retitle 351429 ITP: flasm -- command line assembler & disassembler of Flash
ActionScript bytecode
owner 351429 !
thanks
I intend to package flasm for debian. I'll need a sponsor once I have packaged
it.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On 23 Apr 2006, Miles Bader spake thusly:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I read it. I still think that my answer suffices: Put your
>> pipeline in a script, and set that to PAGER.
>
> Your answer doesn't "suffice," because it's not what people expect
> -- PAGER has historically
On 23 Apr 2006, Loïc Minier verbalised:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Since allowing pipelines seems to be the motivating factor
>> here, we do need to solve that, I think.
>
> Yes, indeed, the root of the problem is the change of support for
> pipelines. However, I'm not sur
David Nusinow wrote:
> I don't think the target market for tasksel is fundamentally different from
> that of the large metapackages like kde or xorg. People make exactly the
> same complaints about metapackages. What I'm proposing is that we eliminate
> the distinction entirely and just move the ma
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 19:42, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 06:59:41PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > * "Clogging Britney" is subjective.
>
> Having the metapackage kicked out of testing and having the release team
> refuse to help you get it back into the release because you ignored
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 06:59:41PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 13:57, Joey Hess wrote:
> > In the head of this thread, I posted a message listing several problems
> > with metapackages. All of these problems may not apply to all
> > metapackages at all times, but in sum they all
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I read it. I still think that my answer suffices: Put your
> pipeline in a script, and set that to PAGER.
Your answer doesn't "suffice," because it's not what people expect --
PAGER has historically (for a _long_ time) supported arguments bei
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 07:40:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> David Nusinow wrote:
> > I think a fundamental problem is that we're seeing is that tasksel hasn't
> > generally been sold very well to anyone. I've tried myself to push it
> > towards users in #debian, but immediately people hop up and c
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 13:57, Joey Hess wrote:
> In the head of this thread, I posted a message listing several problems
> with metapackages. All of these problems may not apply to all
> metapackages at all times, but in sum they all apply in general and are
> a good reason not to use metapackages f
Frans Pop wrote:
> IMO that is not really a very nice policy. Wouldn't it be possible to
> update the meta packages after each KDE transition has settled down?
>
> Seems to me that there are not that many KDE releases that could not be
> done and it would help the general quality of testing.
It
On Sunday 23 April 2006 23:14, Luk Claes wrote:
> Note that the KDE meta packages are only really taken care of near a
> release because of the transitioning problems... If the meta packages
> get to testing earlier it's very probable they will not be installable
> for a long time...
IMO that is n
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:46:16AM -0700, kris kvilekval wrote :
> We are looking for someone with packaging experience to help package OME
> (http://www.openmicroscopy.org/) for debian on a paid basis.
> BTW if this is not the correct forum, please let me know.
Dear Kris,
As far as I know, de
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Yes, that's a problem but i would like to see these metapackages only
> in sid, see below my purposes...
Hmm, my own experience with maintaining a package that never got out of
sid is that it's a waste of time..
> > * Their all or nothing nature making it a pain to put th
David Nusinow wrote:
> I think a fundamental problem is that we're seeing is that tasksel hasn't
> generally been sold very well to anyone. I've tried myself to push it
> towards users in #debian, but immediately people hop up and cry out that
> it's crap, despite my protests. Whether it's ignorant
Michael Banck wrote:
> Can you maybe explain what the current status is for those of us who
> haven't installed etch lately and/or ran tasksel?
>
> IIRC Frans Pop said at FOSDEM that some changes for the desktop task
> were implemented since sarge, I don't remember what exactly that was.
> E.g., c
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 07:10:44PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Should I file a bug somewhere about this? Clearly I hit a corner case
> that dak doesn't handle quite right.
About the empty mail, eh, I see #300599, seems I noticed it before.
Amazing how fast time goes though -- guess I really shou
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:57:32PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:57:32PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as some might have noticed the
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missin
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:57:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> So far this entire thread has managed to be a useless distraction from
> the question at hand, which is how to make Debian's desktop task the
> best collection of packages it can be. I hope that if Gustavo hasn't
> been scared off by the
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:57:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> So far this entire thread has managed to be a useless distraction from
> the question at hand, which is how to make Debian's desktop task the
> best collection of packages it can be. I hope that if Gustavo hasn't
> been scared off by the
The bug is still open:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142164;msg=66
andrew
On 4/24/06, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This bug was closed by spam, but it looks like this problem is actually
> fixed enough for me, so I'll leave it closed:
>
> apt-cache show lftp
> Mai
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:14:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Note that the KDE meta packages are only really taken care of near a
> release because of the transitioning problems... If the meta packages
> get to testing earlier it's very probable they will not be installable
> for a long time...
Th
On 4/23/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco blogged:
> > In Ubuntu there' s ubuntu-meta source package that results in
> > [ubuntu-minimal][1], [ubuntu-standard][2] and [ubuntu-desktop][3]. They're
> > metapackages and the list of packages is built with a tool called germinate
Joey Hess wrote:
> Mike Bird wrote:
>> Metapackages are great. Need to add KDE to a system? Wham. Done.
>> If you don't like them, don't install them.
>
> The kde metpackage is a spacial case, since KDE is all one related
> thing, that shares a release schedule. And yet it still causes many of
Mike Bird wrote:
> However, metapackage equivalents of Debian tasks would have much
> more reasonable numbers of dependencies - I think "desktop" is
> the most complex with 18.
