On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 08:01:27PM -0500, Mark Mealman wrote:
> Is it possible for commercial software to make it into the Debian
> archives(presumably in non-free)?
[...]
I'd tend to agree with the feeling in the above (apt-able archives of
non-(DFSG)-free but (beer)-free are a Good Thing), but d
Thu, 27 May 1999 10:53:22 +0900, Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about
Re: ITP: file2 (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
kmuto> Wed, 26 May 1999 18:29:55 -0700, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: ITP: file2 (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
kmuto> joey> I take it this cannot be tested for using the tes
Wed, 26 May 1999 18:29:55 -0700, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re:
ITP: file2 (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
joey> Kenshi Muto wrote:
joey> > I intend to upload package "file2".
joey> > File2 is similar "file" command, but it reports which KANJI code be
used.
joey> I take it this cannot be te
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> I intend to upload package "file2".
> File2 is similar "file" command, but it reports which KANJI code be used.
I take it this cannot be tested for using the tests available to file(1)?
--
see shy jo
Hi,
I intend to upload package "dviselect".
Dviselect is specific pages from a TeX DVI file.This software is a part
from seetex.
Package: dviselect
Version: 2.19-4
Section: tex
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1)
Description: Select specific pages from a DVI file
Dviselect selects pages
> > Licence:
> >
> > Permission to use, copy, and modify this software and its
> > documentation is granted under no conditions.
> >
> > I will upload it to master in a few days.
>
> "..is granted under no conditions" reads like 'is not granted'.
>
> I.e., there are no conditions under which su
Hi,
I intend to upload package "file2".
File2 is similar "file" command, but it reports which KANJI code be used.
Package: file2
Version: 1.1-4
Section: misc
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1)
Description: kanji code checker
File2 tests each argument in an attempt to classify it to
JI
Is it possible for commercial software to make it into the Debian
archives(presumably in non-free)?
A lot of commercial software uses license keys to control otherwise
freely downloadable software. And being able to upgrade wordperfect,
blender and vmware via "apt-get upgrade" would be this lazy
Le 1999-05-05, Bo Branten écrivait :
> But since 6 months is a rather long time I think it would be interesting
> if other people post here and tell us how long they had to wait so we can
I applied 5 weeks ago. Since then I got a little feedback from
Martin Schulz. I had one message on voice-mail
Hi...
First off Glad to be here; thanks for accepting my app
I'd like to maintain maybe 1 or 2 easy packages, pwgen comes to mind
(Hi Vincent :)
Also, I have some stuff I wrote that's unpackaged I'd like to package
eventually, but I'm not so sure they'd be easy... Let me try to drum up
some
10 matches
Mail list logo