Johnny Ernst Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> While you guys get Woody ready, I will try to find out more about the
> current release procedure and the past of Debian development.
>
> Hopefully I will see you all again May 2Nd.
Or better, start help fixing bugs now.
You've
>>"Tollef" == Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tollef> * Manoj Srivastava
David> 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
David> 1) public keyservers
David> 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
David> 3) Main upstream source site for affected packages
>>
>> Have yo
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> However, what we really need is a more generic naming-scheme like
> -.so
Or more like:
-.so.
Adding compiler version inside the soname would be a
possible, and interesting thing to do, but not something to stuff into
FHS right now.
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 01:47, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2002, Robert Tiberius Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, in section 3.15, you say, "Fetching a series of deltas which
> > update the same area is less efficient than calculating the deltas
> > directly." This is true, but by my
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 00:14, Anthony Towns wrote:
> No, I'm not. I'm saying that "the amount of time spent waiting for
> apt-get update" needs to count every apt-get update you run, not just
> the first. So, if over a period of a week, I run it seven times, and you
> run it once, I wait seven times
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:28:01PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Why did you think that?
>
> rproxy addresses a rather different problem to rsync: for example, it
> transfers only one file at a time, not whole directories. No, rproxy
> does not have a magic way to do the delta computation in zero t
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:19:27PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> The big problem with rproxy is it's implemented in perl (perl: crypto for
Are we talking about the same code here?
[502] [snoopy:unstable:bam] ~ >ldd /usr/sbin/rproxy
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001e000)
/lib/l
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I like dput's DWIM features. For example, it figures out automatically
> whether or not a package is in non-US, and uploads to the correct
> place.
This may not be as much use now non-us is being moved to main...
How does it dete
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:00:36PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> I would agree. We can't "Be everything to everyone". I've just
> recently acquired a laptop (my first!). It's a Toshiba T3400CT, an old
> 486/sx with a whopping 6.5" /color/ LCD! ;-) I've been able to boot it
> with tomsrtbt, but
Tested a PII - 266 with 192 RAM (1997-8 Siemens Xpert) - bf24 ... successfully
MH
--
(Dr.) Michael Hummel
**
fprint = F24D EAC6 E3D7 372C 9122 D510 EB24 01CA 0B56 B518
id: 1024D/0B56B518 key: http://www.seitung.net/key
pgpVV1XfVkeSE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:00:36PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> this particular laptop may not work with anything but a zImage kernel
> (if it has the same problems as the Tecra series)
Those have been resolved by the 2.2 kernel series.
Nils
--
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 April 2002 12:49, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I tested the isolinux boot image on 3 random workstations (Dell and HP) as
> well as an IBM ThinkPad T21. All of them worked fine with both idepci and
> bf24 kernels.
Also tried on a PIII-450 i68
I'm looking for a Debian developer in Vancouver, Canada to sign my key. If
you fit the bill, please reply!
Thanks,
Shaun Jackman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 3.1 Compressed files cannot be differenced
>
> I recall seeing some work done to determine how much savings you could
> expect if you used xdeltas of the uncompressed data. This would be the
> best result you could expect from gzip --rsyncable. I recall the numbers
> were disapointing, it was
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:49:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I tested the isolinux boot image on 3 random workstations (Dell and HP) as
> well as an IBM ThinkPad T21. All of them worked fine with both idepci and
> bf24 kernels.
Also tried a Compaq Deskpro, both idepci and bf24 worked.
--
I tested the isolinux boot image on 3 random workstations (Dell and HP) as
well as an IBM ThinkPad T21. All of them worked fine with both idepci and
bf24 kernels.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 06:19:07PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> What I'd really like is to have access to one of these machines and be
> able to attach debuggers to rsync and see what it's doing. (In this case,
> that would mean being able to ssh in as 'nobody', or something
> equivalent.) I real
Shyamal> The issue I wanted to highlight was that a bf 3.0.19
Shyamal> based netinst ISO works great on this
Shyamal> machine(http://people.debian.org/~ieure/netinst) with all
Shyamal> the syslinux features (I can choose a kernel, hit F3 for
Shyamal> help, etc.).
Ummm...I may
(Removed cross-post to debian-boot, since I'm not on that list).
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 12:42:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Also, PGI currently uses syslinux and will continue to do past its 1.0
> release. PGI works on i386, of course, and may be a good candidate
> for legacy hardware su
Mike> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad
Mike> wrote:
>> It failed to boot an IBM Aptiva 2161-C8E desktop with a
>> 1/19/1997 BIOS. This 166Mhz Pentium box has been my trusty
>> machine for 5 years, and boots the potato r3 CD and also
>> another woody
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 09:48:36AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> > It failed to boot an IBM Aptiva 2161-C8E desktop with a 1/19/1997
> > BIOS. This 166Mhz Pentium box has been my trusty machine for 5 years,
> > and boots the potato r
On Fri 12 Apr 2002, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Just a note: I'm sure everyone will be disappointed to hear that the
> isolinux CD does not boot in bochs ;-)
Wel, it boots just fine in VMware 3.0 (which basically uses a Phoenix
BIOS).
