--
Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108
(505) 256-0834--- Begin Message ---
I'm haveing some difficulty getting my network to accept mail messages.
I'm using exim through a cicso router. I have forwarded port 25 to my
mail machine. I am able to send mail to anyone. And I can recei
On Thursday 28 December 2000 17:23, Michael Boman wrote:
> Nate Duehr wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:13:50PM +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > > Hello..
> > > Has anyone tried to set up any such debian systems?? I'm thinking of
> > > trying to set up two machines sharing the same raid disk
I'll be off for a few days, so I may not be able to answer the
posts in RFC: pools... thread.
Happy New Year!!
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
Neal H Walfield wrote:
> I think that this is a reasonable idea, however, it only addresses a
> small part of the problem. I feel that a better solution would be to use
> a similar method to perl modules: a hierarchal name space. In fact, we
We'll have better than that :) My tool will have a ful
esoR ocsirF wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> IANAD, but I would like to suggest an idea that I had. There has been a
> lot of interest in getting packages arranged by different
> catagorizations, something like the menu. Most ideas that I have seen so
> far seem to imply adding new fields to the debs, but
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:32:12PM -0800, esoR ocsirF wrote:
> Greetings,
> IANAD, but I would like to suggest an idea that I had. There has been a
> lot of interest in getting packages arranged by different
> catagorizations, something like the menu. Most ideas that I have seen so
> far seem to im
Hi,
In my (potato) /var/cache is...
apache/ apt/ bind/ cracklib/ man/ man2html/ xfstt/
-Jim
> "Cristian" == Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> cat /proc/cmdline auto rw root=/dev/nfs video=788
>> nfsaddrs=192.168.87.130:192.168.87.129:192.168.87.129:255.255.255.0:
Cristian> ^
Cristian> Am I seei
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:12:35PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > Same idea, different implementation. It is using (de)compression code that
> > is
> > shared with other programs.
>
> Being linked to it statically means it doesn't share the code. T
Greetings,
IANAD, but I would like to suggest an idea that I had. There has been a
lot of interest in getting packages arranged by different
catagorizations, something like the menu. Most ideas that I have seen so
far seem to imply adding new fields to the debs, but his seems like
overkill to me.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Same idea, different implementation. It is using (de)compression code that is
> shared with other programs.
Being linked to it statically means it doesn't share the code. This increases
dpkg code size.
> Will we one day see a shared libdpkg, with mo
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Not quite. dpkg-deb actually does call out to tar and gzip, and lets those
> > programs do what they do best. It doesn't try to be tar and gzip and dpkg
> > all
> > at once. The UNIX approach is to build tools that do one or a few
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Why are packages kept back like follows?
>
>$ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
[ snip ]
>The following packages have been
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
>
> > Yes, that was kind of my point.
> >
> > An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
> > functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and may
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
>
> > Yes, that was kind of my point.
> >
> > An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
> > functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
> > make to handl
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> Yes, that was kind of my point.
>
> An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
> functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
> make to handle dependancies).
Not quite. dpkg-deb
Hello
I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago.
Two questions:
1. Why are packages kept back like follows?
$ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade
Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Release
Hi
[ Ben Armstrong writes ]
>
> So, for subsections perhaps:
>
>...
> Education/Language
> qvocab
I'd love an Education/Language section too.
I'm not really happy with any of the Menu choices available for my
"kdrill" program, which is a vocabulary quiz program,and dictionary for
kanji.
Hi Martin,
in the light of what has been discussed...
could you please replicate the bug and report
upstream?
thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
Previously Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> to contact Brian as well. I'm posting to debian-devel now to ask if
> anyone knows what's up with Brian.
He is alive, He uploaded a package on Dec 3, and his last message
to debian-devel was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Nov 4.
Big brother is watching you :)
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:13:32AM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
> $ find /usr/man -exec dpkg -S {} \; |cut -d: -f1 |grep -v , |sort |uniq
Just parse a Contents-ARCH.gz file to find all packages that still have
/usr/man.
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 00-12-28 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Kurz wrote:
> > |dpkg-scriptlib -- dpkg-perl and dpkg-python (142 days old)
> >
> > Is any package using functions of dpkg-perl or dpkg-python? If yes, I
> > think someone should take care of this packages and the bugs that are in
> > the
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 02:08:08PM +, Chad Miller wrote:
> I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
> On this box, there are...
