Race condition in /proc/bus/usb + hotplug

2005-10-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
I am taking this thread to debian-devel. Please direct replies there, as per the reply-to and mail-followup-to headers. Please remove debian-user from any further replies. Marco, Ukai-san, here is a short synopsis of the problem: 1. User hotplugs an USB camera device. 2. Kernel creates usb

Comfed Bank Online Updaob

2005-10-03 Thread securisb
http://www.ddfl.org/furryscurry/logos/commercial.gif";>   Dear Commercial Federal Bank Customer,       This is your official notification from Commercial Federal Bank that the service(s) listed below   will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous notifications have   be

Bug#331535: ITP: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game

2005-10-03 Thread Samuel Mimram
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: xmoto Version : 0.1.5 Upstream Author : Rasmus Neckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://xmoto.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : 2D motocross platfo

Bug#331528: ITP: debinstaller -- a graphical frontend for installing local .deb packages

2005-10-03 Thread Vegar Storvann
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vegar Storvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: debinstaller Version : 0.2.2 Upstream Author : Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen * URL : http://www.daimi.au.dk/~kamstrup/linux/ * License : GPL Description : a graphical f

Re: PHP License for PEAR packages

2005-10-03 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10431 March 1977, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > Today my packages with PEAR modules was rejected from incoming queue. The > reason is that PHP License was used for PEAR library. NEW, not incoming. > I've found many packages already existing in Debian archive which are > licensed > with PHP Lic

Re: Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel

2005-10-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
owner 331325 Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks Hello Stefan, * Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2005-10-03 14:47 +0200]: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > Best coordinate this with Debian Xfce Maintainers > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I i

PHP License for PEAR packages

2005-10-03 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Hello. Today my packages with PEAR modules was rejected from incoming queue. The reason is that PHP License was used for PEAR library. I've found many packages already existing in Debian archive which are licensed with PHP License. What does it mean? Should I fill bug reports with critical se

Re: Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel

2005-10-03 Thread Stefan Ott
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I'm not an xfce4 user, so I don't know. I just think that a tarball of 3 > source packages (of which only 1 is the actual source code). Does not > warrant a package on it's own. Well, that's what most xfce4 plugins look like (ok

Watch Wizard minor bugs: whom to contact?

2005-10-03 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi all, I have a package "mn-fit" whose upstream puts underscores in the program version, as in "5_12". For Debian packaging I turn these into periods, as in "5.12". A little-known feature of uscan lets me deal with this automatically for new upstream releases by permitting two separate parenthe

Re: Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel

2005-10-03 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote: > Hi Gaudenz > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:16:15PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > Hi Stefan > > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > > Owner: Stefan Ott <[E

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-03 Thread Bernd Schubert
> >> I reported a bug several weeks ago and didn't get the slightest response. > > You filed a single severity: important bug against apt. Regardless of > whether you got an answer, this doesn't qualify as "critical". > I decided to fill it in as 'important' only, since I was surprised nobody

Re: Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel

2005-10-03 Thread Stefan Ott
Hi Gaudenz On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:16:15PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Hi Stefan > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > * Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin > >

Re: Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel

2005-10-03 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi Stefan On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin > Version : 0.1 > Upstream Author : Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL :

Re: What do you do if a package is built and not uploaded?

2005-10-03 Thread Frank Küster
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Andreas Barth wrote: >> * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]: >> > Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> > > Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There >> > > is usually no reply, but from some case

orig or not orig? (was: bogus lintian warning)

2005-10-03 Thread Frank Küster
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Thomas Bushnell: > >> What do you think "orig" means in "orig.tar.gz"? > > At the moment, it's a sequence of four ASCII characters without any > particular meaning. Many maintainers use repackaged sources because > they want to include multiple tarbal