Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You won't be able to stay away from tcl/tk for too long if you want GUIs,
>
> Huh? My desktop is 100% tk-free...
Yeah, me too; I actually use that as one criterion to decide whether I
really want to install some random borderline useful utility... :-)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 12:46:30AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Not so fast. If the light weight system is to be kept as small as
> > possible, the additional tcl/Tk libraries would not be welcomed.
> You won't be able to stay away from tcl
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> What about using .tar.7z files to fix those problems?
What about writing a gzip-like utility using the improved 7zip compression,
and doing that the way bzip and gzip are done (a very sane library we can
call directly from inside apps, and a command-lin
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Not so fast. If the light weight system is to be kept as small as
> possible, the additional tcl/Tk libraries would not be welcomed.
You won't be able to stay away from tcl/tk for too long if you want GUIs,
but I see your point.
> GTK at least is common to
Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not to day that Python is bad - It has better OO, which Perl
> unfortunately negletted fromt he very starts. Now, talk about Perl OO
> and that's hairy!.
Actually, Python *also* ignored OO at the beginning.
It has grafted it on, but since real OO
Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Perl syntax is elegant, efficient and Python's regexp handling is
> nowhere as intuitive as needed for day-to-day tasks where the poer is
> needed.
Efficient, perhaps, but _elegant_?!? HAhahahahah1hahah3$I17-e87
Perl is an utter mess, with a few nice
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 322762 by 319726
Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug)
Was blocked by: 189856 190020 203278 254800 254913 254924 254930 255590 256250
302504 320084 320103 321926 322749 322769 322772 322775 322776 322778 322779
322781 32278
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Nicolas François" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pootle
Version : 0.6.3.20060126
Upstream Author : David Fraser, translate.org.za
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/translate
* License : GPL
Description :
All Brands of Jeans 29.99 USD
www.charshaf.com
Dolce Gabbana, Armani, Prada etc..
if you want to opt-out from mailing list just reply and use subject "leave me
alone"
Thanks for checking
Current email was sent by
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 21:28, Frans Pop wrote:
> + href="http://groups.google.com/advanced_search?q=""+group%3Alinux.debian.bugs.dist";>
Hmm. Quotes within quotes probably won't work, so this is better:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_search?q=+group%3Alinux.debian.bugs.dist";>
pgpauf7f
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 20:56, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 15, kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This kind of thing is not possible currently. Do you think it is a
> > good implement such a feature? Currently bugs.kde.org allows this
> > (searching for strings in the bug rep
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:19 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>
>> And if we followed the the line of argument you are pressing
>> uncritically, we'd bloat essential/base with gazillions of
>> interpreters from people too lazy or incom
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 14:10 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi
>
>I wanted to report a minor bug on kicker using reportbug package
> tool. But then it forces me to read a huge number of bug titles (around
> 647 of them) most of which were not filed against kicker. For example it
> shows
--- Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> There are more alternatives: http://rzip.samba.org/
>From the same web page:
"rzip is not for everyone! The two biggest disadvantages are that you can't
pipeline rzip (so it can't read from standard input or write to standard
output), and that it
On Feb 15, kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This kind of thing is not possible currently. Do you think it is a good
> implement such a feature? Currently bugs.kde.org allows this (searching
> for strings in the bug reports without worrying about package names etc.,).
You use goog
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> #include
> * Lars Wirzenius [Wed, Feb 15 2006, 10:42:02AM]:
>
>> (Once we use .tar.bz2, the sizes will be even smaller.)
>
> I cannot remember a clear consens from the "Size matters" thread, and
> IMO we should go for 7zip at least for source packages.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:25:07PM +0300, =?UTF-8?Q?
=D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=80=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=BD_?=
=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9B=D1=8C=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=87 ?= wrote:
> First, I suggested .zip just for an example. There are other similar
> archivers with bigger compression ratio.
>
>
> One
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 03:35 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
>> > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Tue, 20
John Goerzen a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include
* Lars Wirzenius [Wed, Feb 15 2006, 10:42:02AM]:
(Once we use .tar.bz2, the sizes will be even smaller.)
I cannot remember a clear consens from the "Size matters" thread, and
IMO we should go for
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can you all provide more information on
>
>> "too buggy that we refuse to support it"
>> full of malloc(FIXED_NUM)
>
>> So that I can take this to upstream. Is there improvements
>> that you would like to propose?
