On Wed, 10 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
freeze etch rather soon and also the RC bug count doesn't look too good,
and we want to be on time this t
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> freeze etch rather soon and also the RC bug count doesn't look too good,
> an
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-10 23:11]:
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> freeze etch rather soon and also the RC bug count doesn't look too good,
> and we want to be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-nose
Version : 0.8.7
Upstream Author : Jason Pellerin
* URL : http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
> > * Although there is a way to view pdf.gz without explicit decompression
> > (use see or xzpdf) it is inconvenient for being used from firefox for
> > instance (?)
> Could you point us to a bug report ? firefox being a web browser is likely
> to be used to download .pdf.gz files from non-D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: summain
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://liw.iki.fi/liw/summain/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On 5/10/06, Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about improving transparent decompression somehow?
well... unification via mailcap is nice, but as I mentioned before it
would be trickier to make it work from firefox (it assumes all .gz files
Good solutions aren't always trivial
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:18:56PM +0200, Kurt Petersen wrote:
> Kurt Petersen wrote:
> > I was the happy user of Emacs on Debian unstable. After a normal
> > apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
> > Emacs disappeared and has not been seen later. I'm I the only one to
> > miss it?
> > Could thi
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:15:54PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> I've raised this discussion at -mentors first [1] but I think it is worth
> asking on a devel list since no definite decision was reached and I
> could not find similar discussion in the archives.
>
> I've
On 5/10/06, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
> > installed at the same time?
> > For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
>
> Read the papers
Hi,
there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
freeze etch rather soon and also the RC bug count doesn't look too good,
and we want to be on time this time :), we think the switch to gcc 4.1
as def
> On 5/9/06, Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* dh_compress doesn't compress some other files based on extension
> > including .zip files. PDF (to my knowledge) uses zip internally to
> > compress the document. So why PDF should be gzipped if .zip not?
> Probably because .zip is com
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
> installed at the same time?
> For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
Read the papers listed in the wiki. The short answer is no, same as it is
today wi
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >> Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on "alsaplayer-alsa |
> >> alsaplayer-output" and "alsa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mp3val
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://mp3val.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A program for MPEG audio stream validati
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:37:48AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> I uploaded an experimental version of 'lightspeed', as you see in
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lightspeed/news/20060507T214839Z.html
> on Sun 7th of May ; but strangely enough it does not appear, neither in
> http://packages.qa.debia
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 10, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
>> objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
>> bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:58 -0400, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
>> alsaplayer-common contains the main alsaplayer binary
>> (/usr/bin/alsaplayer), which does not function without an
>> alsaplayer-output and alsaplayer-input pl
"Olaf van der Spek" writes...
> Does it also allow completely arbitrary combinations to be installed?
We're not sure of this implementation detail yet. But I think...
By default your system won't be multiarch, but the sysadmin can turn on
combinations. The config file for doing this will have
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:37:34PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> >> You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
> >> objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
> >> bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
> >> or som
On 5/10/06, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's just that I'm quite concerned about the precendent this creates. Up
until now, people have abandoned packages when other people felt the
packages in question where poorly maintained. I remember the case of the
Sometimes they have abond
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:41:56PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >> Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on "alsaplayer-alsa |
> >> alsaplayer-output" and "alsa
Kurt Petersen wrote:
> I was the happy user of Emacs on Debian unstable. After a normal
> apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
> Emacs disappeared and has not been seen later. I'm I the only one to
> miss it?
>
> Could this be the reason:
>
> # apt-get install emacs21-nox
> [...]
> The follow
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:53:23PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> developer like yourself in the team to help out and explain where and
> why things are good or bad will surely help in the long run. In light of
> that, and in light of his past contributions (good and, well, 'not as
> good') which
On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:04:14 -0400, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
>> Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on "alsaplayer-alsa |
>> alsaplayer-output" and "alsaplayer-gtk | alsaplayer-interface". Is
>> this really a problem?
My q
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:08:57PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
> > > to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
> >
> > You should
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> In practice, the rules that say that work done by the government is
>> automatically public domain...
> Work done by US federal government employees on government time is
> effectively public domain. This does _not_ apply to work
Hello,
I'm writing to let you know that I have just added your website,
lists.debian.org, to my directory.
You can find your listing here...
http://www.faxwin.com/efax
I also wanted to gauge your interest in networking our websites
together more closely for mutual benefit.
If you would conside
Russ Allbery writes:
> In practice, the rules that say that work done by the government is
> automatically public domain...
Work done by US federal government employees on government time is
effectively public domain. This does _not_ apply to work done by state or
local government employees. It
Frank Küster wrote:
> Well, it isn't, since perl is installed by debootstrap (or whatever the
> installer uses)
*blank stare*
> Upgrading from sarge should be done according to the instructions in the
> release notes. The only things that should be installed separately are
> probably aptitude, a
John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
>>> I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
>>> to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
>>>
>> You should not go ahead and remove José from m
Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> (In fact, IMHO nothing should depends from perl-modules at all).
