On Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 09:01:09AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> just for curiosity's sake, editors,
four different emacsen
> x11
xbooks
> doc
the gimp manual
> devel seem to be the
lots of -dev and -dbg stuff
(don't take me wrong, all of this is good!)
I do think rethinking what's "extra
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote:
csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g"
for
csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using
-O2 for
csmall>> C++ compilation? Also do we really want debugg
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Now heres a question, this library is really only of interest to people
> creating custom mail handling clients. Do I need to make a c-client1
> package containing a shared library? Policy would seem to say yes but I
> notice for instance that libinn.
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Marcelo E. Laurenti wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> >
> > > I am wondering, if anybody tried to build a CDimage of Slink. Will
> > > main fit on one CDROM? For hamm this problem was addressed pretty
> > > late (main, contrib, non-fre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g" for
> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using -O2 for
> C++ compilation? Also do we really want debugging symbols in all the
> binaries?
>
> The C++ code compiled with -O
Hi!
> Ossama Othman writes:
OO> Has anyone tried building static libraries with shared libraries
OO> disabled with libtool 1.2b? If I enable static library creation
OO> and disable shared library creation, e.g.:
OO>./configure --enable-static --disable-shared
OO> My static library
This is another split from the imap package. At the request of a user,
I'd like to make c-client.a and its header files into a package called
c-client-dev. Like imap, it's copyright is DFSG free.
Now heres a question, this library is really only of interest to people
creating custom mail handli
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Galbra>What I find strange if that I managed to download it without realising it
Galbra>was non-free. I only *now* noticed that it's non-free by putting the
Galbra>cursor on the `Download it!' ftp link and seeing the non-free part in
the
Galbra>path.
Matthew writes:
> How about naming it [Debian releases] after species of penguin?
*Excellent* idea. I suppose it's too late to rename 2.1?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Brent Fulgham writes:
> Witness the latest bloodletting that involved three of the founding
> project members leaving after shouts of "lawsuits" and other hysteria
> against them.
The only mention of lawsuits that I recall was the fear expressed by them
that they might be sued by a third party for
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:24:37AM -0700, David Welton wrote:
> >
> > How about naming it after species of penguin?
Hey, the first VERY GOOD idea !
read you,
-christian-
--
Linux - the choice of the GNU generation. Join the Debian Project
It seems the whole point you are making is that there is nothing old,
slow, lowmem machines can't handle that should be bzip2 compressed, but
my point is that if there is no package that a slow, lomem machine can't
handle, like an X or Emacs source distribution, then the slow, lowmem
machine could
>> "MS" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpackage. Better
Martin> wait/contact Manoj before you get into the strange problems
Martin> we have.
I seems that a conf_prefix='debian' is needed in /etc/cvsdeb.conf.
With this line, everythi
Gregory S. Stark wrote:
>
> John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This a kind of interesting looking package. It is GPL'd but
> > depends on a no-source-available library. I just reread the relevant
> > portions of the GPL, but I'm no Talmudic scholar.
> > Can the GPL be pr
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 11:43:29AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > I had to deal with this idiocy back in the eighties when I was building
> > > computers which may have qualified as 'munitions'.
> >
> > And remember that books are the purest form of evil and should always be
> > burned if they ha
> "Shaleh" == Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shaleh> libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime (>= 1.1.3.v2-1) jdk1.1
Shaleh> conflicts with jdk1.1-runtime jdk1.1 provides
Shaleh> jdk1.1-runtime
Shaleh> jdk1.1-dev depends on jdk1.1 (= 1.1.6v4a-3)
Shaleh> So I cant install
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> > Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> > reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> > LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let'
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Tom Lees wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:06:51AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> > The hitchhikers guide!!! I love it!!!
> > BTW that was Mavin (the paranoid android not the martin). Don't
> > forget Slarty Barfast (I know I spelled that one wrong).
>
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > libjpeg6b is broken and shouldn't be used by any new packages. It
> > > doesn't respect the upstream maintainers choice of soname, namely
> > > libjpeg.so.62, and hence makes Debian incompatible with Red Hat
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:06:51AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> The hitchhikers guide!!! I love it!!!
> BTW that was Mavin (the paranoid android not the martin). Don't
> forget Slarty Barfast (I know I spelled that one wrong).
And Trillian. And Agrajag. etc. etc. etc. I think this is the best i
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let's do so before the
> freeze.