What package does the apt source selection belong to? Because I
Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead
> > > > of the
> > > > USB attached modem (which
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:40:17PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > ...
> > > I just tested it on all the bootable x86 systems in my house:
> > ...
> > > Tosh
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:50:31PM +0200, Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/devel] dput sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
> Uploading package to host ftp-master.debian.org
> D: /home/debian/devel/sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
> Checking Signature on .c
Just a note: I'm sure everyone will be disappointed to hear that the
isolinux CD does not boot in bochs ;-)
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
| "Note that fires are not restricted to dormitories. |
| Indee
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns
was heard to say:
> Additionally, it's very easy to test: find random systems, reboot them
> with the small CD Raphael's prepared and check you can get into the
> installer. You don't need to go all the way through the install, nor
> worry a
Hello,
my latest upload with dput resulted in the following
output.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/devel] dput sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
Uploading package to host ftp-master.debian.org
D: /home/debian/devel/sanduhr_1.0-1_i386.changes
Checking Signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made
On http://pandora.debian.org/~andreas/obsd are the tools needed
for creating debian packages of software on openbsd.
As stated vaguely half a century earlier, I would like to create a
secure debian/gnu/openbsd with the best of both worlds. For that
I would now begin to package the openbsd source
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> It failed to boot an IBM Aptiva 2161-C8E desktop with a 1/19/1997
> BIOS. This 166Mhz Pentium box has been my trusty machine for 5 years,
> and boots the potato r3 CD and also another woody netinst ISO (the one
Well, I guess the que
"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of
Anthony> Raphael's test image on a CD and try booting it in any
Anthony> computers you have handy. If it doesn't work on a machine
Anthony> where a potato CD does boot, please mai
Title: Untitled Document
원치않는 메일을 받으셨다면 정말로 죄송합니다. 귀하의 메일주소는 인터넷 상의 공개된 메일 주소를 근거로 발송하였으며 E-Mail
주소 외에, 다른 정보는 갖고 있지 않습니다. 정통부 권고사항에 의거 제목에 [광고]라고 표기한 메일입니다. 원치 않으면 수신거부를
눌러주세요.
♣ 샤프론이 제공하는 오늘의 날씨정보 ♣
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 20:53, Brian May wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:02:15AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava
>
> | David> 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
> | David> 1) public keyservers
> | David> 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> | David> 3) Main upstr
Why hello, republic of Angola. I got your email address off your website
http://www.angola.org/
Here's a deal for you, your military can track down this rebel and kill
them, then we'll split the money.
Is that a good deal or what? I'll even give you your share paid in
valuable "Enron" stock.
-
ATTN:
This letter may come to you as a surprise due to the fact that we have not yet
met. The message could be strange but reel if you pay some attention to it. I
could have notified you about it at least for the sake of your integrity.
Please accept my sincere apologies. In bringing this messa
* Jeroen Dekkers
| Software always used to be free. That changed, but RMS didn't
| change. I don't what software he used to write parts of GNU, but it
| could have been free, there was enough free software at time. Oh, and
| 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel 2) RMS has never written anything of
| it AFA
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:22:45AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Luis Bustamante wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
> >
> > Beta packages can be found at:
>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:28:01PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2002, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
[...]
> > AFAIK, it solves all the problems regarding server load discussed in
> > rsync, doesn't it???
>
> Why did you
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> > > and dput?
> >
> > Dumb question, but what dput, and why is one better then the other
* Manoj Srivastava
| David> 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
| David> 1) public keyservers
| David> 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
| David> 3) Main upstream source site for affected packages
|
| Have you done anything
Hi
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:53:00AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:08:10AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I have this sneaking suspicion that we need a tool more appropriate than
> > the BTS to handle the WNPP. The BTS seems rather fragile for this
> > purpose - the form
Jeroen [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:29:14 +0200:
> What is wrong with telling him that the kind of problems he's having
> is normal with non-free software and say that there are 2 free
> alternatives in Debian which would probably not have those problems?
>
The problem with those solut
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblog-agent-logger-perl
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Raphael Manfredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/doc/RAM/Log-Agent-Logger-0.1.1/Logger.pm
* License
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 11.04.02 um 20:31:55 schrieb Anthony Towns:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
>
> Complete install success on an IBM Thi
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Luis Bustamante wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
>
> Beta packages can be found at:
> http://tabaluga.ipe.uni-stuttgart.de/~nils/download/
Is there any problem you're aware of
On 11 Apr 2002 21:27:23 -0400
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think testing is an excellent thing to have, since it
> provides a semi-stable proto-release. Unfortunately it is
> true that the existence of testing hasn't shortened the
> release cycle.
testing is, in my opinion, the fea
Am 11.04.02 um 20:31:55 schrieb Anthony Towns:
> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
Complete install success on an IBM Thinkpad A30.
