Title: Spam Arrest Sender Verification
BINARYREPORT.COM here,I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail.
Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your emails.
You won't have to do this again.
http://spamarrest.com/a?821805401:631455
You are receiving this message in re
I just uploaded a version of shadow that provides scripts for the
maintenance of /etc/shells. I decided very quickly when I became the
shadow maintainer that I didn't want to (and probably wasn't qualified to
be) an arbiter of acceptable shells.
So:
/etc/shells is no longer a config file, but is
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 05:17:54PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > And, as Steve pointed out, translation stuff is minimalistically
> > invasive so this does not require an enormous amount of attention
> > after the NMU.
> When you do an NMU you're taking the responsibility to maintain the
> packa
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-22
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pythoncard
Version : 0.7.2
Upstream Author : PythonCard Developers
* URL : http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : PythonCard GUI Framework
Hi,
I'm on holiday from 16th August until 31st August,
but I'll reply to you as soon as I'm back.
For urgent issues, you can try contacting my manager,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], who may be able to help.
This message is automatically generated,
and will only be sent to you once.
--
Alan Burlison
--
On Aug 22, "Brian T. Sniffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Additionally, whether the DFSG should apply to documentation in Debian
>is not relevant to the survey, which asks whether the GFDL complies
>with the DFSG: we can deal with the insanity of whether this software
>over here is or is not s
Tune-Town auto response Mail.
Thank You for shopping Tune-Town.
"INSTALLATION NEEDS"
This message is to confirm we have recieved your mail.
For all questions please call toll free 1-877-227-0003.
If you are an installer check out our Exclusive Technical Section, for
installers only. With hu
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:05:13PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Depending on the size of udev it might be on the initrd or not.
> If its not then you need a lot of /dev entries to mount the real root
> device and get udev started or a extra script that created node on the
> fly from /proc/s
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, John Goerzen wrote:
> The corrolary is that 0% of Debian is non-free software.
> Documentation is not software at all.
Ah. So we're 97% Free Software, 3% Documentation, and 0% Non-Free
Software.[1]
Thanks for clearing that up.
> If you take Clause 1 of the Social Contract to
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:19:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> No. It's a way to assess whether the "silent majority" arguments raised
> by a few loud people on debian-legal, claiming that most people don't
> really believe that the GNU FDL needs to satisfy the DFSG, are the real
> consensus
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:57:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> > Have you ever built kde-i18n? When I last NMUed it it took something
> > like nine hours for my laptop to build it, and my laptop isn't all
> > *that* wimpy.
>
> Not surprising
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, First Storage Group\Mailbox Store
(SEXCHANGE), mailbackup/收件匣
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
Looks like it's time to drop down this one... :-). Such debate with
strong opposition would now need a meeting around a beer : we've
reached the point where none of us will move anymore.. :-)
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Except what you don't realize is that one should never, ever, ever just
> > NMU and then forget about the package. If you do an NMU then you need
> > to make sure it worked, follow the package and ma
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:39:53AM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Note that some options are sometimes incompatible with some packages:
> restrictions on kmem ('Deny writing to /dev/kmem, /dev/mem, and
> /dev/port') prevent lm_sensors from working properly with my server. But
"cat /dev/zero > /dev/m
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:24:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Since I am no longer merely an interested observer in the GR
> process, this is going to be hard.
[...]
> I would like to re-propose what I had proposed on -project
> more than three years ago:
Well, it doesn't look
Sorry, I'm not in the office, now.
I will be back at the 5th of September 2003
In case of emergency please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uli Friedrich
best regards
Ulrich Friedrich
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:46:42AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * Goswin von Brederlow
> > > | The bandwith for buildds is a fixed price and already paid/sponsored.
> > > | Whats variable is the
Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Except what you don't realize is that one should never, ever, ever just
> NMU and then forget about the package. If you do an NMU then you need
> to make sure it worked, follow the package and make sure there aren't
> problems with it and follow up wit
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 22:15]:
> Depending on the size of udev it might be on the initrd or not.
> If its not then you need a lot of /dev entries to mount the real root
> device and get udev started or a extra script that created node on the
> fly from /proc/something.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Branden's survey is misleading and assumes that documentation is
> > software. It is unfair and doesn't count.
>
> No, my survey is narrowly scoped.
>
> The Soci
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Which means you need about 100 device nodes so you can boot of any
> > of the 65536 disks you could have connected?
>
> Why?
>
> The kernel currently has hardcoded logic to conve
* Jose M. Fdez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 21:05]:
> Patent on LZW algorithm expired so the support for GIF and TIFF
> images is now back in the main Gimp package.
I hope this is not true, otherwise it would be a RC-bug.
