Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Autotools do require you to do things the way they want, indeed. And
> every single autotool uses a different obscure language. Some
> consistency would be good -- but, I challenge you: write something
> that works better. There's a lot of deficiencies
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
>
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
> but only has a plain Makefile.
>
> 1) Can I use dh_make?
> 2) Does Debian policy have something to say about it?
No.
>
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>> > In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
>> > Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
Oh yeah. Most people don't know
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> You mean the difference between manpages-posix-dev (in non-free) and
> manpages-dev (in main)? The first is not proposed by Debian (I still don't
> get why anone would want to change a standards document as not changing it
> is the whole purpose of its existence.)
In order
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Then let's see what a user of your software would do, in a
> not-so-uncommon use case:
>
> User A wants to burn a CD-ROM. She gets cdrtools,
In reality, as "user A", I switched to using cdrdao for making serious audio
CDs and CD-RWs, and for burning disks from .iso files: th
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
>
> It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
>
> Some advantages of mailing lists:
>
> * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate
>
[Sorry for sending the message only to you John =(]
Em Sun, 13 Aug 2006 21:03:52 -0500
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Not if this is their first exposure to Debian. Say you were a
> seasoned Solaris admin, and you installed Debian to play around with.
> You get a prompt saying that
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:28:58PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:44PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * David Nusinow [Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:37:23 +]:
> > >
> > > > (I'm seriously
> > > > interested in setting up git
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:57:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I explained the upstream authors the difference between main and
> non-free, and asked if they think that we can redistribute their data in
> a dfsg-free manner, and here is their answer:
>
> "REBASE is free to its users and they ma
Wouter Verhelst writes:
>> In my experience, this is greatly exacerbated and perhaps even
>> primarily due to older versions of autotools encouraging or requiring
>> behavior that later versions of autotools declare to be broken.
> [...]
>> The situation is not helped when these mutually incompati
> "huggie" == Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
huggie> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit
huggie> wrote:
>> maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
>> non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it
>> asap.
> Please don't mess with gettext this way. You should ask Ubuntu people to
> rewrite the lines so that the 'branding' is removed or, at most, is handled
> by a variable that *is* replaced at runtime (this is what was introduced in
> Debian Installer). If you do string-based replacement you are goin
Hi,
* Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-15 03:07]:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> >> today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if=20
> >> you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed=20
> >> something).
> >
> > What kind of search are yo
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:50:51PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
>
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
> but only has a plain Makefile.
>
> 1) Can I use dh_make?
Sure.
> 2) Does D
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 03:53:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
> > a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
> > every different system (or library ve
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
> a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
> every different system (or library version, or whatever), strewn
> throughout the entire codebase. Real por
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:59:24PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >> On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> >> >
This one time, at band camp, Riku Voipio said:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > This is of course a lie.or why don't you like to prove it:
>
> > http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/problems.html
>
> > Come back to reallity, the k3b maintainers did al
Am Montag 14 August 2006 23:10 schrieb Bernd Schubert:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > If used properly, autotools usually do their job; and pretty well, too.
>
> Just have a look here http://lwn.net/Articles/188693
KDE never used the autotools properly (I'd rather call it hacking into it),
probably
Am Montag 14 August 2006 23:27 schrieb Steve Greenland:
> On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > > In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
> > > Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The *real* problem with the whole autotools disaster is that it promotes
> a braindead idea of how to achieve portability: a #ifdef branch for
> every different system (or library version, or whatever), strewn
> throughout the entire codebase. Real por
On Mon August 14 2006 00:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> ... my premise
> that pure python modules should only declare Provides when something
> exists in the archive which actually *needs* them...
What of stuff which will never be in the archive?
["ask for it" is an obvious answer, so...]
Any though
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> > > Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
>> > > cmake?
>> >
>
On 14-Aug-06, 15:59 (CDT), Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > In the case of autotools, the fact is that usually it's configure.ac or
> > Makefile.am being horribly broken, rather than the autotools.
>
> In my experience, this is greatly exacerbated and perhaps
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > > > Btw, why always the autotools
On 2006-08-14 22:55:41, Sam Morris wrote:
Sure, just customise the rules file it generates to not call a
configure
script. The rules file can really contain anything you want, as long
as it
builds a decent package when called. :)
Nice, I have been accustomed to use dh_make and the various conf
On 2006-08-14 22:33:49, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there
is
Well, the software is already prepared to support *BSD, Solaris and
Linux, but I only intent to support Linux - the only thing I use on a
day to day basis.
absolutely
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> > > Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
>> > > cmake?
>> >
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:50:51 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
> but only has a plain Makefile.
>
> 1) Can I use dh_make?
Sure, just customise the rules file it generates to not call a configure
script. The rules file can real
Am Montag 14 August 2006 21:50 schrieb Michael Rasmussen:
> I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
[...]
