bug #21998 should be promoted to severe

1998-05-08 Thread Raul Miller
It seems to me that bug #21998 against xbase (xbase provides a manpage for Xnest) should be promoted to severe: while this bug exists it's impossible to install xnest. Am I way off base here? -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: magicfilter and /etc

1998-05-08 Thread David Frey
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 08:00:12PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: ... > > There are also some other things which really not belong into /etc. For > >example the Filsystem Hirarchy Standards says that no executable files > >should go there, but 'filter

Re: Uploaded uae 0.7.3b-1 (source i386) to chiark

1998-05-08 Thread Stephan Alexander Suerken
On Fri, 8 May 1998, Fredrik Hallenberg wrote: > -BEGIN PGP DECRYPTED MESSAGE- > Format: 1.5 > Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 19:46:44 +0200 > Source: uae > Binary: uae > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 0.7.3b-1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL P

Re: ../dists/slink/main/binary-i386/Packages is empty

1998-05-08 Thread Johnie Ingram
"Douglas" == Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Douglas> To follow up on my own post - this was reported as bug Douglas> #21025. In the bug report the date on the file was Apr 2. Douglas> Now it is Apr 24 but it is still zero length. In case I haven't mentioned it enough, the Packages fi

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Martin" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> There are one or two others who have already signed up for Martin> this package: Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Jens Martin> Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Sami is still in the Martin> new-maintainer procedu

Predepends query

1998-05-08 Thread Andy Mortimer
I've just been testing the new version of dpkg-mountable -- nothing exciting, I'm afraid -- using a large set of packages to install, and I've hit a small problem. perl-base was predepended on by something, which caused it (using the usually-disabled predepends support) to remove perl. This broke d

Re: corel porting apps to linux

1998-05-08 Thread Behan Webster
G John Lapeyre wrote: > > Does anyone know if something official is released? I have only > seen the irc transcript on slashdot. I was at the meeting last night when they announced the netwinder. They said all the tools to develop on the Netwinder were GPL'ed and will be released soon.

Re: on forming a new Linux Distributionx

1998-05-08 Thread Raja R Harinath
"Rev. Joseph Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 06:55:43PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > > You think nobody is going to try and snatch it then? > > > > Er.. how do you snatch an expired patent? > > Reregistration? Prior art Since there is documentary evidence that the

Processed: f

1998-05-08 Thread Ian Jackson
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 20587 Bug#20587: There's no current libg++ package Bug#21253: gperf can't be installed with libstdc++ Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 20587 normal Bug#20587: There's no current libg++ package Bug#21253: gperf can't be installed

Re: ../dists/slink/main/binary-i386/Packages is empty

1998-05-08 Thread Douglas Bates
Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice that the Packages file for slink/main/binary-i386 on master > is empty ... To follow up on my own post - this was reported as bug #21025. In the bug report the date on the file was Apr 2. Now it is Apr 24 but it is still zero length. -- To

Re: magicfilter and /etc

1998-05-08 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >> Is there some good reason why all of the printer filters need >> to be installed in /etc? The magicfilter filters, in particular, >> make /etc/ much bigger than it might be otherwise. (I understand >> I can remove that which I don't need; this is a que

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Michael Bramer
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 12:10:56PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 1998 at 07:37:57PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > > This is my formal announcement of intention to package x11amp, a > > graphical .mp3 player for X. > > > > x11amp is a clone of WinAMP. It's free to redistribute, bu

Re: "official" brand for cdroms

1998-05-08 Thread shaul
> maybe the term "offical" for cdroms be used, if someone sells a set of > cdroms, constisting of the official cdroms and an extra cd with things > like debian-non-US, debian-non-free (those parts that are allowed to be burned > and sold), and other stuff like 2.0 + 2.1 kernel source, netscape, moz

RE: Lilo..

1998-05-08 Thread Patrick Ouellette
I had similar problems with Windows NT and large drives on 2940UW controllers. The problem appeared to be the wide bus mode setting ( I forget the exact wording in the adaptec setup). If I changed the setting, the machine would not boot from the drive until I either low level formatted the drive

Re: libg++ in hamm?

