On Thursday 17 February 2005 20:56, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10203 March 1977, Igor Genibel wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:07, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >> Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> >
> > I wil
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:04:59PM -0600, Donald J Bindner wrote:
>> When you compile a kernel and check the help on a module, you'll
>> never find "If unsure, don't say Y." Something to think about...
> That's because the string is "If unsure, say N
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 06:02:00AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:04:59PM -0600, Donald J Bindner wrote:
> > When you compile a kernel and check the help on a module, you'll
> > never find "If unsure, don't say Y." Something to think about...
>
> That's because the str
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:04:59PM -0600, Donald J Bindner wrote:
> When you compile a kernel and check the help on a module, you'll
> never find "If unsure, don't say Y." Something to think about...
That's because the string is "If unsure, say N".
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux-2.6.10$ grep u
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:24:26 -0800, Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I put in the time to figure out
>the debian way of doing Exim (and I'm still not sure I understand it,
>but at for now I have it working).
Please file a bug against exim4-base stating which part of the
description in /us
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:01:45 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If something like this is different, then not only should Debian
>supplied documentation reflect the change, but a list of differences
>should appear in README.Debian.
One thing I have learned in the last 24 hours is that pe
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:07:11PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * John Hasler
>
> If you are unsure then you should not use split configuration.
>
> I think the last point sums it up -- use monolithic configuration if
> you don't understand what the question is about.
I've installed exim ma
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:11:16PM -0800, Blunt Jackson wrote:
> it through the web. Except, I suppose there is, I was just too dumb to
> find it. Gulp.
I had a similar experience when I reported bugs in Unstable on the list
and was roundly flamed for not reading bug reports.
apt-listchanges is
On Thursday 17 February 2005 22:44, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:26:12PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:32, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:09:41PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:18, B
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:00:26AM +0100, alionka wrote:
> Description : It's a pong clone, but a one difference-It's played with
> two balls.
More like "pong clone played with two balls" (it is common practice to to
have descriptions that fit well into "PACKAGENAME is a DESCRIPTION" or
som
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: alionka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: 2pong
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Itay Kirshenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED],net>
* URL : http://twopong.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : It's a pong clone, bu
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I have found the exim-4 packages to be extremely well organized and
handy. I used to use the "one-file" method, and was simply delighted
when I found how easy it was to switch and tweak the individual files
that I needed to when I had to create a more complicated mail se
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:08:41 -0600, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why were you not referring to the Debian documentation? It has been (or
> should have been) edited to reflect the "Debian way".
>
Well... I guess I'm the typical dumb user in this case. I didn't know
the documentatio
Scripsit John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm writes:
>> I maintain one package whose upstream author apparently thought that
>> $PATH would be a good place to look for a system-wide configuration
>> file. I changed that to look in /etc instead, which makes the
>> configuration mechan
example below.
is this a problem of the server being generally over-taxed, or just
a sluggish ldap implementation? in either case, has someone looked
to see if the ldap db could be optimized/indexed? if not and someone
could send me the slapd.conf i could send some recommendations on things
to s
Blunt Jackson writes:
> I'm still not sure I understand it, but at for now I have it
> working). There was a substantial amount of hair pulling and cursing due
> to the disparity between what I saw on my hard drive and what I saw in
> the online documentation.
Why were you not referring to the Deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ktoon
Version : 0.7.0.1
Upstream Author : Toonka Films, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://ktoon.toonka.com/
* License : GPL
Description : 2d animation tool
> "John" == John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Henning Makholm writes:
>> I maintain one package whose upstream author apparently thought that
>> $PATH would be a good place to look for a system-wide configuration
>> file. I changed that to look in /etc instead, whic
I have found the exim-4 packages to be extremely well organized and
handy. I used to use the "one-file" method, and was simply delighted
when I found how easy it was to switch and tweak the individual files
that I needed to when I had to create a more complicated mail server.
Thomas
--
To UNS
* A Mennucc [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:52:15 +0100]:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
> >That is not a valid reason to pretend it is a native package. The
> >correct thing to do is to create a new .orig.tar.gz with the offending
> >files removed from it, but keep the rest of the .orig.tar.gz
> >unchanged.
> I
[First off, please follow debian list policy and refrain from Cc:'ing
me. Secondly, this discussion is more appropriate for -user, not
-devel. MFT set appropriately.]
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Philipp Hug wrote:
> > What the hell is a "base installation"?
>
> The list of packages that gets installed
* Marc Haber:
> Is it really necessary to take our internal issues to upstream's
> mailing lists? Can't we have internal flamage internally?
Well, from time to time, many of us have an urgent desire to inflict
harm on the project. Maybe this was just one of the usual excesses?
I don't know.
The
* John Hasler
| William Ballard writes:
| > The exim4 config asks you if you want itty bitty or one monolothic config
| > file. It offers you the option of doing it the upstream way.
|
| Does it tell you which is the upstream way? Most new users won't know.
