Hi tired and overworked folks,
I recently got some help from a fellow in cuba(Maykel Moya) to translate
my diagram into spanish. I have added some bits about the autobuild
network but have not reconciled it with my original bits. On the far
right is the unincorperated bits. Its now at:
http://deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lat
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Loren Bandiera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.mmgsecurity.com/~lorenb/lat/
* License : GPL
Description : Ldap Adminis
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 14:11 +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 06:02:48PM -0600, Marco Alfonso said
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: gtk2-engines-clearlooks
> > Version : 0.4
> > Upstream Aut
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 06:02:48PM -0600, Marco Alfonso said
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gtk2-engines-clearlooks
> Version : 0.4
> Upstream Author : Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http:
Dear Homeowner,
You have been pre-approved for a $402,000 Home Loan at 3.45% Fixed Rate.
This offer is being extended to you unconditionally and your credit is in no
way a factor.
To take Advantage of this Limited Time opportunity all
we ask is that you visit our Website and complete
the 1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gtk2-engines-clearlooks
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://maop.puntodeb.net/
* License : GPL
Description : An attractiv
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:47:34PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> You need to refer to KP707106781KP707106781 through the GOT, something
> like
> pfmul [EMAIL PROTECTED](%ebx), %mm3
Ok, i gave it a try, it compiles and runs fine, but i still get
the 'objdump -p libfftw3f.so | grep
Sean,
sounds really good. How do your scripts relate to the db management
scripts provided by wwwconfig-common, maintained by Ola Lundqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
I suspect your package should be either supercede wwwconfig-common or
be rolled into it.
cheers,
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:41:27PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> When you install an alsa-modules package for the 2.4 kernel, you get
> alsa-base per the dependencies. However, when you install sarge with a
> 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed.
It's not a depency in any way.
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050305 20:00]:
> While I only read it back then, I wanted to actually do the stuff
> described in the cheat sheet. However, it mentions the command
> "debootstrap-farm". I can't find anything about it. What is changed in
> this command, compared to standard de
su, 2005-03-06 kello 21:09 +0100, Thiemo Seufer kirjoitti:
> We don't talk about automated bug filing here.
We're talking about filing over 6000 bugs for watch files. It may not be
automated, but it is mass-filing. It doesn't matter if it takes weeks or
months, it is still not a good idea. That is
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2005-03-06 kello 20:11 +0100, Thiemo Seufer kirjoitti:
> > Since preparation of the accompanying patches would take some time,
> > it is unlikely to cause "denial of service" or "disruption".
>
> If they are sent at a slow pace, then the disruption is less, it is
> true
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Denial of service attacks on the bug tracking system, on mailing lists,
> mail servers, and maintainers is unappreciated. 6229 bug reports would
> result in all sorts of unnecessary and unwanted load on all sorts of
> systems and people. It is because o
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
pardon me for the delay, I really have better things to do that getting
involved all day long in discussions with purposely obtuse people.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:30:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Yay for pulling up flamewars from over a month ago and restarting th
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:01:15AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago, I adopted switchconf, a very simple bash script used to
> simply switch between configurations, planned for use on mobile
> systems, but perfectly usable on the desktop as well.
>
> Now, switchconf is too simple
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 06:44:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a debian developer, so i could not post on dda mailing list. I
> > > had o
su, 2005-03-06 kello 20:11 +0100, Thiemo Seufer kirjoitti:
> Since preparation of the accompanying patches would take some time,
> it is unlikely to cause "denial of service" or "disruption".
If they are sent at a slow pace, then the disruption is less, it is
true. It is still detrimental to have
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2005-03-06 kello 19:28 +0100, Thiemo Seufer kirjoitti:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
> >
> > Why not? As wishlist bugs with patch this seems sensible to me.
>
> Denial of service attacks on the bug trackin
Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Thiemo Seufer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
> >
> > Why not? As wishlist bugs with patch this seems sensible to me.
>
> I assume that you will hand-check the patches in those 6229 bug
> reports that the watch files
Re: Thiemo Seufer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
>
> Why not? As wishlist bugs with patch this seems sensible to me.
