On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 12:08, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 28, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yes but those criterion fail to mention why it is required in the Debian
> >Kernel Source. I understand it should be in the default Binary images..
Hi folks,
Beginning in 2001, concerns regarding the compatibility of the
GNU Free Documentation License with the Debian Free Software
Guidelines came to the attention of the debian-legal mailing list.
In early 2002, the Free Software Foundation announced that it
would be revisi
Добрый день Debian-devel!
К ак д ела?
Ц.ент.р А.мери.к.а.н.ско.г.о А.нгли.й.с.кого. Go9l4fp
П.риг.лашаем к се.бе. Моск.ва Ро.ссия prPfVkt
Пре.дл.агае.м б.ыстро выу.чить Р а .з. г о.. вор н ы й а.н..г ли й.с.кий я
зык
Уникальная м е тоди к а обу че н и я
HCXcwpMdqK9JTH6D3M2c96r
М Ы Ш
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:12:06 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity, and is
>> very useful to maintainers who need advice on licensing issues. And
>> I shall stipulate that the
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:49:28 +0200, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj wrote:
>> > I would be interested in knowing how you set it up equivalent to
>> > cardctl scheme allows me to set up pcmcia networks.
> cardmgr's system of configuring things dependently upon
> "scheme,socket,insta
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 28, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yes but those criterion fail to mention why it is required in the Debian
> >Kernel Source. I understand it should be in the default Binary images...
> >but as for inclusion i
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cabber
Version : 0.4.0-test5
Upstream Author : A. J. Macías <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cabber.sourceforge.net/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Descript
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cabber
Version : 0.4.0-test5
Upstream Author : A. J. Macías <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cabber.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Easy and basic ja
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 11:23, Richard Atterer wrote:
> I've fixed a critical bug in w3c-libwww and now want to regenerate all the
> libtool/autoconf/automake files. Not trivial!
>
> With the same libtoolize/aclocal-1.4/autoheader2.13 under unstable, the
> latter gives "FATAL ERROR: Autoconf versi
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:12:48AM +1000, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
> Consider also not just what packages are installed but other things that
> could be using space: logs, caches etc. Not too many machines would have
> 3GB of actual packages installed unless you'd been *really* liberal with
> dselect
Manoj wrote:
> > I would be interested in knowing how you set it up equivalent
> > to cardctl scheme allows me to set up pcmcia networks.
cardmgr's system of configuring things dependently upon
"scheme,socket,instance,hwaddr" is quite powerful but it is
possible to configure interfaces dependentl
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:39:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which is the tool (of choice) to create the files?
I wrote a small script myself now, but I'm sure, that other
people did better. See attachment. At least it seems to
work with the apt-get/apt-move/FAI tool-chain.
Cheers!
#!/
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
> > This seems unnecessary and won't work as desired. If ltsp is in stable
> > you cannot ask for a security update of ltsp-core everytime a security
> > advisory for busybox or xfree
On Sep 28, Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:37:21 +0200, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 20:25, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> I have a laptop that sometimes is on fixed ip wireless
> >> networks. Since dhcp is not involved,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
> This seems unnecessary and won't work as desired. If ltsp is in stable
> you cannot ask for a security update of ltsp-core everytime a security
> advisory for busybox or xfree86 happens.
Why not? I mean I do agree that it is not the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libhtml-template-associate-perl
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/HTML/
* License : GPL, Artistic
Description : Helps use HTML::Templat
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:06:08AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> what? even apt-cache search aMule doesn't help (seems to pull up a lot
> of nethack --- damn Amulet).
I've made an ITP for aMule, and I will upload aMule package soon.
> so well known I've never heard of it.
http://freshmeat.n
On Sep 28, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes but those criterion fail to mention why it is required in the Debian
>Kernel Source. I understand it should be in the default Binary images...
>but as for inclusion into the default source, still begs the question
>_why_ is it required, a
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Daniel J. Priem wrote:
> build_rootfs.sh clientarch=i386/mips/ppc xservers=all/svga/vga16
> from=f.d.o saveconf=/etc/ltsp/rootfs.conf
>
> on secupdates we update ltsp-core
This seems unnecessary and won't work as desired. If ltsp is in stable
you cannot ask for a se
Am Son, 2003-09-28 um 17.24 schrieb Robert Jordens:
> Hello!
>
> [Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > But this is strange. Why does lts-core include it's own version of
> > > busybox and X and other packages? Why not use the Debian packages and
> > > unpack them into the lts-root? What a
尊敬的debian-devel：
迎国庆大优惠[特卖] ！
因艾商城为了答谢新老顾客的厚爱！决定在2003年09月25日―2003年10月30日
VP-RX阴茎增大疗程装 9 折大优惠。欢迎新老顾客光临选购！注册会员订购有产品增送！
详细介绍和图片请看：http://www.yinlove.net
电话订购：021-56728806
联系人： 李小姐
QQ咨询： 202963
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But this is strange. Why does lts-core include it's own version of
> > busybox and X and other packages? Why not use the Debian packages and
> > unpack them into the lts-root? What about security fixes as the recent
> > one in xfree86? Those don'
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:55:56AM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
> Hello!