(Except for the odd locales behaviour, but that got nothing to
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200:
> * Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]:
> > You don't have to tell me how glibc works, I develop it.
> Yeah, and Daniel Stone is a Linux kernel developer.
>
Heheheheh
But watch out, Jeroen == Hurd developer.. (Ohyes
On 11 Apr 2002, Robert Tiberius Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all your hard work on rsync. I think it is a great tool.
> I'm especially excited to hear it is used in Intermezzo. I like your
> rsync/debian web page.
I'm glad you like them.[0]
> I feel you aren't fair to diff
On 12 Apr 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've changed my opinion on this since we last talked, partly because
> of taking over rsync itself,
... what I meant, but people other than jgg probably didn't know, is
that I was looking at installing rproxy and I'd now rather fix rsync.
Hi Martijn!
You wrote:
> What is the fix here? I must admit, I've always liked being able to visit a
> link simply by pasting it anywhere in netscape/galeons window.
Indeed. And at least in galeon, this behaviour can be turned off.
--
Kind regards,
+
On 12 Apr 2002, Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nobody8835 25.7 0.3 22120 1740 ?RN Apr10 525:24 rsync --daemon
> nobody 22896 5.0 0.3 22828 1992 ?SN Apr11 21:20 rsync --daemon
> nobody3907 7.3 0.5 22336 2820 ?RN Apr11 15:30 rsync --daemon
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:48:01PM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
> Also, in section 3.15, you say, "Fetching a series of deltas which
> update the same area is less efficient than calculating the deltas
> directly." This is true, but by my computations, the number of packages
> which chang
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:40:31PM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 02:28, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I'd suggest your formula would be better off being:
> > bandwidthcost = sum( x = 1..30, prob(x) * cost(x) / x )
> I think it depends on what you're measuring. I can
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 01:15, Martin Pool wrote:
> There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
> couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
> of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
> will be useful.
>
> http://rsync.samb
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 00:30, Craig Small wrote:
> Hello,
> I have bug #142292, #109237 and #106414 for procps. The common thing
> is that if System.map file is a multiple of 1024 (or 4096 not sure
> which) ps crashes. Thanks to Dark for getting me that far.
>
> Can someone look at 106414 and D
On Fri Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I just tested it on all the bootable x86 systems in my house:
> ...
> > Toshiba 490CDT Satellite Pro Laptop: Works
>
> That's good news. What was your success booting the Potato CD on this
> laptop? In my experience, the To
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> I'd appreciate comments.
Hmm...
As you may know I'm both the APT author, administrator of the top level
debian mirrors and associated mirror network. So,
> 3.2 rsync is too hard on servers
> If it is, then I think we should fix the problems, rather tha
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 07:45:08AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> * clustalw (1.82-2 to 1.82-3)
>
> * Maintainer: Andreas Tille
> * 43 days old (needed 10 days)
> * Valid candidate
> * Depends: clustalw ncbi-tools6
^^^
clustalw needs a new ncbi-to
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 09:46, Erich Schubert wrote:
> What diff options do you use?
> As the diffs are expected to be applied to the correct version, they
> probably shouldn't contain the old data, but the new data only.
Good point. I used diff -ed, so I think this is not including
unnecessary con
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 04:35, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > Scheme Disk space Bandwidth
> > ---
> > Checksums (bwidth optimal)26K 81K
> > diffs (4 days)32K
Good day everyone,
thank you for a lot of input.
As a fair number of you have pointed out, you are all quite busy with
getting Woody out the door.
I aggree that is important, and that the release process can not be
changed now right in the middle of Woody-work.
Priority right now is fixing bugs
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 20:53, Brian May wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> > and dput?
>
> Dumb question, but what dput
Hello,
in the package clustal[wx]_1.82-3 I fixed a buffer overflow and sended the
fix upstream. I do not think that the problem is a real security risk but
in many cases clustalw does not perform correctly so that I think the
latest packages should go into testing. I wonder why it is sticked to
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > > the
> > > USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
> >
> > This does
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 02:28, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I think you'll find you're also unfairly weighting this against people
> who do daily updates. If you do an update once a month, it's not as much
> of a bother waiting a while to download the Packages files -- you're
> going to have to wait _much
Hi all,
For the glabels package, I have uploaded glabels_0.4.3-2, it
will solved the problem of missing gawk in build-depends, but it
happened before all build attempt, I close #142480 here and notice
other developers, the problem has been fixed in new upload.
Thank you.
--
Best Regar
68 matches
Mail list logo