1998-05-08 Thread jdassen
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 04:28:09PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > I am wondering that there is no libg++ in hamm compatible with egcs. I > know, that a lot of things moved to libstdc++, but for me things like the > Integer class are still useful. > > Has somebody a libg++ debian package? I'm worki

Re: Intent to package doc-debian-es

1998-05-08 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- The doc-debian-es package is already in alpha stage, and contains the Debian FAQ. Please see: http://master.debian.org/~sanvila If you are interested in translation issues, please subscribe to the debian-l10n-spanish mailing list. BTW: I need people to read th

Intent to package doc-debian-es

1998-05-08 Thread Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
Hi everyone, I have translated today the New Maintainer HOWTO to Spanish and am willing to translate some other important debian documentation to Spanish making it, thus, more accesible to spanish developers. I intend to package it as doc-debian-es. Just a thought: it might be not

libg++ in hamm?

1998-05-08 Thread Rainer Dorsch
I am wondering that there is no libg++ in hamm compatible with egcs. I know, that a lot of things moved to libstdc++, but for me things like the Integer class are still useful. Has somebody a libg++ debian package? Thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: compile probs, glibc, satlink.c (Planetc Feed)

1998-05-08 Thread jdassen
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote: > I've a Planetc satfeed and there's a module satlink.c (.o > respectively) which doesn't want to compile w/ glibc. > No prob with that, I added a "-I/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/" to > the gcc call and it compiled. The recommended way of com

compile probs, glibc, satlink.c (Planetc Feed)

1998-05-08 Thread Alexander Koch
Hiya. I've a Planetc satfeed and there's a module satlink.c (.o respectively) which doesn't want to compile w/ glibc. No prob with that, I added a "-I/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/" to the gcc call and it compiled. I've installed the "libc5-altdev" beforehand and the libc5 and hopefully this is enough. N

Re: RSync

1998-05-08 Thread Andrew Tridgell
> One thing though, is there any chance you might consider a pair of new > options: --regex-include and --regex-exclude. It shouldn't be too > difficult using one of the new regex libraries (pcre comes to mind). possibly. I know the current exclude mechanisms really aren't flexible enough right n

Re: magicfilter and /etc

1998-05-08 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
> Is there some good reason why all of the printer filters need > to be installed in /etc? The magicfilter filters, in particular, > make /etc/ much bigger than it might be otherwise. (I understand > I can remove that which I don't need; this is a question about > the optimum default configuratio

magicfilter and /etc

1998-05-08 Thread Susan Kleinmann
Is there some good reason why all of the printer filters need to be installed in /etc? The magicfilter filters, in particular, make /etc/ much bigger than it might be otherwise. (I understand I can remove that which I don't need; this is a question about the optimum default configuration.) Susan

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Martin Schulze
On Thu, May 07, 1998 at 07:37:57PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > This is my formal announcement of intention to package x11amp, a > graphical .mp3 player for X. > > x11amp is a clone of WinAMP. It's free to redistribute, but no > source is available, so it's going into non-free/sound. > > Its ho

Bug#22206: Some package uses psmisc without a dependency

1998-05-08 Thread Santiago Vila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 7 May 1998, James Troup wrote: > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyway, since psmisc is not essential (and this is what really > > matters), it would be interesting to know which package uses killall > > (if any) and where, to add the approp

Re: Lilo..

1998-05-08 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 09:06:32AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > I still saw problems last weekend with mbr.b not being written to > /dev/sda when installing frozen with the 04-11 boot-floppies. I > did that by hand "dd if=/boot/mbr.b of=/dev/sda bs=444" and after that I > could boot from the disk.

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Ben Gertzfield wrote: > No source available. :/ In the FAQ, though, it says there will be source available sometime. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andreas> don't make it suid if it works without (mpg123, amp both Andreas> work well as normal programs), register it with Andreas> suidmanager without suid bit, and document in Andreas> README.debian how to make it

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
>One question: x11amp uses the real-time functions of Linux (and sounds >much better) if it's installed suid-root, but there are unknown holes >that this opens up. Should I use suidmanager and make it suid? don't make it suid if it works without (mpg123, amp both work well as normal programs), reg

Re: installation report of hamm 26.4.

