On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:26:31PM +1100, Lex Hider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just returned to debian after a bit of an experimental odyssey
> (gentoo, freebsd etc.) and am currently tracking sarge.
>
> I've used debian on various occassions but never really
> contributed (yes I know I should be asha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 15:18, Joe Drew wrote:
>> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 07:41, Duck wrote:
>> > Songwrite is a guitar tablature (fingering notation) editor and player,
>> > quite similar to TablEdit.
>>
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:03:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > There is one unreachable person; IIRC, he was a reasonably major
> > contributor.
>
> Double bummer.
Aye; sort of condemns it to external DDKdom.
> > I was thinki
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 04:24:19PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
> > Songwrite is a guitar tablature (fingering notation) editor and player,
>
> Perhaps "string and fret notation" instead of "fingering notation"?
I don't think anyone who doesn't already know what guitar tablature is
is going to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Please rename the package to python-openal and probably pythonX.X-openal
> whereas X.X is the Python version built against.
The package source name is not at all misleading or conflicting, so i see
no real reason to change.
Nevertheless, i forgot t
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:19:19PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 08:01, Duck wrote:
> > ircservices-ptlink provides powerful IRC services (NickServ, ChanServ,
> > MemoServ, NewsServ and OperServ) for the PTlink IRC server. Vlinks,
> > securemode, guestnicks and logonnews are suppor
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:57:32PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> These arguments are good, but...
>
> All packages which use this library depend on t1lib1. Of course, I can
> provide dummy t1lib1 package which depends on libt1-1 but I do not like
> this idea.
I strongly urge you to overcome
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:03:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:52:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > Er, actually, last I
[snip]
Guys, would you *please* move this discussion to -legal, which is a far
more appropriate place for it?
--
G. Branden Robinson|Somewhere, there is a .sig so funny
Debian GNU/Linux |that reading it will cause an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
我公司有多余发票可以对外代开：
增值税专用发票；普通商品销售发票；广告业发票；建筑安装发票；其他服务行业发票等。
如有需要请联系：
0755-22086067 或 13670102010 张兴
Tom wrote:
> Can you point me to the ISO? I tried burning the sarge netinst twice
> but was never successful at installing Debian with it.
It's the big bold[1] links on the d-i web site:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
--
see shy jo
[1] links may not be big and bold
signature
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:31:55PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 21:17]:
> > > >We are pleased to announce the first beta release of
> > > debian-installer, the >new installation system for sarge.
> > >
> > > We want screenshots!
> >
> > Seconded
* Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 21:17]:
> > >We are pleased to announce the first beta release of
> > debian-installer, the >new installation system for sarge.
> >
> > We want screenshots!
>
> Seconded!
Try that damn installer and see for yourself. ;-) And report bugs.
--
Mart
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:02:07AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We are pleased to announce the first beta release of debian-installer, the
> >new installation system for sarge.
>
> We want screenshots!
Seconded!
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask this question,
Unless you are trying to make a Debian package of your port (and then
you should really know such things in advance), it'd quite badly
incorrect. Debian-devel is for discussions of the development *of*
De
Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frederik Dannemare wrote:
>> Hi everybody, the last week or so I have been seeing complains
>> about libGL not being able to handle TLS data (whatever that means
>> in this context).
>>
>
> forgot to say I'm running Sid, of course...
>
>> After a lo
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:40:11PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> The packaging method is the whole point. And indeed, some people like
> the ability to do standard things like "apt-get source foo" and get
> foo's sources.
Since you like playing word games... what else do you get when you do
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:26:31PM +1100, Lex Hider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just returned to debian after a bit of an experimental odyssey
> (gentoo, freebsd etc.) and am currently tracking sarge.
>
> I've used debian on various occassions but never really
> contributed (yes I know I should be asha
Hi,
I've just returned to debian after a bit of an experimental odyssey
(gentoo, freebsd etc.) and am currently tracking sarge.