According to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html the unisys patent
The Airborne Express mail system will not accept this attachment due to
recent virus threats.
CAUTION- Airborne Express has detected Computer Viruses in an email
message you recently sent to this location. The infected message was
blocked and will not be delivered to recipients at this organizati
At Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:33:10 +0300,
Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> FU> Dmitry Borodaenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FU> libyaml-ruby1.8 (<- libyaml-ruby)
>
> I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
> Ru
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> More seriously, I do not consider that documentation is software and
>> this is the reason why I don't know how to reply to you survey: is
>> this another way to exclude people from discussions? I cannot
>> imagine it wasn't deliberate.
>
> So
Hi,
Jose M. Fdez wrote:
> Patent on LZW algorithm expired so the support for GIF and TIFF
> images is now back in the main Gimp package.
Only in the US...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/
At Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:37:17 -0500,
Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 12:53, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> > Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > libtest-unit-ruby1.8 (<- libtest-unit-ruby)
>
> Actually, I now only maintain Test::Unit for Ruby 1.6. Since it became
> included with 1.8, akir
Hi,
I uploaded ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults (1.6.8-6) now.
Packages built from ruby1.6 source package is simply renamed from
ruby 1.6.8-5.
I plan ruby 1.8 transition:
- Wait a while until ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults are installed,
because these are NEW packages.
- Keep ruby-defaults to 1.6 for a
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:41:40PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 01:42, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Teófilo Ruiz Suárez
> >
> > | What about Apache? Should we change the apache2 package to apache?
> > No. (Wearing apache & apache2 maintainer hat.)
> What are the criteria for
Josip Rodin dijo:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:50:54PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> > >BTW gimp(1.2)-nonfree was recently obsoleted.
> >
> > Because it is making way for 1.3 presumably?
>
> No, I believe it's gone because libtiff linkage has been declared non-free
> by mistake since libtiff was
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 01:42, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Teófilo Ruiz Suárez
>
> | What about Apache? Should we change the apache2 package to apache?
>
> No. (Wearing apache & apache2 maintainer hat.)
What are the criteria for the apache package to become Apache 2?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:24:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am now formally looking for seconds for this proposal.
Seconded.
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
pgpSp5kuhETPm.pgp
Descrip
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:17:04AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
> >
> > Thanks for excusing yourself from the discussion thus.
>
> Wh
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 01:14:40PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> Hey, Branden, how about another survey, about whether documentation is
> software or not,
I'm not interested in circulating such a survey. Someone else may wish
to, but debian-legal is not an appropriate list for it -- I recomme
[Followups set.]
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Branden's survey is misleading and assumes that documentation is
> software. It is unfair and doesn't count.
No, my survey is narrowly scoped.
It is not the job of the debian-legal mailing list, as I understand it
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:50:54PM -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> >BTW gimp(1.2)-nonfree was recently obsoleted.
>
> Because it is making way for 1.3 presumably?
No, I believe it's gone because libtiff linkage has been declared non-free
by mistake since libtiff was never made to include actual pat
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > I, for sure, cannot hijack any package for which nothing has been done
> > > for translation related bugs. I would quickly end up with dozens of
> > > packages I'm responsible for, the majority of w
Thank you for your interest in our suite of GPS tracking
products called Modus(TM). Catch4 Technologies, Inc. is a
Colorado-based, privately owned company that develops and
distributes technology products and services specifically
for transportation and other fleet-based industries.
We appre
Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I, for sure, cannot hijack any package for which nothing has been done
> > for translation related bugs. I would quickly end up with dozens of
> > packages I'm responsible for, the majority of which I'm perfectly
> > unable to maintain.
>
> If you ca
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:53:30PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> Quoting Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:28:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > J?r?me, please use "darn cabal of debian-legal zealots" next time.
> > >cu and- triple reading the origina
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I feel this is utter bullshit, personally. One shouldn't be NMU'ing for
> > wishlist bugs. If the package isn't maintained then hijack it instead.
> > If you don't have time to do that then there's no
---
This e-mail is generated by the WEBMAILLOGIN.COM mail server to warn you that
the e-mail
sent by debian-devel@lists.debian.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is infected with
virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please contact your system administrator for further information.
If you
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:55:51AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > We'll start with french translations. Not a lot of them are sleeping,
> > because we already pissed off some maintainers, or even did some NMU's
> > (yes, for wishlist bugs...).
> I
Quoting Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:28:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Jérôme, please use "darn cabal of debian-legal zealots" next time.
> >cu and- triple reading the original mail, stil smiling -reas
>
> And don't forget to call them "licensing
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Advantage: This makes the list in 5.2 the authoritative list, which
> makes it easier later to see which documents are in fact foundation
> Documents. (Or to speak in computer slang: normalization of data.)