The Debian exim4 packages can eith
Scripsit sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
> i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
IME, this message is typically seen when one complies a modu
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:02:21 -0800, Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The Exim
>website gracefully acknowledged the Debian configuration mechanism as "elegant"
>and then advised that if I needed help with it, I should contact the
>debian distribution
>owners. Maybe I missed some great docum
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:31:20 +, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > As a general note, I find it annoying, frustrating, and confusing
> > whenever ANY debian package has a substantially different
> > installation or configuratin mechani
So, while discussing a bug in a -dev with the maintainer, recently, it
reminded me to review an old thread from d-devel regarding the weird
situation with libc-dev as a pure virtual package.
The summary is this:
*) The 'libc-dev' package is a pure virtual package, roughly meaning
"provides the he
John Hasler wrote:
> Henning Makholm writes:
>> I maintain one package whose upstream author apparently thought that
>> $PATH would be a good place to look for a system-wide configuration
>> file. I changed that to look in /etc instead, which makes the
>> configuration mechanism in Debian substant
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:26:12PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:32, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:09:41PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:18, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:
Henning Makholm writes:
> I maintain one package whose upstream author apparently thought that
> $PATH would be a good place to look for a system-wide configuration
> file. I changed that to look in /etc instead, which makes the
> configuration mechanism in Debian substantially different from
> ups
Due to unforseen hardware issues with other machines we host, we need to take
master and murphy offline, install them onto rails. We had planned on
scheduling this, but other problematic hardware has forced to do this on short
notice.
The original rails sent with the machines didn't work in our r
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
i don't get this message if i use "m-a build pwc-source" or the
appropriate --append-to-version flags with m
Hi,
I confirm that the pwc driver works well.
Only at boot time, I have the following messages:
usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
Linux video capture interface: v1.00
pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata
pwc: Unkn
On 10203 March 1977, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> The new page looks really clean and easy to read. Thanks to everyone
> who participated in making it available. I like the "Age" column, but
> I think it's still useful to know the actual
> What the hell is a "base installation"?
The list of packages that gets installed by d-i/debootstrap...
> Install whatever you want. You're free to install nullmailer, ssmtp,
> etc.
>
I know I can replace it with whatever I want, that's not the point.
I'm just wondering if it makes sense to have
Scripsit Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As a general note, I find it annoying, frustrating, and confusing
> whenever ANY debian package has a substantially different
> installation or configuratin mechanism than the mechanism documented
> by the software publisher.
Perhaps Debian is not the
William Ballard writes:
> The exim4 config asks you if you want itty bitty or one monolothic config
> file. It offers you the option of doing it the upstream way.
Does it tell you which is the upstream way? Most new users won't know.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Quoting Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Philipp Hug wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to have a full blown MTA in the base installation?
>
> What the hell is a "base installation"?
...what you get when installing from scratch and choose no task in
tasksel.
You then end
* Blunt Jackson:
> Taking Exim as an *example* of this, when I installed Exim, and ran
> into some problems configuring it the way I wanted, comparing the
> application documentation on the Exim website with what apt-get
> installed I found it utterly different.
Just because the configuration fil
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:53:01PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had
> any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen.
The compiled source from saillard.org works fine here for my PowerPC system
as well... (tested with 2.6.8 t
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Philipp Hug wrote:
> Is it really necessary to have a full blown MTA in the base installation?
What the hell is a "base installation"?
> Wouldn't it make more sense to just install a simple store-and-forward proxy
> (e.g nullmailer)?
> Or are there other alternatives that ju
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:02:21AM -0800, Blunt Jackson wrote:
> and do utterly wacked out things to it. The upside *may* be having a
The exim4 config asks you if you want itty bitty or one monolothic
config file. It offers you the option of doing it the upstream way.
What's the problem?
--
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:16:24 -0500, Greg Folkert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Except I'd rather see --keepcomments as
>default and changed to --removecomments. My only gripe, pretty minimal.
And fixed soon. #295735.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies,
* Philipp Hug ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is it really necessary to have a full blown MTA in the base installation?
> Wouldn't it make more sense to just install a simple store-and-forward proxy
> (e.g nullmailer)?
> Or are there other alternatives that just provide a sendmail wrapper?
Well, wou
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:16:24 -0500, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Debian is unpopular Many places where Debian has changed the "globbed"
> config. Many people HATE little bitty files to make things work. Me,
> best thing since Sliced Bread. Except I'd rather see --keepcomments as
> d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: peercast
Version : 0.1211+svn
Upstream Author : PeerCast Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.peercast.org
* License : GPL
Description : P2P audio and video s
i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had
any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen.
so, after looking over the latest version, assuming there are no
new issues i'll plan on uploading the pwc-source package to unstable.
i don't think this really warrants a
Is it really necessary to have a full blown MTA in the base installation?
Wouldn't it make more sense to just install a simple store-and-forward proxy
(e.g nullmailer)?
