Re: Rolex Order Details. [osmosis]

Re: Rolex Order Details. [claremont] No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 07.02.2005

Re: UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:42:13AM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > I am emailing to ask your opinion on the likely hood of UML packages > making it into sarge/stable. > > We (the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) are experimenting with using > UML to manage multiple secure web servers on a single

Bug#277175: upload in progress

Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #277175 Owner: tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've packaged this CPAN module and will upload a package shortly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: volunteering to help development

Scripsit Frederico Rodrigues Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > hi. i want to help developing for debian. > how should i proceed? Start by reading some of the documentation on . The Developer's Reference and New Maintainer's Guide are invaluable for getting an ove

volunteering to help development

hi. i want to help developing for debian. how should i proceed? i have experience with computer graphics and mathematical tools programming, but most interested in the computer graphics field, in which i'm completing my master thesis. thank you -- Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: what is /.udev for ?

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell writes: > > Even if one thinks "I've been compromised", it is not the right thing to > > immediately delete the files which are the evidence of the intrusion. > > People often do the wrong thing, especially when agitated. When we notice >

Re: Bug#294491: RFA: povray -- Persistence of vision raytracer

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:16:54 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason to outright insult random software developers here > on a public mailinglist, where insults are offtopic anyway? (Hint: no). > Please refrain from doing so, not only is it against list policy

CVS access to read

Hi to all, A translator of the DDTP Brazilian team asked to me about the CVS acess to read the DDTS source code. Well, the source is not available to read via anonymous CVS! See below: $ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ddts login Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvs/ddts CVS

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Thomas Bushnell writes: > Even if one thinks "I've been compromised", it is not the right thing to > immediately delete the files which are the evidence of the intrusion. People often do the wrong thing, especially when agitated. When we notice something they could hurt themselves on we should tr

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Lech Karol PawÅaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To be honest - i don't care what you think about people who "cut > extra wire from their car". They can be morons or whoever they want > to be. I would point out that one might be suprised that a hidden > directory appeared in his/hers root direct

Re: what is /.udev for ?

> "John" == John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Norbert Tretkowski writes: >> There's no label saying "if you don't like these wires, remove >> them". John> And cars never grow unwanted wires. You obviously need to run "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade" on you

Re: Bug#294491: RFA: povray -- Persistence of vision raytracer

> "Miles" == Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Miles> Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> That would be cool. At least one of the povray maintainers >>> has a giant stick up his butt about Debian, something along >>> the lines of "The version of povray in Debian

debian-policy: please add x-display-manager to virtual-package-names-list.txt

Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.1.1 Severity: wishlist Hello, I am following the steps in virtual-package-names-list.txt[1] in order to add (or not add) the virtual package name 'x-display-manager' to the authorative list of virtual package names. The virtual package x-display-manager is desc

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:52:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:18 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > Roberto C. Sanchez writes: > > > I said "snap it off," not "carefully remove with appropriate tools." > > > Anyone who goes mucking around their filesystem removing potentially >

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:18 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez writes: > > I said "snap it off," not "carefully remove with appropriate tools." > > Anyone who goes mucking around their filesystem removing potentially > > critical compenents without thinking about it and using the proper

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 19:14 +0100, Lech Karol Pawłaszek wrote: > On Thursday 10 of February 2005 18:22, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Feb 10, Lech Karol Paw?aszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well... not really... it's something like this: > > > "I don't know much about cars, just how to drive one

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Roberto C. Sanchez writes: > I said "snap it off," not "carefully remove with appropriate tools." > Anyone who goes mucking around their filesystem removing potentially > critical compenents without thinking about it and using the proper tools > for the job, is not thinking straight. Rm is the too

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thursday 10 of February 2005 18:22, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 10, Lech Karol Paw?aszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well... not really... it's something like this: > > "I don't know much about cars, just how to drive one. I looked under the > > hood, and there were all the messy wires every

