Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:40:40 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Actually, the proposed solution that raised some approval was to split
>> out the ALSA modules, just like the pcmcia modules.
>
>
> I raised this idea on #debian-kernel and it was shot down.[0]
> So use -sa.
I forgot to ACK this : the suggestion was of course correct. Thanks
for the "tip" (which indeed could have been a RTFM.:-))
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:36:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> They are already are, please review the (simple) package. For some of the
> packages that provide them (like systat) the tasks are pulled in from the
> depends:, for other packages there might be users that mig
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:20:36AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:11:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Here is the relevant section of the .changes file for the package in
> > question:
> > Date: Wed, 1
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:12:37AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:40:40 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Actually, the proposed solution that raised some approval was to split
> > out the ALSA modules, just like the pcmcia modules.
> I raised this idea on #debian-kernel and i
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:46:46AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
I've been meaning for some time to get a USB key to manage private keys
(such as gpg, ssh, etc), but it's not until recently that I tried to sit
down and sketch on how to implement it (filesystem layout,
functionality, which parts
Le jeudi 10 mars 2005 Ã 00:12 +0100, Thomas Hood a Ãcrit :
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:40:40 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Actually, the proposed solution that raised some approval was to split
> > out the ALSA modules, just like the pcmcia modules.
>
>
> I raised this idea on #debian-kernel an
Le mercredi 09 mars 2005 Ã 20:33 +0100, Thomas Hood a Ãcrit :
> In theory I guess there should be an oss package that was the homologue of
> the alsa-base package. It would include files that would blacklist ALSA
> modules, just as alsa-base blacklists OSS modules. These packages would
> Conflict
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:40:40 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Actually, the proposed solution that raised some approval was to split
> out the ALSA modules, just like the pcmcia modules.
I raised this idea on #debian-kernel and it was shot down.[0]
[0]http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op za, 05-03-2005 te 14:26 +0100, schreef Thiemo Seufer:
> > Steve Halasz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've sent a few emails over the last month to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting that grass be removed from
> > > packages-arch-specific. But my ple
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:11:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:12:03AM -0800, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >>It's hard to take this sort of discussion as anything but an attack on
Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> Dear Debian developers,
>
> I gather there are some people out there with MIPS little-endian
> machines (from mipsel drop discussion) and Debian on it. Do huge shared
> libraries (containing >4 symbols) work for you? I am currently
> investigating an issue I have
El mar, 08-03-2005 a las 16:50 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt escribió:
> David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:21 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> * Package name: gtk2-engines-clearlooks
> >>> Versi
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:03:41PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> On 03/09/2005 03:35 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> >The .dsc file contains:
> >.../...
> >Files:
> > fb6549efbab887efea88a8fcc4b4319f 451517 gnome-find_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
> > 7ea07e4e9226648422fb7a83d066ffe8 3400 gnome-find_1.0.2-1.1.d
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:35:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 mars 2005 à 11:23 -0800, Blunt Jackson a écrit :
> > I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the
> > developer
> > to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and th
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:57:00 + (UTC), Jason Lunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> I just figured out a way to do this for the ssh binary. Maybe this would
> work for you?
>
> Here's what I did:
>
> $ apt-get source ssh
> $ cd openssh-3.8.1p1
> $ debian/rules build
I a
On 03/09/2005 03:35 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
The .dsc file contains:
.../...
Files:
fb6549efbab887efea88a8fcc4b4319f 451517 gnome-find_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
7ea07e4e9226648422fb7a83d066ffe8 3400 gnome-find_1.0.2-1.1.diff.gz
And the .changes:
.../...
Files:
733af0b63b2a63ac5ec3df7e46a9633a 659 ut
After stumbling upon the non-free Adventure font in python-gd, I
systematically checked all other Truetype fonts included in Debian
(except for packages that contain only fonts, I expect their maintainers
have already made sure they're free).
The result is this list of about twenty packages. I pla
Le mercredi 09 mars 2005 Ã 11:23 -0800, Blunt Jackson a Ãcrit :
> I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the developer
> to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and third
> party libraries,
> but to dynamically pick up "system" libraries, of which I would nu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the
> developer to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and
> third party libraries, but to dynamically pick up "system" libraries,
> of which I would number libpthread. That would be adequate
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:10:12 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> It's not a depency in any way. I play sound just fine with OSS drivers
> without the ALSA mess getting in my way anywhere.