I assume that you will hand-check the patches in those 6229 bug
reports that the watch files actually do the right thing before y
su, 2005-03-06 kello 19:28 +0100, Thiemo Seufer kirjoitti:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Do *not* file 6229 bugs about the same subject. Never.
>
> Why not? As wishlist bugs with patch this seems sensible to me.
Denial of service attacks on the bug tracking system, on mailing lists,
mail ser
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
[snip]
> > > I had try to randomly submit wishlist bugs for 6 packages to bts with
> > > the tag "patch" pointing to the dehs site or attaching the watch file to
> > > the bug.
> > > Almost all of this bug was closed and the watch file was check (in some
> > > cases fix
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> [Why to cc on policy? Cut]
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>
> > >If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
> > >perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *sh
On Sunday 06 March 2005 05:55 am, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Not yet, because it does not report to the normal popcon account so I am
> afraid that look a bit sneaky to just drop it in experimental without
> warning users.
Well, the idea would be to post here AND upload it to experimental, so
peop
[Marcelo E. Magallon]
> Whilst no insult was meant, it _still_ _looks like_ a silent
> decision.
Well, that is one of several explanations. I have no idea if it is
the real one, but believe the release team would have the decency to
let us know if they made such decision and do not believe the re
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:38:06 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:05:52AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:17:50AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> > * Package name: tinywm
>> > Version : 1.2.0
>> > Upstream Author
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:17:51AM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > * it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of
> >the pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing dependencies,
> >ignores /cha
Hi,
pardon me for the delay, I really have better things to do that getting
involved all day long in discussions with purposely obtuse people.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:30:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:21:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:40:02AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > It works and is available from dak.ganneff.de. And the packages
> > > is used on several archives now. Its just not out of NEW atm.
>
> > So, let's *guess* ...
>
> > * -release decided to stop processing NEW ... we
Scripsit Nick Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From what I can gather, the license was developed through discussion on
> OSI's mailing list, and in the end it was OSI who approved it.
That only goes to show that the OSI has finally lost every last bit of
sense they used to possess.
--
Henning Makhol
Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 Ã 11:53 +0100, Thomas Hood a Ãcrit :
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:20:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > As long as the linux26 installation ends up with both sound modules
> > loaded, that's a bug that needs to be fixed, though. Another option
> > would be to put the alsa mo
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:20:13 +0100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> Hmm. I would think that the better solution (the less surprising
> solution) would be to leave out the ALSA modules from the Debian
> kernel package, since we have a seperate package of ALSA modules
> which _does_ depend on alsa-base.
That
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:05:49PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2005 06:48 pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > For that purpose, I have made an experimental popularity-contest package
> > that use both smtp and http. Please find it here:
>
> Have you considered uploading it to e
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:51:43 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> The links you gave earlier don't appear to show much useful debate or
> input from anyone with the first clue about licence authoring.
The internet appears to have swallowed the mailing list messages, but I
do remember reading through them
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:22PM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:48:21 +0100
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello developers,
> >
> > We have plans to add support in popularity-contest to send the
> > report through http POST. Both the server part an the client
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 02:38:35AM -0600, Nick Welch wrote:
> > This is why random Joe off the street should not be writing licences.
>
> >From what I can gather, the license was developed through discussion on
> OSI's mailing list, and in the end it was OSI who approved it. Quite
> different fro
[Why to cc on policy? Cut]
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:32:30AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> >If people don't care as much about this as you think they should,
> >perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should*
> >care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic
> >under
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:05:52AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:17:50AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > * Package name: tinywm
> > Version : 1.2.0
> > Upstream Author : Nick Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://incise.org/
> > *
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> When you install an alsa-modules package for the 2.4 kernel, you get
> alsa-base per the dependencies. However, when you install sarge with a
> 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
> for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up
> This is why random Joe off the street should not be writing licences.
>From what I can gather, the license was developed through discussion on
OSI's mailing list, and in the end it was OSI who approved it. Quite
different from "random Joe off the street" whipping up some homebrew
license and sl
42 matches
Mail list logo