I agree with this change, other comments?
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:17:04 +0200, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Quoting Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> > We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
>>
>> Thanks for excusing yourself from the discussion thu
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:28:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Jérôme, please use "darn cabal of debian-legal zealots" next time.
>cu and- triple reading the original mail, stil smiling -reas
And don't forget to call them "licensing geeks"!
Richard Braakman
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > http://zoy.org/~sam/debian/barrendero_1.0-1.1.diff.gz
>
> >I haven't contacted the maintainer yet because I was working on other
> > bugs, but if he is MIA as you seem to be suggesting, I'll probably
> > upload that NMU to DELAYED quite soon
Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I feel this is utter bullshit, personally. One shouldn't be NMU'ing for
> wishlist bugs. If the package isn't maintained then hijack it instead.
> If you don't have time to do that then there's no way in hell you should
> be NMU'ing it anyway. If no
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> We'll start with french translations. Not a lot of them are sleeping,
> because we already pissed off some maintainers, or even did some NMU's
> (yes, for wishlist bugs...).
I feel this is utter bullshit, personally. One shouldn't be NMU'ing for
wi
Il gio, 2003-08-21 alle 17:35, Jay Bonci ha scritto:
> * Package name: livejournal
> Version : 2003042200
> Upstream Author : Brad Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://www.livejournal.com/code
> * License : LGPL (possibly others, clarifying)
> Descri
Dear Debian Developers,
as some of you might have read on DWN the FFII is organizing some last
minute protest against Software Patent legalization in the EU (the
European Parliament plans to vote on this topic in the week beginning
with September 1st). To find more information about the protest re
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:33:37PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:51:29AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > That usually contains the original message as attachment so your virus
> > filter should catch and destroy those. :)
>
> Actually I got one such message wher
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:51:29AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> That usually contains the original message as attachment so your virus
> filter should catch and destroy those. :)
Actually I got one such message where amavisd-new/clamav didn't detect
anything wrong.
LATER: I see why, the M
What about exec-shield by Ingo Molnar?
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/exec-shield/
it seems it is less intrusive then other kernel patches and can be
enabled/disabled at run-time
Stripped from annoucement:
The exec-shield feature provides protection against stack, buffer or
function pointer overf
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> But then again a bug in webim-sendmail would keep webmin-postfix out
> of testing. But that shouldn't be a problem if you fix RC bugs
> quickly.
True.
Especially since sendmail has a history of security problems...
The exact
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Which means you need about 100 device nodes so you can boot of any
> of the 65536 disks you could have connected?
Why?
The kernel currently has hardcoded logic to convert the root=... string
into a major,minor number, it
Hi,
We (Daniel Glassey and Ivo Timmermans) are going to take over the
package icu from Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Yves has failed to
respond (his hotmail address, that he last used in communication, is
over quotum, and other email went unanswered) to bugs and other email.
We will upload a
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:44:02PM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> BA> I intend to package ncurses-ruby, which is a ruby extension for the
> BA> ncurses C library. It is placed under the LGPL 2.1. It's required
> BA> by raggle.
On Aug 22, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm basically just intrested in whats needed in /dev/ to get udev
>started and what userspace tools udev needs on a initrd.
Whatever is already needed to make your system boot.
So far udev will only create nodes for plug and play device
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:46:42AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Goswin von Brederlow
> > | The bandwith for buildds is a fixed price and already paid/sponsored.
> > | Whats variable is the traffic.
> >
> > How can you say that? It might b
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Eh. Personally I tend to doubt it's lack of trust that's causing
> > translations to rot in the BTS.
>
> As far as I know this is more maintainer laziness, for sure.. :-)
>
> I guess that in the fu
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:21:55PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > No, it is based on the assumption that a buildd will only install
> > things listed in the Build-Depends, which means it will catch
> > stuff that only builds on the maintainers workstation b
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:58:30AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
JrmM> Branden's survey is misleading and assumes that documentation is
JrmM> software. It is unfair and doesn't count.
Hey, Branden, how about another survey, about whether documentation is
software or not, and whether documentation
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:44:02PM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
BA> I intend to package ncurses-ruby, which is a ruby extension for the
BA> ncurses C library. It is placed under the LGPL 2.1. It's required
BA> by raggle.
BA>
BA> http://ncurses-ruby.berlios.de
Isn't libcurses-ruby what you ar
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Brian May wrote:
>
> > You obviously did not understand my scheme then.
> >
> > webmin-postfix and webmin-sendmail would still get built as
> > seperate *.deb packages.
> >
> > They just share the one source package.
> >
>
> Oh
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:24:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > For the auto-responders you can write to them directly and ask them to make
> > their machines stop sending email to you.
