JENNY¡¯S£¨½ðÑó°É£©³Ð½Ó¸÷Àà¾Û»á
Ç×°®µÄ¿Í»§£¬ÄúºÃ
Èç¹ûÄúËùÔÚµÄÆóÒµÕýÏë¾Ù°ì¾Û»á£¬´Ó¶øÔö¼ÓÔ±¹¤Äý¾ÛÁ¦»òÀ½ü¿Í»§¾àÀ룡
Èç¹ûÄúÕýΪ¸÷´¦¿ª³öµÄ¸ß¼Û°ü³¡·Ñµ£ÓÇ£»Èç¹ûÄú¶Ô½ìʱËùÌṩµÄʳƷ£¬¾ÆË®ÖÊÁ¿ÐÄÀïÎÞµ×£¡
Èç¹ûÄúÅÂÒò¾Û»áµØµãƫƧ£¬Ô±¹¤µ½Ê±Á¬¾Û»áµØµãÒ²ÕÒ²»µ½£¡£¡
ÄÇôÇëÄú¿´ÏÂÈ¥¡££º£©
I sucessfully created a debian-installer disk with a kernel that has
SE-Linux, EVMS, FreeS/WAN support, and ACL support.
(actually I can't imagine anybody wanting FreeS/WAN to install, but it
might be useful, eg for installing over secure wireless network I
can't see any benifit of ACL support
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 01:59:31AM +, James Troup wrote:
> > > copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl may fail to
> > > understand that GPL is only mentioned in the copyright notice, and is not
> > > the type of the license
> >
> > Ehm. If GPL isn't used, don't mention it. How m
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 01:04:40AM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl may fail to
> > understand that GPL is only mentioned in the copyright notice, and is not
> > the type of the licen
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 01:04:40AM +0100, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl may fail to
> understand that GPL is only mentioned in the copyright notice, and is not
> the type of the license
Ehm. If GPL isn't used, don't mention it. How mu
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:21:17AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Do you have some documentation done somewhere? I wasn't able to find the
> README file.
Sorry about that. It is possible that the webserver has somehow
been configured not to display README files.
For now I have renamed it
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 14:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > And we could fix the exim issue by switching to Postfix as the default
> > MTA...
>
> the sollution is not to use other packages, it is fixing the packages.
But no one has shown
JENNY¡¯S£¨½ðÑó°É£©³Ð½Ó¸÷Àà¾Û»á
Ç×°®µÄ¿Í»§£¬ÄúºÃ
Èç¹ûÄúËùÔÚµÄÆóÒµÕýÏë¾Ù°ì¾Û»á£¬´Ó¶øÔö¼ÓÔ±¹¤Äý¾ÛÁ¦»òÀ½ü¿Í»§¾àÀ룡
Èç¹ûÄúÕýΪ¸÷´¦¿ª³öµÄ¸ß¼Û°ü³¡·Ñµ£ÓÇ£»Èç¹ûÄú¶Ô½ìʱËùÌṩµÄʳƷ£¬¾ÆË®ÖÊÁ¿ÐÄÀïÎÞµ×£¡
Èç¹ûÄúÅÂÒò¾Û»áµØµãƫƧ£¬Ô±¹¤µ½Ê±Á¬¾Û»áµØµãÒ²ÕÒ²»µ½£¡£¡
ÄÇôÇëÄú¿´ÏÂÈ¥¡££º£©
What about having control file like format for copyright files?
--- copyright ---
Packaged-By: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Packaged-On: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 00:52:10 +0100
Original-Source: ftp://ftp.example.org/upstream-1.0.0.tar.gz
Upstream-Authors:
Foo
Bar
Copyright: GNU G
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Haberman wrote:
>>> It is a bad practice to repeat the package name as the first word in the
>>> long description.
>>> Also the URL does not belong into the description but should be
>>> placed in the debian/copyright file instead.
