On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
> control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
> days.
I am in the same situation with hostname.
> Nevertheless, the BTS persists in giving the Q
Keegan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What drives the assertion that "demons are evil?" I'm neither religious
> or highly educated on the matter, but I've never really thought of them
> as such. Other summaries in this thread have pointed out their
> neutrality. Can you provide some refere
How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS?
I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
days. I have checked that I am correctly listed as maintainer in
the unstable Sources file and i
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:30:52AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:19:58PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:03, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Demons are evil, and the BSD mascot is a demon (albeit a stylised
> >
> > Below is the first de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> > However, this does not work for asian input methods. Especially the
> > asian IMs are the ones which depend on the locale. They shouldn't
> > do it.
>
> That's why I suggest my way. I have one UXTerm for English which to
> not activate IM. I can
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:19:58PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:03, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Demons are evil, and the BSD mascot is a demon (albeit a stylised
>
> Below is the first definition provided by the "dict daemon" command in Debian.
>
> From The
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:03, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What would be unacceptable about it, and why is it only a "borderline"
> > case? What would push it over the borderline?
>
> Demons are evil, and the BSD mascot is a demon (albeit a stylised
Below is the first definition provid
Scripsit Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> However, I am not (nor do I believe a majority might be) that
> experimental should duplicate unstable, with only a few packages (the
> experimental ones) being newer. However, with the pool structure
> archive, this might not actually mean a duplicatio
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> why is the md5sums file useless and space wasting especially in
> terms of security? until now, I was of the opinion, that the md5sum
> gives me the guarantee that a debian package is not penetrated
> before installation
No, that's what the checksum of the entire .deb
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:24:54AM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> I suffer from the same problem, too. I'm using chinese, english and
> german. However, the problem does not get fixed by changing the locale
> all the time... this should not be done anyways.
Yes.
> IMHO the local setting should re
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: snownews
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Oliver Feiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://home.kcore.de/~kiza/software/snownews/
* License : GPL2
Description : Text mode RSS newsreader
Snownews is a conso
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:40:11PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:01:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> >> Branden's second proposal of using something from Pratchett did have a
> >> nice ring to it, and then there's always the
Adrian Bunk:
> E.g. Mozilla defaults to Gtk 1.2, you have to give an explicit configure
> option to compile it with Gtk 2 .
Because of http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186789 i don't
like gtk2.
Hartmut
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:06:28PM -0700, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
>...
> I downloaded the source code and compiled Mozilla 1.6b
> myself. Unfortunately, the configure script required that I
> install libgtk1.2-dev, and no anti-aliasing joy whatsoever
> was apparent. I have been assuming that moz
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:03:00PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Demons are evil, and the BSD mascot is a demon (albeit a stylised
> one). On the other hand, it's not /intended/ to be evil. In this
> particular case, my personal thought on this is that the intent
> outweighs the fact that it's a de
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [I am not subscribed to debian -bsd.]
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:30:48PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I'm not opposed to anything else you've said. I do believe these
>> > particular names are a bad
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:01:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
>> Branden's second proposal of using something from Pratchett did have a
>> nice ring to it, and then there's always the valar.
>
> Actually, given that I'm a long-time and deep-seated Tolkie
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, +00:45:17 EET (UTC +0200),
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys:
> On 2003-12-05 19:34 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: normal
> > http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/front.php
>
> I took at the sources. Did you try compiling them u
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> it's a bit different and for different arches. What about the arches
>> `all'? Well, I'm maybe a particular case: powerpc + java ;) but it
>> could be the same with sparc + perl o
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:21:44AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we
> > > > can investigate? ma
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 05:54, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:07:56AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> | Only GNOME applications should be in the GNOME Applications menu.
>
> Why?!
