Package: wnnp
Severity: normal
Package name: swiss-ephemeris
Version : 1.6.6
Upstream Author : Dieter Koch and Dr. Alois Treindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : ftp://www.astro.ch/pub/swisseph
License : DFSG-free I think, see below
Description : Ephemeris
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 01:38:45 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Domenico Andreoli) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.]
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:56:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >
> > > T
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.]
>
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:56:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > Thus I propose that Herbert should remove the IPsec patch and make
> > it a separate kernel-p
Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bug #213524 on automake has the potential to hit a lot of packages
> in a way that they become uninstallable. So far, diff, indent and
> nano have been affected, but there might be more to come.
Ah! I've recently noticed that a recent install didn't
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:34:10PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Marcos Dione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >*but*... now I set up atp.conf to have 'frankie' as the default
> > release, but when I try to install galeon, it tries to get the unstable
> > ones. if I try to get the frankie
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:49:18PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> bug #213524 on automake has the potential to hit a lot of packages in a
> way that they become uninstallable. So far, diff, indent and nano have
> been affected, but there might be more to come.
>
> What could be done to limit the
Hi,
bug #213524 on automake has the potential to hit a lot of packages in a
way that they become uninstallable. So far, diff, indent and nano have
been affected, but there might be more to come.
What could be done to limit the damage?
--jcohen
Marcos Dione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>*but*... now I set up atp.conf to have 'frankie' as the default
> release, but when I try to install galeon, it tries to get the unstable
> ones. if I try to get the frankie version w/ 'apt-get install
> galeon/frankie' I get:
> E: Release 'farnki
I need to install debian unstable on certain machines. I have a
mirror for this but I want some packages from testing, like galeon or
smbclient. also I have my own packages. so I made a new 'release' called
'frankie', where I have my apps debs and symlinks to the versions I want
from testing.
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:01:57 -0500
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0400
> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a DEC Alpha 1000/4 and a DEC Alpha 2100/4 (sable) that
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0400
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have a DEC Alpha 1000/4 and a DEC Alpha 2100/4 (sable) that could be
> > stand a linux install on them. .
> > The 2100 would be the nasty one t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wallpaper-tray
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Gareth Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://earthworm.no-ip.com/wp_tray/
* License : GPL
Description : A wallpaper changing utility for your GNOME Notifi
How can I remove file from Outlook Express ?
Eleanor
Package: general Version: 20031001 Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux poseidon 2.4.21 #2 SMP Tue Sep 30 13:03:12 ART 2003 i586
unknown
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a DEC Alpha 1000/4 and a DEC Alpha 2100/4 (sable) that could be
> stand a linux install on them. .
> The 2100 would be the nasty one to get it to work on. They both
> require milo, the sable has never booted
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:25:50PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> I noticed while verifying that the buildds weren't still using the buggy
> g++ 3.3.2-0pre4 that some are using 3.3.2-0pre1 which is 6 weeks old. Is
> there a particular reason some of the buildds are so out of date?
They must be manua
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(debian-installer status summary in -devel and -boot. -i18n and
-l10n-french added to CC)
> Finally, and most important, we need a plan for how we will prepare d-i
> for the first test cycle. So we tried to come up with one. This was
> probably the hardest q
17 matches
Mail list logo