I've used debian on various occassions but never really
contributed (yes I know I should be ashamed).
My question is how can I pitch in and help at the current
point to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We are pleased to announce the first beta release of debian-installer, the
>new installation system for sarge.
We want screenshots!
Mike.
Frederik Dannemare wrote:
Hi everybody,
the last week or so I have been seeing complains about libGL not being
able to handle TLS data (whatever that means in this context).
forgot to say I'm running Sid, of course...
After a lot of trial'n'error this eventually worked out for me as a
solution:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:37:17PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> Is it possible to upgrade GPM in unstable to 1.20.1 (at least) which has
> been out for a long time now. It would fix a lot of brokenness in GPM.
I would love to see a gpm package that used the current upstream and
didn't add lots of dub
Hi everybody,
the last week or so I have been seeing complains about libGL not being able to
handle TLS data (whatever that means in this context).
For instance, launching xmms gives me:
~$ xmms
libGL.so.1: cannot handle TLS data
but the app does starts up, however.
Today, on the other hand, I tr
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:40:31AM +0200, Cristian Rauta wrote:
> Donno if it`s because libc6 but look at this errors :
>
> Hit http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/non-free Release
> Err http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/main Sources
> Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there
> Err http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/contrib S
Donno if it`s because libc6 but look at this errors :
Hit http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/non-free Release
Err http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/main Sources
Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there
Err http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/contrib Sources
Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there
Err http://ftp.tiscali.de sid/
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Andreas Metzlerwrote:
> >> cu and- I would not use an epoch unless I was forced to,
> >> ugly package versions go, epochs stay forever -reas
>
> > You know what, version numbers stay forever too. Well, they would
> > if it weren't for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gap-tomlib
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : the GAP Group
* URL : http://www.gap-system.org/
* License : GPL
Description : GAP table of marks library
GAP is a system for computational discrete algebra with p
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 01:32:44 +0800
Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, Glenn didn't really put many words around his output from timing
> bzip2, so any claims about what he was trying to prove are
> speculative.
The point i was trying to make is that architecture specific
optimisat
First: STOP putting my private address into the To: line. I read the
debian-devel list.
#include
* Robert Millan [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 07:17:33PM]:
> > The only more stupid thing I can imagine in this scope is uploading a
> > package called "debian" or "gnu".
>
> 1) You said before you were concer
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:39:24 +
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently you entirely fail to understand then, because that's not
> what I said. Please refrain from commenting on issues in a language
> which you cannot comprehend.
Yes your majesty.
There are none so blind as tho
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 05:31, martin f krafft wrote:
> System.map is used to translate addresses into function names,
> mainly for debugging and logging. But please correct me if I am
> wrong.
You forgot to mention that "ps" uses it for displaying the WCHAN, or does that
count as "debugging"?
--
h
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to ask this question, my
appologies if it is not.
I am trying to port an old MS-DOS program and I have run into a stumbling
block. The Mess Dos program wrote directly to the printer. I can't seem
to find much information on how to print from a pro
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:47, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of
> drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime
> Only no User licenses)
>
> I have a 1.5MBps SDSL line with a pretty good connectivity, but is
> shar
Robert Millan wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:30:43PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> If I get a new linux package after doing apt-get ugprade which replaces
>> the one for my running kernel, then System.map and the kernel are going
>> to be out of sync until I reboot. Which would be bad.
>
>Ho
I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of
drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime
Only no User licenses)
I have a 1.5MBps SDSL line with a pretty good connectivity, but is
shared with the business it would be located at.
I guess, the qu
also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.09.2118 +0100]:
> Anyway, discussing this is not useful anymore. I just said I'll
> provide it in the package.
That won't do. Read Matthew's post carefully.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. k
also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.09.2030 +0100]:
> If I get a new linux package after doing apt-get ugprade which replaces
> the one for my running kernel, then System.map and the kernel are going
> to be out of sync until I reboot. Which would be bad.
