On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:48:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
[...]
> So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offered by the Mozilla
> Foundation, because of my objections to it and because I don't feel
> empowered to make an agreement like this on behalf of Debian.
[...]
> If the DPL does not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bmp-extra-plugins
Version : 6180
Upstream Author : Artur Frysiak
* URL : http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/bmp-plugins/trunk/
* License : GPLv2, LGPL
Description : A set of BMP plugins
bmp-extra-plugins contain
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:22:29PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:25:12AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
> > come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
> sorry to be a stick in th
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
>> So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offered by the Mozilla
>> Foundation, because of my objections to it and because I don't feel
>> empowered to make an agreement like this on behalf of Debian.
> If you are not empowere
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:14:46PM +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
> The concept is based on an LDAP server (or simiar) as a replacement for
> the Packages file and on a P2P network for package distribution (see
> http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=pkgdist.html). IMO it
> would make a lot sen
hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:25:12AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
why wasn't this brought up *before* it
Eric Dorland wrote:
The thread is petering out
Only because there's only one of me, and I'm too busy to deal with the
volume! It's currently ten to midnight and I just got back from speaking
at a conference in Wolverhampton.
Some very smart developers have come forward to say that trademar
Eric Dorland wrote:
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Debian already has rights that their users don't have, the most
prominent among them being to label a Linux distribution as "Debian" (or
"official Debian", or whatever it is you guys use). :-)
When I said rights, I meant rights
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:15:33PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>Hello,
>
>If you intend to participate in the debconf5 key signing party in
>Helsinki, please send your ascii armored public key as explained at
>[0] by Sunday, July 2nd, 2005.
>
>If you have already sent your key and haven't
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:40:54 +0200, Julien Cristau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:35:17 +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:08:27PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> > Be aware of the fact that diverting conffiles doesn't work.
>>
>> Hi, what exactly is t
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Following a post to Debian-Devel-Announce, I would like to
> discuss getting rid of circular dependencies.
FYI, I've removed the galeon/galeon-common in galeon 1.3.21-4 in may,
and the gedit/gedit-common in 2.10.3-2 (pending an upload).
Shame on me
De Isabelle Kone
Abidjan ,Cote d'Ivoire.Afrique de l'ouest.
Cher,
Permettez-moi de vous informer de mon désir de lentre dans le rapport d'affaires avec vous. Jai eu votre adresse électronique dans lannuaire de votre pays et après quelque jour de prière, jai donc choisi votre no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gkrellm-pmu
Version : 2.4
Upstream Author : Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pbbuttons.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : plugin for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tailor
Version : 0.0.1 (upstream does not make version for now)1
Upstream Author : Lele Gaifax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor
* License
John Hasler wrote:
This means that if they don't do something legal to us now, they will
never be able to do anything regarding their trademark to anyone else
ever.
You assume that our usage is infringing. I don't think that is
established.
If our usage is non-infringing, then no con
Shachar writes:
> No, it's quite worse. By ignoring the issue, we are forcing MoFo to
> either sue us or lose the trademark.
They are not forced to sue. They need (at most) only send us a
cease-and-desist letter. They could also decide that our use is
non-infringing and ignore it.
> Just like w
I'm currently planning to organise the removal of non-free documentation
from Debian. There is not yet a timeline for when I plan to do a
mass bug filing but I will try to prepare a list of affected packages soon.
To be able to track the bugs automatically I propose to use some kind
of meta tag in
I am not a lawyer.
I am a consultant trying to understand the world he lives in, and as
such, studied the applicable law a little.
Eric Dorland wrote:
So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offered by the Mozilla
Foundation, because of my objections to it and because I don't feel
empowe
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://irrevocable.incdropfat.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:43:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to depend on
> > foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface, only data, so it
> > does not need to depend on foo.
>
> However, we have some users randomly f
Hi,
> > $ dpkg -c librote0_0.2.6-1_i386.deb
> > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-06-21 22:36:21 ./
> > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-06-21 22:36:20 ./usr/
> > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-06-21 22:36:21 ./usr/lib/
> > -rw-r--r-- root/root 13744 2005-06-21 22:36:21
> > ./usr/li
21 matches
Mail list logo