>> What if
¡Hola! Re:NUEVO REFLEJOSdeAMOR
Te invitamos a visitar la pagina Reflejosdeamor, donde los tópicos son muy diferentes y muy únicos en su contenido. Es una pagina diseñada con buena navegación y toda en español. Desde una novela hasta un buen chiste aquí lo encuentras sin dejar el sitio. Dadnos
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:03:23PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > i think it's a little heavy handed to do so,
>
> Why?
well, i should restate i guess. i agree it's the best thing to do.
but i would also image that it suddenly puts a lot more work on the
plates of many of the dd's, hence my t
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-07
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: rsxs
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Michael Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rsxs.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:51:03AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> It is a bad practice to repeat the package name as the first word in the
> long description.
Actually it's bad in the short description, not necessarily in the long one.
> Also the URL does not belong into the description but sho
#include
* Wouter Verhelst [Sat, Dec 07 2002, 11:03:23PM]:
> > > Would a policy-proposal forcing packages to use debconf for user
> > > interaction during installation get support?
> >
> > i think it's a little heavy handed to do so,
>
> Why?
>
> In the long run, I think it's the way to go. Al
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:51:03 +0100
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a bad practice to repeat the package name as the first word in
> the long description.
Why is that again?
> Also the URL does not belong into the description but should be
> placed in the debian/copyright file
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:08:24PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:02:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Bastian Blank
> >
> > | if the maintainers won't do that, we need a policy paragraph to force
> > | them.
> >
> > Would a policy-proposal forcing packages to use
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 22:43, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have built some kernel packages for RSBAC and put them online on
> http://www.coker.com.au/rsbac/ .
Oh, I didn't bother building a 2.2 kernel patch package because I don't use
2.2 kernels for anything serious. If you want to test out a 2.2 kerne
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:29, Christoph Martin wrote:
> In http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-nexttime.html it says that work on
> RSBAC support in Debian is in progress. I have not seen any discussion
> of it on the list. However there is an RFP:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:39:36PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'd love to have it work but now the build complains about:
>
> make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/joey/kdenetwork-2.2.2'
> *** Creating acinclude.m4
> make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/joey/kdenetwork-2.2.2'
> make[2]: Leaving direc
JENNY¡¯S£¨½ðÑó°É£©³Ð½Ó¸÷Àà¾Û»á
Ç×°®µÄ¿Í»§£¬ÄúºÃ
Èç¹ûÄúËùÔÚµÄÆóÒµÕýÏë¾Ù°ì¾Û»á£¬´Ó¶øÔö¼ÓÔ±¹¤Äý¾ÛÁ¦»òÀ½ü¿Í»§¾àÀ룡
Èç¹ûÄúÕýΪ¸÷´¦¿ª³öµÄ¸ß¼Û°ü³¡·Ñµ£ÓÇ£»Èç¹ûÄú¶Ô½ìʱËùÌṩµÄʳƷ£¬¾ÆË®ÖÊÁ¿ÐÄÀïÎÞµ×£¡
Èç¹ûÄúÅÂÒò¾Û»áµØµãƫƧ£¬Ô±¹¤µ½Ê±Á¬¾Û»áµØµãÒ²ÕÒ²»µ½£¡£¡
ÄÇôÇëÄú¿´ÏÂÈ¥¡££º£©
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:20:11PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > if the maintainers won't do that, we need a policy paragraph to force
> > them.
>
> No you need patches to help them.
well if the maintainer is too busy, i could try and figure this out
and send a patch. granted i'm not incredi
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:02:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Bastian Blank
>
> | if the maintainers won't do that, we need a policy paragraph to force
> | them.
>
> Would a policy-proposal forcing packages to use debconf for user
> interaction during installation get support?
i think it
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 03:56:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I think we should document this in the policy and force maintainers,
> following this simple rule. When DEBIAN_FRONTEND value is Non-Interactive,
^^^
> no question
Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:40:56AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I have problems fixing kdenetwork for unstable. With gcc 3
> > get/setenv aren't detected through C but through C++ which doesn't
> > work. That's a bug in automake. It should be fixed with a patch
> > in
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:40:56AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I have problems fixing kdenetwork for unstable. With gcc 3
> get/setenv aren't detected through C but through C++ which doesn't
> work. That's a bug in automake. It should be fixed with a patch
> in the following source:
>
> http
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> if the maintainers won't do that, we need a policy paragraph to force
> them.
