On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:41:24PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-08 14:05]:
> [...]
> >acl-installer (#297344), orphaned 38 days ago
> > Description: Installer for Franz' Allegro 6.2 Lisp Trial Edition
> > Reverse Depends: acl-mlisp acl-m
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Scribit Don Armstrong dies 04/04/2005 hora 01:09:
> > Otherwise, all you're doing is abusing the BTS, no matter how correct
> > your actual appraisal of the severity bug is.
>
> Downgrading a bug that is a clear violation of the policy just to
> have a
Scribit Don Armstrong dies 04/04/2005 hora 01:09:
> Otherwise, all you're doing is abusing the BTS, no matter how correct
> your actual appraisal of the severity bug is.
Downgrading a bug that is a clear violation of the policy just to have a
package in the next stable release IS abusing the BTS.
Scribit Steve Langasek dies 04/04/2005 hora 00:42:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300765&msg=14
>
> He has the approval of the release team.
I didn't notice this mail in the time I was discussing with the
maintainer. And it lacks explanation. When I read it recently, I thought
Verdan writes:
> Hello
>
> > With the attached patch 'specter' can be compiled
> > on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
>
> It's not so easy. It was done that way to allow specter compile on gcc
> 2.95. This patch makes it impossible, so I hesitate to apply it.
> Moreover fourth version of gcc is real
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: net6
Version : 1.0.0 (currently 0.9.9.20050408)
Upstream Author : Armin Burgmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://darcs.0x539.de/net6
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mpdscribble
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Kuno Woudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://scribble.frob.nl/
* License : GPL
Description : Music Player Daemon interfa
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:15:40AM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> On Thursday 07 April 2005 19:06, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> [...]
> > popcon.debian.org verified
>
> qa.d.o/developer.php gathers information directly from popcon.d.o and the
> backend crashed today.
> At le
Hello
> With the attached patch 'specter' can be compiled
> on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
It's not so easy. It was done that way to allow specter compile on gcc
2.95. This patch makes it impossible, so I hesitate to apply it.
Moreover fourth version of gcc is really experimental, and if I had to
choose
Hallo Mads,
* Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-08 14:08]:
> I am writing this email as I think there could be done more to
> automatically test Debian packages. This would improve quality, as
> discovering errors is the first step in correcting them. I am not a
> Debian maintainer, but
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-08 14:05]:
[...]
>acl-installer (#297344), orphaned 38 days ago
> Description: Installer for Franz' Allegro 6.2 Lisp Trial Edition
> Reverse Depends: acl-mlisp acl-mlisp8 acl-alisp8 acl-alisp acldoc-el
>
>admesh (#297345), or
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > This raises a valid point; maybe the maintainer can comment on
> > > > this? Since we already receive no security updates to php3 from
> > > > upstream, is it feasible security-wise to keep it in the
> > > > distribution for
Scribit Michael Schiansky dies 08/04/2005 hora 11:44:
> None of my maintained packages do provide such things. For all of them
> any automatic test is impossible as they require user interaction.
apt-get install expectk
> IMHO it's not worth the efford to implement such an autotest-system
> just
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:43:52PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:13:55AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:22:51PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > Given some options:
> > >
> > > 1. Don't distribute the firmware blob at all;
> > > 2. Provid
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:27:27PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2005, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > This is bcron, a new cron system designed with secure operations in mind.
>
> Neat! Any chance of adding fcron-like functionality? I got used to its very
> advanced anacronis
On 20050407T172533+0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> (Don't use grep-status or grep-available in package scripts.)
Since I've been asked, here's some more about that from
/usr/share/doc/grep-dctrl/Compatibility :
8<--
If you use grep-dctrl in a Debian package, you should depend on the
grep-dc
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > - sarge is around the corner, and keeping it in means maintaining
> > > it for possibly another 2-4 years! if it's *already*
> > > no longer maintained upstream...
> >
> > This raises a valid point; maybe the maintainer can comment on this? Since
> > we already rec
Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > This raises a valid point; maybe the maintainer can comment on
> > > this? Since we already receive no security updates to php3 from
> > > upstream, is it feasible security-wise to keep it in the
> > > distribution for some years to come?
> >
> > I think the opinion of t
--- David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 08, 2005 at 01:20, Miriam Ruiz praised the
> llamas by saying:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: cycle
> > Version : 0.3.0
> > Upstream Author : Ole
On Apr 08, 2005 at 01:20, Miriam Ruiz praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: cycle
> Version : 0.3.0
> Upstream Author : Oleg S. Gints <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://cycle.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:45:19AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> Matthew Palmer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-04-08 19:14:
> > You'd be wanting wnpp-check, in the devscripts package. Check out rc-check
> > while you're at it. Both are cronable.
>
> ahh ... devscripts. I think you meant wnpp-alert not
Am I right that according to mirrors.kernel.org/debian, the archive
was not updated for several days? Is that related to the fact that
mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ls-lR* have time stamps of 30-Mar-2005?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:14:23PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:12:13AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> > I am interested in the intersection of packages installed on my
> > machines with the list of orphaned packages. This is to be sure
> > a program in use isn't orphane
Matthew Palmer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-04-08 19:14:
> You'd be wanting wnpp-check, in the devscripts package. Check out rc-check
> while you're at it. Both are cronable.
ahh ... devscripts. I think you meant wnpp-alert not wnpp-check.
Thanks for the tip.
Perfect, thanks!
Steve
--
To UNS
Hi Mads!
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:37:27AM +0200, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
> It would be nice if packages were automatically tested under different
> setups, like language settings or other things that may affect a package.
> Also each package maintainer could supply a script which should test if t
[Mads Lindstrøm]
> Do there exist, any other kind of automatic tests that I have not
> mentioned here?
More automatic testing would be good. Some packages run self-tests as
part of the build process. More packages should do that.
A long time ago, I wrote a prototype for testing package upgrades
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:12:13AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> I am interested in the intersection of packages installed on my
> machines with the list of orphaned packages. This is to be sure
> a program in use isn't orphaned without me becoming aware of it.
> Ideally the program would be run fr
I am interested in the intersection of packages installed on my
machines with the list of orphaned packages. This is to be sure
a program in use isn't orphaned without me becoming aware of it.
Ideally the program would be run from cron about once a week and email
a status report.
Is there a progra
Hi
I am writing this email as I think there could be done more to
automatically test Debian packages. This would improve quality, as
discovering errors is the first step in correcting them. I am not a
Debian maintainer, but have been using Debian for 4+ years. As I am not
an insider, I am likely t
On Thursday 07 April 2005 19:06, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
> popcon.debian.org verified
qa.d.o/developer.php gathers information directly from popcon.d.o and the
backend crashed today.
At least the by_inst file is seriously corrupted
Cheers.
--
Igor Genibel
ÂNon bene pr
30 matches
Mail list logo
