On Tuesday 12 September 2006 23:21, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
> for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
> I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
> packages shouldn
Josselin Mouette wrote / napísal(a):
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 à 07:23 -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit :
At the risk of repeating myself, Desktop Users: For most non-server
minded people who still want a stable OS, Debian takes too long to
release. On top of that,many of them want a "As easy aw W
El mar, 12-09-2006 a las 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escribió:
> Here is the list:
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damog&comaint=no
>
I'll take gnome-schedule if none has done it.
--
Alejandro Ríos Peña
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalm
reassign 385417 ftp.debian.org
retitle 385417 RM: gwrapguile -- RoQA; orphaned, obsolete library
thanks
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 15:39]:
> > > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
On 9/13/06, David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch wi
Em Ter, 2006-09-12 às 23:54 -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira escreveu:
Sorry, discard message.
Kind Regards,
--
Fernando Ike - http://www.midstorm.org/~fike/weblog
Linux User 303638 - Debian User 352
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
Em Ter, 2006-09-12 às 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
> for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
> I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
> package
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:21:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:40:33AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> > also, if you have an answer to the original question it'd be
> > appreciated. i'd really really like to avoid using ucf, since there's
> > something like 40 conffiles
El Martes, 12 de Septiembre de 2006 18:21, David Moreno Garza escribió:
> Here is the list:
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damog&comaint=no
I will take care of parprouted
Toda la suerte david! (best of the luck, david!)
luciano
pgpULKwkNGAii.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 9/13/06, Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:31:21 +0200
"César Gómez Martín" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already took it. Sorry.
I've got an improved package ready for upload, probably we can join our
efforts.
It's all yours then :)
Cheers,
César
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The version numbers from popcon are much more interesting, but also
> heavily skewed by eg, d-i defaulting to installing popcon in etch but
> not in (released versions of) sarge.
Please also be aware that many of us who run stable on hundreds of
production
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:40:33AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 13:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > No, it's a general problem: dpkg won't notice that a conffile has been
> > > moved from one package to the other, no matter whether it declares
> > > "Replaces" or whatever
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:31:21 +0200
"César Gómez Martín" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already took it. Sorry.
I've got an improved package ready for upload, probably we can join our
efforts.
--
bye,
- Nacho
Package: wnpp
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: python-httplib2
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bitworking.org/projects/httplib2/
* License
El mar, 12-09-2006 a las 16:21 -0500, David Moreno Garza escribió:
>
> Here is the list:
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=damog&comaint=no
I'll take playground* and xchat-systray, but I'll be only able to work
on them after the next week-end.
Best regards,
Santiago
signature.asc
De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gnome-mount
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/dist/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Des
On 9/13/06, Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:18 -0500
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
> (filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take bastet.
I already took it. Sorry
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:18 -0500
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
> (filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take bastet.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Coin,
Caio Begotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/09/2006, at 14:00, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Hmm maybe I didn't get it, Arnaud. What you meant?
> Also, if you has found some blank file in the gallery... please let me know.
Fact is people learning CDBS won't make a great example. So i'd ra
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21:18PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>If you think you could adopt some of the packages, feel free to do it
>(filling an ITA would be nice).
I'll take gparted.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi David,
* David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-13 00:32]:
> I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software
> activity for the next couple of months for personal reasons.
Best wishes for your personal life!
> Because of that, I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages.
[
hey steve,
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 13:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No, it's a general problem: dpkg won't notice that a conffile has been
> > moved from one package to the other, no matter whether it declares
> > "Replaces" or whatever. There's simply no solution within dpkg at the
> > momen
Hello,
I'll be taking a long vacation of Debian and free software activity
for the next couple of months for personal reasons. Because of that,
I'm orphaning my non-comaintained packages. I really think those
packages shouldn't make it to Etch with a non attending maintainer,
just like I'
Am Dienstag 12 September 2006 22:29 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> >>I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> >>question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> >>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
> >>users run unsta
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 à 07:23 -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit :
> At the risk of repeating myself, Desktop Users: For most non-server
> minded people who still want a stable OS, Debian takes too long to
> release. On top of that,many of them want a "As easy aw Windows"
> distro. I don't know that
Marc Haber wrote:
>> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
>>question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
>>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
>>users run unstable and probably a fair fraction of the rest run testing.
