I'm afraid that I must drop off the debian project for now.
I'm still on track to drop off the net around mid July, due
to relocation to the Philippines, and I need to spend a larger
portion of my time getting ready for the move. I'm not sure
where in the Philippines I'll end up, or whether a net
Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>And I got this back from the anon.petet.fi gateway. The interesting
thing is
>that my collegue got *exactly* the same mail from the anon.petet.fi gateway
>and he sent a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, no Cc:'s.
Ditto with a bug report I sent
You (Giuliano Procida) wrote:
> Package: apache
>
> Lots of warning messages. However, at the end of it all, only /var/web
> remains and is empty.
And why is this a bug? Seems fine to me. OK, it should probably remove /var/web
too, but the warning messages are nothing serious. That's just the way
Package: apache
Lots of warning messages. However, at the end of it all, only /var/web
remains and is empty.
#dpkg --purge apache
(Reading database ... 14473 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing apache ...
no /usr/sbin/apache-httpd found; none killed.
dpkg - warning: while removin
Hmm something curious today. I sent the following message yesterday ago:
+ Subject: Re: Bug#3290: sysvinit path doesn't include /usr/local/{,s}bin
+ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 14:02:52 +0200 (MET DST)
+ Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
+ [EMAIL
Package: wu-ftpd
Version: 2.4-23
Hi.
Here's a snippet:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:~] dpkg -i wu-ftpd-2.4-23.deb
Selecting previously deselected package wu-ftpd.
(Reading database ... 16318 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking wu-ftpd (from wu-ftpd-2.4-23.deb) ...
Setting up wu-ftpd
Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is currently listed as
our TeX maintainer. The email address doesn't work, and
email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets forwarded to the same
address, so that doens't help eighter.
Some of the TeX packages have bugs reported against them,
and I feel the urge to try
Could we do something similar with the Debian mailing lists? Especially
for unsubscribe requests being sent to the lists themselves.
Christian
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 30 Jun 1996 02:35:51 -
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Amos Shapira writes:
>
> Package: expect
> Version: 5.19.0-1
>
> While installing expect (from the buzz/binary-i386/devel dir at caldera),
> *and* with tcl75 7.5-1 allready installed, expect failed to install since
> it insisted on tcl74. I installed tcl74 and left the links pointing to
> 75, so
I put out a new version of debiandoc, download the file debiandoc_0.1-0.deb
from http://www.clinet.fi/~liw/ (enter the directory as the URL, then
in lynx press d on the file, or shift-right-mouse-button in Netscape, or
something similar in other browsers).
This version is not a security bug. Unle
Figured I'd bring this puppy up to date as well.
Date: 28 Jun 96 20:45 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: m4
Version: 1.4-3
Binary: m4
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
m4: GNU m4 - a macro processing language
Changes:
This upload fixes architecture and name issues for this package.
Date: 27 Jun 96 21:26 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: libident
Version: 0.17-2
Binary: libident
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
libident: libident -
>Last time (yesterday) when I used \usepackage{times} in my latex2e
>files, itworked OK, but you probably mean something different
>with the postscript fonts.
Did you use xdvi, though? latex->dvips works, I think, it's the
latex->xdvi that screws up (xdvi uses ugly fonts at the wrong size
instead,
Christian Hudon wrote:
:
: > dpkg --install --autoresolve xv*deb
: >
: > would install all needed x11 files (since xv needs x11) plus
: > all the other dependencies and requirements needed to run xv.
:
: Errm... Meaning you'd want dpkg to select the right x-server package for
: you? Mor
Package: expect
Version: 5.19.0-1
While installing expect (from the buzz/binary-i386/devel dir at caldera),
*and* with tcl75 7.5-1 allready installed, expect failed to install since
it insisted on tcl74. I installed tcl74 and left the links pointing to
75, so I suppose expect can run with 75 (rig
>
> Package: gs
> Version: 2.62-2
>
> The gsftopk program, which comes with the teTeX 0.3.3, is missing from
> both gs and texbin-3.1415-5. It's non in the non-free gs either.
>
> This program makes it possible to use postscript fonts with xdvi.
>
But where do you want it to be? In texbin, or
>
> Package: latex
> Version: 2e-4
>
> Using xdvi with postscript fonts doesn't work: MakeTeXPK doesn't
> create the postscript bitmap files. I get output like this:
Could you send me your input file(s)?
Last time (yesterday) when I used \usepackage{times} in my latex2e
files, itworked OK, but
Is debian-private running, or have I just been removed from it?
I sent a message to it a couple days ago regarding the "WebPages"
directory now in the distribution, but never saw it, nor any other
messages to debian-private, appear.
Brian
The following problem reports have not yet been marked as `taken up' by a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or or `forwarded' by a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OVER 15 MONTHS OLD - ATTENTION IS REQUIRED:
Ref PackageKeywords/Subject Package maintainer
660 gdbGDB gets addres
19 matches
Mail list logo
