On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:24:04PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Several distros include non-free software, as long as it's
> >> distributable.
> > Debian's one of them -- we just clearly separate out the non-free
> > stuff from the free stuff.
> I am coming to the conclusion thst we
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:13:51 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:21:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> But instead, what I'm led to wonder is if this is really standing up
> for our beliefs and fighting the good fight, or actually just trying
> to avoid those issues. Bec
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:28:41 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:26:55PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>> > Scripsit Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > The conferences I usually publish at always demand an all-out
>> > copy
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:36:36 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 05:28:04PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:30:52 -0600 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:46:24 +1000, Anthony Towns
>> > said:
>> > > I don't believe I've seen anyone deba
Hi,
> I'm totally for a -dbg kernel package with an unstripped kernel for
> OProfile, as I use it quite frequently.
>
> I wanted to use OProfile and get kernel stacks on Ubuntu Breezy, so
> ended up recompiling the standard kernel for vmlinux. To be useful I
> needed to turn on DEBUG_INFO and DE
Hi,
> > > AFAIK apt-listbugs only displays open bugs, if the bug is closed
> > > then it won't get displayed.
> >
> > It will be displayed even when it's closed. It does have some
> > heuristics to avoid showing irrelevant bugs.
> >
> >
> > > Ideally apt-listbugs needs to be updated to suppor
I think the best reason to ask or require contributors to licenses
their papers in a DFSG form is so that Debian can distribute the
papers as part of Debian.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 05:28:04PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:30:52 -0600 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:46:24 +1000, Anthony Towns
> > said:
> > > I don't believe I've seen anyone debate my use of the (aiui)
> > > non-DFSG-free CC ShareAlike/Attrib
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:26:55PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Scripsit Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The conferences I usually publish at always demand an all-out
> > copyright _transfer_. However, in practice they will usually accept a
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:21:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Because sometimes one feels the need to fight for what is
> right? Even if people feel far more comfortable with just sweeping
> stuff under the carpet, and not brought out in the open?
You know, I was going to say somet
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:39:52 +0100, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:45:35 +0100 Henning Makholm wrote:
>>> The conferences I usually publish at always demand an all-out
>>> copyright _transfer_. However, in practic
Scripsit Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:45:35 +0100 Henning Makholm wrote:
>> The conferences I usually publish at always demand an all-out
>> copyright _transfer_. However, in practice they will usually accept a
>> non-exclusive license to print and distribute unmodif
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dtv
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Participatory Culture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://participatoryculture.org/
* License : GPL
Description : a GTK+ based RSS vi
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:45:35 +0100 Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
> The conferences I usually publish at always demand an all-out
> copyright _transfer_. However, in practice they will usually accept a
> non-e
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:36:39 +0100, Andreas Schuldei
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> do we limit personal freedom of speakers in favour of our own, when
> we prescribe a license? debconf is about exchange of ideas (among
> others). will we only permit ideas from people that already share
> out vie
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:12:18 +0100, David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 05:09, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >> To be more specific: I don't believe that the fact that software
>> >> A is being packaged with Debians tools is a derived work of said
>> >> tools,
>>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:09:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James has
>more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle keyring
>updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills paid. As most of
>us do, I
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Samstag, den 12. November 2005:
Uhm its too late... The subject is of course misleading, it has been uploaded
to experimental.
Alex
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi folks,
its a long long time ago that iproute2 got an upstream update. I took over
the package from Andreas and decided to try a new upstream version. As I
don't want to break other peoples networking it has been uploaded to
experimental. I would be very happy if some people would give
iproute-
On Saturday 12 November 2005 19:28, Marvin Raaijmakers wrote:
> Is there a volunteer to create a package for keyTouch 2?
> Website: http://keytouch.sf.net
Please file an RFP (request for package). That's the best way to find a
packager.
Documentation at: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Chris
David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
>> > scripts should work with dash too.
>>
>> That's incorrec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openrpt
Version : 1.1.1beta
Upstream Author : Chris Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ned Lilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pierce Tyler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
Is there a volunteer to create a package for keyTouch 2?