>
> I tend to
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:28:34PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so the question is: what am i forgetting to do? i'm guessing that the
> > problem has something to do with the original package still being
> > present (as a metapackage)?
> No, it's a gene
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libnet-arp-perl
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Bastian Ballmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Net
* License : GPL + Artistic
Descriptio
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 16:05:55 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: bzr-plugin-webserve
> Version : web interface for bazaar-ng
> Upstream Author : Goffredo Baroncelli <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:20:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
> > with the error:
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
> > Can someone investigate why
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
> with the error:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
> Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
> (mbox file) at http://people.d
Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
> users run unstable and probably a fair fraction of the rest run testing.
What percentage
Joseph Smidt wrote:
>
> The question in my mind becomes: Is it still worth it if the bulk of
> people Stable is created for are better servered somewhere else?
You don't have a complete view on the situation, probably because
you're a geek. Stable is not limited to servers. Almost every
municip
On 12/09/2006, at 14:00, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
It may be great to rate the debian/rules or maybe check
that the
debian/rules are clean. Is it possible to do that ?
Hmm maybe I didn't get it, Arnaud. What you meant?
Also, if you has found some blank file in the gallery... please let
On 12/09/2006, at 11:03, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
1) How often is updated the archive? (assuming it is)
Once a week, at the moment. I just need to make it a system's cron job.
2) I'm puzzled by the organization of the debian/rules. IMO having
them
classified on an alphabetic basis is not
> "Caio" == Caio Begotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Caio> Hmm maybe I didn't get it, Arnaud. What you meant? Also, if
Caio> you has found some blank file in the gallery... please let me
Caio> know.
Indeed, often, when you are written a debian/rules with cdbs for the
first
On 12/09/2006, at 10:26, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Great idea. Maybe this link could be added in the cdbs
documentation as
examples?
That'd be awesome :-) thanks for replying about it
--
caio[1982] begotti
http://caio.ueberalles.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 12, 2006 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: udev upgrade lead to an unbootable debian unstable
To: tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I haven't worked with Knoppix much, but the general idea is to boot from
Knoppix, mount your ro
> "Caio" == Caio Begotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Caio> That'd be awesome :-) thanks for replying about it
Hey,
It may be great to rate the debian/rules or maybe check that the
debian/rules are clean. Is it possible to do that ?
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message was not posted to the debian-security-announce mailing list.
It has instead been forwarded to the security team and the listmaster team.
The debian-security-announce list is a moderated mailing list on
which security-related announcements are made by the security team for
Debian GNU/L
ok, it is a sysv-rc bug, read carefully (I got bitten by that yesterday, and
took a wrong direction in the beginning, but then fixed my course;-):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00258.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00255.html
So supposedly a dpkg-reconfigure
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:43, Ruben wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sep 12, Ruben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
> >
> > You should be more sorry about posting without reading the other
On 9/12/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 12, Ruben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
You should be more sorry about posting without reading the other
threads about this problem (which is not related to udev).
> l
Package: wnpp
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: twill
Version : 0.8.5
Upstream Author : C. Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://twill.idyll.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
On Sep 12, Ruben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
You should be more sorry about posting without reading the other
threads about this problem (which is not related to udev).
> ln: creating symbolic link '/tmp/udev.g0Q1Bs/.static/de
> "Caio" == Caio Begotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Caio> [please keep me in cc: for i am not subscribed to the
Caio> 'debian-devel' list] Hello list, I think it's time to show
Caio> you... this: http://cdbs.ueberalles.net
Caio> It's an online gallery with all CDBS rules file
I'm sorry if this is a somewhat inappropriate place to post this, but
I didn't get any usable help in the user list and I'm approaching a
state of despair ._.