>
Rationale (and a real-world example):
Both KDE and GNOME are attempting to make a compl
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * spamassassin
>> * snort
>>
>> could be considered perishable because their effectiveness is reduced over
>> time. Such classed packages should be allowed to be updated in stable, I
>> feel. Of course, it could be argued that any package is p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ttf-tamil-fonts
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : The Tamil Linux Project
* URL : http://www.tamilinux.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Free TrueType fonts for the Tamil language
This is a set of OpenType
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:03:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> [I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:21:30PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> > I'll suggest Offler (or Om), Foorgol (I don't like Fate) and, um,
> > some other god coming
> I couldn't find any way to authenticate db.debian.org when using direct LDAP
> (TLS doesn't seem to be supported), but nonetheless this is damn convenient.
>
> (requires python-ldap)
Or, for people who don't want python installed.
#!/bin/zsh
for i in ${(M)${(ps:\n\n:)${"$(ldapsearch -LLL -x -h
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If this would lead to more developers and beta-testers being able to
> > use experimental, then I think this would be a good idea. People might
> > upload there newer more in-development
goswin,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Subject: general: no md5sums for many packages (e.g. bc)
> > Package: general
> > Version: N/A; reported 2003-12-12
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: security
>
> Every package has a md5sum in the Package file.
the answer is not correct. pls see as an
exa
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:09:07PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:19:10PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > Having cheated and grabbed an online resource for it from Google, the
> > following possibilities show up (my apologies for the lack of accents;
> > I can't easily
Hello all,
I have tried to upload a package with dupload to the anonymous ftp
uploadqueue on ftp-master. Unfortunately dupload fails to upload the
files.
ncftp /pub/UploadQueue > ls -l php*
-rw-r-S---1 2349 8020 Dez 15 18:24
phpsysinfo_2.1-3.diff.gz
After this I have tried
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:19:10PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:15:04AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Actually, given that I'm a long-time and deep-seated Tolkien geek, I rather
> > like the notion of using the Valar - they're fictional, and Tolkien's work
> > isn't yet out
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Hasler writes:
>
>> gram writes:
>>> Every new package, or every new upload?
>>
>> Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
>> Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
>> Experimenta
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> What I'm trying to explain is that I like the idea of an extra pool
>> with the buildd and bts but no automatic move to another pool. I
>> think, DD and people with chroot can poi
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:15:04AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:01:49AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> > Of course, I don't really think we should merit religious nonsense with
> > the honour of giving name to the products of Debian labour anyway...
> > And if we do, le
John Hasler writes:
> gram writes:
>> Every new package, or every new upload?
>
> Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
> Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
> Experimental should go to Experimental only. Nothing would eve
gram writes:
> Every new package, or every new upload?
Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
Experimental should go to Experimental only. Nothing would ever move from
Experimental to any
> Re: Goswin von Brederlow in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why not set it so they are generated when a package is created?
Am I understanding correctly?
And then they could b gpg signed by the developer???
This adds one more check to the security of the system.
I used debsums just a few days to determine if
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complete
> > distribution in the sense that the others are, so it doesn't really
> > deserve a codename.
>
> Isn't it possible th
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:31:19PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> [ As suggested by Policy 10.1 [1], I am forwarding this issue to
> debian-devel. Please maintain the cc list in followups. ]
>
> Recent versions of manpages-dev include a new manpage queue.3. dqs has
> been providing a manpage b
[ As suggested by Policy 10.1 [1], I am forwarding this issue to
debian-devel. Please maintain the cc list in followups. ]
Recent versions of manpages-dev include a new manpage queue.3. dqs has
been providing a manpage by this name for some time. Therefore there
is a file conflict when attem
Package: general
Version: 20031213
Severity: critical
After running apt-get upgrade, here is what happens:
Setting up postgresql (7.2.1-2woody4) ...
Restarting PostgreSQL database: postmaster
No /usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster found running;
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:55:03AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> After taking a look at the RC bug count, I don't see debian-installer
> holding up things at the moment.
Never the less, it has been one of those "must do" items, one of the
milestones that needs to be reached before a release is even c
I'd quibble with both "new" and being associated with freedesktop.org;
the basic technology appeared in XFree86 4.2 and
before.
Xft2/fontconfig, the mature version of the technology that
will interoperate with all X servers, even those lacking
the Render extension, was first released something lik
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:38:37PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Neil McGovern in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I like it too :)
>
> Thanks :)
>
> > Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
> > is released as stable?