No you need patches to help them.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} http://home.page
David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The fundamental problem seems to be that I want to build-depend on
> kernel-build-2.4.20, and then build a module for each of the flavors
> in /usr/src/kernel-build-2.4.20. But which flavors exactly exist
> varies per platform, and might also vary betwe
* Bastian Blank
| if the maintainers won't do that, we need a policy paragraph to force
| them.
Would a policy-proposal forcing packages to use debconf for user
interaction during installation get support?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is
martin f krafft wrote:
> the author of gjay is troubled by
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=gjay&ver=0.2.2-1&arch=ia64&file=log
>
> and is looking for ways to troubleshoot this. short of letting him
> access a debian developer machine running on IA-64 through my account -
> which would
Joshua Haberman wrote:
> > It is a bad practice to repeat the package name as the first word in the
> > long description.
> >
> > Also the URL does not belong into the description but should be
> > placed in the debian/copyright file instead.
>
> What if someone wants to visit the webpage befor
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> And we could fix the exim issue by switching to Postfix as the default
> MTA...
the sollution is not to use other packages, it is fixing the packages.
if the maintainers won't do that, we need a policy paragraph to force
them.
bast
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 05:51, Martin Schulze wrote:
> It is a bad practice to repeat the package name as the first word in the
> long description.
Fair enough. Fixed.
> Also the URL does not belong into the description but should be
> placed in the debian/copyright file instead.
>
> To quote
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 10:51, sean finney wrote:
> also, the ispell package asks you
> which language you use by default.
Ispell is already fixed.
And we could fix the exim issue by switching to Postfix as the default
MTA...
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Your example lists:
>
> Package: foo
> Description: GNOME/KDE/WindowMaker/GNU/Linux>
> foo is a program, designed to help
> you . . Written for
> the , it supports and .
> [..]
> .
> http://www.foo.org.>
>
> It is a bad practice to repeat
★ ★全球高清晰度500多个电影电视频道节目
( 购买用户另送注册版windows优化大师和网络加速软件一套)
原价188圆现在促销价58圆购买全球影视收看软件（像播放器的软件，除了具有一般播放器的功能外，能
收看电视是其主要的功能！支持换肤，支持自动更新版本功能！），即可一览天下！
随着网络的发展，使得网上看电视成为一种可能，本软件正是让你能够在网上自由的享受看电视的乐趣！相对
于普通的电视，网络电视有其不可以替代的优点：可以欣赏到全球各地区的电视节
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-07
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pts
Version : 0.20
Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ptns.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Tetrinet Server Written in Per
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:56, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > That is what is wrong. BIND9 drops the capability cap_dac_override and
> > thus can't create files in directories owned by a UID other than root
> > unless they are mode 777.
> >
> > The solution is to have the directory owned by the same UID that
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:19:43PM +, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 10:00 2002-12-05 +0100 hat Josselin Mouette geschrieben:
> >The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
> >installed. There is currently no way to ensure a package is installed at
> >configuration ti
Hello Josselin,
Am 10:00 2002-12-05 +0100 hat Josselin Mouette geschrieben:
>> right, but isn't that what Pre-Depends is for?
>
>The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
>installed. There is currently no way to ensure a package is installed at
>configuration time.
Th
Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it w
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 03:56:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I think we should document this in the policy and force maintainers,
> following this simple rule. When DEBIAN_FRONTEND value is Non-Interactive,
> no question should interrupt the installation process. Really none.
yeah, i REALLY agr
At 07 Dec 2002 15:56:06 +0100,
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 15:26, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:20, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: dumping master file:
> > > /var/cache/bind/tmp-LWOG9Y: open: permission denied
> > > Dec 7 04:02:49
#include
* Brian May [Sat, Dec 07 2002, 12:40:12PM]:
> It seems to be set for a "pbuilder login" operation on the stable
> version of pbuilder.
>
> So do you think debian-image should check the value of DEBIAN_FRONTEND?
>
> Sounds like a good idea to me...
