Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio, you seem to have been his sponsor, do you have any news from
> him in the last 6 months (or since January, 1st 2005, for that
> matter)? Anybody else?
I didn't have any news from him. :(
I think would be fine if you take over the package.
Thank you for your email. Please note that the Asia Art Archive is closed from
Saturday 28th January 2006 until 10am on the 1st of February 2006 to celebrate
the Chinese New Year.
We apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Kung Hei Fat Choi!
The Asia Art Archive
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I still haven't heard back from Fabio Rafaek da Rosa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, my first MIA-test contact was > 2 months
ago.
Otavio, you seem to have been his sponsor, do you have any news from
him in the last 6 months (or since January, 1st 2005, for that
matter)? Anybody else?
On Thu, Dec 08, 2
* Isaac Jones:
> I'd like to ask the Debian community to look at Haskell98 and some of
> the "research" extensions[2] and give us some input as to what would
> make Haskell more attractive to you.
Uhm, most of the things on Debian's (as opposed to individual
developer's) whishlist are quality-of-
> > so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
> > Is the procedure described above still the right one?
>
> DAM is very slow-moving these days. Probably they haven't looked at your
mail
> yet.
Um, just in case anyone was wondering, that wasn't intended as a criticism of
DAM -- I t
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:49:09PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> So, one conclusion is clear : Nobody wants a second installer for the
> Macromedia Flash Plugin. Efforts should go to flashplugin-nonfree.
> Thanks for the comments leading to this consensus.
>
> Less clear to me is "what now". The
So, one conclusion is clear : Nobody wants a second installer for the
Macromedia Flash Plugin. Efforts should go to flashplugin-nonfree.
Thanks for the comments leading to this consensus.
Less clear to me is "what now". The maintainer of flashplugin-nonfree
seems to be busy with other things. W
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:22:46 +0100, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:06:20AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Am 2006-01-28 13:27:11, schrieb W. Borgert:
>> > I have a package that is configured and compiled two times, so
>> > that two binary packages are buil
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:06:20AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-01-28 13:27:11, schrieb W. Borgert:
> > I have a package that is configured and compiled two times, so
> > that two binary packages are built in one dpkg-buildpackage run:
> > One with --enable-gnome, the second without. Is
Scripsit Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If people find Perl too hard (feh), and python too ugly,
> regressive syntactically, and counter intuitive, and want ruby, or
> scheme, or haskell, what then?
Unless there is a requirement that maintainer scripts have to be
shipped in an a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libclass-throwable-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : stevan little, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/Class/Class-Th
Scripsit Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Imagemagick in general can handle multi-layered images just fine. I'm
> not sure whether this is true for its xcf module already, but the
> necessary framework is certainly there. So if you don't want to keep
> maintaining a separate utility, merging it
Am 2006-01-28 13:27:11, schrieb W. Borgert:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package that is configured and compiled two times, so
> that two binary packages are built in one dpkg-buildpackage run:
> One with --enable-gnome, the second without. Is this supported
> by CDBS somehow? Is there a package, that alrea
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interestingly the size is highly dependent on the architecture:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l postrm-*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 6960782 Jan 30 14:10 postrm-amd64
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 266065 Jan 30 14:09 postrm-i386
> [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 12:26:31AM +0100, Emilio Jes??s Gallego Arias wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The only (very minor) drawback is that above haskell scripts when
> > compiled is about 7MB in size, but the huge gain in reliability
>
> I think you're somewhat joking
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:03:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 30 janvier 2006 à 10:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
> > > some key parts
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:03:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 30 janvier 2006 à 10:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
> > > some key parts
Le lundi 30 janvier 2006 à 10:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > There have already been - admittedly sporadic - proposals to rewrite
> > some key parts of the system, like the init scripts or adduser, in
> > python. However, i
Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In comparison to that the dblatex development is very vivid, when one
> reports a bug, in most cases it will be fixed within a few days. The
> upstream author generally is very helpful and would be glad to get the
> project packaged in Debian.
>
> I was
19 matches
Mail list logo
