this e-mail is for mr Masatoshi
Watanabe
excuse-me for this e-mail
I am Danièle Desjardin, I lived 8 rue de
Fontaine in BRETEUIL SUR NOYE OISE
Are you Masatoshi Watanabe who lived Toshima-Ku in
Tokyo
I writed with Masatoshi en 1964
Are you Him ?
excuse-me again for this e-mail and thank you
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
This has to include a copyright year, also.
...and following additional discussion, the resolution is:
After considering the suggestion, I have decided to close this
bug.
The year really should be included. At least in the US, not having a
year in the notice a
Christopher Bodenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Is available for Windows, Linux and other Unix operating
> systems.
> * Does not require any installation on Windows: unzip, it works!
Er, do we really want windows advertisements in the packages file?
-Miles
--
Americans
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guilherme Mesquita Gondim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dbdesigner
Version : 4
* License : GPL
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.fabforce.net/dbdesigner4
Description : DBDesigner 4
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've requested the binNMU to be done, it should probably get
> build tomorrow somewhere.
Thanks.
> For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, thanks; I considered that, but wasn't sure it was focused enough.
(Granted, -devel isn't that focused
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
> > debian changelog files.
>
> Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
> befo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: opencity
Version : 0.0.3stable
Upstream Author : Duong-Khang NGUYEN
* URL : http://www.opencity.info/
* License : GPL
Description : a 3D city simulator game
O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-rfc2109
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Alan Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/rfc2109/
* License : BSD
Description : a cookie library for Common Lisp based on RFC 2109
r
Hello!
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:29:48 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Some extra hints:
>
> - Its not enough to have the following two-liner:
> | On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public
> | License can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'
> | file.
>
> There
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-trivial-sockets
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Daniel Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.cliki.net/trivial-sockets
* License : see below
Description : a Common Lisp socket interface
trivial-s
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:25:43PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Yee-ha! This makes a wonderful (if moderately belated) first birthday
> present for my em64t workstation. :-)
>
> One question, though: what's the contact address for the new buildd's
> administrators? I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] (to
Yee-ha! This makes a wonderful (if moderately belated) first birthday
present for my em64t workstation. :-)
One question, though: what's the contact address for the new buildd's
administrators? I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] (to call #359023 to their
attention), but it bounces.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:24:50PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:06 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> > The resolution which passed excludes documentation with front cover
>> > texts. Read it.
>>
>> I re-read it, and it
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:24:50PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:06 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > The resolution which passed excludes documentation with front cover
> > texts. Read it.
>
> I re-read it, and it states:
> | This means that works that don't include
On 3/27/06, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been working on a Perl script to use pbuilder to do a recompilation of
> the archive off and on for a few years now. There are a few packages, such
> as gnat, which obviously cannot be compiled from scratch, but otherwise I've
> managed
Le samedi 21 janvier 2006 à 10:17 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> [Jérôme Warnier]
> > But why would you want to become a DD if you are not willing to
> > maintain a package. Debian is just about maintaining packages.
>
> Debian needs more than just people maintaining packages. We need
> p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Cabizza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sabayon
Version : 2.12.3
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : A system a
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 19:31 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-03-20 16:31:39, schrieb Ricardo Mones:
>
> > > [1] http://libetpan.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > It's already used in at least 2 MUAs (packages: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
> > and etpan-ng). Using claws I've regularly handled IMAP inboxes
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
> before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable -> stable
> updates occur more or less over the whole stable+1 development circle.
>
> S
On 10606 March 1977, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am packaging a program for debian, and wrote a manpage and two patches
> for making it compile with libwxwindows. I am not very interested in
> being the author list: I would be a bit ashamed that my name would
> appear more frequently that the author
On 10606 March 1977, Henning Makholm wrote:
> But is the Debian copyright file supposed to describe the source
> package? Not according to my understanding; the source package already
> includes the various upstream copyright messages in their original
> positions.
We distribute the source, and t
On 10605 March 1977, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> As *many* rejects out of the NEW-Queue[2] are still due to broken or
>> incomplete copyright-files - lets refresh that information.
