On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:44:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:45:33PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > It's also tagged "pending" since May... Matthew, do you need a
> > co-maintainer for ssh?
>
> Matthew's *got* a co-maintainer for ssh, as a cursory check of the
>
* Andrew M.A. Cater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030728 18:06]:
>
> I was actually asked directly at work today what I thought was
> going to happen to Red Hat and whether Debian supported the AMD64.
>
> I've seen a couple of posts on this topic since about March.
>
> Anybody care to sum up in words sui
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:10:08PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Anybody care to sum up in words suitable for a suit how well
> Debian supports AMD64 / when it will be ready to support AMD64
In practical terms, Debian does support AMD64, because the architecture
is backwards compatible with x8
I was actually asked directly at work today what I thought was
going to happen to Red Hat and whether Debian supported the AMD64.
I've seen a couple of posts on this topic since about March.
Anybody care to sum up in words suitable for a suit how well
Debian supports AMD64 / when it will be read
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cryptokit
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Xavier Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/software.html
* License : LGPL
Description : cry
Previously Andres Salomon wrote:
> Despite claims otherwise, I'm actually alive, w/ experimental packages
> at http://sloth.voxel.net/~dilinger/lvm2/. Various things (bugs, loss
> of an internet connection, upstream developers going on vacation) have
> kept me from uploading; however, after talkin
Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
WNPP and one about RC bugs.
I think it will help to improve Debian quality if several more lists will be
"broadcasted" by BTS:
- Bugs that have "patch" tag for (e.g.) 2 weeks (and don't have "wontfix"
tag). Broadcasting su
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ocamldap
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Miles Egan, Eric Stokes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.csun.edu/~eric/ocamldap-1.1.0.tar.gz
* License : LGPL
Descrip
* Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 21:32]:
> Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago
> and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer
> according to db.debian.org .
According to packages.qa.d.o was the lastest upload in 2003 (though it
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>...
> >> I contacted the SRM about the possibility of inclusion of gimp-print
> >> 4.2.5-1woody0 in a point release, but I'v
Oh, also, the last upload was 5 months ago; I typo'd in the changelog,
putting 2002 instead of 2003. :)
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:58, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago
> and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer
Despite claims otherwise, I'm actually alive, w/ experimental packages
at http://sloth.voxel.net/~dilinger/lvm2/. Various things (bugs, loss
of an internet connection, upstream developers going on vacation) have
kept me from uploading; however, after talking w/ upstream, I'm going to
do an upload
Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago
and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer
according to db.debian.org .
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is har
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>...
>> I contacted the SRM about the possibility of inclusion of gimp-print
>> 4.2.5-1woody0 in a point release, but I've not had any reply yet. It
>> doesn't meed the usual criteria for a sta
At end of every message posted there are instructions to remove your
email from this list.
[]'s
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 13:05, SCORDATO, C. wrote:
>
>
>
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems db.debian.org is still offline. Is there any way I can change my
> mail forwarding without it? It forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> currently bach is broken, so bounces are going all over the place
> (mailing list subscriptions). I n
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libi18n-java
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Jean-Hugues de Raigniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://jhraigniac.freesurf.fr/i18n-lib/
> * License : ACME
Hello!
What is the current status of mplayer's ITP? After the opendivx driver
removal, has anyone investigated wether it's fully free software?
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mas
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: sins
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Petr Malat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://petrm.host.sk/sins.html
* License : GPL
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
Even the BTS understands attachments now. I wouldn't be a fan of
rejecting them from -devel. In particul
Re: Re: hey [Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM
+0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
/me would miss his gpg signature
Christoph
--
Christoph
Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
pgp signature *should* be attached
-- Arnaud Vandyck
http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
pgp6Q8YBVPiDi.pgp
Des
[It might also be a good idea to wrap your postings]
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
GPG/MIME is nice. And attached patches make thing
It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jaxe
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Damien Guillaume, Bodo Tasche, Léa Guillon, Bertrand
Delacretaz, Sven Kitschke.
* URL or Web page : http://jaxe.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : xml
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: charva
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Rob Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.pitman.co.za/projects/charva/
* License : LGPL
Description : java windowing toolkit for text terminals
Java framewo
hi my name is tom and i saw your name at this site
so i figured maybe u could send some pics and stuff so my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
later
Re: Re: [custom] Some issues for custom debian distributions [Bob Proulx
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 11:10:40PM -0600, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > # check whether we run interactively
> > [ "$PS1" ] || return
> >
> > (Something like that exists in Debian's /etc/skel/.bash_profi
Hi,
It's better to write POSIX standards - compliant shell scripts than just
explicitly use /bin/bash, IMHO, especially for bash-isms as simple as
this one. Just replace ">& /dev/null" with "> /dev/null 2>&1".
Cheers,
Timshel
--
Timshel Knoll
Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.o
Christoph Berg wrote:
> The problem that one doesn't want things like .bash_completion read
> there is easily solved by
>
> # check whether we run interactively
> [ "$PS1" ] || return
>
> (Something like that exists in Debian's /etc/skel/.bash_profile.)
Uh, no. You are thinking of /
31 matches
Mail list logo