>
> $ find /usr/man -exec dpkg -S {} \; |cut -d: -f1 |grep -v , |sort |uniq
[...]
> mpg123
Not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dpkg -l
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:56:37PM +0100, Arthur Korn wrote:
> > for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
> > sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
> > done
>
> You'd better use [EMAIL PROTECTED], else you need a very
> good asbestos suit ...
Too late. }:)
BTW your Mail-Followup-To is
* Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001219 01:30]:
> I have tried to talk to Brian Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> directly
> several times by email. The first email was sent at least 2 months
> ago. The second was sent over than 1 month ago and since I have
> sent the third about a week has passed
hi
Peter Makholm schrieb:
> for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
> sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
> done
You'd better use [EMAIL PROTECTED], else you need a very
good asbestos suit ...
ciao, 2ri
Hi
Hamish Moffatt schrieb:
> Package X and package Y are not truely unrelated if they share any
> dynamic libraries, though, eg libc.
>
> So do you have any suggestion as to how this could actually be
> implemented? Even if it's actually desirable (which I dispute),
> implementation seems far fro
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > O: manpages-de -- German manpages
> >
> > I'd be willing to take them, if it's just for the Debian maintainership
> > and fixing the few outstanding bugs. However, Joey, I see you are also
>
> Please take over Debian maintain
Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
> > all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would
> > be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed
> > here.
>
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
> all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would
> be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed
> here.
[...]
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROT
Anyway, what does apt-cache not do that you want to have happen?
These files include such things as fvwm, koules and xbill.
There doesn't seem to be any tools specifically for building packages.
I know the source for all the packages is kept under the source
directory, but these files aren't in their subcategory directory.
eg we have
ftp.debian.org/debian/dists
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:58:09PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Is there a GRUB mailing list, or is this the proper forum for
> GRUB questions?
bug-grub@gnu.org
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp89c6oWkCJo.pgp
Descrip
Is there a GRUB mailing list, or is this the proper forum for
GRUB questions?
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Palm City, FL USA GPG Key ID: 390D6559
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:41:03AM -0500, Damian M Gryski wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Edward Betts wrote:
> > Arto Jantunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'd like to adopt abuse, if that's okay with you. I don't think I can
> > > handle
> > > the 'only 8bpp'-bug, thought. There is/was a proje
Hmm. sorry to step in here, but
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> My point being, that yes I already use squid as a proxy server for a whole
> network of apt-geting debian boxes and after only a little work it works
this could also be replaced by NFS, or a small
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:08:00PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Branden> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:58:47PM +1100, Brian May
> Branden> wrote:
> >> I seem to have problems booting Linux 2.2.18 via NFS root
> >> image. **2.2.17 works fine**, but 2.2.18 says "No NFS servers
> >> avai
Chad Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:41:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > BUT gmc (and most possibly mc) will not be
> > able to rename stuff, though you can move
> > files ;) It's a bug for certain!
>
> Whoa. I don't understand that; what's the difference between moving and
> Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't suppose there's a easy way to submit a batch of bug reports, eh?
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:17:40PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Just do a
>
> for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
> sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
> done
On 28 Dec 2000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hamish> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:23:52PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >> still haven't tried 2.2.18. The video= options seems to be
> >> completely ignored, and Linux boots up as if it wa
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't suppose there's a easy way to submit a batch of bug reports, eh?
Just do a
for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
done
where sed do the right thing. That is an easy way, right? (say yes!)
I don't suppose there's a easy way to submit a batch of bug reports, eh?
- chad
--
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL: http://web.chad.org/ (GPG)
"Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced".
First corollary to Clarke'
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:05:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > Martin. Yes. I tried. Do you think I'm a newbie or something? Why
> > do you think the file is owned by root? It's on windows partition...
>
> Hold on ... this is an msdos partition mounted? If so,
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:14:30PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Uwe Hermann wrote:
> > Don't file a bug. There's already _at least_ 5 or 6 bugs about this
> > problem in the BTS...
>
> 9 at the moment it seems.
