ir-kbd-gpio.ko missing from kernel images

2006-07-31 Thread David Shepherd
Hi All I'm trying to get the infra-red remote control working on my MythTV box and can't find the correct module (ir-kbd-gpio) So, can anyone tell me where I can find, or how I can compile the ir-kbd-gpio.ko module. The module is part of the bttv video4linux driver but the ir-kbd-gpio.c source

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-07-31 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Dear fellow developers, > > As many of you know, I am conducting research on Debian, > specifically on how Debian developers adopt or reject new methods of > package maintenance. I would like to get a broad collection of data > for

Re: dh_python and python policy analysis

2006-07-31 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > I have finished my initial analysis of Python policy and > dh_python, and created a rough specification of what the python > policy is supposed to be (based on current dh_python behaviour). The > current analysis, and future updates, are to be found at

dh_python and python policy analysis

2006-07-31 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I have finished my initial analysis of Python policy and dh_python, and created a rough specification of what the python policy is supposed to be (based on current dh_python behaviour). The current analysis, and future updates, are to be found at http://www.golden-gryphon.com/soft

Re: package ownership in Debian

2006-07-31 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Due to the "my stuff, don't touch that!" current approach, but (again) > this is just IMHO. I have had people insist that I needed to maintain a package differently, but they have all been strangely unwilling to post clear applyable patches or make N

Re: Re: Quote: Debian and Democracy at Advocato.org

2006-07-31 Thread anton nikolaev
nice work!

Re: package ownership in Debian

2006-07-31 Thread Hubert Chan
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:30:34 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > IMHO the maintainer(s) could mention their wishes wrt to NMU and any > particular package in debian/copyright, right after This package was > debianized by ... When needed NMU is appreciated/forbidden/whatever I agree

expanded wants.

2006-07-31 Thread limited Competing
see how PC works from inside out The computer you using Crynwr v.x drivers docs PKTDA.ZIP PKTDB.ZIP drives PKTDC.ZIP update SKLIB.ZIP UNZIP.EXE VAL.ZIP Code Broker Science Policy Haninah Levine Shopping Contacts SuSe Old breaking trends. links on: Subscribe releases Media theURL winN

Bug#380654: ITP: ndisc6 -- IPv6 diagnostic tools

2006-07-31 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ndisc6 Version : 0.6.6 Upstream Author : Rémi Denis-Courmont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.simphalempin.com/dev/ndisc6. * License : GPL Programming Lang

Re: package ownership in Debian

2006-07-31 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 31 July 2006 18:43, Hubert Chan wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:40:54 -0300, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >

Re: package ownership in Debian

2006-07-31 Thread Hubert Chan
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:40:54 -0300, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> [...] >> >> > The packages that aren't under group maintenance and will nev

Re: Debian should have a weekly debate

2006-07-31 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 31 July 2006 18:16, alfredo diega wrote: > I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate. I > understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think it could be > better if you debated on general concerns. I was reading the "Why Ubuntu > has > all the ideas

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-07-31 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag 31 Juli 2006 17:08 schrieb Frank Küster: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > >>> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped > >>> D

Re: Debian should have a weekly debate

2006-07-31 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 7/31/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: also sprach alfredo diega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1616 +0100]: > I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate. > I understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think > it could be better if you debated

Re: Debian should have a weekly debate

2006-07-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach alfredo diega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1616 +0100]: > I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate. > I understand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think > it could be better if you debated on general concerns. I was > reading the "Why Ubuntu h

Re: Etch artwork (was: Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?)

2006-07-31 Thread Gustavo Franco
Message sent to the related projects mailing lists and maintainers. Time to deal with the goodies, pressure, critics and work... regards, -- stratus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian should have a weekly debate

2006-07-31 Thread alfredo diega
 I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate.  Iunderstand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think it could bebetter if you debated on general concerns.  I was reading  the "Why Ubuntu has all the ideas" thread and think two things were apparent.First-  Many wrote

Debian should have a weekly debate

2006-07-31 Thread alfredo diega
 I really believe Debian would benefit if they had a weekly debate.  Iunderstand you debate on things you are voting on, but I think it could bebetter if you debated on general concerns.  I was reading  the "Why Ubuntu has all the ideas" thread and think two things were apparent.First-  Many wrote

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-07-31 Thread Frank Küster
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: >>> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped >>> Debian development for a large number of people? [...] > H

Re: package ownership in Debian

2006-07-31 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 7/31/06, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > The packages that aren't under group maintenance and will never be, > needs more not so strict NMU rules. Why? Due to the "my stuff, don't touch that!" c

Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?

2006-07-31 Thread Matthias Julius
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Without further specifics, this is not a useful argument to > have. Assuming by "Ubuntu" you mean Ubuntu Breezy (i.e. > stable as of 6 months ago), but what do you mean by > "Debian"? Sarge? Sid today? Sid yesterday? Etch last week? > If you've only loo

Re: Etch artwork (was: Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?)

2006-07-31 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 7/31/06, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote: > > It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a > > good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then > > convince

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-07-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.30.2139 +0100]: > I have Reply-To set for fear of horrible flame wars when one DD > bashes another one's favourite tool, but I will make the results > public, obviously. Thus, I appreciate if you could take the time to > drop me a short note

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-07-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: >> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped >> Debian development for a large number of people? > > CDBS and alioth/svn.debian.org. > > > HTH, > > Michael With

Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?

2006-07-31 Thread Jon Dowland
At 1154090521 past the epoch, Katrina Jackson wrote: > PS. Hardware, Hardware, Hardware, I have to confess, if > there was better hardware support I think most people > would be happy. Hardware supported by Ubuntu 6 months > ago, should be supported by Debian by now. Without further specifics, t

Re: Translated packages descriptions progress

2006-07-31 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On 7/30/06, Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Friends, As someone who has been loosely following this for a while and translated a few descriptions, I have a few little questions/comments: 1. The website you provide (http://ddtp.debian.net/) is extremely light on detail. It contains

Etch artwork (was: Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?)

2006-07-31 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:37:54AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote: > > It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a > > good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then > > convince the gdm maintainer that we should use this. > > Well

Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?

2006-07-31 Thread Jon Dowland
At 1154196833 past the epoch, Michael Banck wrote: > It makes no sense to complain about this until we have a > good default artwork. So let's fix that first, then > convince the gdm maintainer that we should use this. Well put. On that note, where is consistent art work being coordinated? I'm i

Re: More dh_python questions

2006-07-31 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, (Could you please stop cross-posting to debian-devel? The discussion belongs to debian-python@ and the list is low traffic.) On Sun, Jul 30, 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I have only one version in XS-Python-Version (say, 2.4) I think the patch in #378604 enhance this

TRAMP MAGAZINE

2006-07-31 Thread james
Our new online members service. Become a member to use the new online home for all \"TRAMPS\" worldwide. www.trampmagazine.com. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Translated packages descriptions progress

2006-07-31 Thread Michael Bramer
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:55:19PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > On 07/30/2006 03:26 AM, Michael Vogt wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > Hi Michael, Hi > > the current version of apt in debian/experimental has support for > > translated package descriptions and we have a the curren

Re: cdrtools

2006-07-31 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:28:04PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:03:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > Note it is unclear whether the makefiles could be called "scripts" > > > > Unproven asse