Alright. Who wants to
Shaleh wrote:
>The libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime, which tries to remove the -dev file
>s
>needed to actually write Java apps. The jdk1.1-dev provides the runtime, bu
>t
>is not able to provide the numeric version needed. Once again lack of
>versioned provides rears its h
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 09:36:57AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
: I just noticed that glimpse is *not* on my _official_ LSL Debian 2.0 disk
: set. Strange.
:
: I wonder what else I'm missing.
It's in non-free. And it depends on the CD vendor which parts of
non-free are included
Bes
libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime (>= 1.1.3.v2-1)
jdk1.1 conflicts with jdk1.1-runtime
jdk1.1 provides jdk1.1-runtime
jdk1.1-dev depends on jdk1.1 (= 1.1.6v4a-3)
So I cant install libpgjava w/ losing the -dev.
On 05-Oct-98 Stephen Zander wrote:
>>
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 09:57:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I had to deal with this idiocy back in the eighties when I was building
> > computers which may have qualified as 'munitions'.
>
> And remember that books are the purest form of evil
> "Shaleh" == Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shaleh> libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime (>= ??.??).
Shaleh> jdk1.1-dev provides jdk-runtime. However the dependency
Shaleh> resolution tries to install jdk1.1-runtime because of the
Shaleh> versioned depends and jdk-runtime
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 04:20:20PM -0400, Kikutani Makoto wrote:
> I see.
>
> According to the past pine discussions, it seemed that Pine must be
> distributed with its source. Is this correct ?
> I couldn't read such restriction directly from Pine's CPYRIGHT.
> The reason why I'm asking this is
libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime (>= ??.??). jdk1.1-dev provides
jdk-runtime. However the dependency resolution tries to install jdk1.1-runtime
because of the versioned depends and jdk-runtime removes jdk-dev. So if I
install libpgjava, I lose the java compiler and what not, which means I can
> Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let's do so before the
> freeze.
>
Agreed Jim. Would the libjpeg maintainer care to step up and explain why a
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > libjpeg6b is broken and shouldn't be used by any new packages. It
> > doesn't respect the upstream maintainers choice of soname, namely
> > libjpeg.so.62, and hence makes Debian incompatible with Red Hat.
> > (RedHat does use the the upstream soname.
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 01:03:10PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
> Please people, don't upload NMUs without at least trying to discuss it
> with the developer. If I wanted to deal with "anyone can upload a new
> version anytime he/she feels like it", I would be making RPMS.
That was the main thrust o
> "Shaleh" == Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shaleh> The libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime, which tries to
Shaleh> remove the -dev files needed to actually write Java apps.
Shaleh> The jdk1.1-dev provides the runtime, but is not able to
Shaleh> provide the numeric versio
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 09:57:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had to deal with this idiocy back in the eighties when I was building
> computers which may have qualified as 'munitions'.
And remember that books are the purest form of evil and should always be
burned if they have not been pu
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 10:49:26AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If you brought it with you (and can PROVE it) there is probably no
> > problem in theory.
>
> It doesn't matter where he got it. It is entirely legal for anyone to use
> or distribute strong crypto in the US. The only restric
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:06:20AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> > Hey that's the best Idea yet. Rockhoppers are my favorite varity.
> > BTW there are several dozen species (took the kids to the NY aquarium
> > this summer.)
Glad people like the idea
Le Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 06:41:47PM +0200, Alexander Koch écrivait:
> Now. Who comes up with a Perl 5.005_02 for experimental?
> I'd like to run it against the walls to see if it does
> anything "not-so-nice" or something.
[I don't answer, I try to summarize]
AFAIK, Darren Stalder (the perl mainta
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:06:20AM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Hey that's the best Idea yet. Rockhoppers are my favorite varity.
> BTW there are several dozen species (took the kids to the NY aquarium
> this summer.)
> --
>
> How about namin
Bert LITE is a tool from Paralogic: it checks Fortran 77 code to see
whether it is worth parallelising it. Non-free: it consists of a
binary with no source and is commercial code. There is an .rpm -
this package is on the Extreme Linux CD and would be of interest
to people using Fortran on clust
We could just start using names from the new AntZ movie.
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Scharf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 1998 10:07 AM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what's after slink
The hitchhikers guide!!! I love it!!!
BTW that was Mavin (t
Why don't you guys start using the names of the girls
Clinton has de-flowered.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Date: Monday, October 05, 1998 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: what's after slink
>The hitchhikers guide!!! I love it
Hey that's the best Idea yet. Rockhoppers are my favorite varity.
BTW there are several dozen species (took the kids to the NY aquarium
this summer.)