If you install a new
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:44:59PM +0100, John Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > "Standards" are snake oil.
> >
> > I don't expect everyone to agree that following the Debian de-facto
> > standards is a good thing.
> Sorry, disagree. _Any_ standard, including a bad one, is OK, if
> implemented vigourousl
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 12:22:14PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:09:27PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > I changed the naming scheme. All binary packages contain version in its
> > name, i.e.: t1lib-dev is now named t1lib1-dev. Of course old packages are
> Hmm. Why
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:30:43PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >But someone claimed there are critical problems with System.map in the way
> >my package is upgraded, which is not the case.
>
> If I get a new linux package after doing apt-get ugprade which replaces
> t
Robert Millan wrote:
>But someone claimed there are critical problems with System.map in the way
>my package is upgraded, which is not the case.
If I get a new linux package after doing apt-get ugprade which replaces
the one for my running kernel, then System.map and the kernel are going
to be ou
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 19:20, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:53:59PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > 2. kernel-image-* contains images in a deb.
> > > >
> > > > 3. You seem to have a problem with the ker
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:45:37PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > So you're saying that you don't know what System.map is good for?
>
> > No, but if you actualy cared you'd be telling me instead of asking.
>
> Sorry, but: If you want to package a linux kernel, you should _know_
> the few basi
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:31:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.09.1918 +0100]:
> > > So you're saying that you don't know what System.map is good for?
> >
> > No, but if you actualy cared you'd be telling me instead of asking.
>
> I think
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031109 19:25]:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:40:34AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 14:40]:
> > > Actualy, I didn't even bother to provide System.map, and my system
> > > works quite well. I can add it if you br
(As if this ITP hasn't been nit-picked quite enough...)
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:12:19PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Description : Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86
>
> An input driver for the XFree86 X server to enable advanced features
> of the Synaptics Touchpad incl
also sprach Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.09.1918 +0100]:
> > So you're saying that you don't know what System.map is good for?
>
> No, but if you actualy cared you'd be telling me instead of asking.
I think his point is that you shouldn't attempt to package something
as vital as the
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> BTW, is this not the right moment for the creation of a debian-kernel
> (or whatever) mailing list for discussing all this stuff and more ?
Yes. But some people are actualy more worried in rising bogus arguments to
tear down my ITP
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:53:59PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > 2. kernel-image-* contains images in a deb.
> > >
> > > 3. You seem to have a problem with the kernel-source-* packges, which
> > > I honestly don't foll
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:40:34AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 14:40]:
> > Actualy, I didn't even bother to provide System.map, and my system
> > works quite well. I can add it if you bring me a reason to do so,
> > though.
>
> So you're saying
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:58:58PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> > No. It will go to unstable. Then pass through the standard process we have
> > in Debian to determine wether a package is suitable for stable or not.
>
> The only more stupid thing I can imagine in this scope is uploading a
> p
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:18:34AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please provide carefully documented evidence of the performance gains
> > that you are claiming, not handwaving. Evidence of a difference is not
> >
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:14:44PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
| That is not a summary of the thread, that is a summary of YOUR
| interpretation of the thread.
I won't dispute this. :-)
| > Eduard: Optimising kernel code doesn't help as other hardware is the
| > limiting factor.
|
| No. The h
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 11:07, Nicolas Ledez wrote:
> * Package name: zope-kinterbasdbda
> Description : A Zope Database Adapter for Interbase/Firebird
Drop the leading 'A'.
> The kinterbasdbDA is a Interbase 6 / Firebird 1 database adapter for
> Zope 2.5.x based on the kinterbasdb. The D
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:53:26AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
> > hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
> > expect
#include
* Tobias Wolter [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 04:52:54PM]:
> On 2003-11-09T16:19:21+0100 (Sunday), Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > * Tobias Wolter [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 03:47:15PM]:
> > >> # time bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> > > [...]