> 3) Would it be ok if I converted it to use autotools my self?
Do you plan to support other system than linux in a fork? If no, there is
absolutely no gain in us
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > > Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
> > > cmake?
> >
> > I've never used cmake myse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
>>> cmake?
>> I've never used cmake myself, so
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
I don't think so, I hardly use debhelper but I think dh_make is used
when
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> This is of course a lie.or why don't you like to prove it:
> http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/problems.html
> Come back to reallity, the k3b maintainers did already give up with
> Debian versions of cdrtools and use se
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:50:44AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> * The "system mta" should provide /usr/sbin/sendmail, as well as
> mailq, runq, and man pages. The alternative system is able to link
> several alternatives.
Right, so three should be no problems there?
> * The "servic
Hi again,
Sorry, I forgot the must obvious question.
5) Would there be any interest in the community for be doing it?
This question should have been numbered 1 since it is clearly a
show-stopper:-)
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://
Hi list,
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
I intend to package a peace of software which does not use autotools
but only has a plain Makefile.
1) Can I use dh_make?
2) Does Debian policy have something to say about it?
3) Would it be ok if I converted it to use aut
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:59 +0100, Peter Collingbourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
>repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
>a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
>and vmware-mo
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:24:11 -0400, "Roberto C. Sanchez"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, the cyrus init script is called /etc/init.d/cyrus21, the
>courier init script is /etc/init.d/courier-imap and the dovecot init
>script is /etc/init.d/dovecot. It would seem to me that if these
>packages a
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I don't know about the installer, but all filesystems I created with
> mke2fs recently also have resize_inode, which isn't even in the tune2fs
> manpage.
It's not in the tune2fs man page because e2fsprogs doesn't currently
support addi
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:02:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> For dir_index you have to take the FS offline, tune2fs and fsck it or
> you totaly corrupt it.
Actually, that's not true. It's perfectly safe to run tune2fs on a
mounted volume to enable the dir_index feature. All directorie
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>> today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if=20
>> you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed=20
>> something).
>
> What kind of search are you trying to do? Package to DSA? Bug to DSA?
> If so, it would not be difficul
Hi
just a little reminder - if you add a debug package to your package in
the archive then always have its priority at extra, not optional.
Reason:
optional is defined as "This is all the software that you might
reasonably want to install if you didn't know what it was and don't have
specialized
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:36:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hate following up my own message. This is a biased recap of a
discussion Steve ands I had on IRC, and ou should wait his response
before taking my version of the discussion without a grain of salt.
> On S
Frans Pop writes:
>
>On Monday 14 August 2006 14:43, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> The DVD torrents are already produced, just not linked from the page
>> at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/. Check out
>
>I've committed a change to the d-i page that adds all missing links (there
>were a few
On Monday 14 August 2006 14:43, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> The DVD torrents are already produced, just not linked from the page
> at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/. Check out
I've committed a change to the d-i page that adds all missing links (there
were a few others that were omitted
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:02:22PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1418 +0100]:
> > * Package name: python-alsaaudio
>
> Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable...
moo :P
at that time, the package was not listed in bugs.d.o, a
Hello,
On Sat, 12.08.2006 at 20:40:37 +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a countermeasure, the FSF tries to extend copyright to interfaces,
> so that you do create a derivative work merely by programming to a
> specific interface of a library written by someone else, without
>
On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > Btw, why always the autotools while there's this nice
> > cmake?
>
> I've never used cmake myself, so I can't speak for how nice
> it is, but autotools (for all its problem
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nekohtml
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Andy Clark
* URL or Web page : http://people.apache.org/~andyc/neko/doc/html/
* License : CyberNeko Software License, Version 1.0
Description : HTML parser for Java
This is a
On Sunday 13 August 2006 09:18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > * using snapshots and clones based off them are quite useful
>
> Lvm snapshots work just fine.
You've obviously never run VMware if you think that an LVM snapshot is a
replacement for a VMWare snapshot. It leaves me suspicious that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: rebase
Version : NA
Upstream Author : Dr. Richard J. Roberts and Dana Macelis
(http://rebase.neb.com/rebase/rebase.staff.html)
URL : http://rebase.neb.com
License : P
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:57:45PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You should look at the video I pointed you at. You just accused me of
> > being a liar. If i would have your low level I would now do the same you
>
> I did look at this video: it verifi
Anything new regarding libmail-domainkeys-perl? I'd really like to
see this module in Debian.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Do you really believe that you are able to deflect from the main problem:
> > >
> > > The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
> > > did write b
> - With Linux 2.6.x, it is impossible to run cdrecord without
> root privs.