In the head of this thread, I posted a message listing several problems
with metapackages. All of these problems may not
I am orphaning lirc, it deserves a better maintainer.
Please contact me if you are interested.
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think
: :' : I have ended up where I needed to be -- Douglas Adams
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- w
[Hendrik Sattler]
> Should kdebluetooth fix the include statements or should the
> openobex.pc file say that "includedir=${prefix}/include/openobex"?
If the API documentation say , then kdebluetooth
should use that when including the header.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 12:23, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Hmmm... I'm not an expert but I think it goes like this:
>
> - metapackage in 'testing' which (unversioned) depends: A and B
> (in testing A, version 1, and B, version 1, get along together)
> - The maintainers decide that, fo
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missing
> >
> > /debian/pool/main/f/firefox/firefox_1.5.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Since allowing pipelines seems to be the motivating factor
> here, we do need to solve that, I think.
Yes, indeed, the root of the problem is the change of support for
pipelines. However, I'm not sure that pipelines worked in the use case
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missing
>
> /debian/pool/main/f/firefox/firefox_1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2.orig.tar.gz
>
> The missing file has a sideeffect for the debian-amd64 archive be
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:20:04AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Ideally, tasksel would be changed to use the dependencies of
> > > any meta package WITHOUT installing the meta package.
> >
> > This doesn't address the issues with testing migrat
Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I feel that the current /etc/profile or the future (if that plan is
> commenced) /etc/profile does not do any service whatsoever since it
> does not improve the situation.
> The policy's purpose should not to hinder development but guide it to
> sensible d
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Ideally, tasksel would be changed to use the dependencies of
> > any meta package WITHOUT installing the meta package.
>
> This doesn't address the issues with testing migration at all.
Maybe I'm a slow learner. How does adding a package wit
| On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Jari Aalto wrote:
|
| > | Please note that policy says:
| > |
| > |A program must not depend on environment variables to get reasonable
| > |defaults.
| > |
| > | The way I read this, whatever "good" defaults you think should be in
| > | /etc/profile, should be inste
* Mike Bird:
> Metapackages are great. Need to add KDE to a system? Wham. Done.
> If you don't like them, don't install them.
The KDE case is different because the dependencies of the kde package
are already intertwined.
> Ideally, tasksel would be changed to use the dependencies of
> any met
Mike Bird wrote:
> Metapackages are great. Need to add KDE to a system? Wham. Done.
> If you don't like them, don't install them.
The kde metpackage is a spacial case, since KDE is all one related
thing, that shares a release schedule. And yet it still causes many of
the problems I mentioned. T
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 10:18, Joey Hess wrote:
> Gustavo Franco blogged:
> > In Ubuntu there' s ubuntu-meta source package that results in
> > [ubuntu-minimal][1], [ubuntu-standard][2] and [ubuntu-desktop][3]. They're
> > metapackages and the list of packages is built with a tool called germinate
>
Gustavo Franco blogged:
> In Ubuntu there' s ubuntu-meta source package that results in
> [ubuntu-minimal][1], [ubuntu-standard][2] and [ubuntu-desktop][3]. They're
> metapackages and the list of packages is built with a tool called germinate
> based on a seed in the web. I've a [branch of cjwatson
Hello
We are looking for someone with packaging experience to help package OME
(http://www.openmicroscopy.org/)
for debian on a paid basis.
This could be a ont-time or an on-going task depending on the
complexity and time involved for
maintenance. Please contact Illya at [EMAIL PROTECTED] f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: weechat-scripts
Upstream Author : Various authors
* URL : http://weechat.flashtux.org/plugins.php
* License : GPL, public domain
Programming Lang: Perl, Python, Lua, Ruby
Descript
This bug was closed by spam, but it looks like this problem is actually
fixed enough for me, so I'll leave it closed:
apt-cache show lftp
Maintainer: Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It still shows UTF-8 when ISO-8859-1 is set, so the original "apt: output
ignores locale" bug is really still there,
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 23. April 2006 13:39 schrieb Michael Meskes:
> Package: libopenobex1-dev
> Version: 1.2-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Since we couldn't agree on this in private email I think we should try
> to get a more public discussion started. Thus this bug report.
>
> libopenobex1-dev stores its h
Hi,
as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missing
/debian/pool/main/f/firefox/firefox_1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2.orig.tar.gz
The missing file has a sideeffect for the debian-amd64 archive because
the sync-script detects an inconsistency and stops. Since it goes
alphabeticaly and package after f
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 09:46:08AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I wanted to do that from the very first day of the PTS but Ryan Murray
> never agreed to send mails on failed build. He said that many
> compilations fail because of a (temporarily) broken buildd and that
> it would generate too man
Em Dom, 2006-04-23 às 01:37 +0200, Kurt Roeckx escreveu:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The currently library seems to be libgtkdatabox-0.2.4.so.7.0.0
> and has an soname of libgtkdatabox-0.2.4.so.7. I guess the the
> new one will have something like libgtkdatab
retitle 263051 O: sourcenav -- Source code analysis, editor, browser
and build tool
thanks
Hello,
I am orphaning the package now but I am willing to sponsor uploads for
an experienced maintainer (people that already maintain other
packages). Please Cc: your replies to me because I do not read
d
48 matches
Mail list logo