--
How about naming it after species of penguin?
That should keep us going for a little while
The hitchhikers guide!!! I love it!!!
BTW that was Mavin (the paranoid android not the martin). Don't
forget Slarty Barfast (I know I spelled that one wrong).
-
there is always:
Debian Zaphod, Debian Arthur, Debian Prefect, Debian
The-Paranoid-An
Is anything following the lyx development? It seems there hasn´t been a
development release for almost half a year. What's going on there?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant | business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Go Rhein Fire!
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
>
> > I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was
> > intentional to use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play
> > well together. Your NMU
> Is it necessary that they play _together_
The libpgjava depends on jdk1.1-runtime, which tries to remove the -dev files
needed to actually write Java apps. The jdk1.1-dev provides the runtime, but
is not able to provide the numeric version needed. Once again lack of
versioned provides rears its head.
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 11:34:18AM -0400, Kikutani Makoto wrote:
> I'm sorry, Pine again (and again and...).
>
> Does anybody know if other distributions (RedHat, slack...)
> have Pine package ?
yes.
> If they have it, I assume their license policy is not hard as Debian.
Either they break the
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 11:23:52AM -0400, Kikutani Makoto wrote:
> > > I'm a Japanese living in the United States, but not a permanent
> > > resident. I've heared that the usage of PGP in the States by
> > > a person like me is controversial. I posted this qestion to some
> > > related Mailing-List
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 05:38:02PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > The namespase lasts for five more releases. Or do I misunderstand
> > something?
>
> On a related note, do we want to continue using names from pixar movies
> now that Bruce is gone?
Does it really matter?
pgpGlHXoyGpzD.pgp
On Mon, 5 October 1998 13:24:56 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yes, if we do nothing for slink then we will have to make perl5.005 (and
> all perl package after 5.005) conflict with a list of 35 package with
> precise version.
Yep. Seems more of a hassle to me.
> Perl 5.005 is stable.
If we us
[snip]
Now. Who comes up with a Perl 5.005_02 for experimental?
I'd like to run it against the walls to see if it does
anything "not-so-nice" or something.
Alexander
--
Heute nacht war mir fuenf Minuten langweilig... -- Gabriel Krabbe
Alexander Koch - <>< - aka Efraim - PGP - 0xE7694969 - Hanno
On Mon, 5 October 1998 19:52:23 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Posh... After 5 more releases of Debian the Spice girls will be history and
> we can name versions after their replacements!
Please, don't.
Alexander
--
"Video killed the radio star ... then the Shite Girls killed the rest."
Alexand
Hi,
I was looking at the newly available slink packages and noticed the
following in gtkglarea:
A GTK widget for use with OpenGL, an unlicensed Mesa clone
Shouldn't this be:
A GTK widget for use with Mesa, an unlicensed OpenGL clone
Thanks,
-Ossama
_
I am afraid that every Imlib using app is link w/ -ljpeg. Hence all of GNOME,
wmaker-conf, Enlightenment, Eterm, chameleon, perl-imlib, python-imlib, and
Fnlib will all break from the 6a->6b change.
Tynian is going to begin the 6b move over last I spoke to him. All package
maintainers will be gi
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>
> > I am wondering, if anybody tried to build a CDimage of Slink. Will main
> > fit on one CDROM? For hamm this problem was addressed pretty late (main,
> > contrib, non-free) and the
On 05-Oct-98 Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
>
>> I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was intentional
>> to
>> use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play well together. Your NMU
>
> Is it necessary that they play _together_ ?
>
>> b
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 11:29:51PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote:
> Its funny, I read on slashdot that fltk is going non-free, but
> there is a September 23 release which is still under the GPL .
Bill Spitnak won't be working on it anymore because Digital Domain (his
employer) won't allow him t
Ruud de Rooij writes:
> I seem to recall that transfer of cryptographic software to a non-US
> citizen is already considered export in the US.
No. Transfer of cryptographic software to a non-resident alien may expose
one to proecution if and only if the alien subsequently exports the
software. B
I wrote:
> You heard wrong. Your nationality and residency status is irrelevant.
Gregory S. Stark writes:
> It might not be legal for someone to give him PGP or explain how crypto
> works even while he's in the US.
> ...
> In any case it wouldn't be you breaking the law, but the person helping
>
>This is from the linux kernel mailing list. I find it pretty completly sums
>op my thoughts on all the new constitution and voting and policy voting
>stuff that we've been setting up. I haven't been vocal about this, but I
>think we've been moving in the wrong direction.