I think we should document this in th
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 15:26, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:20, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: dumping master file:
> > /var/cache/bind/tmp-LWOG9Y: open: permission denied
> > Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: transfer of 'historia-antigua.com/IN'
> >
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:20, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: dumping master file:
> /var/cache/bind/tmp-LWOG9Y: open: permission denied
> Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: transfer of 'historia-antigua.com/IN'
> from 80.33.181.69#53: failed while receiving responses: perm
Hi
I've been, for several days now, getting the following messages in the
log:
Security Violations
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: dumping master file:
/var/cache/bind/tmp-LWOG9Y: open: permission denied
Dec 7 04:02:49 lagun named[1108]: transfer of 'historia-antigua.c
On Friday 06 December 2002 12:52, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> No default for console-data/keymap/qwertz/swiss/variant - picking one
>
> If you have information about what choice should be the default for
> the above questions which gave warnings, please mail it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
> name that is used in Debian packages "i386" for Intel or "arm" for ARM.
> uname gives "i686" and "armv4l" respectively (and presumably has similar
> pro
Russell Coker wrote:
> In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
> name that is used in Debian packages "i386" for Intel or "arm" for ARM.
> uname gives "i686" and "armv4l" respectively (and presumably has similar
> problems on other platforms).
>
> What do I
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:29:00PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
[...]
> -
> LangCode Encoding Alternative for questionables Notes
> -
[...]
> roISO-8859-16 ISO-8859
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
> name that is used in Debian packages "i386" for Intel or "arm" for ARM.
> uname gives "i686" and "armv4l" respectively (and presumably has similar
> pro
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 13:48, Russell Coker wrote:
> What do I do to get the generic name for the platform?
dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH
should do this.
--
NoÃl KÃthe
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:48, Russell Coker wrote:
> In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
> name that is used in Debian packages "i386" for Intel or "arm" for ARM.
> uname gives "i686" and "armv4l" respectively (and presumably has similar
> problems on other platf
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:48:36PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
> name that is used in Debian packages "i386" for Intel or "arm" for ARM.
> uname gives "i686" and "armv4l" respectively (and presumably has similar
> pro
In my debian/rules I need to know the name of the architecture. I need the
name that is used in Debian packages "i386" for Intel or "arm" for ARM.
uname gives "i686" and "armv4l" respectively (and presumably has similar
problems on other platforms).
What do I do to get the generic name for th
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > > > Source files are here:
> > > >
> > > > http://master.debian.org/~joey/NMU/tetex-bin_1.0.6-7.2.diff.gz
> > > > http://master.debian.org/~joey/NMU/tetex-bin_1.0.6-7.2.dsc
> > > > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/source/tex/tetex-bin_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz
> > >
Please, first learn how to use your mail software. Your mails are just a
pity to read.
Le sam 07/12/2002 à 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Thank you all for your interesting
> analysis to "setup.exe"
> I am sorry to disappoint Craig Im
> not a Troll.
Yes, you are a troll. The title of yo
Colin Walters wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think the package descriptions are a very important product of this
> project. They're going to be one of the first things people see when
> they use Debian, and their quality directly reflects on the quality of
> Debian. I've been putting in some random effor
Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le jeu 05/12/2002 à 09:05, sean finney a écrit :
>>> right, but isn't that what Pre-Depends is for?
>> The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
>> instal
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Brian May wrote:
> I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools,
> available at:
>
> http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/debian/bin2/>.
>
> These scripts will allow you to create and maintain a private archive
> with multiple distributions, architectures, e
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeu 05/12/2002 à 09:05, sean finney a écrit :
>
> > right, but isn't that what Pre-Depends is for?
>
> The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
> installed. There is currently no way to ensure a
Thank you all for your interesting
analysis to "setup.exe"
I am sorry to disappoint Craig Im
not a Troll.
I especially like your answer
Santiago. thanks .It sheds
quite a bit of light on the
problem.
and your addition Ben thanks !
I really do wish for Linux
to be on the same world sca
Oops. Yes, I did. I don't understand why it should hang; I'll log it as
a bug and investigate. Might it be due to what you installed next? (I
can't reproduce it yet; any further info would help).
Regards,
Alastair
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 22:16, Steve Greenland wrote:
> (re-arranged a little)
> > O
65 matches
Mail list logo
