Don't be a fuddy-duddy...use the software everyone's using...

Do not have money , get software cds from here! http://cps.gnkdjfy9v8gndzy.artemiadc.com Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Obscenity is what happens to shock some elderly and ignorant magistrate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:51:57 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I perfectly understand what SMTP is, and I perfectly *don't* >> understand why having a 30 minutes delay or even a 2 or 3 hours >> delay in s

Bug#315349: ITP: rote -- a simple C library for VT102 terminal emulation

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: rote Version : 0.2.6 Upstream Author : Bruno Takahashi C. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://rote.sourceforge.net/

Bug#53121: hostname

Hello, the problem here is that a few programs dont fall-back to use hostname/domainname correctly. (i.e. gethostname() and look it up if fqdn is needed). I think you just can file the bug against every package which does not do that. However keep in mind that most daemons running in producti

KDE apps up for adoption

Hi all, Since my spare time is not what it used to be, I have put a few KDE apps up for adoption this morning: kdbg (#315336) -- graphical debugger interface kprof (#315337) -- visual tool to help analyse profiling results kbear (#315340) -- graphical ftp client for KDE If anyone is willi

Re: Why is PTS complaining about the new standards version?

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 06:42:12PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > The PTS page [0] for toshset, a package I just adopted, show this: > > "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian > Policy (Standards-Version 3.6.1 instead of 3.6.2)." > > Since version 3.6.2 of the Deb

Why is PTS complaining about the new standards version?

The PTS page [0] for toshset, a package I just adopted, show this: "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy (Standards-Version 3.6.1 instead of 3.6.2)." Since version 3.6.2 of the Debian Policy was just released, Anibal (my sponsor) had me update the package to r

Lintian tar error outdated?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 E: schroot source: source-tar-is-posix-tar schroot_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz N: N: The source tar archive of this package is made with tar --posix. This N: tar format is actually not understood by woody's tar. N: N: Some automake 1.7 and 1.8 versions in

Re: Bug#315104: ITP: schroot -- Execute commands in a chroot environment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Upstream Author : Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot/ > * License : GPL > The above URL is temporary. It should shortly be moved from a l

Bug#315298: ITP: yaird -- Yet Another mkInitRD

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: yaird Version : 0.0.9 Upstream Author : Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.xs4all.nl/~ekonijn/yaird/ * License : GPL Description : Yet An

Bug#315292: ITP: monarch -- web-based configuration system for Nagios

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package name: monarch Version : 0.94e Upstream Author : GroundWork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://itgroundwork.com/products/gwm-architect.html License : GPL Description : we

bmp/ppm/jpeg/pbm to wsq/nist2000 file format changer

We are working for a finger print validation system. We have taken NFIS as our base. We need some bmp/ppm/jpeg/pbm to wsq/nist2000 file format changer. any link or Free program will be quit help full. any doc to converter program or specification of wsq/nist 2000 file fomat and  other image

Re: TODO for etch ?

I demand that Andrew Suffield may or may not have written... > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:22:08PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote: >> I demand that Florian Weimer may or may not have written... >>> * Olaf van der Spek: > You should set the clock using NTP *before* starting any daemons. Most > dae

need bmp/jpeg/ppm/pmp to wsq/nist2000 file format changer.

We are working for a finger print validation system. We want to work on the work done by NIST. But we need bmp/jpeg/ppm/pmp to wsq/nist2000 file format changer. We want to use cwsq,mindtct,bozoth3 program and working to make a gui. any help will be boosting for us.. we are hanging this point. wi

Guys Need This rv

"Ci-ialis Softabs" is better than Pfizer Viiagrra and normal Ci-ialis because: - Guaaraantees 36 hours lasting - Safe to take, no side effects at all - Boost and increase se-xual performance - Haarder e-rectiions and quick recharge - Proven and certified by experts and doctors - only $3.99 per ta

Inflame your passion... Tonight!

The real cialis deal on the net! http://yrqkw.crf5gdu5r4u2gvc.boondogglemk.com In waking a tiger, use a long stick. I must create a system, or be enslaved by another man's. Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

I wrote: > The notion that we would be infringing their trademark by failing to remove > strings that they put in is ludicrous. It's equivalent to Ford demanding > that I remove all the Ford logos before selling my truck. Eric Dorland writes: > Your analogy is flawed. My ford is still a ford

Re: Testing package installation, upgrading, and removal

Em Dom, 2005-06-19 às 17:57 +0900, Junichi Uekawa escreveu: > # install-remove check > dpkg -i /tmp/buildd/*.deb > dpkg --remove $PKGNAMES The problem with this kind of tests is that many packages build conflicting packages. For example glade source package creates 'glade' and 'glade-gnome' which

Re: Debian concordance

Em Dom, 2005-06-19 às 16:22 +0100, Scott James Remnant escreveu: > A definitive example would be the (eventually abandoned) attempt by > Ximian to provide debs for Helix GNOME. I was working in a GNOME2 backport back then, IIRC. I remember the Helix GNOME debs were simply low quality, with non-sen

Bug#315223: O: mird1 -- optional

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I want to ask for removing mird1 & mird-dev from debian archive. I belive that noone uses these packages this days because of better solutions (sqlite for example). Any package is depended from these two. Package is in quite bad conditions and moreover last upstrea

Re: TODO for etch ?

Andrew Suffield wrote: Under *no circumstances* should adjtimex be used at the same time as ntpd. The clock will jitter all over the place because they won't agree and will keep slewing it in opposition to each other. That's very true - I experienced this. Helmut Wollmersdorfer -- To UNSUBS

Re: raidtools2 -> mdadm change: woes and problems

On 06/21/2005 04:34 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-21 14:44]: > >>Are there any kind of documents describing how to move from raidtools >>safely to mdadm without loosing a raid? > > > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-u

Re: Testing package installation, upgrading, and removal

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:01:06AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > lvm2 is supposed to be very much improved with read/write snapshots. > (compared to lvm1 which only had read-only snapshots. Correct me > if I'm wrong) If you do not use linux 2.6.10, yes. > Is it stable enough? Except the usual

Re: raidtools2 -> mdadm change: woes and problems

* Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-21 14:44]: > Are there any kind of documents describing how to move from raidtools > safely to mdadm without loosing a raid? http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-mdadm -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cy