
> package being in an unreleasable state [1] and the NEW queue being
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, for those of you who want to see Creative Commons licenses that meet
> our standard of Freedom, this is the time to act. Please, if you haven't
> already, take a few minutes to send an email message to the Creative
> Commons public review mailing lis
Le mardi 03 octobre 2006 à 15:39 +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit :
> And
> that's all the excuse I need to mention the coolness that is compiz,
> which has finally made it's way to unstable -- kudos to Thierry Reding,
> and his sponsor David Nusinow; it's always nice when someone else does
> the work
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> The problem is that .la files provide a way to pull in all the
> dependent libraries for static linking, and unless you also ship .pc
> files, there is no other automated way to do this. Some people
> apparently care about this capability, which is wh
Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this is an ongoing problem, how about the following:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We already have the users lists.
> What could be possible if Debian had an official Helpdesk Department?
> * End-Users could ask *any* question and actually get a nice answ
42 matches
Mail list logo