Or are there other alternatives that just provide a sendmail wrapper?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Jay Berkenbilt]
>> When something is uploaded multiple times, does the age count from
>> the date of the first upload or of the last upload? I've always
>> wondered whether doing a subsequent upload after the first one went
>> into NEW "resets the
On Thursday 17 February 2005 16:07, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
I will integrate per developer new queue in http://qa.d.o/developer.php
soon
Cheers
--
Igor Genibel
«Non bene pro toto
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 16:36 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
[...let's all get along outside Debian please snippage...]
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >To: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Cc: [EMAIL P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-02-2005 14:14, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> thx for your replay. I'll see what I can contribute to speedup the
> release of new packages.
Great :-)
Hopefully we can some day release moin... I mean sarge... :-)
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard -
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Is there anyone who encountered the same problem or is this
> Alpha specific or even specific to my machine?
Same problem here, on my alphastation which I use as a mailserver.
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France).
http://www.logilab
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> I found yesterday that mails were not delivered since about
> 6:30 in the morning so I investigated a problem and found
> that /var/log/exim/paniclog said /var/log/exim/mainlog had
> a wrong owner/permission;
[snip]
> However I found today that the situation was worse than
Is it really necessary to take our internal issues to upstream's
mailing lists? Can't we have internal flamage internally?
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>To: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL P
[Jay Berkenbilt]
>> It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
> The new page looks really clean and easy to read. Thanks to everyone
> who participated in making it available.
Yes, thanks to all of you. :)
> I like the "Age" column, but I think it's still useful to know the
On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:18, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:19:59AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > I do the following (irrelevant output omitted):
> > 8<
> > /usr/src/tmp$ apt-src install foo
> > /usr
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
The new page looks really clean and easy to read. Thanks to everyone
who participated in making it available. I like the "Age" column, but
I think it's still useful to know the actu
On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:32, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:09:41PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:18, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:19:59AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > > I do the following (irrelev
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:54 +0100, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:04:34AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > > I do believe that the right thing is to be disabled by default.
> > No.
>
> Well, I've just checked and
>
> mount --move /dev /temp-mount-point
> mount --bind /dev /wher
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:09:41PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:18, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:19:59AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > I do the following (irrelevant output omitted):
> > > 8<---
Hi Jonas,
thx for your replay. I'll see what I can contribute to speedup the
release of new packages.
--
Raphael Bossek
--
Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS
GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Marc Haber:
> Handling a directory with _some_ files under version control and
> others not is a pain, even with subversion.
I disagree. I do it all the time, especially for classical SCM tasks
(software development). Most systems support this reasonably well,
only old tla versions were a rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-02-2005 11:51, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> thx for your note, but the e-mail was forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] alredy.
> I'm waiting and work on moin 1.3.x packages in the meantime.
>
> --
> Raphael Bossek
>
>
>>Hi Raphael,
>>
>>y
* Lucas de Sousa
| Even the people here that supports the /.dev mount agrees that is not the
| right place for it. It does not match the FHS, and it is a bit weird.
The FHS, like policy, documents current practice. If /.dev catches
on, it'll be in the FHS somehow.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:19:59AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> I do the following (irrelevant output omitted):
> 8<
> /usr/src/tmp$ apt-src install foo
> /usr/src/tmp$ cd foo-version
> /usr/src/tmp/foo-version$ apt-src build foo
> E: No
just my 2 cents:
mplayer _does not depend_ on the win32codecs : it will work quite fine
without them, and still be able to play an humungous number of video
formats and codecs. The win32codecs are purely optional.
a.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, this looks lik
Hi Holger,
thx for your note, but the e-mail was forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] alredy.
I'm waiting and work on moin 1.3.x packages in the meantime.
--
Raphael Bossek
> Hi Raphael,
>
> you had a typo in Jonas' email address, maybe that's why he didn't answer
> ? :)
>
>
> regards,
> Holger
>
Robert Koeneke wrote:
Ok, I am working on getting the correct GPL statement put together so this
game on all the games based on it don't have any restrictions to
distribution. It was never my intention to make it hard to share, just to
make certain my name stayed with the game and future variants
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:04:34AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > I do believe that the right thing is to be disabled by default.
> No.
Well, I've just checked and
mount --move /dev /temp-mount-point
mount --bind /dev /where-you-want-it
mount --move /temp-mount-point /dev
works on a live system
Hi Raphael,
you had a typo in Jonas' email address, maybe that's why he didn't answer ? :)
regards,
Holger
On Sunday 13 February 2005 14:04, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> I'm writing you again after my last email was not answered.
> I would like to help you out packaging moin 1.3.x. Co
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: moomps
Version : 4.5
Upstream Author : Jean-Luc Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moodss.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Modular Object Oriented Multi-Purpose Service
moomps (Modul
On Thursday, 17 de February de 2005 04:14, Robert Koeneke wrote:
> Ok, I am working on getting the correct GPL statement put together so this
> game on all the games based on it don't have any restrictions to
> distribution. It was never my intention to make it hard to share, just to
> make certai
73 matches
Mail list logo
