Hi fellow debianista,
the package in question has not yet been accepted.
For a pacakge to be accepted, here is conditions some have mentioned:
1) dfsg-free
2) can not be sexist
3) has to be able to be mirrored by all mirrors based on the laws of the
location of the server
4) can not offend someone'
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:10:01AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Meanwhile, what's
> > the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
>
> Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
> even have to be de
Scripsit Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Meanwhile, what's
> the total installed space for glastree if you're not a Perl lover?
Perl-base is 'Proirity: required' and 'Essential: yes'. It doesn't
even have to be depended on.
--
Henning Makholm "It will be useful
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:30:05PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> > >
> > > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
>
> > > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> >
> > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> > it in the first place).
>
> How is that an advantage of use?
Well
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:18:12 -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what this has to do with Gnome or anything I said.
Maybe its just me -- but your statement about selecting a preferred
package over any old package that provides [insert whatever] to
satisfy a depen
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:12:53PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:29:53PM -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:28:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Because he's an idiot. Can we move on to something on-topic?
> >
> > Fuc
Scripsit Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> it in the first place).
How would th
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:29:53PM -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:28:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Because he's an idiot. Can we move on to something on-topic?
>
> Fuck you.
You're being offensive, you should not be included in Debian.
Mi
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:26:50AM +0100, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am 2004-12-02 18:11:03, schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
>
> > The Bible is illegal to distribute in the most populous nation
> > in the world.
>
> Not only this, because the "Old Testament" glorifies the genoc
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:58:17PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > > operates?
> > >
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041130 11:46]:
> Should this be moved to debian-legal?
No, to -curiosa.
SCNR,
Alexander
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 17:53 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:45:35 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:57 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:38:19 +, Will Newton
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >>
> >> > O
On Thursday 02 December 2004 09:07 pm, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
> So, you are saying that all we need to do is cross reference all the
> co-dependencies for package or dselect scenario X?
I don't understand your question.
If you have a dependency on a pure virtual package, it should be p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: asymptote
Version : 0.53
Upstream Author : Andy Hammerlindl, John Bowman, Tom Prince
* URL or Web page : http://asymptote.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : script-based vector graphics language inspired by
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:33:00 -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depends: mail-transport-agent
>
> Instead, you should write something like this:
>
> Depends: exim4 | mail-transport-agent
Oh.
So, you are saying that all we need to do is cross reference all the
co-dependencies
Just a reminder to everyone about how to depend on virtual packages. I
thought this knowledge was widespread, but I recently ran up against this
problem in one of our core packages.
When your package Depends upon or Recommends a pure-virtual package P, you
should always OR the dependency w
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:43:19 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Stern, from my understanding, was broadcasting such language on the
> > public airwaves. Do you have an example of a company being
> > prosecuted for distributing CDs, or
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > operates?
> >
> > glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:08:17PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 11:47 am, sean finney wrote:
> > exponentially faster
>
> How, exactly, is this "exponentially faster"? Is it guaranteed to run in
> logarithmic time relative to a normal download?
>
> Sorry to bu
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:43:19 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:02:24 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>> > (However, the material in question on this thread may or may not
>> > be illegal).
>>
>> Q
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:49:17PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>bible-kjv beats procmeter3, xmms-jack, and openuniverse.
> It's #4735 out of 17953 in popcon.
It's #3562 out of people who use it regularly.
hi andreas,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:32:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> More questions on your version 0.7:
>
> - I asked in previous mail what to do for PostgreSQL support. While
>having a quick view on the code I wonder if just using a variable
>for the database server most of th
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:40:14PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> This is obscure specialty stuff.
bible-kjv beats procmeter3, xmms-jack, and openuniverse.
It's #4735 out of 17953 in popcon.
It also beats xevil.
Le vendredi 03 décembre 2004 à 01:23 +0100, Alexander Schmehl a écrit :
> Did anyone mentioned "overkill" yet? Okay, it's not a FPS but it's
> quite bloody (according to the package description).
There is also xbill, which is quite popular - or at least used to.
--
.''`. Josselin Moue
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:02:24 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > (However, the material in question on this thread may or may not be
> > illegal).
>
> Quite. And if material objectionable to children is under
> discussion, there is
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:28:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Because he's an idiot. Can we move on to something on-topic?
Fuck you.
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:09:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:39:47 -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > The Bible's in there because some people like it. The Bible should
> > be in Debian. But the Koran, the Torah, and the Vishnu texts (name
> > escap
Am 2004-12-02 18:11:03, schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> The Bible is illegal to distribute in the most populous nation
> in the world.
Not only this, because the "Old Testament" glorifies the genocide...