>
> Correct. I'd prefer that nothing did.
Is this documented anywhere? If is really is the case that nothing
should de
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Except that apt-get fails if any of the signatures are unknown or
> expired. So you still need both keys and not just one of them as you
> intent.
No, that used to be apt's behavior, but since January apt and all other
Release-verifying tools (debootstrap, net-retriev
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:23:03AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:36:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>> Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel.
>>> * Your clean target was ineffective and caused a huge diff.gz
>> For 1.38 ? Yes. Can't cle
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:03:16PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I also don't see how it matters: If José and John were Co-maintainers,
> no other DD would sponsor José's uploads. In consequence, John would be
There is no guarantee of that. Somebody has been uploading these
packages all along, an
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:12:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > I have not withdrawn my intent to take over Bacula. I am volunteering
> > to do some pretty significant work on it, and have already done so.
>
> You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
> objection if h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> Except that he is not a developer and so far has not showed the minimal
> competence required to maintain a package, nor attempts to improve his
> procedures.
I also don't see how it matters: If José and John were Co-maintainers,
no other DD would sponsor
Please, this time, obey the Followup-to to debian-legal.
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I do not want to argue,
Yes. Please. Please do not argue before you've read the discussions we
already had on this. I don't expect you to find any relevant new
points.
> and your com
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:20:19PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 15:44, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
>
>> The current dependencies are used to allow a slightly newer version
>> of perl-modules to be installed: porters had issues in unstable
>> where perl was uninstallable due to the
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As for the public domain, I thought I was on solid ground because work
> made by public servants in the USA is automatically public domain.
> However, I realised that the Standford university where the software has
> been released is private (correct me
On May 10, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should not go ahead and remove José from maintenance over his
> objection if he offers you co-maintenance. Your reason for hijacking
> bacula seems to have been that José was slacking, not anything personal
> or some such. In that case, I
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:26:33AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:10:52PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> > I couldn't be happier if that happened. We have a bit less than 3 months
> > (until Etch freezes) to get all of this in shape. Any other volunteers?
>
> I have not
Le Mercredi 10 Mai 2006 17:09, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> why do kaffe-[pj]threads depends upon gjdoc ? isn't a recommends
> enough ?
>
> given its description, it looks like a developpement tool, and I don't
> get why it's needed just for running java apps, I even don't really
> understand why it
Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>perl-modules should not depends on perl. It's useless to have only
>>perl-modules installed, but this create no harm.
>>
>>moreover people just apt-get install perl, so that won't break anything.
>
> That would be true if perl depended on perl-modules (=
Dear all, dear Frank,
If it was the intention of the general resolution you are reffering to
that any document which has been created by automatic processing of
another document could not be distributed without its "source", it is
rather unfortunate that it refers to the DFSG, which explicitely us
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 22:49 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>Hello Debian developers,
>
>Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
>maintainers.
[snip]
> Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> xfce4-mixer
> xfce4-mixer-alsa
> xfce4-mixer-os
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 17:01, Mike Bird a écrit :
> On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:24, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > gjdoc kaffe kaffe-jthreads kaffe-pthreads
> > http://debian.semistable.com/dot/kaffe-pthreads_stable.png
>
> Can someone point me to an explanation for this (Etch)?
>
> gjdoc depends on kaffe.
On 8 May 2006, Marc Haber outgrape:
> On Fri, 05 May 2006 11:12:35 +0300, Jari Aalto
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Colin Watson wrote:
>>> The rest of the system accounts are happily running with
>>> /bin/false
>>
>> There is
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:24, Bill Allombert wrote:
> gjdoc kaffe kaffe-jthreads kaffe-pthreads
> http://debian.semistable.com/dot/kaffe-pthreads_stable.png
Can someone point me to an explanation for this (Etch)?
gjdoc depends on kaffe. But kaffe-pthreads provides kaffe.
Why then is it necess
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
> >maintainers.
> >
> > perl
> > perl-modules
>
> These two packages are meant to be in
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:10:52PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> I previously declined very 'consistent' offers to adopt/take over
> Bacula, and offered co-maintenance instead.
> One of the main reasons: i have quite good relations with upstream
> (almost made them move main development to Debia
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:36:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel.
I should point out that you CC'd your reply to this message I sent you
in private to debian-devel.
> > Unfortunate, but the proper thing to do in this situatio
Le Mardi 09 Mai 2006 22:49, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
...
> libkcal2b
> libkdepim1a
It looks like these two have circular dependencies because libkdepim depends
on libkcal, while a couple of the standard libkcal plugins (namely
kcal_kabc.so and kcal_remote
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 15:44, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
> The current dependencies are used to allow a slightly newer version
> of perl-modules to be installed: porters had issues in unstable
> where perl was uninstallable due to the package not having built on
> an architecture.*
Package: perl
Depend
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:01:21PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
>On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
>> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
>> >maintainers.
