Re: please post listing and status of NEW queue

[Joerg Jaspert] > The way to generate this is(was) to modify a script from the > dak suite to output html instead of plain text. I tried to not make the > difference between my version and the existing one to big, so it mostly > shows what was already there, just with different format. Is there s

useless trivia, oldest opened bug in Debian

The oldest opened bug in Debian turns 10 years old in approximately 40 days. Bug #725 is on the twm package, submitted by Ian Jackson on Sunday the 2nd of April, 1995. Currently owned by the X-Strike Force, it is tagged normal, upstream, it was last updated Sat, 26 Jan 2002 when some kind soul upda

Re: Bug#292539: xdslusb: please update to the latest upstream version

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > I will probably not do any further work on this package, because the new > cxacru driver will be merged in 2.6.11 or 2.6.12 and does not need user > space components. So far, the plan is to have the package removed from > the distribution after sarge will

APT 0.6 migration -- first status report

Hi, this message contains the first status report about the APT 0.6 migration. From time to time, I'll post such reports to debian-devel. * Status pages I maintain status pages at: Please have a look at this document, especially at the showstopp

Re: Bug#292539: xdslusb: please update to the latest upstream version

On Jan 27, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > upstream released a new version on 04-08-2004, with that version I've > been able to make a michelangelo usb-A work. with 20031029 amload gave > a timeout error. I will probably not do any further work on this package, because the new cxacr

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

Hello On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:42:56PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 21:37 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:15:16PM -0600, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (...) > > > And yes, it does belong there. It could easily add the something

Re: The ghost of libc-dev

On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:58:15AM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:17:55PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > > >> But can one get a C compiler at all (at least a Debian-supplied one) > >> without also pulling in an appropriate l

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

* Henning Makholm | Scripsit Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | > The point is that I want to massage some parts of the configuration | > and not others. I want the others to continue to get updated by the | > normal package installation process. | | So is the whole thing essentially

Bug#295989: ITP: libaudio-flac-decoder-perl -- An object-oriented FLAC decoder

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libaudio-flac-decoder-perl Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Dan Sully [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~daniel/Audio-FLAC-Decoder/ * License : GPL-2 Des

Re: First line in /etc/hosts

Am 2005-02-19 10:13:42, schrieb Junichi Uekawa: > > Hi > Do you mean: > > 1. on linux there is a principal IP address that is assigned to a >node regardless of NIC due to the implementation of ARP etc. > > 2. on linux there is some magic IP *number* that is assigned to a >node; and IP

Re: b.d.o -> ldap gateway reeeeaally slow

* sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050218 00:30]: > is this a problem of the server being generally over-taxed, or just > a sluggish ldap implementation? in either case, has someone looked > to see if the ldap db could be optimized/indexed? if not and someone > could send me the slapd.conf i coul

Re: Take APT 0.6 discussion public!

* Thaddeus H. Black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050216 20:20]: > AJ, having respect for and deference to your inestimable > Debian work, nevertheless I object. When have you ever > seen Martin F. Krafft gratuitously insult anyone? Too often. In this thread, and in others. Cheers, Andi -- http://ho

Re: Bug#295650: ITP: moomps -- Modular Object Oriented Multi-Purpose Service

On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 09:21 +0100, Lars Steinke wrote: > Description : Modular Object Oriented Multi-Purpose Service > > moomps (Modular Object Oriented Multi-Purpose Service) is a modular > monitoring daemon which sends alert emails or execute scripts when > predefined thresholds are crosse

Please test radvd 0.7.2+0.7.3rc1 in experimental

Hi! I just uploaded a release candidate of radvd to experimental; the 0.7.3 final will probably be out on Monday, unless there are problems. Here is the changelog: radvd (1:0.7.2+0.7.3rc1-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release (0.7.3 release candidate). - Fixes hang/sendmsg is

Re: The ghost of libc-dev

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 02:05:56PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > So, while discussing a bug in a -dev with the maintainer, recently, it > reminded me to review an old thread from d-devel regarding the weird > situation with libc-dev as a pure virtual package. > > The summary is this: > > *) The 'li

Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

#include * Henning Makholm [Fri, Feb 18 2005, 09:13:26PM]: > Given the tendency of people like me to just repeat the procedures > that worked for 2.4, it might be a good idea for make-kpkg to check > whether the necessary files are present in the kernel tree (and warn > loudly if they are not) wh

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

> And yes, it does belong there. It could easily add the something like: Sure. Changing an important screen with 36 complete translations just now is an easy thing to do. People who argue for this "easy change" are just volunteering to handle translation updates and bring them back to the state

s1ngle?

Have a rendezvous with a maiden on real soon http://underpartnerbrachycatalectic.com/sse/ endTheze : underpartnerbrachycatalectic.com/xyp/ The audacious lass barfly cocklebur stasis bail . She ophiuchus lindsay maxine emeritus midwestern . boolean seepage sundew koppers . thousandfol

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 05:14:09 +, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So is the whole thing essentially a workaround for dpkg's current >lack of good conffile update management, basically, yes, but I prefer to say that it is an approach that enables Debian to make use of the excellent dp

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

On 18 Feb 2005 19:27:27 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So the many-small-files is perfect for a site like mine. Many changes >aren't even changes that get noticed by dpkg, because they involve >making new files to specify new router rules, for example. They just >get autom

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:25:47 -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is the multiple-file configuration logically equivalent to the >single-file configuration? If you #include'd all the tiny subfiles, >would the resulting config be identical to the single-file config? The single file

Re: "The Debian exim 4 packages suck badly" on exim-users@exim.org

On 18 Feb 2005 17:54:42 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Still, one piece of useful advice has come from the thread: that the >installation comment should tell the user what to do, rather than what >not to do. Fixing this is unfortunately a non-option for sarge. |[11/[EMAIL