Coin,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and replace it with a very small shell script. For cdbs, you delete one
> line and have to replace it with your reimplementation of a very large
> makefile...
That's obvious because CDBS does not target at doing little independent
tasks (even
Hi,
should I set in package jed a conflict on a package jed-extra if
jed-extra enhances jed, but jed has changed its API and now jed-extra is
useless, i.e. it must be updated. jed-extra and jed can be installed at
the same time without harm, but jed-extra does not enhance jed anymore,
because it's
Bundling up a few replies here...
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:02:26AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> I'm also debhelper fan ;-) but what makes you think that if you face a
> problematic debhelper script you are not supposed to reimplement that
> particular part of rules by hand as an interim wor
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all, I got an FTBFS bug yesterday;
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:13:53 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>
>> Package: lynx-cur
>> Version: 2.8.6dev18-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>>
> ...
>
>>> install -m 75
Gentile linux.debian.devel
Per il periodo estivo Telcom Italia sta proponendo una fantastica offerta
in Collaborazione con
Ebai Italia. Quello che ti sta per proporre è di registrarti GRATUITAMENTE
su Ebai (cliccando questo link:
http://clk.tradedoubler.com/click?p=1699&a=1192790&g=16
Lol...wow this certainly is a bug, we must fix it pronto!On 6/10/06, Kenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do nbot ignore me please,I found your email somewhere and now decided tob writbe you.
I am coambing to your place in afew weeks and thought bwecan meet eacah other. Let me know if you do not mind.
Do nbot ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided tob writbe you.
I am coambing to your place in afew weeks and thought bwe
can meet eacah other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To be fair, debhelper is not co-maintained either.
I never noticed it wasn't, but i do think it should. Fact is you're
taking far much care when integrating changes, that's a major
difference.
--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgpmw2zfDouEZ.pgp
Description: PGP s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mario Izquierdo (mariodebian)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: usbvision
Version : 0.9.7-1cvs20060608
Upstream Author : Mario Izquierdo (mariodebian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://usbvision.sourceforge.net/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: scala
Version : 2.1.5
Upstream Author : Martin Odersky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://scala.epfl.ch
* License : BSD-like
(http://scala.epfl.ch/download
Marc Dequènes wrote:
> in a better state now. But this raise another related subject: such an
> important package should be comaintained. Peter refused any cooperation,
> uploaded new versions while i proposed to review his changes with
> another developper
To be fair, debhelper is not co-maintain
Christian, Denis,
I see the localisation infrastructure as a tool of the translator (or
localisation manager for a package in a language). If the translator has
commit right, he can give the tool the data to do automatic commits,
instead of doing them manaully. Only the person that has the rig
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm, that sounds weird to my ears as Peter is currently working with
> myself, Steve Langasek and Noèl Köthe on the samba packages...and this
> team work works pretty well.
Sounds very strange to me.
I reviewed his first upload, found a regression
> by NMU). The CDBS Team does no more exist and Peter is the only one
> working on it and refusing any help, that's a very bad situation.
Hmmm, that sounds weird to my ears as Peter is currently working with
myself, Steve Langasek and Noèl Köthe on the samba packages...and this
team work works p
Coin,
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tend to agree.
I tend to agree too, every maintainer should be encouraged to understand
the packaging tools he is using. These tools are made to solve _common_
situations, so you have to understand what automatic mechanisms are
involved, a
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.10.1156 +0200]:
> Of course, it was not. I omitted to put smileys because it seems
> that some people around are thinking I'm sometimes too happy or
> saying too much fun things,
and that's negative? We never took you seriously anyway, mus
#include
* Loïc Minier [Sat, Jun 10 2006, 11:08:15AM]:
> Yes, I 100% agree with you. Would I be evaluating an applicant, I
> wouldn't like him to prepare a new source package in CDBS. (But I
> wouldn't request to build a .deb with ar either.)
>
> Is Debhelper our C and CDBS our C++?
No. B
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:24:42AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Oh, really? The last time I tried to add a custom command to the install
> rule (well, >> 1 year ago) it was a real PITA. Docs have not told me how
> it works, docs have not told me in an understandable language how to add
> extensions
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.10.0852 +0200]:
> > But I suspect that implicitely telling Manoj that he thinks
> > top-down because he actually likes cdbs will get you into trouble,
>
> It was not my intention.
Of course,
also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.10.0852 +0200]:
> But I suspect that implicitely telling Manoj that he thinks
> top-down because he actually likes cdbs will get you into trouble,
It was not my intention.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> When using debhelper, you (typically) have a single debian/rules makefile
> which lists out all the commands that are invoked for building your package;
> each of those commands primarily uses the contents of other files in debian/
> as input. If you h
Hi,
first off, I'm neither a DD nor an NM, but I do some packaging work
(thanks to alioth), As most people here argue against CDBS, I think the
benefits of it are missed (if you didn't guess, I use it and I like it).
Am Freitag, den 09.06.2006, 15:10 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Fri, Jun 0
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> This is my opinion and others will disagree:
> Please don't. CDBS is a major pain to use for those who didn't
> (co-)author it. It's just too much about obfuscation.
Yeah, I and others we disagree! :)
CDBS makes maintenance of some packages damn e
On Saturday 10 June 2006 01:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
--cut--
> In contrast, almost all of cdbs is stashed away in /usr/share/cdbs/; almost
> none of what it does is inspectible by looking at the debian/rules and
> using those lines as hooks into the documentation. There is
> /usr/share/doc/cdbs/c
24 matches
Mail list logo