The Thora too. But not the Quran :-)
> manoj
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #2
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041202 10:24]:
> | Are there any such FPS' in Debian? nethack is there, but the
> | violence is imagined, not in your face.
> lxdoom is in main. quake2 and -data are in contrib.
Did anyone mentioned "overkill" yet? Okay, it's not a FPS but it's
quite bloo
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:09:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Why? Why should one not be true and the others false? Why
> can't there really be one true religion?
So your problem with the Bible is Jesus is a fake magical being because
Krishna is the only real magical being.
The evid
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:17:05 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> "Andrew" == Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Anybody who can't obtain porn using only the tools provided on
Andrew> a Debian CD is a total moron. You might as well complain that
Andrew> the internet
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:43:56 -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:57:42PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>> > Krishna is Jesus, dumbass.
>> No He isn't. dumbass.
> http://www.krishna.com/newsite/main.php?id=324 quote: Trying to
> prove that Krishna is God p
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:39:47 -0500, William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:22:29PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>> Except Debian contains no Vaishnava texts nor is anyone trying to
>> introduce them.
> Of course Manoj complained about the Bible in Debian, but he
>
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:17:43 +, Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:50, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > No. We are talking about "distributing" hot-babe. Debian never
>> > has and probably never will distribute "teh Intarnet". We cannot
>> > stop people doing anythi
On Thursday 02 December 2004 11:47 am, sean finney wrote:
> exponentially faster
How, exactly, is this "exponentially faster"? Is it guaranteed to run in
logarithmic time relative to a normal download?
Sorry to bug you, but I see this phrase being used a lot to mean "a whole
lot faster" an
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:02:24 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> "David" == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Worried parents should realise, that if their kids are old
> Worried parents, like it or not, have already caused laws to be
> created in some countries th
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:47:32 -0600, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:26:26PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > Nobody objects to the CPU monitor itself. The objection lies
>> > with the included image, not with the code. Remove that image
>> > and I don't thi
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:45:35 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:57 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:38:19 +, Will Newton
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 21:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >> There are a
Am 2004-12-02 17:58:06, schrieb William Ballard:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:33:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Debian is not Project Gutenberg. Debian is about _software_.
>
> Bible software. It's more than a mere e-Text. They are more like
> little databases.
Like "qtquran" or which it
I wrote:
> Debian is not Project Gutenberg. Debian is about _software_.
William Ballard writes:
> Bible software. It's more than a mere e-Text. They are more like little
> databases.
You wrote "The Bible should be in Debian", not "Bible software should be in
Debian".
And while I do not object
Am 2004-12-02 16:39:47, schrieb William Ballard:
> The Bible's in there because some people like it. The Bible should be
> in Debian. But the Koran, the Torah, and the Vishnu texts (name escapes
> me at the moment) should all be in there too.
There is already a Qur'an as Debian Paket
Languag
> Choosing to be offended by what other people do is a choice.
Oh, come on. That's a cop-out if I ever heard one.
(Discussing the generalities here, not the particular hot-babe example
in question.)
b.
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[snip]
> >> very hard (figure out how to make a minimal diff
> >> from the daylies) or you need every days Packages file (apt-dupdate
> >> does that).
> >
> > It is not "very hard" to re-diff a few files to incorporate the changes
> > between old and new Packages file.
>
Hello David,
Am 2004-12-02 18:25:00, schrieb David Mandelberg:
> People have been complaining about not having child-safe images, so I've
> made some (attached). The images fade from solid green to solid red,
> pretty harmless. The images attached to this email are public domain and
> are provide
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > operates?
>
> glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
> actually m
People have been complaining about not having child-safe images, so I've
made some (attached). The images fade from solid green to solid red,
pretty harmless. The images attached to this email are public domain and
are provided as-is.
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GAT/CM$/CS>$/C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libapache-mod-ntlm
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Andreas Gal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://modntlm.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : NTLM auth module for Apache 1.3.x
This module is impl
> In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually most closely related pdumpfs. Like pdumpfs, glastree works
locally and not
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:33:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> William Ballard writes:
> > The Bible should be in Debian. But the Koran, the Torah, and the Vishnu
> > texts (name escapes me at the moment) should all be in there too.
>
> Debian is not Project Gutenberg. Debian is about _software_
William Ballard writes:
> The Bible should be in Debian. But the Koran, the Torah, and the Vishnu
> texts (name escapes me at the moment) should all be in there too.
Debian is not Project Gutenberg. Debian is about _software_.