>
> Do not believe single persons who claim otherwise as Linux-2.6.x
> filters away random SCSI commands when cdrecord does not have
> root-privs and as cdrecord heavily depends
Hi,
I have some more thoughts to offer on the example Steve
presented: in essence, he is talking about a package that has become
incompatible with the version that was in stable.
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:03:13 -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 0
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you really believe that you are able to deflect from the main problem:
> >
> > The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
> > did write bug reports against the Debian version of cdrtools did already
> > switch to a
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
> * Joerg Schilling [Sun, Aug 13 2006, 12:28:15PM]:
>
> > The original sources do not have such bugs and many Debian users that
>
> Most of that is true if and only if the users follow your
> recommendations and strictly use kernel 2.4.x, ide-sc
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:25:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.14.1917 +0100]:
> > does that imply that an ITP is not checked against the current available
> > packages? Should there be a check?
>
[..]
> The ITP should have been filed a day o
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:59:57AM +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > > reposi
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> The second feature is quite cool; update-notifier uses hal to detect
> that a new CD/DVD was inserted and tries to figure out whether that is
> a Ubuntu CD; I patched the program to also look for Debian CDs, and to
> avoid mes
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The GPL (section 3) does restrict distributions of binaries ("object
> code or executable form", to use the words of the GPL, to be more
> accurate, since the GPL only uses the term "binary" once, and only to
> refer to a completely different issue) and sta
I wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>>This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
>>--enig40699EE2A035BC4485AA339B
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>>Joey Hess wrote:
>>> Sven Mueller wrote:
>
Hello Javier,
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-14 13:48]:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:02:31AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
> > you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
> >
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
>--enig40699EE2A035BC4485AA339B
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Joey Hess wrote:
>> Sven Mueller wrote:
>>> My reason for
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:31:29 +0100
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
>> ... twice the size, but it can do a whole lot more. And it has the
>> added benefit that it can actually fire off GET/HEAD/POST/whatever
>> requests.
>>
>> This is libwww-perl. I
Em Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:31:29 +0100
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> ... twice the size, but it can do a whole lot more. And it has the
> added benefit that it can actually fire off GET/HEAD/POST/whatever
> requests.
>
> This is libwww-perl. I don't object to furl, but so far I am n
Em Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:58:53 +0900
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Maybe a way to solve the problem would be to make clear in the package
> name, documentation and popup messages that it is not a native Debian
> tool? For instance, it could be called "Ubuntu update notifier for
> D
On Aug 14, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is libwww-perl. I don't object to furl, but so far I am not
> convinced.
I object, since so far it looks like a worthless waste of disk space.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
also sprach Marco Bertorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.14.0735 +0100]:
> It' s more little and easy to use... a little utility.
> I must specify this in description, sorry.
>
> $ ls -alh /usr/bin/furl
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8,6K 2006-08-11 10:18 /usr/bin/furl
>
> $ls -alh /usr/bin/lynx.stab
Le Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:03:52PM -0500, John Goerzen a écrit :
>
> Say you were a
> seasoned Solaris admin, and you installed Debian to play around with.
> You get a prompt saying that you have to reboot because zlib or
> something has been upgraded. Are you going to think this is a serious
> o
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:29:13PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> The second feature is quite cool; update-notifier uses hal to detect
> that a new CD/DVD was inserted and tries to figure out whether that is
> a Ubuntu CD; I patched the program to also look for Debian CDs, and to
> avoid mes
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:34:52PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [Goswin von Brederlow]
> >> Instead move the things in etc that need writing to other places:
> >>
> >> 1) link /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and create a dummy /proc/mounts
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:02:31AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
> you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
> something).
What kind of search are you trying to do? Package to DSA? Bug to DSA?
If so, it would
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:46:44AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> netbase:
> critical network configuration.
> It has some ancient cruft like /etc/services (which does more ill
> than good), but /etc/init.d/networking is not something one wants to
> skip.
Why do you b
At 1155544521 past the epoch, Marco Bertorello wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:08:19 +0200
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a real benefit over lynx -dump -head and similar things ?
>
> It' s more little and easy to use... a little utility.
> I must specify this in descriptio
On 8/14/06, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And to some extent, the FSF must claim that it's not possible to
escape the GPL with a second implementation (so that programs linking
to readline must still be GPLed, even though you could use libedit as
a mostly-transparent replacement, for
At 1155469573 past the epoch, martin f krafft wrote:
> Why don't those that want to work with QEMU do that, and
> those who want to work with VMware worry about its
> packaging?
>
> I can't believe we're having this discussion anyway.
It would make sense for each team to keep an eye on what
each
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Don Armstrong:
> > Assuming there's a box available that can handle it, HyperEstraier is
> > pretty easy to set up and configure to do this sort of thing...
>
> According to what I've heard, it tries to fit the whole database
> into memory during inde
80 matches
Mail list logo