>
> This won't work if the auto-response is a bounce message, eg. u
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow
>
> | The bandwith for buildds is a fixed price and already paid/sponsored.
> | Whats variable is the traffic.
>
> How can you say that? It might be on an ADSL line or something.
Have fun building kde i18n. Its 200MB sources
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:35, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > A paper on udev was presented at OLS this year, at the URL below
> > > you can find a copy in PDF format. Basically it is a way of
> > > providing some of the features of devfs but based aroun
Quoting Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
>
> Sorry, but that insult doesn't put a winksmiley on my face.
> Please don't try to start a useless flamewar. They break
> out so easily on their own. There is no need to discuss
> this matter here; it ha
I would suggest a small modification:
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 07:05]:
> + 5.2 Initially, the list of foundation Documents consists
> + of this document, The Debian Constitution, as well as the
> + documents known as the Debian Social Contract and the
> +
Quoting Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ROTFL.
>
> Am I the only one who interpreted this as a joke? Humpf, as even
> Branden sent a sincere follow-up I think I am missing something
> important. Perhaps the word "cabal" was missing? Throwing in some
> "darn" might have helped, too.
>
> J
Quoting Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
>
> Thanks for excusing yourself from the discussion thus.
Where has you sense of humour gone?
More seriously, I do not consider that do
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 09:49, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> ... what KDE, gcc, X,
> gnome versions will be in sarge?
And what about postfix? 2.0 is in unstable quite a while and works ok. I guess
it will make it to sarge.
cheers
-- vbi
--
Jack Nicklaus hit a golf shot that only gravity kept
Quoting Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> > No, no, no! You don't get it. There may be a majority among the
> > debian-legal zealots, but we need a consensus among Debian as a
> > whole (which means voting of course).
> >
> mailto:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Essential packages which currently pre-depend on libpam0g (read:
> login) will also need a versioned Pre-Depends on libpam-runtime
> before adopting this scheme, so that they are usable in an
> unconfigured state. Please consider this an introdu
Martin Quinson wrote:
> I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper contributors to
> Debian to get their GPG key in the Debian keyserver.
No. The contents Debian keyserver reflect the
list of registered Debian developers who also have an account on about
all Debian machines. It
Hi,
ooops. This should have gone to debian-vote. Could prospective
seconds, and Simon, please send the email to debian-vote, rather than
here?
I apologize for the inconvenience.
manoj
--
He knew the tavernes well in every toun. Geoffrey Chaucer
Manoj Srivastava <[EM
On 22 Aug 2003 03:58:03 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>>
>>
>> > But sometimes there are fundamental disagreements about how
>> > something should be package
Hey dTJITdGYHjD Debian-devel zteTc
8305 076
Quoting Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Eh. Personally I tend to doubt it's lack of trust that's causing
> translations to rot in the BTS.
As far as I know this is more maintainer laziness, for sure.. :-)
I guess that in the future many translation will stop to rot in the
BTS.. :-)
We'll
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:21:55PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> No, it is based on the assumption that a buildd will only install things
> listed in the Build-Depends, which means it will catch stuff that only
> builds on the maintainers workstation because they aren't building
> inside a chroot and
* Goswin von Brederlow
| The bandwith for buildds is a fixed price and already paid/sponsored.
| Whats variable is the traffic.
How can you say that? It might be on an ADSL line or something.
| What I ment was its muchs faster to upload way less data.
I doubt the buildds have a much faster co
Josip Rodin wrote:
BTW gimp(1.2)-nonfree was recently obsoleted.
Because it is making way for 1.3 presumably?
* Teófilo Ruiz Suárez
| What about Apache? Should we change the apache2 package to apache?
No. (Wearing apache & apache2 maintainer hat.)
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :'
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:51, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:24:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > For the auto-responders you can write to them directly and ask them to
> > make their machines stop sending email to you.
>
> This won't work if the auto-response is a bounce message, eg
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:24:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[snip]
> ==
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall
Linux Counter wrote:
The subject line of your message was Re: Wicked screensaver.
the linux counter got spammed! now, that's just f..kin' rude.
ben
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:24:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> For the auto-responders you can write to them directly and ask them to make
> their machines stop sending email to you.
This won't work if the auto-response is a bounce message, eg. user
doesn't exist...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:39:52PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Well for now I'm going to solve the immediate policy violation by reducing
> webmin.orig.tar.gz. I'll implement your scheme when the new release comes
GREAT!
> out in the next couple of weeks. (Perhps you'd like to file a wishli
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:38, rintek wrote:
> > As for Adamantix people helping out, they haven't even posted to this
> > mailing list yet, so I have no great expectations for them to help in
> > future.
>
> Please have a look at your email
Yes, I lived in the Netherlands for 2 years of the time I sp
93 matches
Mail list logo