Website: http://keytouch.sf.net
(I don't know if this is the right mailing list for asking this)
- Marvin Raaijmakers
On Saturday 12 November 2005 05:09, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> To be more specific: I don't believe that the fact that software A
> >> is being packaged with Debians tools is a derived work of said
> >> tools,
>
> Hmm. What about software bits of the package (maintainer
> scripts, added
Le samedi 12 novembre 2005 à 02:29 +0100, Pierre THIERRY a écrit :
> And I see a rationale for allowing them: what prevents a DD to upload
> binaries that include exploits or some trojan code, along with a clean
> source?
It was already suggested to accept only source+binary uploads, but to
rebuil
Le vendredi 11 novembre 2005 à 23:19 +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo a
écrit :
> Sorry, Joss, but I can't believe disk space can be a problem nowadays.
> Of course you can be short of disk space, but a 160GB HDD is quite
> affordable, and you can cache Debian lot of times there.
I can't believe I
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:30:52 -0600 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:46:24 +1000, Anthony Towns
> said:
[...]
> > I don't believe I've seen anyone debate my use of the (aiui)
> > non-DFSG-free CC ShareAlike/Attrib clause on my debbugs paper this
> > year.
I did it, last july on d
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 09:23:11 +0200
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source powerpc
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1
> Distribution: stable-security
> Urgency:
On 11/11/05, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering that James' reluctance to do the work he has volunteered
> to do is a recurring issue in the Debian project, and that this issue
> has not yet been addressed by the new DPL who was elected in the hope
> that he would try solving some
sorry for replying to this only today. i had been busy preparing
for a talk i was giving yesterday at a conf.
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 01:08:49]:
> > given your knowledge level of how debconf intents to handle
> > things and the way you escalate this issue gives me the ide
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:54:38AM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:33:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>So, wouldn't they be in the same catagory as pgp or openct thingy?
> >
> >I could do that, except that none of the binaries in opensc, ope
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:33:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:44:50AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[eidviewer menu category]
These things are about user identity and authentication for possibly
bank transactions or login like cryptog
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:33:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:44:50AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[eidviewer menu category]
> These things are about user identity and authentication for possibly
> bank transactions or login like cryptographics tokes, no?
Well, yes and
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:09:22PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You're not the only person requesting key updates, and there's a queue.
> Probably because there've been issues of higher importance (such as
> upgrading project machines from Woody to Sarge, or making sure the SPARC
> and ARM build
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
> > done right.
>
> Yes, this is what is meant by supporting partial upgrades. "Supporting
Ah, ok. THAT is what I meant too, in a roundabout way. So we're in
agreement.
> pa
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:38:11 -0600, Jeroen van Wolffelaar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:23:08PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
>> Branden Robinson, the DPL, is aware of this organizational failure. But he
>> has done nothing effective to repair it. He has suggested that an
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:44:50AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The next upload (which is in NEW already) adds libeid and the eidviewer;
> the former allows a programmer to read out identity information and
> pictures from the card; the latter provides a GUI to interactively view
>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:30:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
>> The various "testing migration" pages seem to be all confused:
>> - http://qa.debian.org
Hi,
Maintaining the belpic package, I recently found out that they hid their
license somewhere else. Since I hadn't found their license document
previously, I didn't package what I thought was being distributed
without a license; however, now that I found out that they do have a
license, and that
> > New shadow would conflict with ALL packages that do not support the new
> > syntax
>
> Unfortunately, yes; and we saw plenty of occasions in woody->sarge where
> conflicts with old packages made the upgrade path more difficult than it
> should have been...
Up to now, we have identified pbui
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:04:47AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Whatever you choose to do, you need to take care of partial upgrade.
> Not across released stable versions! Since when do we support
> stable/stable+1 mixed systems?
Since
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:43:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > >> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know
> > >> it can be unstable but...) and the update includes grep where
> > >> no open critical bug was seen. After Boot the syste
42 matches
Mail list logo
