also sprach Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.07.0001 +0200]:
> ajaxterm is a web based terminal written in python and some AJAX
> javascript for client side. It can use almost any web browser and
> even works through firewalls.
Have you considered anyterm.com? It seems like the cleaner
> I think that tools like synaptic or Debian Installer should have an option to
> provided a screenshot or/and the project logo with the text description.
The graphical version of D-I will include a "screenshot" option.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Could you please point me to an UNMERGED bug to see what it looks like ?
> (an URL to the {status=closed ; resolution=merged} bug that was reopen,
> as well as the bug in was merged "into").
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 07:52:43PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get a list of bugs opened by me, so that I can close
> any that should be closed.
>
> Is that possible with the BTS?
>
> Thanks
>
Hi Ron,
I make a hack to download someones bugs to an mbox.
http://debian.home.pip
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 04:44:23PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Initialiy this was for people with older computers, not a 2 GHz amd64
> with 2GB ram. Think P90 with 64Mb or slightly better.
>
> We are not talking "generally" here but "specific". Specific to
> certain hardware.
OP mention
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> ajaxterm is a web based terminal written in python and some AJAX javascript
> for client side.
> It can use almost any web browser and even works through firewalls.
1) I'm glad to see ajaxterm approaching Debian because I think it
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 07:52:43PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> I'd like to get a list of bugs opened by me, so that I can close
> any that should be closed.
http://bugs.debian.org/from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks
--
Frank Hart
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Hi,
I'd like to get a list of bugs opened by me, so that I can close
any that should be closed.
Is that possible with the BTS?
Thanks
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
"If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the gener
Gonéri,
> I think that tools like synaptic or Debian Installer should have
> an option to provided a screenshot or/and the project logo with
> the text description.
That's a good idea and I've got a few questions about it.
First, do you plan to make some rules for the screenshots ? Like for X11
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ajaxterm
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Antony Lesuisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://antony.lesuisse.org/qweb/trac/wiki/AjaxTerm
* License : Public Domain
Program
[Tried 'debian-user' with this question first, but there were no
responses. Now trying here. I'm not subscribed to 'debian-devel' so
please CC me if you respond!]
Original Message
Just out of curiosity, what is the Debian Way to change compiler
settings like -Ox and -march
On 4/28/06, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
> > Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
> >
>
#include
* Joey Hess [Thu, May 04 2006, 10:05:34PM]:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Once you update apt it does. That is when you notice that suddenly you
> > need the key for authentication.
>
> As I said, you have to install debian-archive-keyring first.
And many users won't do untill told
On 5/3/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to see the effects of compiling programs with -Os, I tried to get
the sources for firefox 1.5 from testing (which is what I use by
default) and compiled it with -Os, instead of -O2. The program was much
more responsive, with less use of swa
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Once you update apt it does. That is when you notice that suddenly you
>> need the key for authentication.
>
> As I said, you have to install debian-archive-keyring first.
>
>> Also on every key upgrade you have to install an u
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:02:57AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>> For Etch and Sid, it is probably a good idea to use -Os instead of -O2 at
>> least on the bigger arches (ia32, ia64, amd64, etc), as we can probably
>> trust gcc not t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libsub-install-perl
Version : 0.91
Upstream Author : Ricardo Signes, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~rjbs/Sub-Install-0.91/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libuniversal-can-perl
Version : 1.12
Upstream Author : chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~chromatic/UNIVERSAL-can-1.12/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pastescript
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pythonpaste.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
Le Sam 6 Mai 2006 11:53, Martijn van Oosterhout a écrit :
> On 5/5/06, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Proposal 1:
> >
> > a possible way would be to have two valid keys at any time. like
> > one new key per year (or 6 month like you want) with a validity of
> > 2 years (resp. one
[Martijn van Oosterhout]
> Generate the key for 2007 on 1st of December 2006. This gives everyone
> a month to get the new key before it's used.
One month is not enough. CD distributions, offline and stable
machines do not get updated every month.
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSU
Le Sam 6 Mai 2006 02:18, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Please STOP resetting the forwarded address
I do not reset, I follow duplicates, which is a most wanted feature
> and revert the changes you already did.
I never do such a thing.
sometimes it looks like so, but it's because atm, I generate co
On 5/5/06, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Proposal 1:
a possible way would be to have two valid keys at any time. like one
new key per year (or 6 month like you want) with a validity of 2 years
(resp. one year).
that would obviously mean two signatures per package (but I don
* Pierre Habouzit:
> Proposal 1:
> Proposal 2:
> Proposal ...:
Sure, it is possible to devise arbitrarily complex schemes. For a key
that is basically used to create a digital signature that protects
against tampering along the mirror network, even yearly key rotation
is way over the top.
> IMH
24 matches
Mail list logo
