Scripsit Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What's the general consensus on this?
> http://www.eiffel.com/general/news/2006/2006_04_05_pr.html
The press release ought to have been clearer. It took me about a dozen
clicks from their press release to discover that the unspecified "Open
source license" t
Sorry, the message was intended for d-p, please do not follow up here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Marc and fellow Debian friends,
Thanks for this cogent and clear summary of the problem as you see it.
It reminds me a bit of the problem of scientific peer-review; for-pay
journals often ask people to donate their limitted time reviewing
other people's work. Although the journal profits, t
Hello,
my comments as someone planning to enter NM during the next couple of
month follow.
Overall I find your analysis enlightening. I agree with those points I
do not discuss here.
> 1.2.1 Add more people
[Marc argues that this is not a long solution]
I disagree here up to a certain point. I
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
>> 2.1 Multiple advocates
>> --
>>
>
>
>> Ask for more than one advocate (at the moment, I'm thinking about
>> two). This should get the number of people advocated with a
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> 2.1 Multiple advocates
> --
> Ask for more than one advocate (at the moment, I'm thinking about
> two). This should get the number of people advocated with a "Errr,
> I met him, he seemed nice" down. At t
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:44:57PM -0300, Andr? Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware.
> I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
>
> - x-window-system-core
Note that this metapackage
I've been trying to reach Thorsten Sauter for some time now. I've sent
him a couple emails over the last month and have heard nothing back. I
was recently involved in an NMU of libphp-adodb, which he maintains and
was 6 months out of date and had serveral security problems. There was
even a backpor
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:10:39AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
> utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
>
> I'm uploading the exact packages at
> http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with "dput
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with "dput" to the
anonymous queue on ftp-master. The upload goes well, I see them if I
ftp
* Andr Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060411 18:45]:
> - x-window-system-core
> - xfce4 (beautiful!)
> - gdm
[...]
> - gnome-ppp
> - gnome-utils
Definitions differ, but I'd not call something "light" pulling in
half of gnome. What about "Debian Light Gnome Desktop"?
Hochachtungsvoll
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:53:29PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want
> to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
> Current status:
> source package: texinfo
> orig file: texinfo_4.8.or
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:29:44PM +0800, Katipo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What's the general consensus on this?
If Eiffel Studio is under GPL, then it can be included in Debian.
There isn't really much else to it, as far as Debian is concerned.
There is already an ITP on it: http://bugs.debian.org/36
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear all!
>
> I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want
> to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
>
> Current status:
> source package: texinfo
> orig file: texinfo_4.8.orig.tar
Hello
Just wanted to show you what I did in a few hours. Any comments or
wishes for extensions/changes are welcome. Preferably with patches.
http://io.debian.net/~tar/bugstats/
Cheers,
Gürkan
btw, this runs on debian gnu/kfreebsd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
HOLA!!!
Te invito a conocer mi nueva pagina Web con nuevas fotos y nuevos precios!!!
www.perfumes.com.py
Fragancias con la misma calidad de siempre: C. Dior, Carolina Herrera, H. Boss,
C. Kleyn, etc. para hombres y mujeres. Más de 70 variedades. Precios desde Gs
40.000 a Gs 115.000
Solicita
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:29:44PM +0800, Katipo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What's the general consensus on this?
>
> http://www.eiffel.com/general/news/2006/2006_04_05_pr.html
>
> A good move?
> Or dangerous?
> Regards,
There's nothing wrong with that -- MySQL does the very same thing, and
has been d
Hello,
What's the general consensus on this?
http://www.eiffel.com/general/news/2006/2006_04_05_pr.html
A good move?
Or dangerous?
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:44:57 -0300
"André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware.
That's an admiral goal, however I would be prepare
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 13:44 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware.
> I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
>
> - x-window-system-core
> - xfce4 (beautiful!)
> - gdm
> -
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:56:50AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Bill Allombert [Tue, Apr 11 2006, 12:34:45AM]:
>
> Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming "WindowManagers/Modules" to
> "$wm Modules" (one level above WM starters and indicating which
> "modules" are meant by that).
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 18:40, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
> I'd like to implement the proposals I made in (2.1) and (2.2) as fast
> as possible, especially applying the rules in (2.2) to people already
> in the queue waiting for an AM.
I agree both points are a good thing, and should be impleme
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 13:44 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware.
Great task.
> I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
>
> - x-window-system-core
> - xfce4 (beautiful!
Hi !
I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
machines with poor hardware.
I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
- x-window-system-core
- xfce4 (beautiful!)
- gdm
- gftp
- mozilla-firefox
- mozilla-thunderbird
- menu
- gcalctool (or xcalc)
- evince
- eog
-
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > right, but that makes a nasty circular dependency I thought we
> > should avoid at any rate ? Shouldn't libc-bin rather conflicts with
> > bad version of the libc ?
> I think that circle is unavoidable.
right, I forgot about the
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060411 15:27]:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > When doing a full upgrade (stable->unstable) could it happen that apt
> > breaks the libc6<->libc-bin depends cycle and put them into seperate
> > dpkg calls? I don't remember how smart
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 15:08, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> When doing a full upgrade (stable->unstable) could it happen that apt
> breaks the libc6<->libc-bin depends cycle and put them into seperate
> dpkg calls? I don't remember how smart/stupid libapt was there. It
> might be best to add "apt
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6
>> here. The former is needed to always pull in libc-bin on upgrades and
>> the later is needed to ensure the minimum ve
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>
>> > I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6
>> > here. The former is needed to always pull in
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 12:09, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > > I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on
> > > libc6 here. The former is needed to alway
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Furia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ossec-hids
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Daniel B. Cid
* URL : http://www.ossec.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Host-based intrusion detec
Dear all!
I am moving out the GFDL documentation from the texinfo package and want
to ask whether the following procedure is the right way to do it:
Current status:
source package: texinfo
orig file: texinfo_4.8.orig.tar.gz
binary packages:texinfo_4.8-8, info_4.8-8
N
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6
> > here. The former is needed to always pull in libc-bin on upgrades and
> > the later is needed t
Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Le Lun 10 Avril 2006 19:41, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> >> Anthony Towns a écrit :
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > This is a reject of the new -bin packages (both of them).
> >> >
> >> > The issues
Forwarding to debian-glibc.
Please don't CC debian-devel on replies.
MfG
Goswin
"Luo Yong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's some problem occured when I cross compiling glibc.
>
> ==
> In file included from ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc-lowlevellock.c:21:
> ../nptl/sysdeps/uni
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Lun 10 Avril 2006 19:41, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>> Anthony Towns a écrit :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is a reject of the new -bin packages (both of them).
>> >
>> > The issues with the -bin package are that it may cause upgrade
>> > problems, both in
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Yep. WRT you said above, what abot renaming "WindowManagers/Modules" to
> "$wm Modules" (one level above WM starters and indicating which
> "modules" are meant by that).
One more thing to consider is that if we will have to to move/rename
modules in the future (current situa
37 matches
Mail list logo