I'll give a sequence of events (debian unstable on a
Thinkpad T20):
I recently did an aptitude upgrade, which upgraded udev to version
0.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:42:01AM -0300, Caio Begotti wrote:
> Hello list, I think it's time to show you... this: http://cdbs.ueberalles.net
Many thanks for that work, it's really helpful.
A couple of suggestions/questions to make it even more helpful:
1) How often is updated the archive? (assu
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:02PM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
>> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
>> question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
>> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Deb
I forgot to give the URL for my package.
You can find the new version of libraw1394 to:
http://haydn.debian.org/~lr-guest/libraw1394/
Regards,
--
.---. Ludovic RESLINGER
/ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@./ Trumpet Student in CNR
/`\_/`\ Free Software Developer
// )X( \\
| \
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:18:19PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Isn't it a cause of stress trying to cram for the freeze?
>
> Yes, but that doesn't mean it's not worth it.
>
I admit, just because something is hard does not mean it is not
worth it.
The question in my mind becomes:
merge 385349 386991
thanks
> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> There's already someone working on that: see #385349.
Raphael> Please merge the bugs and work together.
Hey,
I have merged this bug. Sorry for the noise. James: would you like to do
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:18:32PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > The whitelist field in mailman accepts regular expressions. This is
> > > trivial.
> > If
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 15:39]:
> > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
> > bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib
> > libcapplet libglade oaf
> gwrapguile and gtkhtml have no reverse-dependencies in Debian except for
>
* Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-31 07:55]:
> Still open:
> > * kforth
> > (new Upstream)
Can you please file an O: bug?
> Taken:
> >
> > * festival, speech-tools
> Franz Pletz
Franz, when will you upload?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
> with the error:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
> Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
> (mbox file) at http://people.d
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:18:32PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > The whitelist field in mailman accepts regular expressions. This is
> > trivial.
>
> If you can _find_ the whitelist field. It is very well hidden.
Oh, come o
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 22:08 -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
> users run unstable and probably a fair fracti
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so the question is: what am i forgetting to do? i'm guessing that the
> problem has something to do with the original package still being
> present (as a metapackage)?
No, it's a general problem: dpkg won't notice that a conffile has been
moved from one p
Gabriel Puliatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, maintainers _need_ to run unstable.
No, I don't agree here.
> How else would they test the
> latest package that has been uploaded and see if any bugs need to be
> fixed before it moves into testing?
I'm running unstable in a chroot, but I ha
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> it's not the first time such a question is raised, I did that
>>> recently enough, for a foo-package I don't even remem
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:02PM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
> users run unstable and probably a fair frac
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it's not the first time such a question is raised, I did that recently
> > enough, for a foo-package I don't even remember (some python messages
> > that bounced to me). that is compl
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:28:24 +0200
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
> with the error:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
> Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
> (mbox file) at h
Am Dienstag 12 September 2006 12:28 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
> with the error:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
> Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
> (mbox file) at http://people.debia
Le mar 12 septembre 2006 12:28, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to
> build with the error:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
> Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
> (mbox file) at http://people.debian.o
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/1394.bz2
Thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:08:02PM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
> users run unstable and probably a fair frac
On Sep 12, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Debian (I maintain a couple packages too, and hopefully more in
> the future, so I am not just trying to tell those who work what to do)
> should consider only supporting unstable and testing for a few reasons:
Then people would need to
Le lundi 11 septembre 2006 à 22:08 -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit :
> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
> users run unstable and probably a fair f
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
>>users run unstable and probably a fair fraction of the rest run testing.
>
> I tend to doubt these numbers, especially if they come from a source
> that is known for its Ubuntu / Canonical
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 11:08, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:08:02 -0600, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
> >question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
> >http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archi
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:08:02 -0600, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I know I am in for an argument, but I think it is a good
>question. I'm sure many of you have read Mark's blog:
>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/56. It says 76% of Debian
>users run unstable and probably
hey d-d,
in sarge, the nagios-plugins is a single monolithic package with a
number of plugins and config files (mostly with a 1:1 mapping).
in sid/etch, the nagios-plugins package is split into two packages,
nagios-plugins-basic, nagios-plugins-standard, each of which contains a
subset of the ori
74 matches
Mail list logo