--
John Hasler
> "Andrew" == Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Anybody who can't obtain porn using only the tools
Andrew> provided on a Debian CD is a total moron. You might as
Andrew> well complain that the internet is bad, just because it's
Andrew> primarily used as a vehi
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
> branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
> documents or retrieve lost files. Hard links serve to compress out
> unchanged files, whil
* Fernanda Giroleti Weiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:12:02 12:28 -0200]:
> I'll paste here a part of a message from Hellen on Debian-women mailing
> list. I'm sure you will read and think a little bit about.
>
> "It is also the type of discussion that deterred me
> from becoming involved in Debi
> "Michelle" == Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michelle> And if she does not like violence and naked people ?
Michelle> And publicity using half naked people is offensive !!!
I would like to think somebody who doesn't like this, even at age 13,
wouldn't download and inst
> "David" == David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Worried parents should realise, that if their kids are old
Worried parents, like it or not, have already caused laws to be
created in some countries that limit the distribution of certain
materials to minors.
...including US
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:56:21PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:03:27PM -0500, Simon Law wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:47:38AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> > > please, please treat this machine politely. it's my workstation and
> > > i have no qualms with turning o
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:22:29PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Except Debian contains no Vaishnava texts nor is anyone trying to
> introduce them.
Of course Manoj complained about the Bible in Debian, but he specically
used the phrase "false gods", at which point I felt it necessary to
say th
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, sean finney wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:23:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
deb http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/examples/ ./
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/examples/ ./
More questions on your version 0.7:
- I asked in previous mail what to do f
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:21:36PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: simnazi
> Version : 0.0.1
> Upstream Author : Chris Statzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://simnazi.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, William Ballard wrote:
Well sorry I was assuming you meant from some historical or theological
perspective but even then...
> Krishna is an advocation of false gods, exactly as is Jesus and should
> be equally offensive to Manoj for the exact same reasons.
Except Debian conta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: newlib
Version : 1.12.0.20041126
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sources.redhat.com/newlib/
* License : GPL, LGPL, BSD, and others
Description : a simple ANSI C library and math library
N
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: simnazi
> Version : 0.0.1
> Upstream Author : Chris Statzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://simnazi.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Description
Will Newton wrote:
>On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 09:27, David Weinehall wrote:
>
>
>>>So far so sarcastic. IMO if it can be demonstrated that distributing
>>>something is illegal we should think about not distributing it.
>>>
>>>
>>And, as demonstrated elsewhere in the thread, whoops goes
>>bib
Regarding this thread - there are 240 articles posted into google NNTP
groups already.
-Sx-
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:57:42PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > Krishna is Jesus, dumbass.
> No He isn't. dumbass.
http://www.krishna.com/newsite/main.php?id=324
quote:
Trying to prove that Krishna is God presents a similar challenge.
Someone might ask, "If Krishna is God, why doesn't He com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: glastree
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Jeremy Wohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://igmus.org/code/
* License : public domain
Description : builds live backup trees, with branches for each day
The poor
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which are illegal where?
We have no evidence that hot-babe is actually illegal. If you want to
go gather such evidence, feel free, but don't expect the rest of the
Project to wait for it.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, sean finney wrote:
this sounds like a good plan, i'll upload this after i do the update
and some final testing of the last set of changes i've made.
I've found your stuff at
http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/examples/
from today and I'm really impressed. My question
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:50, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > No. We are talking about "distributing" hot-babe. Debian never has
> > and probably never will distribute "teh Intarnet". We cannot stop
> > people doing anything with Debian that is within license terms once
> > it is installed, but we ca
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:48, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Who gets to decide for each case? Usually it is the person who
> does the work who makes the decision -- the packager, in this
> case. The only way to override that is call in the tech ctte -- but
> this is not a technical issue. Yup, a
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 00:00, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > It seems to me this is the sensible solution. When we could not
> > export crypto from the US for legal reasons we created non-US. Now I
> > think it is as significant an issue to distribute items such as
> > hot-babe.
>
> Cool, we legiti
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:38:59AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:57:20 -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > So, do you think DeCSS should be included in main? Why or why
> > not?
>
> Cause it is illegal to distribute in the countries where
> mas
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 04:43, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, that doesn't work. There's some base level of stuff that's so
> > unlawful we don't include it because it would cut off far too much of
> > the userbase (or cause them to commit illegal act
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 09:27, David Weinehall wrote:
> > So far so sarcastic. IMO if it can be demonstrated that distributing
> > something is illegal we should think about not distributing it.
>
> And, as demonstrated elsewhere in the thread, whoops goes
> bible-kjv-text.
I know of no country w
On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:35, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the
> inclusion of hot-babe in main.
I can't see how that choice is yours to make.