> Just for clarification, since there seems to be this increased
> interest in copyright notices: Do developers need to
On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
> debian changelog files.
Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable -> stable
updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
touch /var/lib/racoon/racoon.conf
- --
Greetings!!
_
M.Sc. José Raúl Barreras
Security Officer
G3Security
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla
* Michelle Konzack wrote:
> In some folders (like LKM) I have more then 280.000 messages!
apt-get install archivemail
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am 2006-03-20 16:31:39, schrieb Ricardo Mones:
> > [1] http://libetpan.sourceforge.net/
>
> It's already used in at least 2 MUAs (packages: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
> and etpan-ng). Using claws I've regularly handled IMAP inboxes of 20k
> mails without trouble. I don't know for larger values of "lar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christopher Bodenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nihongobenkyo
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Mathieu Blondel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nihongobenkyo.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Niho
¡Tengo nueva dirección de correo!Ahora puedes escribirme a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]A votre Attention,Permettez-moi de vous informer de mon désire d'entrée dans le rapport d'affaires avec vous. je pense que vous êtes digne de la recommandation de ma prière donc une personne honorable de confiance que je
Hi,
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 17:40]:
> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10605 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
> >> * Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-26 20:31]:
> >>> A while ago Peter 'weasel' Palfrader wrote a nice little "How (not) to
> >>> write copy
Hello
> Usually people want the source package here. I see it is available on
> your web page, but as the directory is not browsable, it's a bit
> annoying to find.
Sorry about that.
The source package is available at:
http://www.mesing.de/packagesearch/packagesearch_2.1.tar.gz
And .dsc and .ch
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>>> > And we ignore any (C) FSF in generated autofoo stuff.
>
>>> The generated autofoo stuff does not end up in the .deb, so the
>>> copyright fil
Re: Benjamin Mesing 2006-03-27 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You can download the package from
> http://www.mesing.de/packagesearch/packagesearch_2.1_i386.deb
> and a pgp signature from:
> http://www.mesing.de/packagesearch/packagesearch_2.1_i386.deb.sig
Usually people want the source package here. I see
Le Lundi 27 Mars 2006 11:54, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > By the way: my latest experiment is putting in a hook script to build
> > everything as if it were a binNMU, with a version of e.g. 1.2-3+pb1, in
> > order to help apt distinguish those versions from th
Scripsit Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> > And we ignore any (C) FSF in generated autofoo stuff.
>> The generated autofoo stuff does not end up in the .deb, so the
>> copyright file needs not describe it.
> It often ends up in the
Hello,
I want to close #355625 which says that packagesearch crashes on startup
if debtags is not installed.
I have implemented a solution that should fix this, but since Justin
said it is somewhat unreproducable once debtags was installed (pbuilder,
and tested with dancer's xnest recipe) and I
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > And we ignore any (C) FSF in generated autofoo stuff.
>
> The generated autofoo stuff does not end up in the .deb, so the
> copyright file needs not describe it.
It often ends up in the source package (depending when you run the
autotools), which we
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Micha Lenk wrote:
uh, it's not that common to get general linux support using the debian BTS,
isn't it?
I'm asking not for general Linux support. I just detected a bug
after a weekly upgrade from testing to newer testing and I file
it against general because nobody was ab
Scripsit Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Re: Raphael Hertzog 2006-03-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Each package with translations has several dozens of copyright holder,
>> we don't have to keep that list in the copyright file, do we ?
> And we ignore any (C) FSF in generated autofoo stuff.
The
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #357877
Owner: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I intend to adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=th_TH, LC_CTYPE=th_TH (charma
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 21:20 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am packaging a program for debian, and wrote a manpage and two patches
> > for making it compile with libwxwindows. I am not very interested in
> > being the author list: I would be a bit as
Le Samedi 25 Mars 2006 22:54, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> Obviously, compiling the archive from source leads to many important
> insights. What I found out over the last two weeks is just how much
> work it actually is. We should try to create better infrastructure
> to make manual compilation o
41 matches
Mail list logo
