On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Norbert Preining wrote:
> (I take in debian-devel and debian-tetex-maint)
For completeness I attach the complete email of Jörg.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining Università d
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Anthony Towns:
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:59:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Anthony Towns:
>>> Moving away from MD5 is certainly not a bad idea, but it's not
>>> clear whether the alternatives are any better. Sure, ev
Hi Jörg, hi ftpmasters!
(I take in debian-devel and debian-tetex-maint)
I want to add some comments and questions:
First, genesis of TeX live for Debian. This probably/hopefully answers
"the big ?" of you: Following the ITP #312897 there was quite a bit of
discussion on debian-devel on the topic
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:32:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Knapsack cryptograph's "provably" secure (in that a general solution
> is NP),
You mean NP-_complete_. (Sorting is also NP, but not NP-complete. NP
is "can be done in polynomial time by a non-deterministic Turing
machine, so anythin
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 02:18:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> My understanding was that there aren't other hash functions that've
>> had remotely similar levels of cryptographic analysis to md5 and
>> sha. IIRC, the ellipt
* Stephen Gran:
> No noticable time difference between the two, either. So, I don't
> think this is the real problem.
You could be right.
The problem is still present, unfortunately. One more data point: A
couple of seconds before the last bounce was generated, murphy (which
is on the same ne
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 02:18:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > My understanding was that there aren't other hash functions that've had
> > remotely similar levels of cryptographic analysis to md5 and sha. IIRC,
> > the elli
Ban cho toi gia bay noi dia tiuyen Hanoi - Daklak
vao ngay 29,30/11/2005.
Gia re nhat.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:05:52PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > > I have written a Lintian check which attempts to flag instances of
> > > this problem. It looks for ELF objects that flag shared libraries in
> > > the default search path as NEEDED without actually importing symbols
> > > that
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Due to upstream ABI changes, it looks very likely that libfreetype is
> > going to have to undergo a library transition in the near future[0].
> > The details are still being settled, a
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 02:31:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:48:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > g++ -Wall `"/usr/bin/wx-config" --cxxflags` -I/usr/include -I/usr/include
> > -I/usr/include -g -O2 -o tqsl tqsl.o extwizard.o tqslwiz.o dxcc.o
> > stationdial.o qs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kalgebra
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Aleix Pol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kalgebra.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Description : calculator based on MathML l
Scripsit Peter Samuelson
> [Henning Makholm]
> > I have written a Lintian check which attempts to flag instances of
> > this problem. It looks for ELF objects that flag shared libraries in
> > the default search path as NEEDED without actually importing symbols
> > that the library exports.
> Thi
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> Worse, the existance of a practical md5(A+B+C)=3Dmd5(A+D+C) attack means
> that it's not out of the question that there're md5(A+B)=3Dmd5(C+D)
> attacks in the hands of particularly well resourced groups (which is
> worse, since the version uploaded to the archiv
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:48:37PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> I've trimmed the configure scripts to avoid this, leaving me with the
> link commands for the two binaries being:
>
> g++ -Wall `"/usr/bin/wx-config" --cxxflags` -I/usr/include -I/usr/include
> -I/usr/include -g -O2 -o tqsl tq
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Due to upstream ABI changes, it looks very likely that libfreetype is
> going to have to undergo a library transition in the near future[0].
> The details are still being settled, and it's possible (though unlikely)
> that the librar
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 02:18:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> My understanding was that there aren't other hash functions that've had
> remotely similar levels of cryptographic analysis to md5 and sha. IIRC,
> the elliptic curve cryptography stuff was supposed to be similarly neat,
> until peopl
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:14:38 +0100, Henning Makholm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Scripsit Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I wouldn't use real base64, though, because it would mean that you can
>> use its hashed output as a file name.
>
>Good point. One might replace "/" with "_" and omit the f
18 matches
Mail list logo
