> Is this one better or worse than pangzero?
It's diferent. Pang Zero is much simpler. Anyway, after talking with Pang
Zero's upstream, it'll have to wait, as some of the graphics have to be
replaced.
Pang Zero is simpler, but it's designed for multiple players, whereas ceferino
is more complex
* Miriam Ruiz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: ceferino
> Version : 0.97.5
> Upstream Author : Hugo Ruscitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL :
> http://www.losersjuegos.com.ar/ju
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
Some advantages of mailing lists:
* E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate
firewalls, (my company has never allowed external
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is the root of the key difference between the `like patch
> systems' people and the `hate patch systems' people.
>
> `Hate patch systems' people are those who can read code, and prefer
> programming and debuggint to doing archaelogy.
Oh brothe
I demand that Matthew Palmer may or may not have written...
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:52:09PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>> I demand that Matthew Palmer may or may not have written...
>>> I've given up on this thread, but I just have to say one thing:
>>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +0300
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:52:09PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Matthew Palmer may or may not have written...
>
> > I've given up on this thread, but I just have to say one thing:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> >> `Hate patch systems' can easi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ceferino
Version : 0.97.5
Upstream Author : Hugo Ruscitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.losersjuegos.com.ar/juegos/ceferino/ceferino.php
* License : GPL
Programmi
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:59:38PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> no. the currend ddtp-server don't support the review process, sorry.
> >
> >No problem, just to let the translators aware.
> >
> >We
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: linuxbios
Version : 0.0+svn2006xxyy
Upstream Author : http://linuxbios.org/index.php/Contributors
* URL : http://linuxbios.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, assembl
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * John Goerzen wrote:
> > Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG
> > signatures even.
>
> That's the only feature I miss after I switched from darcs to
> mercurial.
I just realized that this feature is implemented in the patchbomb
extension, whi
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
>
>
On 8/4/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no. the currend ddtp-server don't support the review process, sorry.
No problem, just to let the translators aware.
We can use the pseudo-urls system to review that, before
the translator send it back to th
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Note that med-fichier is the name of the source package, the binaries
are named libmed*, except med-fichier-utils and med-fichier-doc. I can
rename those one to libmed-utils and libmed-doc, but I don't think I
will change the name of the source package.
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> How about patching thunderbird to look at both directories?
>
> HS
>
I can, somehow, grok maintaining a thunderbird extension, but delving
into the actual thunderbird code is way over my available time at the
moment. :-(
Yes, I know, I can open a bug and dump this on t
I demand that Matthew Palmer may or may not have written...
> I've given up on this thread, but I just have to say one thing:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
>> `Hate patch systems' can easily apply all chunks and start
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> Easily. Heh.
On Aug 06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we not just move those rules to the packages that create those
> users? I assume they are system users, who shouldn't be in LDAP anyway.
Yes, but there is no real reason to do it.
So far I have been suggesting to use a per-package rules fil
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can quote major parts of it by heart since a few years, does that
> help?
If you like to discuss the GPL with other people, it is irrelevent whether
you know it "by heart" in case you did not understand it yet...
> [...]
> > > GPL§3 clearly says w
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
> On Aug 06, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What should be creating the above users/groups?
> The relevant packages.
>
> > Could udevd be changed to make debugging these issues easier,
> > e.g. maybe some sort of verbose mode?
> You just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Outside the chroot, where you probably have auto* installed the
>> invocation suddenly works and you get a different generated file that
>> might or might not fail.
> They would immediately f
On 06/08/06, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* John Goerzen wrote:
> Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG
> signatures even.
That's the only feature I miss after I switched from darcs to
mercurial.
Norbert
At last someone mentions mercuria
On Aug 06, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should be creating the above users/groups?
The relevant packages.
> Could udevd be changed to make debugging these issues easier,
> e.g. maybe some sort of verbose mode?
You just have to enable it.
> Should I file any bug reports, if so what
* John Goerzen wrote:
> Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG
> signatures even.
That's the only feature I miss after I switched from darcs to
mercurial.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Hi,
Some more thoughts.
/etc/kernel-img.conf is a shared configuration file -- any
number of kernel image and mkvmlinux packages that use that file may
be installed pr going to be installed on the machine. Not all
supported packages are official packages either -- anyone may co
Hi all,
we uploaded preview packages for the next security update of mozilla
applications in debian sarge.
This is the second maintenance release after mozilla developers
officially dropped support for the product versions we ship in sarge.
The packages are based on the patches I backported and a
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 09:11:52 +0200, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> As for #361929, I overlooked that kernel-package also happens to be
>> the most appropiate place for fixing the user scripts. Would you
>> please also add something like:
I reject this assertion. There is no w
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:27:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> >* Package name: med-fichier
> >
> >MED-fichier (Modélisation et Echanges de Données, in English Modelisation
> >and Data Exchange) is a library to store and exchange meshed data or
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