>
> That's not the way it works; "Sid" is not "Sar
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:57:45AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:02:54 -0700, Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Oddly enough, most FreeBSD sysadmins don't appear to mind doing things much
> >more invasive than a dist-upgrade, every six months. This has largely to do
> >
As an aside, the questions that were sent to Mr. Mewburn have been
forwarded to the rest of TNF's Board, and scheduled for discussion on their
next conference call (in a couple of days). His personal reaction to the
thought of renaming the ports to 'codenames' was quite positive; in his
(personal)
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:04, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read debian-devel via the newsgroup now (linux.debian.devel) and I'd
> like to unsubscribe to the list but I can't. I did receive the
> confirmation string and answer it but it seems that I still receive
> mails from the list (also
Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi Juhapekka, hi Debianers!
On 2003-12-05 19:34 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I just corrected that to wishlist.
http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/front.php
I took at the sources. Did you try compiling them under Linux? Things
like
Le lun 15/12/2003 à 14:56, Colin Watson a écrit :
> > This is the kind of services that should be available on the web.
> > Making the NEW queue available on the web just like incoming.d.o would
> > also be valuable.
>
> The NEW queue isn't exported for reasons of US crypto regulations. That
> sai
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a a következőeket írta:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:21:20PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> > What was your intent in posting all of these messages?
>
> He probably expects
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:51:58PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 14/12/2003 à 23:53, Brian May a écrit :
> > Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a
> > specific packages are available?
> >
> > I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
>
> Thi
Re: Goswin von Brederlow in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The md5sum files inside the package as they are now can be generated
> at install time by anyone who wishes to have them. Security wise they
> are useless and for accidental corruption they are redundant (since
> they can be generated at install tim
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 20:57, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> [Whoops, didn't send to the list the first time :-)]
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:03:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > LSD is "lysergic acid diethylamide", that's three words and there are three
> > variants of BSD. So the only ques
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
>> that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
>> unstable has with "Sid".
>
> I think that's
Le dim 14/12/2003 à 23:53, Brian May a écrit :
> Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a specific
> packages are available?
>
> I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
This is the kind of services that should be available on the web. Making
the NEW qu
[Whoops, didn't send to the list the first time :-)]
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:03:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> LSD is "lysergic acid diethylamide", that's three words and there are three
> variants of BSD. So the only question is which BSD gets which chemical term.
What about DragonflyBS
Re: Neil McGovern in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I like it too :)
Thanks :)
> Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
> is released as stable?
That's not the way it works; "Sid" is not "Sarge+1" but the never-to-be-
released development version. Think of it as "version i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tamil-gtk2im
Version : 06182003
Upstream Author : Dinesh Nadarajah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tamilinix/files/keyboard/
* License : BSD
Description : Tamil input method for GTK
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:46:27AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
> > since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> > that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> > unstable has with "Sid". I'd propose to call it "Scud", which
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we
> > > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken.
> > > I wonder, t
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> unstable has with "Sid".
I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complet
* Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:20:27PM +, Scott Minns wrote:
> > Hiya all,
> > First of all let me introduce myself, my name is Scott Minns, i'm a
> > debian user, not a developer. That most likely makes you question why
> > i'm using thins mailing l
Jamin W Collins writes:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>>
>> I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug
>> email I mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back
>> from anyone as to why that might have happened. With the BTS being
>>
On Dec 15, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From the view point of libc6 maintainer, it's no problem to merge /sys
>mount for /etc/init.d/devpts.sh. The name of devpts.sh should be
>renamed to something, though. And it can be also applied for /dev/shm
>tmpfs.
Another reason is that
--
.,p**"*=b_ Nicolas Rueff
?P" .__ `*b Montbéliard - France
|P .d?'`&, 9| http://rueff.tuxfamily.org
M: |} |- H' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&| `#?_._oH' +33 6 77 64 44 80
`H. "`"`' GPG 0xDD44DAB4
`#?. ICQ 97700474
`^~.
We are Penguin. Resistance is futile. You will be
Hi!
