As explained in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00438.html, I plan a
mass bug filing for packages using debconf "notes" templates and
display them at low or medium priorities.
The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the "note" type should
be used only for important notes t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: linuxfirmwarekit
Version : 0
Upstream Author : Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org/
* License : GNU General Public Licens
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OpenSAML is a set of open source toolkit for implementing the SAML 1.0
> and 1.1 specifications.
It's amazing how you don't notice these things until you post them
publicly. That will be "OpenSAML is an open source toolkit" in the
uploaded package.
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: opensaml
Version : 1.1a
Upstream Author : Internet2
* URL : http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/downloads/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yanovych Borys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: doc-debian-uk
Version : initial release of native Debian package
* URL : http://cvs.debian.org/
Description : Debian Manuals an
Am Dienstag 19 September 2006 20:25 schrieb Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which OS combination does not define int to be 32bit on a 64bit
> > architecture?
>
> This is mainly compiler-, not primarily OS-dependent. And: all compilers
> with an ILP64 data m
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:41:38PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> It might be worth noting that rxvt seems to be fairly dead upstream, and
> that there also exists mrxvt with tab support. I'll Cc: Qingning Huo who
> maintains our mrxvt packages, maybe he has an opinion.
>
> The ITA bug report for
Frank Küster wrote:
> We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
> problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
[...]
> Below is a list of all
> packages that Depend on, Recommend, or Suggest either tetex-base,
> tetex-bin or tetex-extra, sorted by maintainer.
An
On 9/19/06, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, the question should rather be: *why* compilers do not define
int to be 64bit on a 64bit architecture? And the answer is simple:
Yes int should be 64bit on a 64bit architecture, since int is defined
as the architectures "natur
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which OS combination does not define int to be 32bit on a 64bit architecture?
> long should better be 64bit then as many assume that you can cast a pointer
> into a long and back (e.g. timer in the linux kernel has a long for private
> data and not a
Hi,
looks very nice.. do you mind publishing the source?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> > > > > > * rxvt
> > > > as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
> > > > developer
> > >
> > > Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe
> > > you'd like to agree on some kind
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which OS combination does not define int to be 32bit on a 64bit architecture?
This is mainly compiler-, not primarily OS-dependent. And: all compilers
with an ILP64 data model.
However, the question should rather be: *why* compilers do not define
int to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bouthenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ffproxy
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Niklas Olmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ffproxy.sf.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A lig
Em Ter, 2006-09-19 às 13:30 +, Rodrigo Tavares escreveu:
> I add the fisrt line the field :
>
> Source : missing
>
> But the error continue the same.
It's not only the Source: field, it's the whole stanza, like Wouter
said. Again, pretty please, read the Debian New Maintainer's Guide and
***
Hello,
I add the fisrt line the field :
Source : missing
But the error continue the same.
Thanks
Faria
--- Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> This is really a question for -mentors, rather than
> -devel. Cc set,
> please send follow-ups (if any) only there.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Summary:
>
> We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
> problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
... and tell us.
> Note that we have tried to contact as many upstream authors as possible,
> and we will probably no
This is really a question for -mentors, rather than -devel. Cc set,
please send follow-ups (if any) only there.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:19:04PM +, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I run the command below, come this error message:
>
>
> mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol
> dh_gencon
Summary:
We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
Hi,
in the past I have started to do a license auditing on teTeX. I found a
couple of files with non-free or unclear licensing, they are listed at
http://wiki.debi
Am Dienstag 19 September 2006 04:01 schrieb Miles Bader:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It is also clear that this is how many maintainers have understood it,
> > because as you yourself have noticed, there are many packages that
> > assume they can ship directories in /var/run an
Hello,
When I run the command below, come this error message:
mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol
dh_gencontrol: Compatibility levels before 4 are
deprecated.
dpkg-gencontrol: error: control file must have at
least one binary package part
dh_gencontrol: command returned error code 652
My debian/co
Hi Josip,
> If you two don't manage to get to it, I'm a backup. :) We need an O wnpp bug
> report to record this...
may I take that as an offer to sponsor us? :) I've created an ITA bug
against wnpp now. (Don't know the number yet, the BTS bot is slow, and
I'm in a hurry...)
Regards,
Jan
sig
warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error.
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libasound.so.2" is not at the
expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting
expectations
Two things here:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:02:42AM +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> > > * rxvt
> > as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
> > developer
>
> Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
> like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My w
Hi,
> > * rxvt
> as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
> developer
Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My workload is quite low
at the moment, but will rapidly increase in about f
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Moreno Garza wrote:
[...]
> The ones which haven't been picked up either with ITAs or in this thread,
> and which aren't lib*-perl or lib*-ruby, are:
>
> * dlume
> * fpm
> * gxmms
> * kipina
> * revolution
> * rxvt
as a user of rxvt I like
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388065 general
Bug#388065: My PC should warn me when I try to shut down while my printer is
still printing
Bug reassigned from package `cupsys' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pax-utils
Version : 0.1.13
Upstream Author : Ned Ludd and Mike Frysinger
* URL : http://www.gentoo.org/~solar/pax/
* License : GPL
Description : ELF checking
28 matches
Mail list logo
