Bug#281279: ITP: mudmagic -- The MUDMagic MUD and MUSH client for X

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mudmagic Version : 1.0.4 Upstream Author : Calvin Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/ * License : GPL Description : The MUDMagic MUD and MUSH client for X MUDMagic is a rob

Bug#281283: ITP: mux -- The MUX mush server

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mux Version : 2.3.3.22 Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.tinymux.com/ * License : Artistic Description : The MUX mush server This is the MUX flavor of mud servers of th

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > I remail my email from debian.org machines, I do not forward it. So, I > > > do not have the problem (I have others, but it is a different story). > > > > > > master:~ % cat .procmailrc > > > > > > :0 > > > ! [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Documentation for upstream software authors

Hi! Martin Schulze [2004-11-14 20:13 +0100]: > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to > > collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of > > a packager easier. > > > > I'm sure all packa

Re: Nagios Packages

Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > A while ago the old Nagios Maintainer filed an O: for nagios. A group of > people, including myself, started an Alioth-Project for it and did some > work with the packaging. > Now we are at a point where we can consider an upload into the archive,

Re: any comments on diagram?

Kevin Mark wrote: > Hi DD folks, > i made a diagram in xfig of what I think is the debian development > model. Could folks give me a few comments on what's not correct. > http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.png Oh dear! Several remarks: . user serif-less fonts . there is no path from volatil

Re: Documentation for upstream software authors

Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to > collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of > a packager easier. > > I'm sure all packagers have wondered about "brain-dead" upstream developers

Looking for co-maintainers for MySQL and Quaga

Hello I'm looking for a co-maintainer for my MySQL and Quagga packages. Any volunteers? :-) bye, -christian- pgpD6y7qSVqF0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Introducing experimental php5 packages

|| On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:42:47 +0100 || Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: pr> If it is possible, I'd like to upload the packages to the experimental pr> archive. I think is the right place to put it. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R

Re: sarge security (was: Re: Release update: please upload to unstable; toolchain; buildds; ...)

Marc Haber wrote: > >Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > >> Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely, > >> to get as much testing as possible? (Like: general debian-announce, press > >> contacts, ...) > > > >No. Why should it? > > Because it was widely

Re: sarge security (was: Re: Release update: please upload to unstable; toolchain; buildds; ...)

* Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041113 19:20]: > On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 14:53:25 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > >> Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely, > >> to get as much testing as possible?

Re: Nagios Packages

Ce jour Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Joerg Jaspert a dit: > Hi > built, installed, and ran fine on PPC. it's now happily running as before. -- ,''`. http://www.debian.org/ http://www.nuit.ca/ : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://simonraven.nuit.ca/ '

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:50:39 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > However, I was not satisfied with this solution because of several > reasons: [Several excellent reasons] > So the Ubuntu approach is a bit different: we let hal run as normal > user, do not modify /etc/fstab at all and instead use a pro

Re: pkg-config issues

On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 14:47 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > I've just started packaging some library which provides .pc file for > pkg-config. So I was wonder where to put this file and if my -dev package > should depend on pkg-config. > > As usual I started looking how it is done in ot

Bug#281154: RFA: ipsec-tools -- IPsec tools for Linux

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am planning to maintain this package in the meanwhile, and would love to help out with the racoon-tool script that configures the daemon. I have an interest in making this work for my new laptop, but IPSEC and VPNs are no longer part of my day-to-day work, and oth