>
>Of course, this came up
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> I am wondering, if anybody tried to build a CDimage of Slink. Will main
> fit on one CDROM? For hamm this problem was addressed pretty late (main,
> contrib, non-free) and the solution was acceptable at best.
I have. Slink's main se
On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
> I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was intentional to
> use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play well together. Your NMU
Is it necessary that they play _together_ ?
> breaks every Imlib-using GNOME package out there. Th
How about naming it after species of penguin?
That should keep us going for a little while...
"I like my new debian emperor system" ;)
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society
Selwyn College Computer Support
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/8841
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc Singer) wrote on 04.10.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What is the *right* way to sync to slink (or any other distribution)?
> I looked into dftp and found that it seems more like a method for
> installing new packages than keeping in sync with the most recent
> versions.
>
>
How about naming the releases after current developers last names sorted
by date of becoming a developer and then sorted by alpha(if two or more
were activated on the same day).
Debian Murdock (an exception but appropriate)
:
Debian Jackson
:
Debian Schulze
etc.
That should last about forever as
On Sun 04 Oct 1998, James Troup wrote:
> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Old/slow/lomem machines can't properly compile X or Mozilla anyway.
>
> Bzzt. I've compiled xfree86 for Debian/m68k on a 386/25 equivalent
> with only 14Mb (don't ask) of memory several times. Took 5 days,
On Sat 03 Oct 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> >> "MD" == M Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MD> when installing isdnutils from slink, MAKEDEV complains about
> MD> device names - something like 'don't know how t mail isdnctrl0' or
> MD> something (don't remember exact device name).
>
>
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 06:47:46PM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> It runs (it's own copy of) 'texconfig init' rather than just
> generating .fmt's for what it is installing (jadetex and
> pdfjadetex).
Solution: instead of 'texconfig init', do 'fmtutil --byfmt
formatname', where in jadetex's case f
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Vincent RENARDIAS wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Ben Armstrong wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> > 2.2 potatoe
>> > 2.3 andy
>> > 2.4 davis
>> > 3.0 sergeant
>> > 3.1 hannah
>>
>> Bo was taken, but how about "Peep"?
>
>Not a good idea considering what it (phone
I was surprised that glimpse was not on my Debian CD, so I downloaded it
from the Debian web page. Until [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me it was
non-free.
What I find strange if that I managed to download it without realising it
was non-free. I only *now* noticed that it's non-free by putting the
cur
I am wondering, if anybody tried to build a CDimage of Slink. Will main fit on
one CDROM? For hamm this problem was addressed pretty late (main, contrib,
non-free) and the solution was acceptable at best.
Or is this problem completely obsolete with Apt?
Thanks.
--
Rainer Dorsch
Abt. Rechner
I just noticed that glimpse is *not* on my _official_ LSL Debian 2.0 disk
set. Strange.
I wonder what else I'm missing.
Peter
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > 2.2 potatoe
> > 2.3 andy
> > 2.4 davis
> > 3.0 sergeant
> > 3.1 hannah
>
> Bo was taken, but how about "Peep"?
Not a good idea considering what it (phonetically) means in French...
(Or we might as well call
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 07:52:23PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> >> > As far as something to replace them.. hrmm. Geography has been
> >> > popular lately.. cities, rivers.. Something international would be
> >> > good. Lakes? Seas? National parks? Drinks?:->
> >
> >> how about endangered
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 11:50:19AM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "MS" == Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MS> What is the *right* way to sync to slink (or any other distribution)?
> MS> I looked into dftp and found that it seems more like a method for
> MS> installing new pac
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about pop stars? We could have Debian sporty, Debian Ginger, Debian
> Posh...
*bang*
--
James
Christopher Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If your mighty 386/25
^
a) cut out the sarcasm, it's uncalled for.
b) get your facts right, it's not a 386, it's a 386/25 equivalent[1]
as I said already.
> with 4MB can make World the entire X distribution and custom kern
> On Sun, 04 Oct 1998, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> >I packages korganizer for Debian. Currently it is not on the Debian
> >ftp server, because of license problems (GPL programs linked against
> >commercial libraries).
>
> Hi Rainer, thanks for the package and the announcement. Just one minor detail:
>
>> "MS" == Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> What is the *right* way to sync to slink (or any other distribution)?