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Frank Küster wrote: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is true. But really, I thank that what happened shows a lack of common sense. There is little helping that. Imagine that you take your car to get serviced. The mechanic replaces some part. Next time you open the hood, yo

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:30:41PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 10, "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In something like df I think the sensible thing to do is just to > > continue to list all bind mounts, even when it's redundant. > The sensible thing to do is to check majo

Bug#294594: ITP: tutos2 -- The Ultimate Team Organisation Software

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: tutos2 Version : 2.0.20050210 Upstream Author : Dimitri Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL or Web page : http://www.tutos.org * License : GPL Description : The Ultimate Team Organisation Software TUTOS is a tool to ma

Re: Bug#293986: ITP: rubilicious -- the Delicious (http://del.icio.us/) bindings for Ruby

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:25:55PM +0900, Nobuhiro IMAI wrote: > Hello, > > > Delicious is a social bookmarks manager. It allows you to easily add sites > > you like to your personal collection of links, to categorize those sites > > with > > keywords, and to share your collection not only betwee

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Feb 10, "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In something like df I think the sensible thing to do is just to > continue to list all bind mounts, even when it's redundant. The sensible thing to do is to check major/minor and report file systems only once. -- ciao, Marco signature.

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:19:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > I'll file bugs against gtkdiskfree & pydf. Now that I understand > this more (thanks, MdI), I see that df has a way to exclude bind > mounts. > > $ df -T > FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/hda

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Feb 10, Lech Karol Paw?aszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well... not really... it's something like this: > "I don't know much about cars, just how to drive one. I looked under the > hood, > and there were all the messy wires everywhere. And I remember, that one of > them wasn't there when i

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Norbert Tretkowski writes: > There's no label saying "if you don't like these wires, remove them". And cars never grow unwanted wires. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: php 4.1 => 4.3

Re: kooolman in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Serait-il possible de connaître quand la version de php passera à la > version 4.3 ? Please use english when writing to Debian lists. PHP4 is at version 4.3 in the upcoming Sarge release: 4:4.3.10-2 0 700 http://ftp2.de.debian.org sarge/main Pac

php 4.1 => 4.3

Bonjour,   Serait-il possible de connaître quand la version de php passera à la version 4.3 ? C’est très important car plusieurs scripts fonctionnent sous 4.2 minimum.   Merci beaucoup ;-) kooolman     Hello, Would it be possible to know when the version of php will pass to v

Re: what is /.udev for ?

"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is true. But really, I thank that what happened shows a lack of common > sense. There is little helping that. Imagine that you take your car to > get serviced. The mechanic replaces some part. Next time you open the hood, > you see a part

Re: what is /.udev for ?

* Steve Greenland wrote: > On 10-Feb-05, 08:01 (CST), Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This does not excuse the fact that someone with (a) root access, > > > and (b) without the proper knowledge, went around rm'ing things. > > > > I thought Debian was a distribution targetted at a wi

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On 10 February 2005 15:31 (CST), Steve Greenland wrote: [...] > Consider this: > > "I don't know much about cars, just how to drive one. I looked under the > hood, and there were all these messy wires every where. I didn't like > the way it looked, so I cut them all out. Now my car won't start." >

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Quoting Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:29 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> # If you don't like this, umount /.dev/ and remove the empty directory. > > > > This does not excuse the fact that someone with (a) root access, >

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On 10-Feb-05, 08:01 (CST), Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This does not excuse the fact that someone with (a) root access, > > and (b) without the proper knowledge, went around rm'ing things. > > I thought Debian was a distribution targetted at a wide audience, > including experience

Re: what is /.udev for ?

Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:29 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) schrieb: >> >> > On Feb 09, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> File a bugreport... /etc/init.d/udev says: >> > Don't. >> > >> >> # /.dev is use

Re: Bug#294491: RFA: povray -- Persistence of vision raytracer

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:35:00PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Cl?ment Stenac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm interested in maintainership of PovRay. > > > > I'm going to try to update the package to the latest upstream version > > and to work on some of the bugs > > That would be cool. At le

Rolex ? [travesty]

Rolex is forever.Are you for it ? 4401277 tempestuous ingestible heraclitus variate ankle custody impious No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2005-02-07

Re: Rolex Order [dampen]

Impress her with a Rolex 8926273429 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2005-02-07

Re: UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:42 +, Jon Dowland wrote: > Hello, > > I am emailing to ask your opinion on the likely hood of UML packages > making it into sarge/stable. > > We (the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) are experimenting with using > UML to manage multiple secure web servers on a sin

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:29 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) schrieb: > > > On Feb 09, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> File a bugreport... /etc/init.d/udev says: > > Don't. > > > >> # /.dev is used by /sbin/MAKEDEV to access the real /dev directo

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 10:11 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 10, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "So what?", you say. Well, data should only be listed once, not > > twice. gtkdiskfree sums up all total and free disk space, and > > having /.dev in there totally distorts the truth.

UML packages for sarge: likelyhood of making it to stable

Hello, I am emailing to ask your opinion on the likely hood of UML packages making it into sarge/stable. We (the University of Newcastle upon Tyne) are experimenting with using UML to manage multiple secure web servers on a single physical box, and have been advised that Debian GNU/Linux is a v

Re: Bug#294491: RFA: povray -- Persistence of vision raytracer

Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It's in non-free: > > Thus not in Debian. Oh cool it's pedants' hour -Miles -- 97% of everything is grunge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#294491: RFA: povray -- Persistence of vision raytracer

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:03:02PM +0900, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> That would be cool. At least one of the povray maintainers has a > >> giant stick up his butt about Debian, something along the lines of > >> "The version of povray in D

Re: Bug#294491: RFA: povray -- Persistence of vision raytracer

Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> That would be cool. At least one of the povray maintainers has a >> giant stick up his butt about Debian, something along the lines of >> "The version of povray in Debian stable is old, so DEBIAN SUX0RS IN >> EVERY IMAGINABLE WAY!@&* YARGH#(*!!! LOL!" >

Re: what is /.udev for ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) schrieb: > On Feb 09, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> File a bugreport... /etc/init.d/udev says: > Don't. > >> # /.dev is used by /sbin/MAKEDEV to access the real /dev directory. >> # if you don't like this, remove /.dev/. > "Remove /.dev/" does

Re: execturing libc

On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:27:32PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:17:01PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > > It still lets you execute files that don't have the executable flag > > > set like libc. It's a different bug but it's still there. > > > Is that a bug? I can run -

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:08:16AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > "Remove /.dev/" does not mean "rm -rf it". > > What does it mean instead? It's what politicians do: quote something out-of-context and pretend it means something entirely different than in the original context :-) /etc/init.

Re: what is /.udev for ?

On Feb 10, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "So what?", you say. Well, data should only be listed once, not > twice. gtkdiskfree sums up all total and free disk space, and > having /.dev in there totally distorts the truth. This means that gtkdiskfree is broken, and should be fixed to un

Bug#294540: ITP: concurrent -- utility classes for concurrent java programming

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: concurrent Version : 1.3.4 Upstream Author : Doug Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl License : Public domain Description : utility classes for concurrent java programming The conc

Bug#294539: ITP: jama -- a basic linear algebra library for java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: jama Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Joe Hicklin and others URL : http://math.nist.gov/javanumerics/jama/ License : Public domain Description : a basic linear algebra library for java A basic linear a

Bug#294536: ITP: vecmath1.2 -- free implementation of javax.vecmath package from Java3D 1.2

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: vecmath1.2 Version : 1.14 Upstream Author : Kenji Hiranabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://www.objectclub.jp/download/vecmath_e License : no explizit license (see below) Description : free implementatio