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am 2004-12-02 08:44:34, schrieb David Weinehall:
>
>> Really, she's 13, and you think it'd do any difference whatsoever to
>> expose her to a pixelled image of a nude woman?! Sheesh. Either
>> you've been shielding her completely (no TV, no advertis
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:56:21PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> now, if the apt method kept a timestamp of the last successful update,
> it could send as part of the ldap query filter something like
> '(debTimeStamp>$lasttime)'. this would make keeping debian up to
> date over dialup a much easier
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:03:27PM -0500, Simon Law wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:47:38AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> > please, please treat this machine politely. it's my workstation and
> > i have no qualms with turning off slapd if it's getting in the
> > way :)
>
> If you're using OpenL
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:41:34 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Where do we specify these requirements for a package to be in
> > Debian?
>
> Umm, does everything need to come on a piece of paper
> properly daubed with penguin
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 09:00 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 02-Dec-04, 02:23 (CST), Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. Everywhere (or just about everywhere) in the US, it is illegal
> > to give porn to a minor.
>
> If hot-babe is porn, then so is pretty much any issue of Cosmopoli
On Thursday 02 December 2004 14:02, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:36:50PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:06:13PM +, Helen Faulkner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really, you can't see any difference between kde and hot-babe?
between the kde-cpu mon
On Thursday 02 December 2004 12:47, David Schleef wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:03:42AM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> > Yes, you are being absurd. Since you are presumably not understanding
> > the point, let me explain more clearly:
> >
> > Pornography is widely regarded as being demeaning
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 04:57 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:36:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:54 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:57:56PM +0100, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:26:26PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Nobody objects to the CPU monitor itself. The objection lies with
> > the included image, not with the code. Remove that image and I
> > don't think there'd be any complaint.
>
> If the program works well, and depicts cp
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:57 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:38:19 +, Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 21:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> There are a number of locations where gambling is illegal, as are
> >> all games of chance.
>
>
On Thursday 02 December 2004 17:15, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:28:20PM -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A lot of men don't think the cartoon is pornography.
> 2. Please take a look into a dictionary for the definition of
>pornography.
I did
Steve Langasek wrote:
> The "existing installer" used a kernel that is not being shipped in sarge,
> and would have installed this kernel, with all its vulnerabilities and lack
> of drivers, onto the installed system as well.
Partially wrong. It would have done that only on the perhaps 15% of
mode
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 08:58 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 02-Dec-04, 02:13 (CST), Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Encourage? No. But when he gets old enough to be interested in
> > girls, and especially naked girls, he's going to do it on his own.
>
> So you're abdicating your r
John Goerzen wrote:
> On the other hand, it worked already.
So have you ever ported boot-floppies to a new major kernel version? I have
(partially). Not fun.
> We seem to decide we have to
> rewrite the installer from scratch for each new release, and it seems to
> slow us down each time.
We've
Quoting Allan Sandfeld Jensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> LOL, the package is no more sexist than it is racist for only showing a
> person
Well, I gave you my opinion. You're free of not agreeing with
it. Playing the Monty Python argument course won't help us, though.
ITP's are, in my interpretati
Quoting Joerg Wendland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Go, install bible-kjv. Read it until you find the first offensive
> passage that hurts the feelings of several women. Won't take you long...
If this is meant at proving me that the bible is sexist, you do not
need to convince anyone...at least not my
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:41:34 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> a) legal to distribute
> Where, and to who? You can't distribute something without being
> somewhere and distributing it to someone.
>> b) meets the dfsg
>> c) scratche
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 11:49:06 -0600, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:21:03AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > Indeed, and this is also why Manoj's vi/KDE argument is not
>> > relevant.
>>
>> > vi serves a useful purpose for an operating system.
>>
>> > Porn/
On Thursday 02 December 2004 15:47, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:28:20PM -0200, Fernanda Giroleti Weiden wrote:
> > "It is also the type of discussion that deterred me
> > from becoming involved in Debian for some time."
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2004/12/msg00
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I would be surprised if ftp-masters let personal feeling about
> content interfere with their official duties -- I am not aware of
> this being the case. I have heard cases where packages were refused
> on license grounds.
>
FWIW, when I pac
Isn't there already a gimp-dcraw package to do the exact same thing but
is more mature? Does UFRaw have any advantages over dcraw? Does it open
different kinds of images?
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gimp-ufraw
Version : 0.2
Upstream Au
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> * Package name: simnazi
This is the most creative invocation of Godwins law I've seen. Well done.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, William Ballard wrote:
>
> Krishna is Jesus, dumbass.
>
No He isn't. dumbass.
(And in case you were going to bring up that list of supposed
correspondences that's floating around the net, don't bother, it's
worthless.)
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: simnazi
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Chris Statzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://simnazi.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : historical city simulation game, clone of Sim City
SimNazi i
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
