> "Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Junichi> I have had an impression that debconf is part of base as
Junichi> well, which means a Pre-Depends is not required.
Ah, no.
pooh% apt-cache show debconf
Package: debconf
Priority: important
Section: admin
No base ther
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> console-common is part of base so changing the preinst at this point
> of the freeze is not a good idea. Therefore, I will go ahead and add
> a Pre-Depends on debconf if that's ok.
I have had an impression that debconf is part of base
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > It might be nice if you could just mass-NMU (maybe to DELAYED/1-day)
> > with Build-Depends updated.
>
> Agree. I was hoping you, the pbuilder dude, may volunteer :)
Hmm... if it's not automatic, things are a bit difficult.
I'm not insi
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:34:27 -0500
> > If tetex-bin >= 1.0.7+20011202-5.1 then it might help you
> > to add /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90boot (or something appropriate
> > name) which co
Atsuhito Kohda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
>
> > After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears
> > that
> > we run i
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
> After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears that
> we run into the default pool sizes of LaTeX. I'm not sure where ex
|| On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:00:44 -0400
|| Bill Jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
bj> have LILO installed.) If you're using GRUB, be sure the 'kernel' line
bj> includes 'initrd=/path' somewhere in it. (See
bj> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/initrd.txt.)
Yes, I gave the path in GRUB.
bj> Sor
Hi,
After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears that
we run into the default pool sizes of LaTeX. I'm not sure where exactly the
boundary lies, but the debian-policy (350K) is definitely too big to be turned
into a PDF document; the PS version can be generated without
Hi,
I just uploaded a new version of debiandoc-sgml which has its urgency set to
high to speed up things. It now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
(so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
Thanks,
Ardo
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:55:52PM -0300, Leo Costela wrote:
> Does anyone know the whereabouts of my AM Jordi Mallach ? I've sent him
> 2 emails about two weeks ago and heard nothing from him ever since. Is
> he on a vacation or something ? Or maybe my emails didn't get throught
> to him (even tho
[reply with CC please, I only read -devel-announce]
Hi people
Does anyone know the whereabouts of my AM Jordi Mallach ? I've sent him
2 emails about two weeks ago and heard nothing from him ever since. Is
he on a vacation or something ? Or maybe my emails didn't get throught
to him (even though I
Le Sunday 21 April 2002 à 09:24:15, Brian May a écrit:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > I wouldn't weep. Seperate files is a very reasonable thing to do.
>
> Dumb question of the day: how do you put it in a seperate file?
>
> What should this seperate file be
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jpilot-mail
Version : 0.0.6
Upstream Author : Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://innominate.org/kurth/jpilot-Mail/
* License : GPL
Description : Mail plugin for
It could also be a simple use of sgrep...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is sendmail version 8.12.3-4, gotten in last night's dist-upgrade
(testing), which ran without any errors.
1st issue:
--
sendmailconfig aborts with the message:
/usr/sbin/sendmailconfig: /usr/sbin/update_conf: No such file or
directory
Output of "dpkg -S update_conf" reveals:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:01:17AM +0530, Ramakrishnan M wrote:
> Any idea what is happening?
Do you have an 'initrd=' line in lilo.conf? (I believe that's the
correct setting; I can't easily verify as I'm using GRUB now and don't
have LILO installed.) If you're using GRUB, be sure the 'kernel'
Hi,
I am trying to make a kernel with initrd support (just to understand how to make
an kernel with initrd support and how initrd works with it).
I built the kernel with initrd support, and made an initrd image (using the
excellent
initrd-tools package) and using the modules of the same above ke
On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:30, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I see that 0.0.5 has been released this last week. Would it be possible
> for someone to ITP these now? (I'm not too picky about who :) )
Packages for woody and sid are all available at
http://mindx.dyndns.org/debian/.
Feel free to
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:07:42AM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> PS: My "Debian reference" in DDP CVS/WEB needs to be packaged. Any
> volunteer? I am not Debian developer.
As I am translating it to Finnish so it is quite natural for me to package
it. Of course, one requirement is that my applica
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kbiff
Version : 3.5.5
Upstream Author : Kurt Granroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://devel-home.kde.org/~granroth/kbiff/
* License : GPL
Description : Mail notification
> AC_DEFUN([rk_CONFIG_HEADER],[AH_TOP([#ifndef RCSID
See that AH_TOP? *that* is expanding to an AH_VERBATIM which is
expanding to the AH_OUTPUT you see in the error. ("it's turtles all
the way down" :-)
> static /**/const char *const rcsid[] = { (const char *)rcsid, "\100(#)" msg }
I'm not sur
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:48:56AM +0100, Josef Spillner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 02:28, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-05
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: ggz
> > Version : 0
Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> esultò:
And the SUM of the numbers in the version number is also
an even number!!!
Sorry, but you are able to get a *odd* number summing only *even*
numbers? :-) Someone (I don't remember who) said that odd numbers are
better than even numbers, because summing
#143837 was reported against console-common because the package uses
debconf in its preinst without having a Pre-Depends on debconf.
Policy 7.2 says:
`Pre-Depends' are also required if the `preinst' script depends
on the named package. It is best to avoid this situation if
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:24:04 -0400
> There must be some tool that will parse a set of html files
> (recursively for all relative links) and give me back a list of files
> linked to by and and whatnot. In short: I need
> a list of all the files that make up the documentation, starting
> from "ind
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
> with known problematic version (1.1.59).
So far I've only heard about the broken installation documentation in
disks-* directory of the FTP archive, and seen it
* Brian May
| On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
| > Am 19.04.02 um 00:05:14 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
| > > Would anybody weep if we deprecated putting all the translations in
| > > one file?
| >
| > I wouldn't weep. Seperate files is a very reasonable thing to do.
|
Kon'nichiwa Umekawa-san (Hi, Mr. Umekawa),
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:42:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
> > few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) a
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
> few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) appears into testing.
>
> Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
> with known pro
Hi folks,
debiandoc-sgml in testing (1.1.59) is known to be very unfriendly to
the current links/lynx. Though the maintainer (Ardo) and I think this
is browser issue, we think it is practical to fix debiandoc-sgml and
build pages with new version. And that is what is happening in unstable
but ha
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pisg
Version : 0.37
Upstream Author : Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pisg.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Perl IRC Statistics Generat
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 09:02:59AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> I received both these emails.
>
> Did my package get accepted or not?
Hello,
assuming my package was rejected (and I hope it was , I uploaded
it to soon, see other E-Mail), I know what the problem was.
This is a typical error I get if
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:23:22AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are the sources that give these errors the current "apt-get source
> heimdall", or something else?
Yes, thats it. I have made some changes, but nothing to produce these
errors.
I wonder if autoconf is somehow interpreting an exp
oh, and "invalid back reference" is a gnu regex error for \n without a
matching nth group.
also, the
configure.in:5: warning: do not use m4_patsubst: use patsubst or m4_bpatsubst
now looks suspiciously relevant (it comes from autoconf.m4, and passes
through the arguments to patsubst -- and at a
ah. well, the AH_OUTPUT([1], AS_ESCAPE looks a lot like it is an
expansion of AH_VERBATIM, and possibly even the one in AH_TOP (look at
/usr/share/autoconf/autoconf/autoheader.m4 near the end of the file.)
So if there's an AH_TOP invocation that has text that looks like the
rest of that argum
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:14:07PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > Is there any way of keeping razor out of woody until spamassassin 2.2 can
> > > be
> > > uploaded? (I could file an RC bug, but is there a better solut
36 matches
Mail list logo