> > >> # time /tmp/bzip2-1.0.2/bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> > >> D
#include
* Cameron Patrick [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 11:52:41PM]:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> | #include
> | * Michael Poole [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 09:22:13AM]:
> | > Eduard Bloch writes:
> | >
> | > > Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
> |
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> >> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >> >We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
> >> >hasn't bee
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zope-kinterbasdbda
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : mw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://zope.org/Members/mwoj/kinterbasdbDA
* License : ZPL 1.0
Description : A Zope Database Adapter for Interbase/Firebird
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > 2. kernel-image-* contains images in a deb.
> >
> > 3. You seem to have a problem with the kernel-source-* packges, which
> > I honestly don't follow.
>
> Do you understand what standarisation means?
"Creation of an arbi
On 2003-11-09T16:19:21+0100 (Sunday), Eduard Bloch wrote:
> * Tobias Wolter [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 03:47:15PM]:
> >> # time bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> > [...]
> >> # time /tmp/bzip2-1.0.2/bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> >> Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
> >> ap
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
| #include
| * Michael Poole [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 09:22:13AM]:
| > Eduard Bloch writes:
| >
| > > Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
| > > application code and other two maybe from the optimized libc? There i
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:03:16PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:24:16PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > I welcome this experiment in a new package of the Linux kernel. I will
> > be observing its progress in the coming months.
> >
> > Unlike other core components of
#include
* Tobias Wolter [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 03:47:15PM]:
> > # time bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> [...]
> > # time /tmp/bzip2-1.0.2/bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> > Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
> > application code and other two maybe from the optimized l
On 2003-11-09T14:46:38+0100 (Sunday), Eduard Bloch wrote:
> # time bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
[...]
> # time /tmp/bzip2-1.0.2/bzip2 -9 < out.wav > /dev/null
> Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
> application code and other two maybe from the optimized libc?
You
#include
* Michael Poole [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 09:22:13AM]:
> Eduard Bloch writes:
>
> > Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
> > application code and other two maybe from the optimized libc? There is
> > not{hing| much} we have won using an optimised kernel. But the place
* Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-09 14:40]:
> Actualy, I didn't even bother to provide System.map, and my system
> works quite well. I can add it if you bring me a reason to do so,
> though.
So you're saying that you don't know what System.map is good for?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL P
Hello,
Does anybody know a way to find a mail sent to the BTS with a specific
Message-ID? Neither google nor lists.d.o. nor gmane.org archive
debian-bugs-(rc|dist).
The reason why I need that is that echelon only shows date, list and
message-id.
cu andreas
--
Hey, da ist ein Ballonau
Eduard Bloch writes:
> Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
> application code and other two maybe from the optimized libc? There is
> not{hing| much} we have won using an optimised kernel. But the placebo
> effect has been demonstraded once again.
You have not shown wh
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
| Do you see now that 8 of your 10 percent come directly from the
| application code and other two maybe from the optimized libc? There is
| not{hing| much} we have won using an optimised kernel. But the placebo
| effect has been demons
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> > Sure. My users are those who like the advantages described in:
>
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00414.html
> [...]
>
> This *IMHO* does not include a reason good enough to justify a 30MB
#include
* Robert Millan [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 02:40:11PM]:
> > Oh, then keep your packages in p.d.o/~rmh/whatever please. Because
> > that's Debian hosting them. Which is what Herbert said, nothing more,
> > nothing less.
>
> No. It will go to unstable. Then pass through the standard process
retitle 219163 ITP: xfree86-driver-synaptics -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for
XFree86
stop
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 02:52:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[..
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 07:18:17PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
[...]
>> I think it's more than justified to ask you who you think your users
>> are.
> Sure. My users are those who like the advantages described in:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian
#include
* Glenn McGrath [Sun, Nov 09 2003, 05:09:32PM]:
> > What does that mean? Gentoo uses a heavily patched kernel which goes
> > far beyound of what we dicuss
>
> I was in a debian chroot under a gentoo system hence both tests used the
> same kernel.