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:50:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Without alsa-base installed, hotplug and discover
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:40:15 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I think switchconf is nice because it ties in well with guessnet,
> and because it's lean and mean and does exactly what it should, no
> more and no less.
I agree that switchconf should be kept around so long as there is nothing
else in
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:00:49PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Why {c,sh}ouldn't they be implemented as cron.daily scripts in the respective
> packages?
They are already are, please review the (simple) package. For some of the
packages that provide them (like systat) the tasks are pulled in fr
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 05:00:52 -0600, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, dlopen, but the problem is version skew. With a dynamic libc6,
> libc and the NSS modules will always be compatible. With a static
> libc6, NSS functions (gethostbyname, getpwuid, etc.) will only work if
> the
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:34 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> You could partition the usb key and have a small partition for GPG/SSH
> keys and the rest for normal data transfers and stuff.
I was going to do the same, but picked up a rediculously cheap tiny USB
key, and only use it for this purpose.
[Please don't confuse my procmail with Cc's]
[http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct]
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 16:16, sean finney wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:00:49PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Why {c,sh}ouldn't they be implemented as cron.daily scripts in the
> > respecti
hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:00:49PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Why {c,sh}ouldn't they be implemented as cron.daily scripts in the respective
> packages?
i'd like to ack that. however, if the non-arch specific stuff (generic
cron jobs, init scripts, etc) for cron is still sufficiently comp
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 15:20, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> - Basic system accounting (implement in sysstat)
> - Basic logfile reporting (implemented through logcheck)
> - Basic security checks (implemented through checksecurity and Tiger)
> - Integrity file monitoring (through tr
Hi there,
A while back I did a little bit of hacking and put together a package
with "standard" cron tasks. These tasks includes:
- backup stuff the cron package currently backups
- some other simple backups (the 'backup-simple' program and
manpage are included)
- common cron-related packages th
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:50:05PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > In that light, fully automatic NEW processing will not hurt at all (I agree
> > that a delay of a few days is sensible to give us time to react to the
> > worst problem cases.)
>
> Unfortunately reality isn't so simple. In prac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Last summer, the LSM2004 took place in Bordeaux, organized by ABUL.
The president of the ABUL, Pierre Jarillon asked me to contact debian
about a documentation project.
Well, why me ? because I'm using debian a lot :-P
Pierre Jarillon and I have
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:44:25AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> 60 PCs with Debian and there exist 4 different configurations?
> In case each PC has a nic, it sounds like the fai package suits your
> situation.
Or cfengine2 (optionally coupled with pkgsync).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://ww
also sprach Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2005.03.09.0124 +0100]:
> If Martin Krafft don't try to put it back, I may try to find
> a sponsor. I am searchinf for a good excuse to be a DD.
I'll sponsor you.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
also sprach Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.08.0232 +0100]:
> Well... It could get back into Debian for sure, but there must be
> somebody responsable for it. You can take the package, even not being
> a DD, uploading it through a sponsor. You are, besides, the second
> person who asked me
[Blunt Jackson]
> I am familiar with the nss issue, although that's not really relevant
> to this question. The nss issue, and the related question in the FAQ
> is that when statically linking to libc, there are still dynamic
> loads required -- but libc handles this for the application.
> (Presum
* David Pashley
| Ideally I want to keep the disk formatted as vfat so it is usable on
| other operating systems and use an ext2 loopback filesystem. Getting the
| system to mount that is the hard part.
You could partition the usb key and have a small partition for GPG/SSH
keys and the rest for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ARAKI Yasuhiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sip-tester
Version : 1.1rc1
Upstream Author : Richard GAYRAUD
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sipp/
* License : GPL2 or any later
Description : a performanc
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, sean finney wrote:
you could easily extend the script i wrote to unencrypt/loop-mount
a filesystem-in-a-file without too much effort. prod me enough and
i might do it myself.
Prodding. :)
Moreover I'd suggest to send the result of it as patch to the gpg package
for inclusion in
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 01:42, David Härdeman wrote:
> So the revocation could even be stored in cleartext on the usb key,
> unless I'm mistaken?
Depending on the strength of the crypto/passphrase protecting your key, this
could lead at least to a DOS if the revocation is publicised without
c
39 matches
Mail list logo
