Hi,
I am at Bratislava, Slovakia at the specified time. Anyone is there
for a meet, keysign or anything, I am open for it. I can be reached
by SMS (english or hungarian please) +36-20-4441745
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
* Andrew M.A. Cater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:59:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 08:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > In any case, since you're the maintainer of the package, the decision is
> > > ultimately yours -- see the Debi
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:48:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> [...]
> > So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offered by the Mozilla
> > Foundation, because of my objections to it and because I don't feel
> > empowered to make an agreement like
Hi,
I am at Bratislava, Slovakia at the specified time. Anyone is there
for a meet, keysign or anything, I am open for it. I can be reached
by SMS (english or hungarian please) +36-20-4441745
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >The thread is petering out
>
> Only because there's only one of me, and I'm too busy to deal with the
> volume! It's currently ten to midnight and I just got back from speaking
> at a conference in Wolverhampton.
The volume
* Shachar Shemesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am not a lawyer.
>
> I am a consultant trying to understand the world he lives in, and as
> such, studied the applicable law a little.
>
> Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> >So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offered by the Mozilla
> >Foundation,
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>Debian already has rights that their users don't have, the most
> >>prominent among them being to label a Linux distribution as "Debian" (or
> >>"official Debian", or whatever it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roger,
At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
Roger Leigh wrote:
> This mail is just to test the water to see if there is any interest in
> forming a printing group for coordination between all of the various
> printing packages. Due to the numerous
Dear all,
I am pleased to announce the availability of my new (English) book
"The Debian System", which Open Source Press[0] introduced at the
Linuxtag 2005. I would like to thank all who have followed its
development over the last year, and apologise for the delay and the
long wait you have endur
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: evilfinder
Version : 666(?)
Upstream Author : Michal Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/evilfinder/ef.shtml
License : under clarification, hopefully GPL
Magik wrote:
> I'm one of the developers of Omni-bot (www.omni-bot.com).
A side comment. Not having heard of omni-bot I went to that web site
and looked for something that would tell me about it. I may be blind
but after looking I still don't know what it is.
> We recently ported our stuff to L
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:59:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 08:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > In any case, since you're the maintainer of the package, the decision is
> > ultimately yours -- see the Debian Constitution, §3.1, point 1. In other
> > words, you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cedric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sabayon
Version : 0.18
Upstream Author : Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : http://www.gnome.org/projects/sabayon/
* License : GPL
Description :
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050626 08:59]:
> In any case, since you're the maintainer of the package, the decision is
> ultimately yours -- see the Debian Constitution, §3.1, point 1. In other
> words, you /are/ empowered to accept or reject this deal; and although I
> would prefer that
* Petri Latvala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050624 17:57]:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:30:08PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:21 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to depend
> > > on foo. foo-data does not provide
Hi.
I'm one of the developers of Omni-bot (www.omni-bot.com). We recently ported
our stuff to Linux and everything works fine so far. We're using Debian
Sarge to compile our stuff.
Here comes the problem:
It seems there are still a lot of users out there running glibc-2.2 based
systems. As Sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Printing under GNU/Linux has always been complex, and although it
works quite well nowadays, it's still difficult and error-prone.
Debian has a large number of interdependent printing packages, and
generally a unique maintainer for each. We
* Margarita Manterola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 16:45]:
> On 6/23/05, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there a better solution to this?
> > I think that there have been proposals for a new header that
> > accomplishes what you want,
> Well, a new header would be nice, of cour
su, 2005-06-26 kello 12:54 -0500, Ron Johnson kirjoitti:
>
> Don't forget to tell Rene Engelhard to rename OpenOffice.org2.
>
Hi, Ron. I once asked you to quote only the parts that are relevant when
you respond to someone. I did it in private since that is usually the
best and most effective fir
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:14:44PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > It was sent right after the hosting died.
> > Should he sent "The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please
> > offer something just in case we need it"?
>
> well
Dzien dobry
Chcialbym sie dowiedziec kiedy Pan bedzie mial
najblizsze konsultacje i jaki jest adres strony na ktorej sa informacje na temat
prac zaloczeniowych.
Szymon Sawicki
Informatyka i Ekonometria, III
rok
On 6/26/05, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote:
>
> >> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
> >> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
> > sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but..
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 12:34 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> First, this sounds like an interesting piece of software, and I'm happy
> to see it packaged.
>
> su, 2005-06-26 kello 01:51 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici kirjoitti:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Kenneth J. Pronovici" <[E
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: initng
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Jimmy Wennlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://initng.thinktux.net/index.php/M
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 07:59:32PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2005-06-26 kello 11:13 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici kirjoitti:
> > Perhaps you would prefer this?
> >
> >Description : local and remote backups to CD-R/CD-RW media
> >
> > It's probably more descriptive anyway.
