I demand that Michael Banck may or may not have written...
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:09:55AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> But one they forgot when making the spec was some kind of date
>> information.
> Just subscribe to debian-devel-changes. You can get all the necessary
> information from t
Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2003 03:09 pm, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Sure, "you don't need to know the date, as you are using sid and did
> > apt-get update, you are assured it's the latest version". Well, one
> > doesn't need the maintainer field either etc.
>
> Are you implying that
I just want to thank the security team for doing such a stellar job
lately, with both the enormous kernel fixes, and the constant stream of
advisories on other packages. Though I kinda hope that will taper off
sometime, or we're going to look bad on the security issues per year
metrics..
And I can
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:09:55AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> But one they forgot when making the spec was some kind of date
> information.
Just subscribe to debian-devel-changes. You can get all the necessary
information from there.
HTH & HAND,
Michael
--
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
MOAHAHAHA
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 03:09 pm, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Sure, "you don't need to know the date, as you are using sid and did
> apt-get update, you are assured it's the latest version". Well, one
> doesn't need the maintainer field either etc.
Are you implying that knowing the date you last update
Hi,
Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Angathule wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to install KDE on a Sid Machine, but I can't, this is what I
> > do:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ apt-cache show libsensors1
> Package: libsensors1
> Status: install ok installed
Yes. It is inst
There are tons of information categories in the apt Packages file.
But one they forgot when making the spec was some kind of date
information. For unless a maintainer somehow smuggles it in, say in
the version number,
$ apt-cache policy icom
Installed: 19990819-3
Candidate: 20020923-2
otherwis
Hello,
A couple of weeks ago I posted with some considerable pleasure an
announcement asking for developers for a multi-media project based in
Portland, Oregon.
See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200305/msg02155.html
I received a few responses of interest and have f
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:09:44PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I've got:
> [...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ apt-cache show libsensors1
> Package: libsensors1
> Status: install ok installed
...whcih is a locally-installed package not available in the archive.
Whatever package is depending on libse
Thus spake Neil McGovern:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ apt-cache show libsensors1
> Package: libsensors1
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: libs
> Installed-Size: 123
> Maintainer: David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Source: lm-sensors
> Version: 2.7.0-3
lm-sensors (2.7.0-4)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Angathule wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install KDE on a Sid Machine, but I can't, this is what I
> do:
>
I've got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ apt-cache show libsensors1
Package: libsensors1
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:33:58PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I urge anyone who participates in package maintenance to read this section
> > in the Developer's Reference:
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-
I'm trying to install KDE on a Sid Machine, but I can't, this is what I
do:
Lorien:~# apt-get install kdebase
[ ... ]
he following packages have unmet dependencies:
kdebase: Depends: ksysguard (>= 4:3.1.2-1) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
Lorien:~# apt-get install ksys
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I urge anyone who participates in package maintenance to read this section
> in the Developer's Reference:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-bug-security
For political reasons, I'd rather like to file bug reports usin
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Micha? Drozd wrote:
> Latest I've tried to apt-build xserver-xfree and i got error because
> apt-build couldn't find any candidates to install openbsd.
> (apt-get build-dep has similar problems)
> In .dsc file there is :
>
> Build-Depends: ..., ,
Hi,
Latest I've tried to apt-build xserver-xfree and i got error because
apt-build couldn't find any candidates to install openbsd.
(apt-get build-dep has similar problems)
In .dsc file there is :
Build-Depends: ..., , ..
..., kernel-headers-2.4 | hurd | freebsd | netbsd | openbsd
but i
Looks like your KMail is doing strange things with the In-Reply-To
header (using a wrong Message-ID).
Your last mail contains:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ie you break all threads you are replying to.
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAI
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:22:54AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Yep. That's the point of my proposal. They would be. When you changed a
> package to use the new c103 (or whatever the next ABI is), you'd change
> the library dependencies to the c103 versions.