>> >
>> >
Le mercredi 10 mai 2006 à 23:44 +1000, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
> A specific problem, rather than a vague description of "evil" would
> help.
See for example
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316403;msg=15
among many RC bugs caused by circular dependencies.
--
.''`. Joss
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:51:59PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 14:40, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
>> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed
>> > by maintainers.
>> >
>> >perl
>> >
On 5/10/06, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
> installed at the same time?
> For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
I think that's
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
> installed at the same time?
> For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
I think that's not going to fly. Just think about the different
arch
Hi,
If you want to discuss this further, please move the discussion to
-legal; you can ask to get Cc's if you aren't subscribed there.
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:21:58AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote :
>> * Frank Küster:
>>
>> > Most PDF files in Debia
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:32:53AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2006 22:49:36 +0200, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >alsaplayer-alsa
> >alsaplayer-common
> >alsaplayer-gtk
>
> Hmm... alsaplayer-common Depends: on "alsaplayer
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:32PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
> >maintainers.
> >
> > perl
> > perl-modules
>
> These two packages are meant to be in
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart and others <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
binary targets on the same system, for example running both i386-linux-gnu and
amd
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 14:40, Brendan O'Dea a écrit :
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed
> > by maintainers.
> >
> > perl
> > perl-modules
>
> These two packages are meant to be installed toget
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
>maintainers.
>
> perl
> perl-modules
These two packages are meant to be installed together, split only for
arch any/all.
I'm a bit puzzled as to why
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:21:58AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote :
> * Frank Küster:
>
> > Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
> > which are generated on a Debian system, and somehow TeX is involved
> > are.
>
> And those which haven't been rebuilt could well be non-f
hi
I had the same idea some time ago
if you ever decide to work on that, I may help
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I actualy have a little hack how one could implement patch debs now to
> test this out:
>
> 1. Create an archive mirror with rsync batch files (or xdelta or
> whatever) between the
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 02:00 -0700, Matt Taggart and others wrote:
> Hi debian-devel,
>
> For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
> "multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
> binary targets on the same system, for example runn
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyfits (python2.x-pyfits for the binaries)
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Science Software Branch of the STScI
* URL : http://www.stsci.edu/resources/software_hardware/pyfits
John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello Jose,
>
> Before I reply to your message, I want to be clear that I'm going to be
> blunt here, and say exactly what I think. This is not intended to be an
> insult or an attack, but the reasons for these concerns.
>
Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plent
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:57:22AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
> > Debian GCC Maintainers
> > g++-3.3
> > g++-3.4
> > g++-4.0
> > g++-4.1
> > gcj
> > gcj-4.0
> > gcj-4.1
> > java-gcj-compat
> > libgcj-dev
> > libgcj6-dev
> > lib
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
binary targets on the same system, for example running both i386-linux-gnu and
amd64-linux-gnu binaries on the same system (ma
Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello Debian developers,
Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
maintainers.
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
console-common
console-tools
Ok, console-common will depend on ( kbd | console-tools) in the next
re
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:57:22AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> maybe the corresponding g++-X.Y and libstdc++-Z-X.Z-dev packages could
> be solved by merging these packages. Anyway, these binaries are built
> from the same source, so we should ot care-
please note that cycles that cycles of pack
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060506 12:46]:
>> if you take the 2y validity with 1y overlap, to have no problems,
>> users/images/... just have to be updated once a year (and will have a
>> life of at least one year, almost two if those are up
hi
I uploaded an experimental version of 'lightspeed', as you see in
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lightspeed/news/20060507T214839Z.html
on Sun 7th of May ; but strangely enough it does not appear, neither in
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lightspeed.html
nor in
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-b
* Frank Küster:
> Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
> which are generated on a Debian system, and somehow TeX is involved
> are.
And those which haven't been rebuilt could well be non-free anyway
(because we lack the source code). 8->
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>> Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
>> created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
>> from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve.
>
> Exactly, and this
Le Mer 10 Mai 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Le Ven 5 Mai 2006 18:41, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> >> * Lionel Elie Mamane:
> >> > Why can't we have a master key that signs the yearly keys? After
> >> > all, we have a long-term unique X.5
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about compressing all generated pdf with eg pdftk instead of gzip?
That would save on space without troubling potential readers.
Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
which are gene
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Thanks for this. I'm using backuppc at work and was considering to
> move our backups to bacula after upgrading our current hardware setup.
> Package updates and bug squashing in general was on the roadmap.
:-)
Bacula (specially 1.38.x is much better... hopefully
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:23:34AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> > antlr
> > gjdoc
>
> Somehow these seem to be false positives to me because the packages
> depend on a java runtime environment which can but does not have to
> depend on.
The dependency involve the following
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Ven 5 Mai 2006 18:41, Florian Weimer a écrit :
>> * Lionel Elie Mamane:
>> > Why can't we have a master key that signs the yearly keys? After
>> > all, we have a long-term unique X.509 master key, so what's the
>> > difference with OpenPGP?
>>
>> E
83 matches
Mail list logo