I noticed that later.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Lars Wirzenius [Wed, Feb 15 2006, 10:42:02AM]:
>
> > (Once we use .tar.bz2, the sizes will be even smaller.)
>
> I cannot remember a clear consens from the "Size matters" thread, and
> IMO we should go for 7zip at least
Hi
I wanted to report a minor bug on kicker using reportbug package
tool. But then it forces me to read a huge number of bug titles (around
647 of them) most of which were not filed against kicker. For example it
shows bugs against kdeprinter, kate, konsole etc., Why is this so? I
think it
Hi folks,
sbuild 0.38 has been released; the changelog follows at the end of
this message. It's tagged in CVS as sbuild_0_38, and has been
uploaded to experimental. It is also available at
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/sbuild-0.38/
If you are a user of sbuild, it would be greatly appreciated
* Jari Aalto [Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:13:36 +0200]:
> The HELO argument may be funny,
It says something about the author.
> but the package seems to work okay. This list weight GUI version of
> sending mail (in contrast to console based ones; mutt etc.), is very
> small application that is suitabl
#include
* Lars Wirzenius [Wed, Feb 15 2006, 10:42:02AM]:
> (Once we use .tar.bz2, the sizes will be even smaller.)
I cannot remember a clear consens from the "Size matters" thread, and
IMO we should go for 7zip at least for source packages.
Eduard.
--
For any stupid thing chosen at random, yo
Портон Виктор Львович <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not always. For example, apache2 package is split into two packages:
> apache2 and apache2-doc (and also apache2-dev and several others). To
> Build apache2 binary package most of documentation files are not
> needed. In the case of apache2 downl
First, I suggested .zip just for an example. There are other similar archivers
with bigger compression ratio.
>> 3. Users could be then able to mount a .zip file from the Debian FTP
server
>> and compile a package directly from the server. This would reduce
download
>> I deem some about 50% compa
Hi,
I am Alex accounts manager of Skymkglobal. We just opened a new office and
currently looking for reliable partners that would benefit of our services.
We successfully run an customer service and reactivation project for a
company like yours. We are located in Europe, Romania and we have 5
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Please recreate base.tgz for this to take effect.
> What's the issue?
Sorry, I missed the changelog entry (it took a while for me to trigger
that bug and someone else using a newer chroot but probably
pbuilder/stable had the same problem but I didn't think of him not us
Hi,
> Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > Have you tried just recreating base.tgz with an up-to-date pbuilder?
> Ah, no. Cool. I'll have to file a wishlist item against pbuilder to
> update its configuration upon update.
One problem is that currently policy-rc.d is just stuffed in without
any version con
Hi,
>
> I'm seeking advice on the following problem:
> - xvfb-run bails out on nonexistant / not root-owned /tmp/.X11-unix,
> - a/my pbuilder chroot won't have /tmp/.X11-unix,
> - I need some X (xvfb is fine) to build libaqbanking (glade-2 code
> generation needs X bug).
>
> A working work-aro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyqonsole
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Logilab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.logilab.org/projects/pyqonsole
* License : CeCILL
Description : X term
Am 2006-02-07 14:40:52, schrieb Ian Jackson:
> 2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data loss,
> data corruption, or an overly broken system, or the package is broken
> or not usable (anymore).
>
> That seems to be true in this case. I think a system which gets the
> clock
Scripsit Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>>You are supposed to write an appropriate shlibs file, as described in
>>policy �8.6. Have you done so?
> My file is currently automatically generated by dh_shlibdeps, and says
> "libargtable2 0 libargtable2-0".
No it isn't.
Chandan M. C. wrote:
> Hai ,
>
> Is it possible to change the menu name ... I need to change the "debian
> menu" what is appearing in "Applications" start menu of gnome ... Instead
> of debian menu I need some other name ... How and whr I can change If
> I want to change in source in which pk
ke, 2006-02-15 kello 04:00 +0500, Victor Porton kirjoitti:
> Here is my plan how to reduce Debian servers load and users Debian packages
> download bandwidth:
>
> 1. Package in .zip (or a similar format) instead of .tar.{gz,bz2}
Picking a random package:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 liw liw 18113820 Mar 18 2
Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:31:57 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352912: general: Reduce network load using zip packaging
and VFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
37 matches
Mail list logo
