On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:56:21AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> This sort of vague anecdotal "evidence" has been repeated over and over.
> It may be true, but as far as I know, nobody has yet to come forth with
> reporting specific problems in Debian, only "x worked out of the box in
> ubuntu but n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 384693 xterm
Bug#384693: Debian traduction team should work on Xt applications localization
too
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `xterm'.
>
End of message, stopping
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Since I have no valid ID-Card (problens with France, since I am origin
> iranish/turkish witeh illegal german adoptivp arents) I can not enter
> the NM... nobody can sign legaly my GPG key and more bs.
>
> Maybe if I go back to Iran or Turkey it would be possible for me.
>
edwardsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm installing a 32 bit chroot, following
>
> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/356
>
> First, there is a tiny typo under 1.2
>
> -arch should be --arch
>
> Second, it says that I have to put a soft link in /lib to the ld-linux.so.2 in
> the chro
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n
Hi,
Xt applications (like xfig, gv, xterm, ...) are currently not localized,
while software support is already there, the traduction team just needs
to work on translating labels in /etc/X11/app-defaults.
For instance, the attached files are the one
Am Freitag 25 August 2006 12:54 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> Given that a kernel image these days takes up about 50M already
I guess that those that care for the smallest possible base system (and those
that hate initrd/initramfs) have their own kernel. My one (for a laptop) has
an installed size
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tunapie
Version : 1.0-rc4
Upstream Author : James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
On Fri August 25 2006 03:46, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> I cannot 100% agree with You, althought Your point is for sure
> partially valid.
Uhm, Debian's target audience is not Joe User, never has been AFAICT.
Joe isn't usually capable of determining which MTA, web server, proxy
server, etc., sp
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:34:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 23:11 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > The problem with the python policy is that there is no policy as to
> > where the modules are supposed to be installed. Depending on the tool
>
Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 23:11 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> The problem with the python policy is that there is no policy as to
> where the modules are supposed to be installed. Depending on the tool
> you are using (python-support or python-central), the directory is
> different. Where is some
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:22:10PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 13:01 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > I can't speak for others, but python-support provides
> > > pysupport-movemodules and pysupport-parseversions to separate the
> > > debhel
Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 13:01 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > I can't speak for others, but python-support provides
> > pysupport-movemodules and pysupport-parseversions to separate the
> > debhelper snippet from the actual abstraction code.
>
> That is still not what is required. Unless t
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:46:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Let me rephrase it: the internals of python-support, and how it helps
> implementing the python policy, are developed in the python-support
> documentation. They don't need to be part of the policy
Yes they do.
> and they have no
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:12:04AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2006-07-28 12:43:55, schrieb John Goerzen:
> >
> > > I like the fact that a base Debian install is only 100MB. Most of
> > > Debian's competitors are 10 times t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: calendar-server
* URL : http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/calendarserver/browser/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Apple's calendar server
Cal
* Remi Denis-Courmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060825 15:10]:
> > Blocking incoming connections is a common and good starting points for
> > every firewall setup.
>
> This is only meaningful if there are any open ports by default. Quite many
> Linux distributions have all ports closed by *default* aft
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> We really need to put our heads together and come up with a good system
>> for managing pre-built kernel modules for the kernels in Debian. It's
>> a much more widespread problem than just a question of free
Am 2006-08-24 11:56:21, schrieb John Goerzen:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > Because, hardware support seems to be better in Ubutuntu than in Debian?
> > I've not tested it by myself, but I've heard from many people claiming
> > that their hardware (especial
Am 2006-08-24 11:12:04, schrieb John Goerzen:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2006-07-28 12:43:55, schrieb John Goerzen:
> >
> > > I like the fact that a base Debian install is only 100MB. Most of
> > > Debian's competitors are 10 times that.
> >
> > Is
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
> installer's
> defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
>
> [...] Perhaps people could comment on other things like this which
> they've
I am on sabbatical through June 2007.
Be advised that I am not reading my
email as regularly as I might otherwise;
responses may be delayed.
Please accept my apologies.
I will not be taking on any new projects
during my sabbatical.
If you're writing to ask me to review a paper
or serve on a progra
Selon "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > They don't work well if there's NAT[1] involved, you wanted to say.
> Blocking incoming connections is a common and good starting points for
> every firewall setup.
This is only meaningful if there are any open ports by default. Quite many
Linux d
* Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060824 01:46]:
> > This is a bit of a red herring. Torrents work without re-configuring
> > firewalls, they just don't work as well.
>
> They don't work well if there's NAT[1] involved, you wanted to say.
Blocking incoming connections is a common and good sta
Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 11:09 +0200, Sander Marechal a écrit :
> Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > * Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-25 07:39]:
> >
> >> Matthias Julius wrote:
> >>> pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --arch=amd64
> >> It didn't work after all. I got a kernel running, but
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qemuctl
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Peter Rustler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=155120
* License : GPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pykerberos (binary package python2.X-kerberos)
Version : SVN version 55
Author : will have to figure out, (c) is Apples
* URL :
https://svn.macosforge.org/projects/cale
I cannot 100% agree with You, althought Your point is for sure partially
valid.
I really don't believe that Debian can equal itself with Ubuntu in terms
of user friendliness. There is so much to say about that, that I hardly
can remember the very concrete cases, so please don't attack me on th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kiki
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Kodi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kiki.sf.net
* License : Public Domain
Description : kikithebot -- Control the nanobot in the 3D puzzle
This is a 3D puzzle game.
Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-25 07:39]:
>
>> Matthias Julius wrote:
>>> pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --arch=amd64
>> It didn't work after all. I got a kernel running, but debootstrap
>> doesn't want to cooperate. It quits with an error that it canno
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We really need to put our heads together and come up with a good system
> for managing pre-built kernel modules for the kernels in Debian. It's a
> much more widespread problem than just a question of free vs. non-free.
> It's possible to do right now, bu
* Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-25 07:39]:
> Matthias Julius wrote:
> > pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --arch=amd64
>
> It didn't work after all. I got a kernel running, but debootstrap
> doesn't want to cooperate. It quits with an error that it cannot find a
> script. It takes
31 matches
Mail list logo