On 2003-12-15 10:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >From the view point of libc6 maintainer, it's no problem to merge /sys
> mount for /etc/init.d/devpts.sh. The name of devpts.sh should be
> renamed to something, though. And it can be also applied for /dev/shm
> tmpfs.
That sounds reasonabl
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:03:01AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > I get the impression that there is some sort of a "Debian clan" that
> > controls some important positions of the Debian project and that is
> > protecting itself
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:37:34AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-14 13:20]:
> > - As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
> > are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since days,
>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> This is an official complaint about the current buildd situation.
>
> The situation:
>
> - Wouter Verhelst wrote on Tue, December 9, 2003 18:40 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and the m68k porters list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get informa
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:47:28PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
>
> > Your proposal would change that. I oppose it, and I would oppose it just
> > the same if you wanted to call them Loki, Kali or Hitler. (To pick a few
> > at random.) Using names of e
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:00:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Sure, people can be overloaded with work, being too busy to answer
> > immediatedly, but when this extends to a longer time or is the default
> Hell, when they have time to discuss the issue with third parties, then
> they also assur
David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > * Bruno Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031213 19:50]:
> > > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Some packages have a useless and space wasting md5sums file inside
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug email
> I mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back from anyone
> as to why that might have happened. With the BTS being broken (or at
> least appears to
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:21:20PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> > I hope that at least some of you were listening. (First I thought
> > there would be some feedback, at least like "stop it, this is
> > boring!", or "why do you writ
Ryan Murray said:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
>> - James Troup wrote then (as a reply I think) on Thu, December 11, 2003
>> 19:34 a mail to m68k-build list to get a status about the m68k buildd
>> machines (new ssh key, kernel info, etc.). He then got answer
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's the question of botched uploads. I think we've all accidentally
>> botched an upload one time or another, and having access to auric means
>> we can fix it without having to call on the ftpmasters for help.
> It depends on whether the queue da
>My point exactly, even though I tried to make it through irony.
Which enhances your point for those who understand but might get your voice
ignored
for those who don't.
Maybe I'm just overcautious because I've just experienced a bad case of "vocal
minority (1.5%) get's their way because they're m
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:02:54 -0700, Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Oddly enough, most FreeBSD sysadmins don't appear to mind doing things much
>more invasive than a dist-upgrade, every six months. This has largely to do
>with the fact that most upgrades are very smooth, and don't require, s
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:41:13 -0600, Chad Walstrom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I like the "Debian is ready when it's ready" argument. Two years
>between releases may be a bit long for my taste. A year would be nice,
>and six months is highly optimistic. Once debian-installer is polished,
>things
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> - James Troup wrote then (as a reply I think) on Thu, December 11, 2003
> 19:34 a mail to m68k-build list to get a status about the m68k buildd
> machines (new ssh key, kernel info, etc.). He then got answers he asked for.
One p
Sorry, you are correct.
I apologize for the error.
> Lucas, not only did you horribly misquote my statement as coming from
> Scott, but you also seem to not having read my mail thoroughly. Nowhere
> did I suggest that installed packages stop working when "expired", did I?
> Please re-read my sugg
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:20:41PM -0800, Jim Gettys wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to educate you: the world has been changing
> out from under your feet.
>
> Any current GTK+, Qt or Mozilla will typically use client side
> fonts, which make font servers moot; fonts must be installed in
> the file sy
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:54:13PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:07:56AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> | Only GNOME applications should be in the GNOME Applications menu.
>
> Why?!
Yea, I thought that was somewhat odd. The only reason the non KDE items
are be
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:07:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Unless you are the local administrator of one of the build daemons, I
> > doubt you'd have seen any of his attempts at coordination.
> He is, and hasn't seen any such attempt. Nor have I, being the DD
> responsible for the buildd
On Monday 15 Dec 2003 07:21, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:43:53PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm the maintainer of the libfilesys-smbclient-perl module. The mips
> > build fails with this error:
> >
> > dpkg-deb: building package `libfilesys-smbclient-perl' in
84 matches
Mail list logo