1998-05-08 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 29 Apr 1998, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > linux did not booted, and when repairing from the boot cdrom, i got : > > no room in lost+found directory. > expand ? y > segmentation fault. Damn, that's still in there? I ran into this problem about 18 months ago, while trying to repair a disk

Re: Lilo..

1998-05-08 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 29 Apr 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote: > "matthew.r.pavlovich.1" wrote: > >I am getting a quirky bug with lilo. I have a 4gig Wide SCSI drive that > >is set to scsi id 0. I can partition the disk, write to the disk, read, > >mount it as /, but I cannot boot from it (The boot flag is set on t

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Larry 'Daffy' Daffner
> "BG" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Larry" == Larry 'Daffy' Daffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Larry> I would say to register it with suidmanager, leave it Larry> non-suid by default, and place a notice somewhere that if Larry> performance is an issue, it may be

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Larry" == Larry 'Daffy' Daffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Larry> I would say to register it with suidmanager, leave it Larry> non-suid by default, and place a notice somewhere that if Larry> performance is an issue, it may be made setuid through Larry> suidregister. On my

Re: Intent to package: xfnt-URW gimp-extra-plugins

1998-05-08 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "vanco" == vanco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: vanco> URW fonts are a set that the gimp home page points to as vanco> "good fonts to use in the gimp." vanco> Additionally, in the plugin registry, there are a number of vanco> good plugins that are not included in the gimp

Re: Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Larry 'Daffy' Daffner
> "BG" == Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BG> One question: x11amp uses the real-time functions of Linux (and BG> sounds much better) if it's installed suid-root, but there are BG> unknown holes that this opens up. Should I use suidmanager and BG> make it suid? I would say

corel porting apps to linux

1998-05-08 Thread G John Lapeyre
Does anyone know if something official is released? I have only seen the irc transcript on slashdot. John John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: hamm

1998-05-08 Thread vanco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 6 May 1998, James R. Van Zandt wrote: > > >> I maintain a hamm mirror at work. According to my records, the > >> traffic to keep hamm up to date amounts to about 20 MB/day. > > >I'm a bit of a newbie with respect to Debian, and I've recently susbcribe

Intention to package x11amp

1998-05-08 Thread Ben Gertzfield
This is my formal announcement of intention to package x11amp, a graphical .mp3 player for X. x11amp is a clone of WinAMP. It's free to redistribute, but no source is available, so it's going into non-free/sound. Its home page is: http://www.x11amp.bz.nu/ One question: x11amp uses the real-time

Intent to package: xfnt-URW gimp-extra-plugins

1998-05-08 Thread vanco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- The URW fonts are a set that the gimp home page points to as "good fonts to use in the gimp." Additionally, in the plugin registry, there are a number of good plugins that are not included in the gimp distribution. I would like to begin working on packaging th

Re: hamm

1998-05-08 Thread James R. Van Zandt
>> I maintain a hamm mirror at work. According to my records, the >> traffic to keep hamm up to date amounts to about 20 MB/day. >I'm a bit of a newbie with respect to Debian, and I've recently susbcribed >to some mailing lists. I'm still reading a lot of FAQ material, but since >I saw this thre

Re: New APT version

1998-05-08 Thread Craig Sanders
On Tue, 5 May 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 1998, Joey Hess wrote: > > > This makes me wonder if we should think about dropping autoup as > > the preferred way to upgrade to hamm, and switch to apt. On the one > > hand, autoup has been tested pretty thouroghly and we shouldn't risk

Re: intent to package eql

1998-05-08 Thread Lindsay Allen
That's good news. I use eql here and at present have three 56K modems connecting a school to the ISP. The one big problem is that the ISP has three boxes and eql needs to have all modems connected to the same box. This is purely a matter of chance when you dial in to a rotary, so most days I hav