Guess you'll have a lot of fun, closing/merging all those bugs :-)
Uw
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:17:20PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Chad Miller wrote:
> > dpkg
>
> Looking at the changelog the dpkg manpage were moved to /usr/share/man
> in version 1.4.1.5, released Tue, 13 Jul 1999. I just checked and I
> have dpkg manpage in /usr/share/man on my sy
Hi Guenter!
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Should I file this as a bug, or could be something wrong with my Perl
> installation?
This issue has been filed about 10 time (really!) and is resolved in -2
which is currently in incoming (yes, wiggy uploaded a new -2).
Previously Chad Miller wrote:
> dpkg
Looking at the changelog the dpkg manpage were moved to /usr/share/man
in version 1.4.1.5, released Tue, 13 Jul 1999. I just checked and I
have dpkg manpage in /usr/share/man on my system.
Wichert.
--
__
Previously Chad Miller wrote:
> I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
> On this box, there are...
There are more problems, like packages usage /var/cache which shouldn't
exist anymore.
Wichert.
--
_
Previously Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Don't file a bug. There's already _at least_ 5 or 6 bugs about this
> problem in the BTS...
9 at the moment it seems.
> There are just two wrong linebreaks in the postinst script.
Indeed, a stupid copy&paste error I made. Should be fixed in 5.7.019-2
which is curr
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:58:44PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Don't file a bug. There's already _at least_ 5 or 6 bugs about this
> problem in the BTS...
Alright.
> There are just two wrong linebreaks in the postinst script.
Ahh, this was indeed a simple problem.
Many thanks.
Guenter
--
Linu
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:02:52PM +0100, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yesterday I updated vim-perl from Debian unstable and got
> the following error during installation with dselect:
[snip]
> Should I file this as a bug, or could be something wrong with my Perl
> installation?
Don't
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:13:32AM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
> I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
> On this box, there are...
>
[...]
>
> ...several packages that install stuff in /usr/man . Do these warrant bug
> reports?
Yep, IMHO. We should be FHS compli
Yes, that was kind of my point.
An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
make to handle dependancies).
My point being, that yes I already use squid as a proxy server for a whole
network of apt-getin
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
On this box, there are...
$ find /usr/man -exec dpkg -S {} \; |cut -d: -f1 |grep -v , |sort |uniq
dpkg
catdoc
cdcd
cflow
dvidvi
electric-fence
fakeroot
hfsutils
libgdbmg1-dev
liblockfile1
libmime-base64-perl
lsof-2.2
m4
macuti
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:18:35PM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their
> > licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it.
> I wouldn't mind doing it -
++ 27/12/00 12:21 +0100 - Martin Schulze:
> > Debian will have a booth in exhibition. Also we need to be
> > reprepresented on all conferences. We need volunteers! BTW, I hope to
> > see some non-russian debian developers on Moscow exhibition, because there
> > are
> > only two of us in .ru.
>
>
Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their
> licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it.
I wouldn't mind doing it - i'm going to do kernel-patch-int, and openwall
fits in nicely..
Greets,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 08:02:10PM -0600, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
> On the more mundane side, it doesn't know how to deal with BO2K, and
> upstream development appears to be halted (no mailing-list or CVS
> updates updates in a year).
Yes. It's unmaintained.
More details on the 'Unmaintained Fre
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 10:43:08AM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> RTFFYI. It refers to bandwidth
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Marc Haber wrote:
> > The four lines rule doesn't apply to bandwidth. It applies to screen
> > real estate.
no need to quarrel here, historically it applied to *both*.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:17:28 GMT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc Haber) wrote:
>I am maintainer for run and console-log, and waiting for NM to
>complete. Unfortunately, run has a nasty bug that causes console-log
>to hang which in turn may prevent a clean shutdown. I don't have the
>expertise to fix this
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:49:49 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Younie)
wrote:
>Or add woody to sources.list and parse the Packages files locally.
Since we have a Debian mirror, I decided to locally parse the Packages
files on the mirror machine.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
Takuo KITAME wrote:
> Description: A tty recorder
> ttyrec is a tty recorder. A recorded data can be playback with the included
> ttyplay command. ttyrec is just a derivative of script command for recording
> timing information with microsecond accuracy as well.
Hmm, are you aware of bug #68556
64 matches
Mail list logo