MS> I looked into dftp and found that it seems more like a method for
MS> installing new packages than keeping in sync with the most recent
MS> versions.
apt-get update &&
Le Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 01:57:46AM -0400, Adam P. Harris écrivait:
> C'mon, let's be realistic. Introducing a new perl right now would
> basically blow a 1998 stable slink out of the picture (as would PAM,
> of course), IMHO. It's not just a question of re-uploading 35
> packages, but also of tes
>> > As far as something to replace them.. hrmm. Geography has been
>> > popular lately.. cities, rivers.. Something international would be
>> > good. Lakes? Seas? National parks? Drinks?:->
>
>> how about endangered species. e.g. tigers, cheetahs, whales, microsoft, etc.
>
>Gnome seems to
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 03:33:27PM +0100, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> Some time ago, xterm's terminal emulation changed, and the "xterm"
> terminfo entry changed with it. Since xvt implements the emulation
> associated with the old version of xterm, I changed its terminal type to
> "xterm-old".
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> 2.2 potatoe
> 2.3 andy
> 2.4 davis
> 3.0 sergeant
> 3.1 hannah
Bo was taken, but how about "Peep"?
Ben
--
nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chebuctohttp://
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 02:18:39PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 3) It is a violation of US law to export any kind of pgp from the US.
>This is true even if you brought it here in the first place.
This reminds me of a joke; unfortunately I couldn't track it down
in a quick look on altavist
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 05:24:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > [Please CC: any replies to me, since I'm not subscribed to your list]
> >
> > Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent me mail about the Debian CD web
> > pages on www.debian.org. Unfortunately, this addres
Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I'd like to package sabre if nobody objects.
> sabre is an svgalib flight simulator.
> License: GPL 1.
>
> Milan Zamazal
>
> --
> "Having GNU Emacs is like having a dragon's cave of treasures."
> Robert J. Chassell
--
VFS:
On 5 Oct 1998, Frederic Lepied wrote:
>CH> /usr/bin/bookmarks-convert
>CH>Converts html pages to bookmarks for several browsers like
>CH>netscape, lynx,
>
>CH> /usr/share/debian-bookmarks/debian-bookmarks.html
>
>Why don't you put it under the web hierarchy (/var/
On 4 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
gsstar>a fltk package based on the last stable release (i think) of it before
it went
gsstar>non-free. It's a nice lightweight LGPL'd toolkit which is nearly drop-in
gsstar>compatible with libforms.
According to http://fltk.easysw.com/ , you did ge
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:57:54AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > I thought 2.2 was going to be "rc", and 3.0 would be "woody". Johnnie
> > > Ingram was pushing for that one, as were a few others.
> >
> > But didn't an even earlier discussion c
Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the *right* way to sync to slink (or any other distribution)?
> I looked into dftp and found that it seems more like a method for
> installing new packages than keeping in sync with the most recent
> versions.
>
> The main thing I'm trying to avoid
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:32:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
> > I agree.
>
> I do not. Perl 5.005 and the new perl-thread seems to interest a lot of
> people. But if we don't switch to perl5.005 right now, they would presumably
> download
On 1998/10/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Kikutani Makoto writes:
> > Yes, my PGP is an international version which was built in Japan, and I
> > brought it in my laptop.
>
> The international version infringes the RSA patent and so the owner of the
> patent (PKP?) could theoretically sue you for
On 4 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
gsstar>However, a better solution would be to try compiling it against fltk. We
have
gsstar>a fltk package based on the last stable release (i think) of it before
it went
gsstar>non-free. It's a nice lightweight LGPL'd toolkit which is nearly drop-in
gsstar
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This a kind of interesting looking package. It is GPL'd but
> depends on a no-source-available library. I just reread the relevant
> portions of the GPL, but I'm no Talmudic scholar.
> Can the GPL be properly applied to this ?
>
> http:/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Kikutani Makoto writes:
> > I'm a Japanese living in the United States, but not a permanent
> > resident. I've heared that the usage of PGP in the States by a person
> > like me is controversial.
>
> You heard wrong. Your nationality and residency status is irrelevan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> License: GPL
That's good.
> The author calls the executable 'tn' . I should probably change
> this to 'tochnog' or 'tng' or something.
Do you suppose the correct way to do this would be to place the real binary in
a directory outside of the standard bi
I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was intentional to
use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play well together. Your NMU
breaks every Imlib-using GNOME package out there. Therefore I am overriding
it. Please go through the correct channels next time, instead of goi
I am stepping down as the maintainer of the Enlightenment debs and the
libraries that go with it. It has become apparent that E and I are going in
two different directions. So I have found two people who I have known for a
good while and are both very eager to help Debian and Enlightenment. Tyni
97 matches
Mail list logo