This will work, but it will sto
On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 16:43 US/Eastern, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:46:13PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Now, if we changed sarge to use g++-c102 (as I briefly suggested),
would that prevent this problem in sarge+1 or sarge+2 or whenever the
ABI changes again?
no, be
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11.30, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:44:12PM +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote:
> > Essentially, it is a count of packages that directly and indirectly
> > depend on a package with at least one RC bug before they can go into
> > testing.
> >
> > My idea is to show
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:24:03PM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kajkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm intending to move to SID from my woody box. I was wondering what
> > problems should I expect while building packages using new gcc 3.3. Does
> > kernel 2.4.21 build cor
Peter Mathiasson wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote:
>> My program answers the question "Where will an extra effort produce
drastic
>> results?" I'm sure I could have modified Björns program to yield this
output,
>> but I don't read and write Perl programs for
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:30:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Hello, Mark has uploaded it yesterday in the evening. The bad news is
>> that 4.3 seems to be broken on m68k, ia64 and alpha, "make test"
>> fails.
> Even if autobuilders have starte
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:30:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello, Mark has uploaded it yesterday in the evening. The bad news is
> that 4.3 seems to be broken on m68k, ia64 and alpha, "make test"
> fails.
Even if autobuilders have started rebuilding packages I can't see them
in the pool di
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:30:03PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Take kdelibs as an example. When the RC bugs for kdelibs are fixed,
> kdelibs still can't goto testing, because all other kde applications
> have to be RC free and compile on all supported platforms. And since
> kdebase is creating inte
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:30:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Mark has uploaded it yesterday in the evening. The bad news is that
> 4.3 seems to be broken on m68k, ia64 and alpha, "make test" fails.
Yes, thanks, I get in touch with him on this subject, but I forgot to Cc
debian-devel.
Regard
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:17:37PM +1200, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
> get the rgzip package into debian. This patch is 100% stable (read
> it, it is short). The only problem with it is it can only be used in
> 99% of situations, so to avoid unexpected bugs it probably should be
> off by default (e.g
-
+++ newsfox.com +++ newsfox.com +++ newsfox.com +++
-
You have removed your profile from the newsfox press
distribution database. This is the last confirmation mail
that You have
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Huh? POSIX is the same as SUSv3 now? They used to be separate.
http://lwn.net/Articles/15697/
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 02:34:56PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/182570
> Thanks, I missed it. I've looked for bug reports only on the binary pcre
> packages BTS' pages, sorry.
> Anyway from the BTS isn't clear (to me) what
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:44:12PM +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote:
> Essentially, it is a count of packages that directly and indirectly depend on
> a package with at least one RC bug before they can go into testing.
> My idea is to show where the low hanging fruits are, so that people able to
> len
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 17:35, you wrote:
> Is there a link to just the changelog so I can see if they added this
> before I spend the modem time downloading? http://packages.debian.org
> doesn't seem to have links to changelogs, not are they in separ
Krzysztof Kajkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm intending to move to SID from my woody box. I was wondering what
> problems should I expect while building packages using new gcc 3.3. Does
> kernel 2.4.21 build correctly?
Yes.
> What about other progs like mplayer,
> mozilla etc? Can I instal
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote:
> My program answers the question "Where will an extra effort produce drastic
> results?" I'm sure I could have modified Björns program to yield this output,
> but I don't read and write Perl programs for pleasure.
http://bjorn.haxx.s
Re: Package Lists and Size, linux.debian.devel
Cor> Some of the servers run rsync, which works well for the Packages
Cor> file, but does not work for the packages themselves.
OK, will putting rsync in one's sources.list as you say below just
affect the Packages file fetching, or also the fetchi
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:33:08PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Today I noticed those summaries were getting spamassassing scores in the
> 30 range. I ended up whitelisting myself, though that doesn't feel like
> a good idea -- now SA might mislearn spam subjects as ham, and any
> spammer who forge
36 matches
Mail list logo