> [Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote:
> > | /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
> > | clients can be regenerated, that should go into
> > | /var/lib/ltsp/.
> > No, in LTSP the one ro
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 23:10, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So which of the 11 platforms _REQUIRE_ the IPSEC backport? If any, what
> > is the rational that they *REQUIRE* that piece.
>
> As for the criteria for inclusion, I have already outlined some simple
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: extlib
Version : 1.0b
Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse, Brian Hurt, Yamagata Yoriyuki
* URL : http://ocaml-lib.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : exte
* Jonathan Oxer
| Turck MMCache is a PHP Accelerator, Optimizer, Encoder and Dynamic
| Content Cache. It increases performance of PHP scripts by caching
| them in a compiled state, so that the overhead of compiling is almost
| completely eliminated. It also uses some optimizations for speedup
So as total summary:
rootfs will be /usr/share/ltsp/where means CLIENT arch
rootswap will be /var/cache/ltspbecause refering to FHS "/var/cache
: Application _cache_ dataset different disk and backup policies.."
If anybody willing to tell other directorys.
Tell but please sa
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:54:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > I use the attached bootstrap script to build the autotools scripts. the
> > version of autotools are hardcoded in it, which is a Bad Thing (TM). Feel
> > free to s
尊敬的debian-devel：
迎国庆大优惠[特卖] ！
因艾商城为了答谢新老顾客的厚爱！决定在2003年09月25日―2003年10月30日
VP-RX阴茎增大疗程装 9 折大优惠。欢迎新老顾客光临选购！注册会员订购有产品增送！
详细介绍和图片请看：http://www.yinlove.net
电话订购：021-56728806
联系人： 李小姐
QQ咨询： 202963
debian-devel:您好!
支付问题是电子商务的最大难题，要申请一个在线支付接口经过烦杂的手续和高达数千元的接入费＋年费＋交易费等。并且结算周期长。
很多网站只能通过给网易、新浪等短信提成来变相实现收费。如用户支付12元给新浪，加盟网站只能得到3元。这样对站长和用户都很不利。
而且用户如果要选择手机支付前，总会担心手机会被重复扣款，或注册后无法取消而放心使用手机支付。并且现在中国移动清查短信联盟，
收费问题再一次摆到广大中小网站面前。如果有了在线支付平台，用户愿意支付8元，站长也能收获将近8元，达到双赢。
针对此现状，本公司推出了零风险的特易在线支付方案套餐组合
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 18:59, Julien Delange wrote:
> Description : Stats for aMule
>
what? even apt-cache search aMule doesn't help (seems to pull up a lot
of nethack --- damn Amulet).
>
> aStats is the successor of the well known xStats Statistics
so well known I've never heard of it.
* Steve Greenland
|
|
| Except Solaris, whose /bin/sh doesn't support ~. Or aliases. Or brace
| expansion. Or the pattern matching expansions (i.e. ${VAR%foo} and
| friends). Or return outside of functions. Or shell arithmetic with let.
| Or '-p' for prompting on read. Etc. and so forth.
or «l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 204751 general
Bug#204751: dupload should check for ancient time stamps
Bug reassigned from package `python2.3-pyvtk' to `general'.
> retitle 204751 checking timestamps of files in uploaded packages
Bug#204751: dupload should check for ancient
Am Son, 2003-09-28 um 10.55 schrieb Robert Jordens:
> Hello!
>
> [Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote:
> > | /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
> > | clients can be regenerated, that should go into
> > | /var/lib/ltsp/.
> >
> > No, in LTSP the one root fil
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Cameron Patrick wrote:
> | /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
> | clients can be regenerated, that should go into
> | /var/lib/ltsp/.
>
> No, in LTSP the one root filesystem image is static data shared between
> all clients of a given
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
| > the root-filesystem will now point to /usr/share/ltsp/ and mounted
| > read-only by the clients
|
| /usr/share is for architecture independent data. As the root fs for the
| clients can be regenerated, that should go into
| /var/l
Hello!
[Sun, 28 Sep 2003] Daniel Josua Priem wrote:
> Hello,
> im have debianized www.ltsp.org.
Have you looked at
http://termserv.berlios.de/debian/dists/stable/non-free/binary-i386/
?
> the root-filesystem will now point to /usr/share/ltsp/ and mounted
> read-only by the clients
/usr/share
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, George Danchev wrote:
> > Why not? It's a package. We modify it as we need to in order to provide
> > functionality and satisfy the needs of our users. I'm perfectly willing
> > to bet that more of our users are interested in a functional ipsec stack
> > than are interested in
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:39:04 +0200, Manuel Bilderbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello, Kernel 2.4.22 got into testing, so I have to go to the
> procedure again.
>> #include
>> * Manuel Bilderbeek [Sun, Aug 24 2003, 04:32:45PM]:
>>
>>> The procedure I'm going through is as follows (being root
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:37:21 +0200, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 20:25, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I have a laptop that sometimes is on fixed ip wireless
>> networks. Since dhcp is not involved, there is nothing that updates
>> resolvconf, which could be pointing
40 matches
Mail list logo
