On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:48:12AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> Fetch every time and fetch once. That looks like a difference to me...
How could "fetch every time" possibly be acceptable to the SC when
"fetch once" is not? Are you saying that the "rancid-installer" package
could go in main, if it
I demand that Glenn Maynard may or may not have written...
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:42:07PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
>>> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> That would, however, cover firmware and wind up sending X to con
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsnowball-swedish-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Ask Solem Hoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Snowball-Swedish/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Stemming algorit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsnowball-norwegian-perl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Ask Solem Hoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Snowball-Norwegian/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Stemming algo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblingua-stem-snowball-da-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Dennis Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Stem-Snowball-Da/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Port
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblingua-stem-it-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Aldo Calpini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Stem-It/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Porter's stemming algo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblingua-stem-ru-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Aleksandr Guidrevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Stem-Ru/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Porter's stem
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:42:07PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> > Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That would, however, cover firmware and wind up sending X to contrib. So
> maybe: ... iff it is stored on the local machi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblingua-stem-fr-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Sébastien Darribere-Pleyt, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Stem-Fr/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Perl Fre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblingua-pt-stemmer-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : xern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-PT-Stemmer/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Portuguese language stem
Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> [...] Firefox now tends to fork from the mainline mozilla tree, so the
> code can be quite different, or at least different enough to make
> having firefox load the mozilla components quite impossible.
FWIW, I was also under the impression that the official
The stingy acquiescent. Shebloodstream airway. He attentive polarimeter tulle
doubt calvary
These wicked-hot fillies are on the lookout for a good lay soon :
http://prevenientlymeds.com/sse/
get-me-0ff : prevenientlymeds.com/yik/
The sago greenery orpheus edifice gatlinburg .
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:08:03PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
>
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:08:03PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
> >
> > mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:58:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:38:46AM -0300, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
> >
> > > Mini-XML is a small XML parsing library that you can use to
> > > read XML and XM
I demand that Josh Triplett may or may not have written...
[snip]
> This criteria covers
"These criteria cover", surely - unless you mean "criterion" :-\
--
| Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington,
| woody, sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland
| RISC OS | demon co uk
I demand that Måns Rullgård may or may not have written...
> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Henning Makholm wrote:
>>> Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That would, however, cover firmware and wind up sending X to contrib. So
maybe: ... iff it is stored o
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 09:22, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > This is true whether the bad
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
>
> mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates the vast majority of
> firefox
So every program that uses MozEmbed ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo Marcel Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, I quoted the upstream description, I have a preliminary package
> ready and it will be uploaded as soon as I make it clean.
If you would like someone to check it, I would be happy to review it
Could we have a package which provides /usr/share/.../Contents.gz?
Not sure that share/ is the right place. And as Matt said, versioning
is a potential problem. But lintian (and others: apt-file) could
depend on this package (say, debian-dist-contents).
Justin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 88340 lintian
Bug#88340: Use "chown user:group", not "chown user.group"
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `lintian'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Hi Russell,
El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 23:53 +1100, Russell Coker escribió:
> On Saturday 06 November 2004 02:57, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > debian doesn't GIVE users that choice [remember the adamantix
> > bun-fight, anyone?] and instead settles for about the l
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:33:21AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Right. Do you regard this as a problem?
It would be a lot smarter to check if the install would succeed
before unpacking it. If you were replacing a previous alsa-modules
package, the old one will be uninstalled and non-functional (
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates the vast majority of
firefox
as my link suggest apparently there exists an rpm for
gtkmozembed-firefox so somebody else a
El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 11:33 +0100, Thomas Hood escribiÃ:
[...]
> > What ends up happening now is the package ends up installing broken.
>
>
> I am not sure what you mean by this. Here is what happens when I install
> an alsa-modules package in the absence of alsa-base:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 21:35 +1100, Russell Coker escribiÃ:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 09:22, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > This is t
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:25:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:17:43AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> > > t
On Saturday 06 November 2004 02:57, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian doesn't GIVE users that choice [remember the adamantix
> bun-fight, anyone?] and instead settles for about the lowest possible
> common denominator - no consideration to modern security AT ALL!
Scripsit Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The obvious thing to do here is not to attempt to find a way that
>> we can interpret the SC that makes sense - the obvious thing to do
>> here is to decide what we want the SC to say and then change
Sorry, I quoted the upstream description, I have a preliminary package
ready and it will be
uploaded as soon as I make it clean. The upstream author provides only a
static version of
the library, so I'm having to check lots of things I never had to deal
with in order to do it
right (It seems I'l
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:19:57AM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
> Yes, converting from devfs to udev is one thing that doesn't seem
> to be easy. Another one is the ISDN support. Hasn't that changed
> significantly, too? And what's going to happen with /etc/modutils/*,
> how much manual tweak
> By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
> "unstable" system from 2.4 to 2.6?
An install of the appropinquate kernel-image package should do it. At
least it did for me on various ppc and an x86_64 installed as i386
system.
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:20:04 +0100, William Ballard wrote:
> Kernel module source packages generated Debian packages which may not be
> installable. For instance, alsa-source does not depend on alsa-base,
> but the generated alsa-modules does. ndiswrapper-source does the same
> with ndiswrappe
On Monday 03 January 2005 09:22, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> > > the deaths
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:02:25 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Converting to udev is an additional step, and caused me a lot more
> work than the basic 2.6 upgrade (mostly getting my head around it, and
> converting from usbmgr).
Yes, converting from devfs to udev is one thing that doesn't s
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:21:57PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Why not just touch the crontab right after creating the user if
This works, Thanks. I am just wondering if this is a policy violation.
10.7.3 says preserve local changes, and I would not consider the file
preserved if the mtime is c
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:47:02AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
> > appreciated!
>
> It's "volatile", not "volitile"
> --
> Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum)
* William Ballard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko
> > engine is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko
> > engine than firefox. I mean this could be done, but if it doesn't
> > ac
* Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Folks,
> I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
> appreciated!
It's "volatile", not "volitile"
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49
Fernanda Giroleti Weiden wrote:
That would ease porting this application to run on Debian. This
application would add a great facility for our users since it is
impossible to know what command must be used to print a document on a
Debian system.
Which ones don't support 'lpr' ? The LPR varients obv
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
What is this, "you go to war with the army you have, not the army you
want"?
Consider the full context of the quote[0], yes.
[0]
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20041208-secdef1761.html
This week on Resistance Remixed, DJ lotus will be interviewing Richard
Stallman. They will be talking about the intersection of free software
and politics, the free software movement as a radical social movement,
software patents and the rise of information warfare and information
control techn
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Also, the source is *.fig. Can anyone point to a similar
.deb of a graphic document so that I can see what documents a graphics
file needs so that I can make a GPL & DFSG compliant package. I exported
44 matches
Mail list logo