But different programs. As said by oth
Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to upgrade GPM in unstable to 1.20.1 (at least) which has
> been out for a long time now. It would fix a lot of brokenness in GPM.
> There was a previous discussion in March about this topic, nothing ever
> came of it.
> http://lists.debian.or
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 07:18:17PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >
> > Do you understand what standarisation means?
>
> Is that your problem? Having source distributed in binary packages?
> Then please tell me what your problem with kernel-package is, because
> that's even better than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sebastian D.B. Krause) a tapoté :
> Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 05:19, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote:
>>> * Package name: gnome-jabber
>>> Description : A Jabber client for GNOME
>>
>> Drop the leading 'A'.
>
> Ok.
>
>> Is all that distin
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 05:19, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote:
>> * Package name: gnome-jabber
>> Description : A Jabber client for GNOME
>
> Drop the leading 'A'.
Ok.
> Is all that distinguishes this client that it is written using GNOME
> libraries? If
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:48:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > If you're renaming them anyway, why not follow Policy 8.1 and
> > s/t1lib/libt1-/ (yielding libt1-1, etc.)?
> Yes, I thought about it. But there is no strict ru
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> cu and- I would not use an epoch unless I was forced to,
>> ugly package versions go, epochs stay forever -reas
> You know what, version numbers stay forever too. Well, they would
> if it weren't
> http://diy.xinxing.org/modron/index.asp?id=30
> ллÄ㻨ʱ¼ä ¿´Ò»ÏÂÉÏÃæµÄÕâ¸öÍøÕ¾£¡
> ¾ßÌåµÄÎҾͲ»¶à˵ÁË£¬ÀïÃæÓеÄÊÇ˵Ã÷£¡
> Èç¹ûÄãÈÏÕæµÄ¿´ÍêËüÉÏÃæµÄÿһ¸öÏêϸ˵Ã÷µÄ»°£¬
> ÎÒÏëÄã»áÇå³þÒ»Çеģ¡
>
> ¿ÉÄÜÄú»¹²»Ã÷°×ÄÜ׬µ½¶àÉÙÇ®¡£ÎÒ¸øÄúËãË㣬ÄúֻҪÿÔÂÕÒµ½10¸öÒ»¼¶´úÀí£¬²¢ÇÒÄãµÄ10¸öÒ»
Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Why do you always assume being facing idiots?
I guess the answer would be experience... No, I'm only guessing,
not knowing...
> People knows all about placebo effect, but do you have any evidence
> that there is nothing more than placebo effect?
If you can't provide evidenc
Mark Johnson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm updating the docbook-simple package from V1.0cr2 to V1.0. Since
> 1.0cr2 > 1.0, I'm not sure how to handle the situation.
>
> Policy & the Developers Reference imply that I upload V1.0 and file a
> bug against ftp.debian.org to have V1.0CR2 removed from the
>
¡°×ô¶ù±¡±¡¶ÉÙ¶ù»Ô·¡·µÚÆß½ìÈ«¹úÉÙ¶ùÊé»×÷ÎÄ´óÈü
ÖÐ ¹ú ÉÙ ¶ù ÒÕ ½Ì Íø ×÷ Æ· Èë Íø
µÚ£³£´½ìÊÀ½ç¶ùͯ»Õ¹ÀÀ£¨´óÈü)£¨ÖйúµØÇø)
Õ÷ ¸å ͨ Öª
Ö÷°ì£ºÖйú¶ùͯÉÙÄê»ù½ð»á ÖйúÉÙ¶ùÒÕ½ÌÍø
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 01:13:09 +0100
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does that mean? Gentoo uses a heavily patched kernel which goes
> far beyound of what we dicuss
I was in a debian chroot under a gentoo system hence both tests used the
same kernel.
Its irrelevent, but the kernel i
87 matches
Mail list logo