>
> Yep, I
Thus spake Frederico Rodrigues Abraham:
> Hi. Is there any existing initiative to support webcam and audio on
> MSN conversations? Is there any of this support in any other IM systems
> running on Linux?
> I would like to volunteer to help developing it.
> Thank you
> -- Fred
http:
su, 2005-06-26 kello 11:13 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici kirjoitti:
> Perhaps you would prefer this?
>
>Description : local and remote backups to CD-R/CD-RW media
>
> It's probably more descriptive anyway.
Yep, I think that's better.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Brian May wrote:
> ...which of course is a problem if the daemons are required to setup
> the network connection to the NTP server...
>
> e.g. network tunnels and DNS servers both might need to be started
> first before the NTP server can be contacted.
This is already a long standing problem caus
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:41:04AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst:
>
> > What's painful about it?
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if it already increases load on
> lists.debian.org significantly.
Actually, in my experience on very heavily utilized mail servers,
greylisting greatly
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> It was sent right after the hosting died.
> Should he sent "The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please
> offer something just in case we need it"?
well, i guess i don't know the details of the situation, but i would
hope tha
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:34:43PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> First, this sounds like an interesting piece of software, and I'm happy
> to see it packaged.
Thanks.
> su, 2005-06-26 kello 01:51 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici kirjoitti:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Kenneth J.
On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote:
>> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
>> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
> sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
> why wasn't this brought up *before* it was brought to an en
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 08:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> In any case, since you're the maintainer of the package, the decision is
> ultimately yours -- see the Debian Constitution, §3.1, point 1. In other
> words, you /are/ empowered to accept or reject this deal; and although I
> would p
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:16:42AM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> I've seen some messages about an LDAP implementation around last october
> but I couldn't find them. I'm quite sure an LDAP solution is much better
> than the current solution. But before implementing it, it has to be
> evaluated against
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:29:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I'm currently planning to organise the removal of non-free documentation
> from Debian. There is not yet a timeline for when I plan to do a
> mass bug filing but I will try to prepare a list of affected packages soon.
>
> To be a
Junichi Uekawa wrote on 26-06-2005 11:32:
1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to
depend on foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface,
only data, so it does not need to depend on foo.
However, we have some users randomly filing bugs on
foo-data that doesn't g
Hi,
A while ago I sent a mail to this list if anybody could host debblue for
me. Alexander Wirt was so kind to do this for me. What still needs to be
done is that http://debblue.debian.net has to be set to it's new
webserver location. The new webserver location is
http://ned.snow-crash.org/de
Hi Eric,
First I wanted to say again that whatever your final decision, a build system
that optionally does the renaming would still be appreciated. It would be even
better if the MoFo would do it themselves, of course. I'm sure some users would
feel better if they are able to ponder the risks fo
Le samedi 25 juin 2005 à 22:16 +0200, Marc Haber a écrit :
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:40:54 +0200, Julien Cristau
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:35:17 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> >> Hi, what exactly is the problem with diverting conffiles?
> >>
> >See http://bugs.debian.o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xfonts-wqy
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Qianqian Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and WenQuanYi team
* URL : http://wqy.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description :
Hello A Mennucc,
* A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-27 09:41]:
> I had forgotten mplayer_1.0pre7.orig.tar.gz
>
> now it is there
[...]
any progress?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM
Hi. Is there any existing initiative to support webcam and audio on
MSN conversations? Is there any of this support in any other IM systems
running on Linux?
I would like to volunteer to help developing it.
Thank you
-- Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
> >
> > I'm rather doubtful it should be easy to fix this situation.
> > I doubt having configuration data in foo-bin is a good idea,
> > since it will generally cause problems when
> > libfoo1/libfoo2 needs to coexist.
>
> If it is not a good idea, all the more reason to introduce foo-common ?
>
> >> 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to
> >> depend on foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface,
> >> only data, so it does not need to depend on foo.
>
> > However, we have some users randomly filing bugs on
> > foo-data that doesn't get uninstalled if it
First, this sounds like an interesting piece of software, and I'm happy
to see it packaged.
su, 2005-06-26 kello 01:51 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici kirjoitti:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Kenneth J. Pronovici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: cedar-backup2
Why the 2 in p
I recently found some packages in at an IMHO totally wrong priority in
Debian. Before taking action, I'd like to arrive at a rough consensus
here. I also found some less clear-cut cases, so this prompted me to
think a bit about the language in the policy and what it means. The
more I think about it
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:43:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to
>> depend on foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface,
>> only data, so it does not need to depend on foo.
> However, we have some users randomly filing b
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:14:46PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > The concept is based on an LDAP server (or simiar) as a replacement for
> > the Packages file and on a P2P network for package distribution (see
> > http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=pkgdist.html). IMO it
> > would make
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Kenneth J. Pronovici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cedar-backup2
Version : 2.4.2
Upstream Author : Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cedar-solutions.com/software/cedar-backup/
* License : GPL
49 matches
Mail list logo
