On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:41:03AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:53:39PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > Nobody is lying. A "lie" is an untruth made with the intent to
> > deceive. Debian doesn't try to hide these unmodifiable licenses;
> > it's been discussed open
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:53:39PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> The reason I would do this is the same reason I often get so vocal
>> and sometimes angry about these matters: the issue of honesty. I
>> feel that the current sit
Scripsit Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From http://gitmail.sourceforge.net/ :
> This piece of software allows to send e-mails to any person
> over the net with a fake email address, and also a fake name.
Is this a feature, even? I should think all regular MUAs in Debian
happily allow
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> However, there is also a dishonest way. That is to leave the Social
>> Contract claiming that everything in Debian is free (or "free software",
>> doesn't matter) according to the DFSG, but then to go ahead and put
>> DFSG-non-free stuff into Debian. A
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:08 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: gitmail
> > Version : 0.4
> > Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> The reason I would do this is the same reason I often get so vocal and
> sometimes angry about these matters: the issue of honesty. I feel that the
> current situation is one in which Debian is using its Social Contract to
> lie t
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:08 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gitmail
> Version : 0.4
> Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gitmail
> * Li
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or
> > by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I
> > can't even
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This belongs somewhere else. Directing followups to -project.
>
> Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:31:43AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > Incidentally, if I ever become a DD, I will immediately propose a
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or
> by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I
> can't even unpack the sources " with no Invariant Sections, with no
> Front-Cover T
Hi,
I'm seeking advice on the following problem:
- xvfb-run bails out on nonexistant / not root-owned /tmp/.X11-unix,
- a/my pbuilder chroot won't have /tmp/.X11-unix,
- I need some X (xvfb is fine) to build libaqbanking (glade-2 code
generation needs X bug).
A working work-around is build-depe
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:23:03PM +0100, J??r??me Marant wrote:
>> For instance, how does shipping Emacs with verbatim essays from RMS, the GNU
>> Manifesto, and any other stuffs like that makes it non-free? Will removing
>> them make Debian more free? I doubt anyone is
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:59:42PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:38:03PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Oops. I think I was careless.
> ...
> > > It looks like "synclient" is not always used.
> >
On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant outgrape:
>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>> On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
>>> The only people it made happy are extremists.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gitmail
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gitmail
* License : GPL
Description : Very simple graphical mail user
Hi,
I have a machine with multiple user accounts on it. On that
machine, I use cryptsetup to encrypt _all_ the partitions and swap,
apart from /boot. The machine runs SELinux, to provide and enforce
privilege separation, and my working area is labelled user_work_t.
Now, I also
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:38:03PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Oops. I think I was careless.
...
> > It looks like "synclient" is not always used.
>
> Be really careful then! We have to synchronize uploads when the shared
>
2006/2/11, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There isn't anything to do with politess. If I hurted you, them please
> accept my apologies. But I'm frank enough to express my view as I
> feel them. As a non-native English speaker, the vocabulary might
> not always be appropriate.
Hmm, you should
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: treeviewx
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~rpage/treeviewx/
* License : GPL
Description : TreeView X disp
* Joe Smith:
> http://people.debian.org/~forcer/debian-scheme-policy/debian-scheme-policy.html/
>
> Which may be an unofficial policy mandates certain symlinks managed
> by alternatives to scheme interpreters based on what they
> support. The virtual package names have been accepted by consensus
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
